Research on Influencing Factors and Wind Deflection Warning of Transmission Lines Based on Meteorological Prediction
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Simulation Method
2.2. Correlation Analysis of Meteorological Elements
- (1)
- Kernel density estimation (KDE) is utilized to estimate the density function of each input separately. The Gaussian function is chosen as the kernel function of KDE, and the expression of Gaussian function is:The KDE expression is:
- (2)
- Next, the unknown parameters of the binary Copula function are solved, and the binary Copula function is constructed. The binary t-Copula function is chosen to analyze the correlation of meteorological factors. The distribution function of the binary t-Copula function is:
- (3)
- Finally, the correlation parameters between the input quantities are calculated. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ is chosen to evaluate the degree of correlation between the two meteorological elements. The formula for the Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ is derived from the Copula function as:
2.3. Weather Prediction Based on Generalized Regression Neural Networks
- (1)
- Division of the training set and the test set
- (2)
- Determination of network inputs and outputs
- (3)
- Training of the GRNN to determine the optimal prediction model parameters
- (4)
- Establishment of the GRNN-based meteorological prediction model
2.4. Wind Deflection Warning Based on the Particle Swarm Optimization Support Vector Machine Algorithm
- (1)
- Initialize the parameters (c, g) of the SVM model and encode the initialized parameters as the original particles of the PSO algorithm.
- (2)
- Initialize the number of particles N and generate N particles by randomly perturbing the original particles (i.e., initialize the particle positions) and initialize the rest of the parameters of the PSO algorithm (vi, w, c1, c2).
- (3)
- Obtain the optimal parameters of SVM by the PSO algorithm.
- (4)
- Use the obtained optimal parameters to construct an SVM classification model for wind deflection classification warning.
3. Results
3.1. Influencing Factors of Wind Deflection
3.2. The Result of the Correlation Analysis
3.3. The Result of Weather Prediction
3.4. Effectiveness of the Wind Deflection Graded Warning
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The wind deflection of 1000 kV and 500 kV insulator strings has the same rule of change with line conditions. The larger the stall spacing, the larger the height difference, the larger the wind attack angle, and the larger the wind speed, the larger the wind deflection of insulators. The wind deflection of 500 kV insulator strings is slightly larger than that of 1000 kV insulator strings.
- (2)
- The effect of pulsating wind on transmission lines is about 5% higher than that of static wind. Wind with a positive wind attack angle promotes the wind deflection of transmission lines, while wind with a negative wind attack angle inhibits it.
- (3)
- Both wind speed and the wind attack angle have a certain range of influence on the wind bias of transmission lines. When they are within a certain range, the line has a similar response to the load, which should be emphasized in the monitoring.
- (4)
- The average accuracy of the model is 95.74%, the average false alarm rate is 2.34%, the average misreporting rate is 0.94%, and the average omission rate is 0.98%. Accurate warnings as well as false alarms are conducive to maintaining the normal operation of transmission lines, which are considered effective warnings. Misreporting will still cause concern to staff. Only omission may lead to risk discovery, thus affecting the safety and stability of transmission lines. This model has an average misreporting rate of less than 1%, an effective warning rate of greater than 98%, and an early warning rate of greater than 99%. The overall prediction effect is good, which proves the feasibility of the meteorological prediction model based on GRNN. There is a complex correlation among barometric pressure, wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and humidity, and only by comprehensively considering the interactions of each meteorological element can we predict the meteorological factors more accurately.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zheng, J. Calculation of Wind Deflection of Overhanging Insulator String under Dynamic Wind. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X. Wind deflection characteristics and correction of composite insulators in coastal typhoon environment. Grid Technol. 2023, 47, 2977–2985. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J. Research on Key Technology of Failure Risk Prediction of Power Transmission and Distribution Equipment under Typhoon Disaster. Master’s Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Xue, H.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, M. Calculation and analysis of minimum clearance distance for wind deflection of pendant insulator string. Electr. Meas. Instrum. 2012, 49, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, D.; Li, L.; Long, X.; Liang, Z. Finite Element analysis of dynamic wind deflection angle of overhanging insulator string. Electr. Power Constr. 2008, 9, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Yan, X.; Li, S.; Yin, F.; Wang, L. Simulation of pulsating wind bias characteristics and suppression measures for ultra-high voltage lines. Electr. Porcelain Surge Arrester 2022, 4, 194–200+213. [Google Scholar]
