Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Voltage Restorer as a Solution to Voltage Problems in Power Systems: Focus on Sags, Swells and Steady Fluctuations
Previous Article in Journal
A Sizing Procedure for the DC-Side Capacitor of a Three-Phase Modular Multilevel Converter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Ozone Production Reaction Rate and Partial Discharge Power in a Dielectric-Barrier Acrylic Chamber with 60 Hz High-Voltage Electrodes: CFD and Experimental Investigations

by
Rodrigo M. S. de Oliveira
1,*,
Ronaldo F. Zampolo
1,
Licinius D. S. Alcantara
2,
Gustavo G. Girotto
1,
Frederico H. R. Lopes
1,
Nathan M. Lopes
1,
Fernando S. Brasil
3,
Júlio A. S. Nascimento
3 and
Victor Dmitriev
1
1
Institute of Technology (ITEC), Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil
2
Cyberspatial Institute (ICIBE), Federal Rural University of Amazon (UFRA), Belém 66077-830, Brazil
3
Eletrobrás Eletronorte, Rod. Arthur Bernardes 2175, Belém 66115-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(19), 6947; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196947
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 23 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 4 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section E: Electric Vehicles)

Abstract

:
We present a synergistic investigation into ozone production dynamics within a high-voltage reaction chamber operating from 1.75 kV to 10 kV, at 60 Hz. The output ozone concentration dependence on a 60 Hz root mean square high-voltage for an air input pressure of 0.1 bar was measured using an ultraviolet-based sensor. A finite-element numerical model of the reaction chamber was developed and used for obtaining the reaction rate for the generated ozone for each level of input voltage and the internal distribution of the gas vector velocity field and ozone concentration. An expression to estimate the ozone reaction rates from the measured ozone concentrations was also derived. It was then compared and validated using the developed computational model. Therefore, in this work, a formula is proposed to estimate the ozone production by providing the experimental reaction rates. The other objective is to analyze the hysteresis phenomena observed in the partial discharges’ levels in the reaction chamber and in the output ozone concentration. Finally, we establish a connection between the total power of partial discharges and the consequent ozone production, clarifying the role of cumulative partial discharges’ power levels in governing the resultant output ozone concentration.

1. Introduction

Monitoring physical phenomena arising from the occurrence of partial discharges (PDs), such as ozone generation, electromagnetic fields, and acoustic signals, in an electrical machine is of paramount importance to assess its electrical condition and, thus, to better schedule maintenance actions, minimize downtime, and increase the equipment’s lifespan [1]. Identifying the types of PDs, their locations, and degrees of severity is crucial for defining monitoring procedures of PDs. Their PD location, associated with the PD class identification, provides essential information for planning specific details of the corrective interventions. The continuous monitoring of the severity level, conducted during routine observation phases, enhances the quality and precision of maintenance scheduling decisions [1,2].
Electrical discharges occur in the air gap between high-voltage electrodes when the applied voltage is sufficient to generate electric field intensities greater than the air dielectric strength, ionizing the air (the molecules of air mainly lose electrons). This air ionization begins an avalanche of electrons. When the number of electrons in the avalanche exceeds 108, the electric field originated by the external source exhibits a sharp deformation in the space between the conductors, giving rise to the formation of a low-conductivity plasma channel, called streamer channel [3,4,5,6]. At the beginning of the formation of the streamer channel, an exponential increase of its electric conductivity and current takes place. Then, the streamer channel electrically connects the electrodes, the streamer’s electric conductivity (and, thus, the current) increases over-exponentially [4,5,7], and a large release of free electrons in the channel is observed. After a certain time, there is a redistribution of the electric field in the ionized gap space. The electronic repulsive forces intensify because of the massive increase in the number of electrons in the channel, in such a way that the reassociations of electrons with ionized atoms are favored. This effect results in the electric current undergoing exponential decay, primarily due to the recombination process which consists of the bonding of electrons to the molecules of gaseous species present in air, reducing the plasma conductivity [4] until the disruption of the channel and the cessation of the discharge current.
The partial discharge phenomena also lead to the occurrence of chemical reactions, which generate ozone among their products. Experimental procedures based on the theoretical background that describes ozone production and elimination are treated in the scientific literature [8,9,10,11]. Over the years, research centers specialized in power systems have explored techniques for harnessing PD ozone production as a resource [12,13,14,15,16]. These endeavors aim to not only assess partial discharges but also to proactively anticipate the need for maintenance interventions in generators. Reaction chambers have been proposed to allow the experimental investigation of the ozone production process from partial discharges [10,11]. The ozone-generating chambers typically consist of an acrylic, glass, or ceramic container that houses metal electrodes and dielectric barriers. The reaction chamber is usually designed to maximize the amount of ozone generated by using a careful choice of materials, dimensions, and features regarding geometrical, electrical, and fluid dynamics aspects. The design of the reaction chamber affects not only its construction cost and energy consumption, but also the production and quality of the generated ozone.
In engineering, to design and optimize systems and structures [17,18,19], numerical methods are used. These methods allow the study of the behavior of complex systems under different conditions, the development of new technologies, and the enhancement in the reliability of predictive techniques. Examples of such methods include finite difference methods, finite element methods, and numerical optimization techniques [7,20,21,22]. In [7], a finite element (FEM) model of streamer channel formation was developed. In [20], the phenomenon of air ionization by corona discharges was modeled using the recursive least squares (RLS) method. In [21], transient electromagnetic fields produced by streamer discharges were computed by developing a streamer finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) model.
With its foundation in fluid mechanics, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a discipline that uses numerical methods and algorithms, such as FEM, to simulate and analyze the complex behavior of fluids [22]. It is instrumental for understanding and predicting both the production and the transport of ozone molecules in complex systems.
In this work, experimental measurements of ozone production are carried out with a high-voltage dielectric-barrier reaction chamber designed and built by our research group. Furthermore, we developed electromagnetic and CFD models of the reaction chamber using COMSOL Multiphysics [23]. The principal aim of our study is to investigate, for the first time, the relationship existing between the reaction rate governing ozone production and the cumulative power associated with the partial discharges occurring between the high-voltage electrodes that are separated by a glass dielectric barrier. This investigative pursuit is undertaken through a strategy integrating laboratorial experimentation and advanced computational modeling. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we describe the methodologies employed for performing the experiments and simulations. Our results are presented in Section 3 and discussed in Section 4. Final remarks are provided in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

