An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2
Abstract
:1. General Knowledge of the Pyrolysis Process
2. Feedstock for the Pyrolysis Process
2.1. Sewage Sludge
2.2. Pre-Treatment of Biomass
3. Process Parameters
3.1. Temperature
3.2. Heating Rate
- Slow pyrolysis (carbonization)—temperature: 400 °C, solid residence time: a few minutes to a few hours, heating rate: from 0.1 to 1.0 °C/s;
- Intermediate pyrolysis (conventional)—temperature: 500 °C, solid residence time: up to 10 min, heating rate: 1–100 °C/s;
3.3. Residence Time
3.4. Reaction Atmosphere
3.5. Particle Size
4. Properties of Pyrolysis Products
4.1. Char
4.2. Oil
4.3. Non-Condensable Gases (NCG)
5. Reactors for the Pyrolysis Process
5.1. Slow Pyrolysis
5.2. Intermediate Pyrolysis
5.2.1. Auger or Screw Reactor
5.2.2. Rotary Drum Reactor
5.2.3. Vacuum Pyrolysis Reactor
5.3. Fast Pyrolysis
5.3.1. Ablative Pyrolizer
5.3.2. Rotating Cone Pyrolizer
5.3.3. Bubbling Fluidized Bed (BFB)
5.3.4. Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB)
5.4. Comparison of Pyrolysis Reactors
6. Combination of Thermochemical Processes
- EDDITh process (pyrolysis and combustion) France, Japan [144];
- PKA technology (pyrolysis and gasification) Germany [145];
- Thermoselect process (pyrolysis and gasification) Germany, Japan, Italy [146];
- WGT technology (pyrolysis and gasification) [147];
- Simens Schwel Brenn technology (pyrolysis and combustion) [148].
7. Review of Sludge Pyrolysis Technology
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mulchandani, A.; Westerhoff, P. Recovery opportunities for metals and energy from sewage sludges. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dai, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ruan, R.; He, C.; Yu, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Tian, X. Integrated process of lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction and pyrolysis for upgrading bio-oil production: A state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 107, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachos-Perez, D.; César Torres-Mayanga, P.; Abaide, E.R.; Zabot, G.L.; De Castilhos, F. Hydrothermal carbonization and Liquefaction: Differences, progress, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ünyay, H.; Yılmaz, F.; Başar, İ.A.; Altınay Perendeci, N.; Çoban, I.; Şahinkaya, E. Effects of organic loading rate on methane production from switchgrass in batch and semi-continuous stirred tank reactor system. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 156, 106306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgwater, A.V. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 38, 68–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murillo, R.; Aylón, E.; Navarro, M.V.; Callén, M.S.; Aranda, A.; Mastral, A.M. The application of thermal processes to valorise waste tyre. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piersa, P.; Unyay, H.; Szufa, S.; Lewandowska, W.; Modrzewski, R.; Ślężak, R.; Ledakowicz, S. Review An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Torrefaction Reactors vs. Biomass Pyrolysis—Part 1. Energies 2022, 15, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szufa, S.; Piersa, P.; Junga, R.; Błaszczuk, A.; Modliński, N.; Sobek, S.; Marczak-Grzesik, M.; Adrian, Ł.; Dzikuć, M. Numerical modeling of the co-firing process of an in situ steam-torrefied biomass with coal in a 230 MW industrial-scale boiler. Energy 2023, 263, 125918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collard, F.X.; Blin, J. A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: Mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38, 594–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axelsson, L.; Franzén, M.; Ostwald, M.; Berndes, G.; Lakshmi, G.; Ravindranath, N.H. Perspective: Jatropha cultivation in southern India: Assessing farmers’ experiences. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2012, 6, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giudicianni, P.; Gargiulo, V.; Grottola, C.M.; Alfè, M.; Ferreiro, A.I.; Mendes, M.A.A.; Fagnano, M.; Ragucci, R. Inherent Metal Elements in Biomass Pyrolysis: A Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 5407–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifzadeh, M.; Sadeqzadeh, M.; Guo, M.; Borhani, T.N.; Murthy Konda, N.V.S.N.; Garcia, M.C.; Wang, L.; Hallett, J.; Shah, N. The multi-scale challenges of biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading: Review of the state of art and future research directions. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2019, 71, 1–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, J.E.; Catallo, W.J.; Legendre, B.L. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: A comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2011, 91, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, P.; Dias, G. Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, W.C.; Atreya, A.; Baum, H.R. Experimental and theoretical investigation of heat and mass transfer processes during wood pyrolysis. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, D.