- Clapp, A.L. Calculation of Horizontal Displacement of Conductors Under Wind Loading Toward Buildings and Other Supporting Structures. Ind. Appl. IEEE Trans. 1994, 30, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, P. Research on Dynamic Characteristics and Wind Vibration Control of Large Span Transmission Tower-Line System. Doctoral Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T. Research on Wind Deflection of Ultra-High Voltage V-Type Insulator String. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science Technology, Wuhan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Wu, G.; Fan, J.; Zhou, J.; Jiang, W. Study on wind-biased flashover of draped insulator strings on 500kV transmission lines. Grid Technol. 2008, 09, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, T. Discussion on the calculation of sway angle and wind load of pendant insulator string. Electr. Power Constr. 1991, 04, 23–27+32. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, G. Research on Refined Analysis of Wind Deflection and Equivalent Static Wind Load of Power Transmission Conductor. Doctoral Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, X.; Wen, G.; Zhao, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhao, L. Study of the Prevention Method of ±800 kV Transmission Tower Foundation Deviation. Energies 2023, 16, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, L.; Guan, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, R. Research on Windage Yaw Flashovers of Transmission Lines under Wind and Rain Conditions. Energies 2019, 12, 3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Yin, J.; Liu, Y. Large Swing Behavior of Overhead Transmission Lines under Rain-Load Conditions. Energies 2018, 11, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insulator Type | Parameter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Modulus of Elasticity (Pa) | Poisson’s Ratio | Density (kg/m3) | String Length (m) | Equivalent Diameter (m) | |
FXBW-1000/420 | 3.5 × 1010 | 0.3 | 20,000 | 10 | 2.6 × 10−2 |
FXBW-500/100 | 3.5 × 1010 | 0.3 | 24,000 | 6 | 1.8 × 10−2 |
Line Type | Parameter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Modulus of Elasticity (Pa) | Poisson’s Ratio | Density (kg/m3) | Diameter (m) | Cross-Sectional Area (m2) | |
JL/LB20A-720/50 | 6 × 1010 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 3.53 × 10−2 | 7.55 × 10−4 |
Meteorological Elements | Barometric Pressure | Wind Speed | Wind Direction | Temperature | Humidity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barometric pressure | 1 | −0.0120 | 0.2281 | −0.6208 | −0.5809 |
Wind speed | −0.0120 | 1 | −0.1770 | 0.2372 | −0.4286 |
Wind direction | 0.2281 | −0.1770 | 1 | 0.1404 | −0.3024 |
Temperature | −0.6208 | 0.2372 | 0.1404 | 1 | −0.2253 |
Humidity | −0.5809 | −0.4286 | −0.3024 | −0.2253 | 1 |
Risk Level | Characteristic |
---|---|
Level 0 | No risk of wind deflection and low wind effects |
Level 1 | No risk of wind deflection and high wind effects |
Level 2 | Lower risk of wind deflection and high wind effects |
Level 3 | Moderate risk of wind deflection and high wind effects |
Level 4 | Higher risk of wind deflection and high wind effects |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Gao, Q.; Wan, Y. Research on Influencing Factors and Wind Deflection Warning of Transmission Lines Based on Meteorological Prediction. Energies 2024, 17, 2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112612
Liu Y, Guo Y, Wang B, Li Q, Gao Q, Wan Y. Research on Influencing Factors and Wind Deflection Warning of Transmission Lines Based on Meteorological Prediction. Energies. 2024; 17(11):2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112612
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Yong, Yufeng Guo, Bohan Wang, Qiran Li, Qun Gao, and Yuanhao Wan. 2024. "Research on Influencing Factors and Wind Deflection Warning of Transmission Lines Based on Meteorological Prediction" Energies 17, no. 11: 2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112612
APA StyleLiu, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, B., Li, Q., Gao, Q., & Wan, Y. (2024). Research on Influencing Factors and Wind Deflection Warning of Transmission Lines Based on Meteorological Prediction. Energies, 17(11), 2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112612