This section is divided into two parts: the first one describes the experimental setup established for performing the experiments with the reaction chamber, which was conducted in the high-voltage laboratory of the Brazilian electric power company Eletronorte, located in the city of Belém. The second part offers a condensed overview of the theoretical foundation, and outlines the key elements encompassing the conceived CFD model designed to perform the FEM simulations.

2.1. The Reaction Chamber and Our Experimental Setup

The ozone production reaction chamber, depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2, has dimensions of 300 mm in length, 83 mm in height, and 300 mm in width. It is constructed using 10 mm thick acrylic sheets. The chamber’s base features a centrally positioned hole with a diameter of 4 mm, serving as an aperture for the ground connector to traverse. On the upper surface of the chamber, three holes are situated with collinear centers. Among these, the central aperture has a larger diameter of 65 mm and functions as a conduit for the connection of the upper metallic plates to the voltage source. Additionally, two smaller apertures with diameters of 15 mm are symmetrically positioned 25 mm away from the longitudinal extremities of the structure. Using those apertures, the air inlet and outlet valves are coupled to the air corridor. The air corridor walls are made of acrylic and are 280 mm long, 10 mm wide, and 63 mm high. These walls are 28 mm apart from each other.
The air is supplied by a compressed dry-air cylinder, which is connected to the chamber using a hose. The pressure is adjusted with a manual pressure regulator (manometer). As the input flow rate is the same as the output’s, the input air flow rate is estimated indirectly by multiplying the velocity of air measured at the outlet by the total cross-section area of the chamber’s outlet. The CFD simulations’ results for the airflow along the reaction chamber confirm the estimation of the air flow rate at the inlet.
In the interior of the chamber, both the high-voltage and the ground terminals are connected to perforated aluminum parallel plates. Between the chamber electrodes, there are dielectric barriers consisting of a pair of two-millimeters-thick glass layers separated by three millimeters, which delimitate the air gap where partial discharges occur (see Figure 1b). The aluminum electrode plates are perforated with a series of circular holes to cause an intensification of the electric field in the air gap during the operation of the reaction chamber. This electric field intensification occurs in the air-gap regions that are not aligned with the holes of the aluminum electrodes. In those regions, the high-energy electrons will detach from the air atoms due to the intense electric field [18]. The glass layers improve the stability of the electrical discharges and avoid arc formation, ensuring the emergence of PDs [24]. Thus, according to [25], the glass layers have a dual role: they limit the amount of charge that can flow through each single micro-discharge channel (thus producing PDs), and they promote a uniform distribution of PDs across the air gap.
Figure 3 shows the devices and equipment used for powering the reaction chamber and adjusting the voltage level of the applied 60 Hz voltage over time, as well as for monitoring the input gas pressure and the output ozone concentration. In view of the requisite warm-up procedure, the ultraviolet ozone monitor is activated prior to the actual experiment, a process which demands approximately 20 min for completion [26].
The ozone monitor 2BTech 106-L measures ozone concentration by evaluating the absorption of ultraviolet (UV) light by the ozone. This technique has been used for accurate and precise measurements of atmospheric ozone for many years. Ozone molecules have a maximum absorption at a wavelength of 254 nm, which is the same wavelength emitted by a low-pressure mercury lamp. Fortunately, few other molecules in the atmosphere absorb at this wavelength in significant concentrations. However, in highly polluted air, influences can occur from organic compounds containing certain aromatic rings [26]. To minimize undesirable particle influences, the device has an inlet particle filter, which is also shown in Figure 2.