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Sun, H.; Hu, X.; Zhang, S. Fundamental Advances in Biomass Autothermal/Oxidative Pyrolysis: A Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 11888–11905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.S.; Chang, Y.; Poon, C.S.; Lee, D.J. Slow pyrolysis of municipal solid waste (MSW): A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312, 123615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Elvira, S.I.; Nieto Diez, P.; Fdz-Polanco, F. Sludge minimisation technologies. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 375–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnell, M.; Horst, T.; Quicker, P. Thermal treatment of sewage sludge in Germany: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 263, 110367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frantzi, D.; Zabaniotou, A. Waste-Based Intermediate Bioenergy Carriers: Syngas Production via Coupling Slow Pyrolysis with Gasification under a Circular Economy Model. Energies 2021, 14, 7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.N.; Techato, K.; Taweekun, J.; Rahman, M.M.; Rasul, M.G.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Ashrafur, S.M. An overview of recent developments in biomass pyrolysis technologies. Energies 2018, 11, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hameed, S.; Sharma, A.; Pareek, V.; Wu, H.; Yu, Y. A review on biomass pyrolysis models: Kinetic, network and mechanistic models. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 123, 104–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matusiak, M.; Slęzak, R.; Ledakowicz, S. Thermogravimetric kinetics of selected energy crops pyrolysis. Energies 2020, 13, 3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanidis, S.D.; Kalogiannis, K.G.; Iliopoulou, E.F.; Michailof, C.M.; Pilavachi, P.A.; Lappas, A.A. A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 105, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, J.; Saidina Amin, N. A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5101–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahmi, R.; Bridgwater, A.V.; Donnison, I.; Yates, N.; Jones, J.M. The effect of lignin and inorganic species in biomass on pyrolysis oil yields, quality and stability. Fuel 2008, 87, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caballero, J.A.; Conesa, J.A.; Font, R.; Marcilla, A. Pyrolysis kinetics of almond shells and olive stones considering their organic fractions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1997, 42, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Guo, X.; Wang, K.; Luo, Z. Influence of the interaction of components on the pyrolysis behavior of biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2011, 91, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosoya, T.; Kawamoto, H.; Saka, S. Cellulose-hemicellulose and cellulose-lignin interactions in wood pyrolysis at gasification temperature. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2007, 80, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, A.; Zhao, Z.; Chang, S.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; He, F.; Li, H. Effect of torrefaction on structure and fast pyrolysis behavior of corncobs. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, D.; Pittman, C.U.; Steele, P.H. Pyrolysis of wood /biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 848–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oasmaa, A.; Sundqvist, T.; Kuoppala, E.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Solantausta, Y.; Lindfors, C.; Paasikallio, V. Controlling the phase stability of biomass fast pyrolysis bio-oils. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 4373–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Blasi, C.; Galgano, A.; Branca, C. Effects of potassium hydroxide impregnation on wood pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Li, R.; Zhang, B.; Qiu, Q.; Wang, B.; Yang, H.; Ding, Y.; Wang, C. Pyrolysis of microalgae: A critical review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 186, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aravind, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Kumar, N.S.; Siddarth, N. Conversion of green algal biomass into bioenergy by pyrolysis. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 829–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyoni, B.; Tsipa, P.; Duma, S.; Shabangu, S.; Hlangothi, S. Modelling of thermal decomposition kinetics of proteins, carbohydrates and lipids using Scenedesmus microalgae thermal data. Asian J. Chem. 2020, 32, 2921–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.H.; Chu, Y.S.; Liu, J.L.; Chang, J.S. Thermal degradation of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids in microalgae analyzed by evolutionary computation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 160, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slezak, R.; Nawrot, P.; Ledakowicz, S. Pyrolysis of micro- and macroalgae in thermobalance coupled with mass spectrometer. Algal Res. 2022, 66, 102782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djandja, O.S.; Wang, Z.C.; Wang, F.; Xu, Y.P.; Duan, P.G. Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for biofuel production: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 16939–16956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Environment 2022. Statistics Poland. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska-2022,1,23.html (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Gao, N.; Kamran, K.; Quan, C.; Williams, P.T. Thermochemical conversion of sewage sludge: A critical review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 79, 100843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, V.K.; Lo, S.L. Sludge: A waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 708–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kacprzak, M.; Neczaj, E.; Fijałkowski, K.; Grobelak, A.; Grosser, A.; Worwag, M.; Rorat, A.; Brattebo, H.; Almås, Å.; Singh, B.R. Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fijalkowski, K.; Rorat, A.; Grobelak, A.; Kacprzak, M.J. The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge—The current situation. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.P.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Yu, S.H.; Tan, P.; Fang, Q.Y.; Chen, G. A two-step process for sewage sludge treatment: Hydrothermal treatment of sludge and catalytic hydrothermal gasification of its derived liquid. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 180, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collard, M.; Teychené, B.; Lemée, L. Comparison of three different wastewater sludge and their respective drying processes: Solar, thermal and reed beds—Impact on organic matter characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Werle, S.; Wilk, R.K. A review of methods for the thermal utilization of sewage sludge: The Polish perspective. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 1914–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stolarek, P.; Ledakowicz, S.; Slȩzak, R. Influence of Liming on Kinetics of Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S 2019, 26, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rulkens, W. Sewage sludge as a biomass resource for the production of energy: Overview and assessment of the various options. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Pawłowski, A. Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1657–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, H.W. Sludge management—Future issues and trends. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Brewer, C.E.; Brown, R.C. Ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis of wastewater sewage sludge—A micro-pyrolysis study. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 232, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.; Wen, L.; Yang, T.; Zhang, N. Nitrogen Transformation during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 5088–5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raheem, A.; He, Q.; Mangi, F.H.; Areeprasert, C.; Ding, L.; Yu, G. Roles of Heavy Metals during Pyrolysis and Gasification of Metal-Contaminated Waste Biomass: A Review. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 2351–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowicki, L.; Ledakowicz, S. Comprehensive characterization of thermal decomposition of sewage sludge by TG-MS. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 110, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gievers, F.; Loewen, A.; Nelles, M. Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge pyrolysis: Environmental impacts of biochar as carbon sequestrator and nutrient recycler. Detritus 2021, 16, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larina, O.M.; Zaichenko, V.M. Influence of pyrolysis on evaporation and solubility of heavy metals in sewage sludge. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1556, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Jin, J.; Wang, M.; Naidu, R.; Liu, Y.; Man, Y.B.; Liang, X.; Wong, M.H.; Christie, P.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk/ bamboo sawdust for biochar with high aromaticity and low metal mobility. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubonova, L.; Janakova, I.; Malikova, P.; Drabinova, S.; Dej, M.; Smelik, R.; Skalny, P.; Heviankova, S. Evaluation of waste blends with sewage sludge as a potential material input for pyrolysis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Shu, X.; Zhu, H.; Xie, L.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, Y. Characteristics of biochars prepared by co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and cotton stalk intended for use as soil amendments. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bach, Q.V.; Skreiberg, O. Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, F.; Li, Y. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2014, 42, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kan, T.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T.J. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1126–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, S.; Gu, W.; Chen, L.; Yu, Z.; Dai, M.; Lin, Y.; Liao, Y.; Ma, X. Ultrasonic pretreatment effects on the co-pyrolysis of municipal solid waste and paper sludge through orthogonal test. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 258, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carpenter, D.; Westover, T.L.; Czernik, S.; Jablonski, W. Biomass feedstocks for renewable fuel production: A review of the impacts of feedstock and pretreatment on the yield and product distribution of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and vapors. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 384–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Park, J.; Tilotta, D.; Park, S. The effect of torrefaction on the chemistry of fast-pyrolysis bio-oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, S.; Lei, H.; Wang, L.; Bu, Q.; Chen, S.; Wu, J.; Julson, J.; Ruan, R. The effects of torrefaction on compositions of bio-oil and syngas from biomass pyrolysis by microwave heating. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Blasi, C.; Branca, C.; D’Errico, G. Degradation characteristics of straw and washed straw. Thermochim. Acta 2000, 364, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raveendran, K.; Ganesh, A.; Khilart, K.C. Influence of mineral matter on biomass pyrolysis characteristics. Fuel 1995, 74, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, P.T.; Horne, P.A. The role of metal salts in the pyrolysis of biomass. Renew. Energy 1994, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trendewicz, A.; Evans, R.; Dutta, A.; Sykes, R.; Carpenter, D.; Braun, R. Evaluating the effect of potassium on cellulose pyrolysis reaction kinetics. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 74, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deng, L.; Zhang, T.; Che, D. Effect of water washing on fuel properties, pyrolysis and combustion characteristics, and ash fusibility of biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 106, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Yi, L.; Hu, H.; Xu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, G.; Yao, H. Emission control of NOx precursors during sewage sludge pyrolysis using an integrated pretreatment of Fenton peroxidation and CaO conditioning. Fuel 2017, 195, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Parker, W. A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agar, D.A.; Kwapinska, M.; Leahy, J.J. Pyrolysis of wastewater sludge and composted organic fines from municipal solid waste: Laboratory reactor characterisation and product distribution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 35874–35882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kan, T.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T. Effect of the Heating Rate on the Thermochemical Behavior and Biofuel Properties of Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1564–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slezak, R.; Krzystek, L.; Ledakowicz, S. Thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry of spent mushroom substrate and its fractions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 133, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbas, M.F.; Balat, M. Biomass pyrolysis for liquid fuels and chemicals: A review. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2007, 66, 797–804. [Google Scholar]
- Patwardhan, P.R.; Satrio, J.A.; Brown, R.C.; Shanks, B.H. Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4646–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Xiong, S.; Xiao, B.; Yu, D.; Jia, X. Mechanism of wet sewage sludge pyrolysis in a tubular furnace. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Nunez, J.A.; Pelaez-Samaniego, M.R.; Garcia-Perez, M.E.; Fonts, I.; Abrego, J.; Westerhof, R.J.M.; Garcia-Perez, M. Historical Developments of Pyrolysis Reactors: A Review. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 5751–5775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demirbas, A. Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2004, 72, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbas, A. Determination of calorific values of bio-chars and pyro-oils from pyrolysis of beech trunkbarks. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2004, 72, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kloss, S.; Zehetner, F.; Dellantonio, A.; Hamid, R.; Ottner, F.; Liedtke, V.; Schwanninger, M.; Gerzabek, M.H.; Soja, G. Characterization of Slow Pyrolysis Biochars: Effects of Feedstocks and Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Properties. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, S.; Tian, S.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Z. Effect of Calcium Hydroxide on the Pyrolysis Behavior of Sewage Sludge: Reaction Characteristics and Kinetics. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 5079–5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homagain, K.; Shahi, C.; Luckai, N.; Sharma, M. Biochar-based bioenergy and its environmental impact in Northwestern Ontario Canada: A review. J. For. Res. 2014, 25, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lim, J.E.; Zhang, M.; Bolan, N.; Mohan, D.; Vithanage, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Yan, R.; Xiao, B.; Wang, X.; Yang, H. Influence of temperature on the formation of oil from pyrolyzing palm oil wastes in a fixed bed reactor. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 2398–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trinh, T.N.; Jensen, P.A.; Kim, D.J.; Knudsen, N.O.; Sørensen, H.R. Influence of the pyrolysis temperature on sewage sludge product distribution, bio-oil, and char properties. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Yuan, H.R.; Zhou, S.G.; Huang, H.Y.; Noriyuki, K.; Chen, Y. On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge: The influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar, liquid and gas fractions. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 518–523, 3412–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Guo, Y.; Peng, N.; Lang, Q.; Xia, Y.; Gai, C.; Liu, Z. Nitrogen transformation among char, tar and gas during pyrolysis of sewage sludge and corresponding hydrochar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 126, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udayanga, W.D.C.; Veksha, A.; Giannis, A.; Lisak, G.; Lim, T.T. Effects of sewage sludge organic and inorganic constituents on the properties of pyrolysis products. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 196, 1410–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, E.E.; Yi, H.; Castaldi, M.J. Utilizing carbon dioxide as a reaction medium to mitigate production of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the thermal decomposition of styrene butadiene rubber. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 10752–10757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hornung, A. Intermediate pyrolysis of biomass. In Biomass Combustion Science, Technology and Engineering; Woodhead Publishing: Birmingham, UK, 2013; pp. 172–186. [Google Scholar]
- Guizani, C.; Escudero Sanz, F.J.; Salvador, S. Effects of CO2 on biomass fast pyrolysis: Reaction rate, gas yields and char reactive properties. Fuel 2014, 116, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piddubniak, O.; Ledakowicz, S.; Nowicki, L. New approach to a problem of heat transfer with chemical reaction in a cylinder of finite dimensions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2011, 54, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Wang, S.; Pareek, V.; Yang, H.; Zhang, D. Multi-fluid reactive modeling of fluidized bed pyrolysis process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 123, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Wang, X.S.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Mourant, D.; Rhodes, M.J.; Li, C.Z. Effects of particle size on the fast pyrolysis of oil mallee woody biomass. Fuel 2009, 88, 1810–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuping, Z.; Yulong, W.; Mingde, Y.; Chun, L.; Junmao, T. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of the marine microalgae Dunaliella tertiolecta using thermogravimetric analyzer. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erlich, C.; Björnbom, E.; Bolado, D.; Giner, M.; Fransson, T.H. Pyrolysis and gasification of pellets from sugar cane bagasse and wood. Fuel 2006, 85, 1535–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhyani, V.; Bhaskar, T. A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Energy 2018, 129, 695–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhyani, V.; Kumar, J.; Bhaskar, T. Thermal decomposition kinetics of sorghum straw via thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panchasara, H.; Ashwath, N. Effects of pyrolysis bio-oils on fuel atomisation—A review. Energies 2021, 14, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Sun, K.; Ali, M.; Liu, X.; Huang, Q. Copyrolysis behavior of xylan and polyvinyl chloride plastic. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 8727–8734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostocki, A.; Unyay, H.; Ławińska, K.; Obraniak, A. Granulates Based on Bio and Industrial Waste and Biochar in a Sustainable Economy. Energies 2022, 16, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keiluweit, M.; Nico, P.S.; Johnson, M.; Kleber, M. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Manyà, J.J. Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: A review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7939–7954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mullen, C.A.; Boateng, A.A.; Goldberg, N.M.; Lima, I.M.; Laird, D.A.; Hicks, K.B. Bio-oil and bio-char production from corn cobs and stover by fast pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slezak, R.; Krzystek, L.; Ledakowicz, S. Steam gasification of pyrolysis char from spent mushroom substrate. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 122, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Zhang, S.; Wu, B.; Pi, M.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, H. Co-pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge and Rice Straw: Thermal Behavior and Char Characteristic Evaluations. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Jung, S.C.; Ryu, C.; Jeon, J.K.; Shin, M.C.; Park, Y.K. Production and utilization of biochar: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.S.; Chang, J.S.; Lee, D.J. Adding carbon-based materials on anaerobic digestion performance: A mini-review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalogo, Y.; Monteith, H. Energy and Resource Revovery from Sludge; IWA: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Lehto, J.; Oasmaa, A.; Solantausta, Y.; Kytö, M.; Chiaramonti, D. Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, R.; Yang, W. Influence of temperature on organic structure of biomass pyrolysis products. Renew. Energy 2013, 50, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, G.; Feng, Y.; Chen, D.; Yang, M.; Yu, T.; Dai, X. In Situ Reforming of the Volatile by Char during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 10396–10403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Cao, J.P.; Shi, P.; Zhao, X.Y.; Feng, X.B.; Zhao, Y.P.; Fan, X.; Wei, X.Y.; Takarada, T. Influences of pyrolysis conditions in the production and chemical composition of the bio-oils from fast pyrolysis of sewage sludge. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 110, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, K.; Ben, H.; Muzzy, J.; Feik, C.; Iisa, K.; Ragauskas, A. Chemical characterization and water content determination of bio-oils obtained from various biomass species using 31P NMR spectroscopy. Biofuels 2012, 3, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbas, A. The influence of temperature on the yields of compounds existing in bio-oils obtained from biomass samples via pyrolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campuzano, F.; Brown, R.C.; Martínez, J.D. Auger reactors for pyrolysis of biomass and wastes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 102, 372–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czernik, S.; Johnson, D.K.; Black, S. Stability of wood fast pyrolysis oil. Biomass Bioenergy 1994, 7, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botella, L.; Sierra, M.; Bimbela, F.; Gea, G.; Sánchez, J.L.; Gonzalo, A. Enhancement of Biodiesel Oxidation Stability Using Additives Obtained from Sewage Sludge Fast-Pyrolysis Liquids. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A. Pressurized pyrolysis of sewage sludge: Process performance and products characterization. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 139, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, N.; Quan, C.; Liu, B.; Li, Z.; Wu, C.; Li, A. Continuous Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge in a Screw-Feeding Reactor: Products Characterization and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 5063–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, T.; Guo, W.; Shen, L.; Xiao, J.; Zhao, K. Experimental Study of Biomass Pyrolysis Based on Three Major Components: Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 10424–10433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG-FTIR analysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2008, 82, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, G.; Huang, H.; Li, Y. Hydrogen-rich gas production from pyrolysis of biomass in an autogenerated steam atmosphere. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1748–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Q.; Zhao, C.; Chen, X.; Duan, L.; Li, Y.; Ma, C. NOx and N2O precursors (NH3 and HCN) from biomass pyrolysis: Co-pyrolysis of amino acids and cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 1715–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xu, J.; Zhao, S. Biomass carbonization industrial process. In Proceedings of the ICMREE2011—International Conference on Materials for Renewable Energy and Environment, Shanghai, China, 20–22 May 2011; Volume 1, pp. 54–59. [Google Scholar]
- Kammen, D.M.; Lew, D.J. Review of Technologies for the Production and Use of Charcoal; Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory Report. 2005, pp. 1–19. Available online: http://rael.berkeley.edu/old_drupal/sites/default/files/old-site-files/2005/Kammen-Lew-Charcoal-2005.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Klavina, K.; Klavins, J.; Veidenbergs, I.; Blumberga, D. Charcoal Production in a Continuous Operation Retort. Experimental Data Processing. Energy Procedia 2016, 95, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, J.N.; Brown, R.C. Process optimization of an auger pyrolyzer with heat carrier using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ledakowicz, S.; Piddubniak, O. The Non-Stationary Heat Transport inside a Shafted Screw Conveyor Filled with Homogeneous Biomass Heated Electrically. Energies 2022, 15, 6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, D.; Van De Beld, B.; Bridgwater, A.V.; Elliott, D.C.; Oasmaa, A.; Preto, F. State-of-the-art of fast pyrolysis in IEA bioenergy member countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 619–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anex, R.P.; Aden, A.; Kazi, F.K.; Fortman, J.; Swanson, R.M.; Wright, M.M.; Satrio, J.A.; Brown, R.C.; Daugaard, D.E.; Platon, A.; et al. Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways. Fuel 2010, 89, S29–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isahak, W.N.R.W.; Hisham, M.W.M.; Yarmo, M.A.; Yun Hin, T.Y. A review on bio-oil production from biomass by using pyrolysis method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5910–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgwater, A.V.; Peacocke, G.V.C. Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2000, 4, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venderbosch, R.H.; Prins, W. Fast pyrolysis technology development. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2010, 4, 178–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diebold, J.; Scahill, J. Production of Primary Pyrolysis Oils in a Vortex Reactor. Pyrolysis Oils Biomass 1988, 4, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgwater, A.V.; Meier, D.; Radlein, D. An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org. Geochem. 1999, 30, 1479–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagenaar, B.M.; Venderbosch, R.H.; Carrasco, J.; Strenziok, R.; van der Aa, B.J. Rotating cone bio-oil production and applications. In Progress in Thermochem Biomass Convers; Bridgwater, A.V., Ed.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 1268–1280. [Google Scholar]