Experimental Procedures

The primary objective of the experiment is to monitor the resulting ozone concentrations and to acquire phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) diagrams [27] for the discharges occurring in the chamber. The goal is to estimate the reaction rate for the ozone. The PRPD diagrams were registered using the IMA-DP system [28]. The Instrumentation for Monitoring and Analysis of Partial Discharges (IMA-PD) is a partial discharges measurement system based on virtual instrumentation that was developed by the Brazilian company Cepel using LabVIEW, adhering to international technical standards such as the IEC 60034-27-1, IEC 60034-27-2, and IIE 1434-2014. Furthermore, its validation was conducted through a comprehensive comparison with other products on the market. The IMA-DP is being used in various Brazilian hydropower plants, such as Tucuruí and Itaipu [29,30].
Our investigation also examines the hysteresis effects concerning ozone generation and the power of micro-discharges, particularly as the input voltages undergo a systematic escalation and a subsequent decrement. The experimental procedure unfolds in the following sequence: Initially, we meticulously calibrate the flow of dry air injected into the reaction chamber. The gauge pressure, precisely adjusted via a manometer integrated into the air injection system, is set to 0.1 bar above the atmospheric pressure. Concurrently, the air velocity, previously and accurately assessed using an anemometer positioned in the outlet side at the UV-based ozone sensor’s location, was registered as 1.5 m/s at the T-junction output. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the setup.
At the beginning of the experiment, the temperature and humidity of the environment were measured using the sensor of a thermo-hygrometer positioned close to the ozone concentration sensor. Throughout the experiment, the temperature remained in the range of 20.6 °C to 21.7 °C, while the relative humidity was approximately 54%. Then, with a 60 Hz high-voltage source connected to the terminals of the reaction chamber, we manually varied the excitation through predefined levels. The voltage remained at each level for 3 min before we adjusted the voltage to the next predefined value. Throughout the experiment, we measured the ozone concentration and obtained partial discharge data. The mentioned excitation voltage levels were set to the following root mean square (RMS) values: 4 kV, 5 kV, 6 kV, 7 kV, 8 kV, 9 kV, and 10 kV. We started at 4 kV, moved up to 10 kV (level-by-level), and then the voltage was progressively reduced back to 4 kV. The total duration of the experiment comprised 39 min. The real-world chamber geometry and physical parameters were then used for developing our computational model of the problem.

2.2. Fluid Mechanics Theoretical Background and Computational Modeling

In a steady state, the mass conservation law [17] for ozone is given by
∇∙J + um∙∇c = R,
where
J = −D ∇c.
In (1) and (2), J is the diffusion flux field (mol/(m2s)), c is the species (ozone) concentration (mol/m3), D is the diffusion coefficient (m2/s), R is the reaction rate for ozone, given in mol/(m3·s), and um is the average mass velocity field (m/s).
We derived a formula to calculate R based on the following reasoning. Firstly, it can be considered as the time derivative of the ozone mass generated in the reaction chamber (in g/s) divided by the volume where the ozone generation occurs. It is also divided by the ozone’s molar mass M to yield a unity of mol/(m3.s) for R. Therefore, we have
R = m′/(M·VO3),
where m′ is the rate of the produced ozone mass in g/s, M = 47.997 g/mol is the ozone’s molar mass constant, and VO3 is the volume of the air region where the ozone is generated, which is, for the designed reaction chamber, VO3 = 1.07 × 10−5 m3, as detailed in Section 3.
In the steady state regime, m′ becomes constant and is assumed as m′ = η·P, where η (g/(kW.s)) is the ozone production yield and P (kW) is the power of discharges. Therefore, the reaction rate R is set to represent ozone generation in ionized gas zones in the CFD model as
R = η·P/(M·VO3).
According to [20,21], η = CO3·Gfr/P, where CO3 is the output ozone concentration given in ppmv and Gfr is the gas flow rate in m3/s, which can be computed as Gfr = vin.Ah, where vin is the input air velocity and Ah is the cross-section area of the input hose. Therefore, (4) can also be written as
R = CO3·vin·Ah/(M·VO3).
The discharge power can be approximately estimated using the following expression [24]:
P = 4 f·CD·ΔVdVp − ΔVmin),
where Vmin is the minimum external voltage at which ignition occurs [24], given by
ΔVmin = (1+ Cg/CD) ΔVd.
In these equations, f is the power frequency (60 Hz, in our case), CD is the dielectric capacitance, Cg is the gap capacitance, ΔVp is the peak input voltage, and ΔVd is the discharge voltage, which is the minimum gap voltage in the active phase of the time-varying input voltage [24], i.e., it is the minimum voltage at which the PDs emerge.
A computational fluid dynamics FEM model was developed using the COMSOL Multiphysics software (version 5.5), to also obtain information about the parameter R and compare its results with (5). The parameter R in the CFD model is calculated based on the experimentally obtained ozone concentration values. To achieve this goal, an initial fluid dynamics simulation is carried out with the normalized value R = 1 and then, in the next simulation, R is set to CExp/CR=1 (experimental concentration/numerical concentration obtained with R = 1) so that the average surface ozone concentration at the outlet is the same as the concentration obtained in the experiment for each applied voltage. This is only possible due to the linearity of (1).
The physics modules’ turbulent flow and transport of diluted species of the COMSOL software were used along with a computational representation of the chamber geometry and material parameters. The numerical model is based on the discretization of (1) and (2) by applying the finite element method (FEM) on a discretized representation (mesh) of the internal air region of the chamber and duct walls. A graphical representation of our model is shown in Figure 4. The input velocity at the inlet of the chamber was set to 2.46 m/s to achieve an output velocity of 1.5 m/s, in agreement with the laboratorial experiment. The blue-highlighted region is the finite element mesh representing the internal gas region where computational fluid dynamics calculations are applied to by considering the ozone production due to the partial discharges. The computational mesh is made up of 4,206,418 pyramidal elements with a maximum and minimum edge size of 2.69 mm and 0.04 mm, respectively. Each simulation requires approximately 34 GB of RAM and a processing time of 2 h and 14 min with an error tolerance criterion of less than 5% to terminate the Newton iterations [23]. The used computational system is equipped with 16 cores of an AMD Ryzen 9 processor and 128 GB of RAM, which is running the 64-bit Slackware Linux 15.0 operating system.

3. Results

In the course of the experiments, the temporal evolution of the output ozone concentration was tracked through the employment of the UV-based ozone monitor. Concurrently, the amplitude of the input AC voltage was varied, initially ascending and subsequently descending, while maintaining a fixed input gauge pressure of 0.1 bar. Figure 5 visually portrays the resultant output ozone concentration as a function of the varying input voltage over the experiment time. In Figure 5a is shown the average ozone output calculated within a time window of 3 min and the corresponding numbers of micro-discharges measured via the PRPD, where the RMS value of the input voltage was maintained constant for each time window. Figure 5b shows the raw data retrieved from the continuous monitoring of the output ozone concentration over time. It was observed during the experiments that convergence was reached in a few seconds at each voltage level. This is due to the reduced dimensions of the chamber and the internal laminar flow. The ozone concentration time average was taken after the convergence time for each applied voltage. In this way, it is possible to compare the experimental results with the steady-state simulation results. Note that the ozone concentrations are higher in the voltage descending regime than the concentrations obtained for the same voltages during the voltage rise regime.
The air volume where the ozone is produced, i.e., where R ≠ 0, was delimited by analyzing the electric field distribution via electromagnetic simulations. Figure 6 shows the computed electric field distribution above the level of 0.8 kV/mm for the input RMS voltage of 10 kV (oscillating at 60 Hz). The volumetric region where R ≠ 0 was approximately delimited to the region shown in Figure 6 in our fluid dynamics model. The estimated volume was VO3 = 1.07 × 10−5 m3, which was used to compute R from (5). By slowly increasing the voltage, we observed from the PRPD diagrams that micro-discharges in the chamber started to emerge with a minimum applied RMS voltage of approximately 1.75 kV, resulting in a maximum electric field strength slightly above 0.8 kV/mm in the air gap.
Figure 7 shows the airflow lines and the distribution of ozone concentration, obtained with the computational model for an RMS input voltage of 10 kV, oscillating at 60 Hz. In these simulations, the air velocity in the input valve was set to 2.46 m/s. In the air-gap region between the parallel glass plates, numerical output data indicate that the average air velocity increases to approximately 14.75 m/s. The experimental data were also used in the computational model to estimate the ozone reaction rate R in the gap region where air ionization occurs. Figure 8 shows the ozone concentrations obtained experimentally and the parameter R calculated as a function of the input voltage ΔV. The parameter R was also estimated using (5), derived in this work. The results in Figure 8b show that the estimates for R agree well with the ones obtained with the computational model.
The PRPD measurements were carried out along the experiment to monitor the PD occurrences and their power for each 60 Hz input voltage level. Figure 9 shows phase-resolved PD power maps obtained from PRPD data for the RMS voltages of 4 kV and 9 kV, during the rise and descent voltage regimes. The number of PD occurrences, mean PD power PM, and total (cumulative) PD power PT were calculated for each case. Those parameters were retrieved for all the input voltage levels from the PRPD measurements. Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively, show the absolute number and the mean power of micro-discharges as the input voltage was increased and then decreased. Figure 10 shows the number of micro-discharges in a time window of 120 cycles (2 s), when the count rate of micro-discharges over time had already reached a steady-state value for each voltage. If we take as reference a micro-discharge power of 2.36 W, which was the value obtained via the PRPD for the applied voltage of 10 kV, we have an energy value of 2.36 W × 2 s = 4.72 J, which is in the same order of magnitude of the energy per pulse value of 3.5 J obtained by Buntat in [10] for an input voltage of 13 kV. In Figure 11a, a mean power estimate obtained from (6) is also included (dashed line) for comparison. Equation (6) is an approximation formula derived in [25] and does not account for hysteresis effects. The calculation of parameters used in (6) and (7) are detailed in Appendix A. Furthermore, Figure 12 shows the ozone reaction rate per watt R/PT, obtained in the reaction chamber, as a function of the input RMS voltage, and Figure 13 shows the reaction rate R as a function of the total power of micro-discharges PT.