- Molino, A.; Chianese, S.; Musmarra, D. Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview. J. Energy Chem. 2016, 25, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oladejo, J.; Shi, K.; Luo, X.; Yang, G.; Wu, T. A review of sludge-to-energy recovery methods. Energies 2019, 12, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Study of Gasification/Pyrolysis of MSW Residuals. Available online: https://tnrd.civicweb.net/document/4805/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Malkow, T. Novel and innovative pyrolysis and gasification technologies for energy efficient and environmentally sound MSW disposal. Waste Manag. 2004, 24, 53–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thermoselect—An Advanced Field Proven High Temperature Recycling Process. Available online: http://www.viveracorp.com/index_htm_files/R02_manuscriptThermoselect.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Brems, A.; Dewil, R.; Baeyens, J.; Zhang, R. Gasification of Plastic Waste as Waste-to-Energy or Waste-to-Syngas Recovery Route. Solid Waste A Renew. Resour. Methodol. 2015, 5, 241–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zeng, R.; Wang, S.; Cai, J.; Kuang, C. A Review of Pyrolysis Gasification of MSW. Adv. Eng. Res. 2018, 163, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ledakowicz, S.; Stolarek, P.; Malinowski, A.; Lepez, O. Thermochemical treatment of sewage sludge by integration of drying and pyrolysis/autogasification. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 104, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pyrolysis Process for Biomass and Waste. Available online: https://etia-group.com/operations-for-thermal-processing/pyrolysis/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
The Advantages | The Disadvantages |
---|---|
High flexibility in terms of the substrates for the process | Production of char, oil, and gas, which can require further treatment |
Lower corrosivity of the reactor when compared to the combustion process | Safety rules (toxic CO and flammable gases) |
The possibility of storing pyrolysis products and using them at a later date | The content of volatile organic compounds in the gas |
Destroyed microorganisms (sterilization, especially important during the decomposition of sewage sludge) | The current cost of energy |
The possibility of using pyrolytic oil and gas as fuel or chemical feedstock | Sensitivity of the process to substrate moisture |
Easier control of the pyrolysis process than the combustion process since it is endothermic | Limited operating data |
Lower volumes of flue gas and NOx, dioxins, and furans emissions than incineration | |
Production of stable solid residues that allow further recycling | |
The possibility of use on both large and small scales. |
The Advantages | The Disadvantages |
---|---|
High content of N and P | Harmful substances |
High content of C | Pathogenic microorganism |
No seasonality | High content of water |
Production in the same place | High content of ash |
Type of Pyrolysis | Reactor Type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Slow | Kilns | Low investment cost No special equipment | Emission of oil and gases to the environment High labor demand Low efficiency Very poor control of process |
Retorts | Good quality of products High char yield production | Sensitivity to the moisture of biomass Corrosion | |
Intermediate | Auger or screw reactor | Precise control of residence time Simple reactor | High water content in oil Heat transfer at large scale Pilot scale Sticking of the material |
Rotary kiln reactor | Low degree of feedstock fragmentation | Complicated sealing system | |
Vacuum pyrolysis | No gas carrier High quality of produced oil | Low heat transfer High cost of the vacuum pump Difficult to scale-up Demonstration reactor Sealing system | |
Fast | Ablative pyrolysis | Large particles can be used No inert gas High oil yield High quality of produced gas Compact | Low heat transfer Low possibility to scale-up Solid particles in the oil Parts of the reactor exposed to corrosion |
Rotating cone pyrolizer | No inert gas Compact | Solid particles in the oil Heat and mass transfer Difficult to scale-up Parts of the reactor exposed to corrosion | |
Bubbling fluidized reactor | Efficient heat and mass transfer High oil yield Easy to scale-up | Feedstock should be ground Solid particles in the oil Diluted gas | |
Circulating fluidized reactor | Efficient heat and mass transfer High oil yield | Feedstock should be ground More complex system Not completely reacted feedstock Diluted gas Complex reactor |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Slezak, R.; Unyay, H.; Szufa, S.; Ledakowicz, S. An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2. Energies 2023, 16, 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052212
Slezak R, Unyay H, Szufa S, Ledakowicz S. An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2. Energies. 2023; 16(5):2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052212
Chicago/Turabian StyleSlezak, Radoslaw, Hilal Unyay, Szymon Szufa, and Stanislaw Ledakowicz. 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2" Energies 16, no. 5: 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052212
APA StyleSlezak, R., Unyay, H., Szufa, S., & Ledakowicz, S. (2023). An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2. Energies, 16(5), 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052212