4. Discussion

Throughout the course of the experiment, the ozone generated within the reaction chamber’s gap undergoes transport by means of both diffusion and advection, propelled towards the chamber’s output by the enforced airflow. This dynamic interplay results in the observed ozone concentration profile, graphically depicted in Figure 7. Notably, the concentration profile exhibits an incremental trend in the direction of the airflow. Figure 8 shows that the reaction rate for ozone generation increases exponentially with the input voltage. Hysteresis phenomena manifest across measured and calculated parameters: the output ozone concentration, the power of partial discharges, and the absolute count of the PD events. Specifically, when the input RMS voltages are maintained below 8 kV, the ozone concentrations within the voltage-decreasing regime marginally surpass the concentrations measured during the voltage-increasing regime, as seen in Figure 5a and Figure 8a. This behavior extends to the computed reaction rates, as depicted in Figure 8b. In Figure 5a, we also observe that there is a strong correlation between the output ozone concentration and the number of micro-discharges. Note that the steady-state of ozone concentration is reached at each time window (Figure 5b) and, under such condition, the hysteresis effect is observed.
For an input RMS voltage of 9 kV in both increasing and decreasing voltage regimes, the corresponding PRPD power diagrams remain remarkably consistent (Figure 9), as does the count of gap PDs (Figure 10). Nevertheless, for RMS voltages below 8 kV, a distinct behavior emerges. In the decreasing voltage regime, the count of PDs demonstrates a gentler slope compared to the steeper incline observed in the increasing voltage trajectory. The hysteresis effect is vividly depicted in Figure 10 and Figure 11, illustrating the interplay between the count and power of the PDs, as also seen in Figure 5a for the ozone concentrations and the PDs count. Notably, Figure 10 and Figure 11b reveal an important pattern: when input voltages are maintained below 8 kV, the number of partial discharges is higher during the decreasing voltage variations compared to the instances when the voltage is increasing, which is consistent to what is seen in Figure 11b for the total PD power PT. In contrast, we see that the mean power of the PDs PM for the decreasing variations of the input voltage remained mostly lower than for the increasing variations, which does not seem to agree to the ozone concentration profile seen in Figure 8a. Thus, we see that PT has a stronger correlation with the experimental chamber output ozone concentration CO3. Note that R as a function of the RMS voltage has a similar profile to that of CO3, as shown in Figure 8b.
We may derive further interesting conclusions by analyzing the rate R/PT as a function of the RMS voltage and R as a function of PT. From Figure 12, we note that the hysteresis is more evident in the analysis of the ozone concentration per watt. The calculated rate R/PT also becomes almost linear with the input voltage when the voltage is increased from 5 kV onward, and it remains linear for all the considered decreasing voltage range. During the entire voltage decreasing regime, the rate R/PT assumes higher values than during the increasing voltage proceeding.
The hysteresis response in Figure 13 for R(PT) shows that, in the decreasing voltage procedure, a given amount of micro-discharges power is related to a slightly higher ozone production. Note that R(PT) is quasi-linear (especially in the voltage decreasing regime) and, for the lowest voltage in both regimes, the total PD power reduces significantly to the point that ozone production becomes near zero, forming then practically closed hysteresis loops in Figure 8 and Figure 13.
There seem to be no reports in the literature that deal directly with the estimation of the reaction rates for DBD structures. However, ozone generation is usually expressed in terms of ozone production yield, which increases with power and may reach saturation or a peak at a given voltage or power, as shown in [31]. This behavior qualitatively agrees with the data shown in Figure 13, where the reaction rate increases with the total power of micro-discharges, except for the fact that we did not observe ozone production saturation within our considered input voltage range.
Finally, in [32], a hysteresis effect on a dielectric-barrier discharge structure was investigated, where the authors reported differences in the pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) of the initiating and extinguishing boundaries of the micro-discharges. According to [32], excited and metastable particles are produced in the excitation process. Excited particles are unstable because they emit energy back in the form of radiation photons to the ground state. Once the excited particles rise to the metastable state, they cannot spontaneously jump to the ground state, so the metastable particles have a relatively long lifetime. The authors of [32] affirm that these metastable species could survive and lead to a memory effect. This effect may also be responsible for the observed hysteresis in our results, as, in Figure 10 and Figure 11b, we note that the number of micro-discharges and total PD power PT become higher for the decreasing voltage regime, affecting the measured ozone concentration (which follows a similar pattern, as seen in Figure 8a). In this case, the air region already has a greater density of such excited metastable particles that may affect the number and mean power of micro-discharges. Therefore, this characteristic leads to the nonlinear electrical properties of the air medium between the dielectric layers of the reaction chamber.

5. Conclusions

In this work, experiments were carried out in an acrylic reaction chamber to analyze ozone generation as a function of 60 Hz electric voltage applied to the chamber terminals and PD power. A CFD model for representing chamber geometry was developed using a finite-element-based software to analyze the ozone concentration distribution inside the chamber subjected to airflow. The ozone reaction rates were computed with the aid of the CFD model in conjunction with the obtained experimental data. The experiment allowed the measurement of ozone concentrations at the chamber’s outlet for an input gauge pressure of 0.1 bar and specific levels of the input voltage.
Our analysis shows details of the role of input voltage in influencing ozone generation dynamics, revealing the emergence of hysteresis effects across critical parameters, including ozone concentration, total PD power, and count of PD occurrences. Notably, the ozone concentrations in the voltage-decreasing regime surpass their voltage-increasing counterparts, a phenomenon especially pronounced for the RMS voltages below 8 kV. This behavior echoes in the experimentally measured total PD power PT and PD count, as well as in the calculated ozone reaction rates.
By further scrutinizing the PRPD data, we discern the remarkable consistency of the PD power diagrams and gap PD counts for RMS voltages at 9 kV. However, for diminishing RMS voltages, distinctive trends come to the forefront, where the PD counts exhibit gentler slopes within the voltage-decreasing regime. Moreover, an exploration into the rate R/PT as a function of RMS voltage and R as a function of PT unveils interesting patterns. Particularly notable is the amplification of the visibility of hysteresis effects when investigating ozone production per watt. The calculated rate R/PT demonstrates a certain level of linearity as the input voltage escalates beyond 5 kV, showcasing the profile of the interdependence of total PD power and ozone production. These observations culminate in the understanding of the pivotal role played by cumulative (total) PD power PT, extracted from PRPDs, in defining ozone production dynamics. In particular, the function R(PT) sheds light on the dependence between the total PD power and the resultant ozone generation. We may thus say that each micro-discharge contributes to the measured ozone concentration. Furthermore, the strong reduction in PT at lower voltages leads to a virtually negligible ozone production, effectively delineating closed hysteresis loops. R(PT) is quasi-linear, especially during the voltage reduction regime.
In future works, we aim to investigate the effect of the distance between the dielectric barriers on the ozone reaction rate R. Future experiments and simulations will also be carried out using a larger reaction chamber to analyze ozone generation from an energized stator bar. The intention is to analyze multiple types of stator bar defects at different severity levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.S.d.O., R.F.Z. and V.D.; methodology, L.D.S.A., R.M.S.d.O. and R.F.Z.; software, L.D.S.A., G.G.G. and F.H.R.L.; validation, V.D., R.M.S.d.O., R.F.Z. and L.D.S.A.; formal analysis, L.D.S.A., R.M.S.d.O., G.G.G. and R.F.Z.; investigation, R.F.Z., F.H.R.L., N.M.L., G.G.G., L.D.S.A. and R.M.S.d.O.; resources, V.D., F.S.B. and J.A.S.N.; data curation, L.D.S.A., G.G.G. and F.H.R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D.S.A.; writing—review and editing, L.D.S.A., R.M.S.d.O., R.F.Z. and V.D.; visualization, L.D.S.A. and G.G.G.; supervision, V.D.; project administration, V.D., R.M.S.d.O. and R.F.Z.; funding acquisition, V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the CPFL, ENERCAN, and BAESA via the R&D project with contract number 00642-2905/2019, which is regulated by the ANEEL R&D program. APC payment has been done via FADESP-UFPA.

Data Availability Statement

The authors reserve the right to not disclose the Eletronorte’s private data sets of laboratorial PD measurements used in this study.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to CPFL, ENERCAN, BAESA, and UFPA for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. PD Power Estimation

This appendix shows the calculation of the parameters needed for discharge power estimation using (6) and (7), for f = 60 Hz. To calculate the capacitance values, the equation
C = εrε0A/h
is used, where εr is the relative permittivity of the layer, ε0 is the electric permittivity of vacuum, A is the electrode area, and h is the layer’s height. The parameters and calculation of the capacitances of the glass layer CD and capacitance of the air gap Cg are shown in Table A1.
Table A1. Parameters and calculation of capacitances CD and Cg.
Table A1. Parameters and calculation of capacitances CD and Cg.
LayerRelative
Permittivity, εr
Area,
A (m2)
Height,
h (mm)
Capacitance,
C (pF/m)
Dielectric
(glass)
3.753.92 × 10−22.0650.78
Air gap13.92 × 10−23.0115.69
The discharge voltage was set to Vd = 1800 V, which is a value that had been observed experimentally as the lower voltage threshold for discharges occurrence in the given reaction chamber. These parameters were used to approximately estimate the power consumption of the discharge, given by (6). The estimated mean power consumption of the micro-discharges as a function of the input voltage is plotted in the dashed line in Figure 11a.

References

  1. Stone, G.C.; Boulter, E.A.; Culbert, I.; Dhirani, H. Electrical Insulation for Rotating Machines: Design, Evaluation, Aging, Testing, and Repair, 1st ed.; Wiley-IEEE Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stone, G.C. Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Motor and Stator Windings—A Review. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2013, 20, 2073–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hudson, G.G.; Loeb, L.B. Streamer Mechanism and Main Stroke in the Filamentary Spark Breakdown in Air as Revealed by Photomultipliers and Fast Oscilloscopic Techniques. Phys. Rev. 1961, 123, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sigmond, R.S. The residual streamer channel: Return strokes and secondary streamers. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 56, 1355–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eichwald, O.; Ducasse, O.; Dubois, D.; Abahazem, A.; Merbahi, N.; Benhenni, M.; Yousfi, M. Experimental analysis and modelling of positive streamer in air: Towards an estimation of O and N radical production. Appl. Phys. Res. 2009, 41, 234002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Esfahani, A.N.; Shahabi, S.; Stone, G.; Kordi, B. Investigation of Corona Partial Discharge Characteristics Under Variable Frequency and Air Pressure. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), San Antonio, TX, USA, 17–20 June 2018; pp. 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  7. de Oliveira, R.M.S.; Nascimento, J.A.S.; Fujiyoshi, D.M.; Lima, T.S.; Sena, A.J.C. A Finite-Difference Time-Domain Formulation for Modeling Air Ionization Breakdown Streamers. J. Microw. Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl. 2022, 21, 427–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Davidson, J. Electron Density and Energy Distributions in the Positive DC Corona: Interpretation for Corona-Enhanced Chemical Reactions. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2002, 22, 199–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yagi, S.; Tanaka, M. Mechanism of ozone generation in air-fed ozonisers. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1979, 12, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Buntat, Z.; Harry, J.; Smith, I. Application of dimensional analysis to ozone production by pulsed streamer discharge in oxygen. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buntat, Z.; Smith, I.; Razali, N. Ozone generation by pulsed streamer discharge in air. Appl. Phys. Res. 2009, 1, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cartlidge, D.M.; Casson, D.W.; Franklin, D.E.; Macdonald, J.A.; Pollock, B.C. Machine Condition Monitoring: Ozone Monitor for Air Cooled Generators. In CEA Report No. 9134 G 864; CEATI International Inc.: Montréal, CA, Canada, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rux, L.M.; Becker, L. Ozone Monitoring and Corrective Actions for an Air-Cooled Hydroelectric Generator Stator Winding. In Proceedings of the Iris Rotating Machine Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 19–22 June 2000; Iris Power: Mississauga, CA, Canada, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lemesch, G. Ozone Measurement—A Diagnosis Tool for PD-Detection in Large Generators. In Proceedings of the Iris Rotating Machine Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 14–17 June 2004; Iris Power: Mississauga, CA, Canada, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Belec, M.; Li, S.; Nguyen, D.; Lepine, L.; Guddemi, C.; Lessard-Deziel, D.; Schwartz, T.; Lamarre, L. Investigation and Diagnosis of a 184-MVa Air-Cooled Generator Heavily Affected by Slot Partial Discharge Activity. In Proceedings of the Electrical Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing Expo, Nashville, TN, USA, 22–24 October 2007; IEEE Service Center: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dehlinger, N.; Stone, G. Surface partial discharge in hydrogenerator stator windings: Causes, symptoms, and remedies. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 36, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Versteeg, H.K.; Malalasekera, W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method; Addison-Wesley: Harlow, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Talaat, M.; El-Zein, A.; Samir, A. Numerical and simulation model of the streamer inception at atmospheric pressure under the effect of a non-uniform electric field. Vacuum 2019, 160, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raouti, D.; Flazi, S.; Benyoucef, D. Modeling and Identification of Electrical Parameters of Positive DC Point-to-Plane Corona Discharge in Dry Air Using RLS Method. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2016, 44, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kitayama, J.; Kuzumoto, M. Analysis of ozone generation from air in silent discharge. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1999, 32, 3032–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, J.; Davidson, J. Ozone Production in the Positive DC Corona Discharge: Model and Comparison to Experiments. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2002, 22, 495–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chung, T.J. Computational Fluid Dynamics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  23. COMSOL Multiphysics® v.5.5. Available online: https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.comsol/COMSOL_ReferenceManual.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  24. Buntat, Z. Ozone Generation Using Electrical Discharges: A Comparative Study between Pulsed Streamer Discharge and Atmospheric Pressure Flow Discharge. Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kogelschatz, U. Advanced ozone generation. In Process Technologies for Water Treatment; Stucki, S., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1988; pp. 87–120. [Google Scholar]
  26. 2B Tech. Ozone Monitor 2B Tech. Model 106-L Ozone Monitor Manual Rev. J-2; 2B Technologies: Broomfield, CO, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fruth, B.; Niemeyer, L.; Hassig, M.; Fuhr, J.; Dunz, T. Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Measurements and Computer Aided Partial Discharge Analysis Performed on Different High Voltage Apparatus. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, 6th ISH, New Orleans, LA, USA, 28 August–1 September 1989; pp. 15.03–15.06. [Google Scholar]
  28. Amorim, H.; de Carvalho, A.; de Oliveira, O.; Levy, A.; Sans, J. Instrumentation for Monitoring and Analysis of Partial Discharges Based on Modular Architecture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE 2008), Chongqing, China, 9–12 November 2008; pp. 596–599. [Google Scholar]
  29. Landeira, V.; Argolo, D.; Amorim, H.; Carvalho, A. Instrumentation for Monitoring and Analysis of Partial Discharges: Viewer and Report Generator. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE), Athens, Greece, 10–13 September 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Amorim, H.; Carvalho, A.; Rodrigues, T.; Borges, J.; Cunha, C. On-site measurements of Partial Discharges through tap of the bushings—Brazilian experience in power transformers. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics (ICSD), Bologna, Italy, 30 June–4 July 2013; pp. 1020–1023. [Google Scholar]
  31. Salam, Z.; Facta, M.; Amjad, M.; Buntat, Z. Design and implementation of a low cost, high yield dielectric barrier discharge ozone generator based on the single switch resonant converter. IET Power Electron. 2013, 6, 1583–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, J.; Tang, M.; Zhou, D.; Kang, P.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, C. Hysteresis characteristics of the initiating and extinguishing boundaries in a nanosecond pulsed DBD. Plasma Sci. Technol. Phys. 2019, 21, 044001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reaction chamber for ozone production: (a) external view and dimensions; (b) longitudinal section, showing the reaction chamber’s main parts; and (c) constructive details and relative positioning of the perforated aluminum plates (electrodes). The inset shows the perforation details. The plates are 3 mm thick.
Figure 1. Reaction chamber for ozone production: (a) external view and dimensions; (b) longitudinal section, showing the reaction chamber’s main parts; and (c) constructive details and relative positioning of the perforated aluminum plates (electrodes). The inset shows the perforation details. The plates are 3 mm thick.
Energies 16 06947 g001
Figure 2. The core part of the experimental setup, in which the reaction chamber, the UV ozone monitor, the high-voltage conductor, the air input hose, and the chamber’s gas output can be seen. In the top left corner, the alignment between the T-junction pipe chamber output and the UV ozone monitor’s inlet particle filter can be observed in detail.
Figure 2. The core part of the experimental setup, in which the reaction chamber, the UV ozone monitor, the high-voltage conductor, the air input hose, and the chamber’s gas output can be seen. In the top left corner, the alignment between the T-junction pipe chamber output and the UV ozone monitor’s inlet particle filter can be observed in detail.
Energies 16 06947 g002
Figure 3. Overview of the experimental setup: the ozone reaction chamber, the ultraviolet monitor 2BTech 106-L, the high-voltage source SERTA ET 4500 CA, and other main devices and parts can be seen. The chamber and UV monitor details can be seen in the previous figure.
Figure 3. Overview of the experimental setup: the ozone reaction chamber, the ultraviolet monitor 2BTech 106-L, the high-voltage source SERTA ET 4500 CA, and other main devices and parts can be seen. The chamber and UV monitor details can be seen in the previous figure.
Energies 16 06947 g003
Figure 4. A graphical representation of the reaction chamber’s numerical model conceived in COMSOL Multiphysics. The main parts of the fluid dynamics pathways are indicated.
Figure 4. A graphical representation of the reaction chamber’s numerical model conceived in COMSOL Multiphysics. The main parts of the fluid dynamics pathways are indicated.
Energies 16 06947 g004
Figure 5. Ozone concentrations obtained in the laboratory over the experiment time for the regimes of increasing and decreasing the RMS voltages: (a) time-averaged ozone concentrations CO3|avg (ppb) and number of micro-discharges, and (b) raw data from continuous UV monitoring of ozone over time. The air velocity at the input hose of the reaction chamber is vin = 2.46 m/s.
Figure 5. Ozone concentrations obtained in the laboratory over the experiment time for the regimes of increasing and decreasing the RMS voltages: (a) time-averaged ozone concentrations CO3|avg (ppb) and number of micro-discharges, and (b) raw data from continuous UV monitoring of ozone over time. The air velocity at the input hose of the reaction chamber is vin = 2.46 m/s.
Energies 16 06947 g005
Figure 6. The electric field distribution, given in kV/mm, which was calculated for an input RMS voltage of 10 kV, obtained using our electromagnetic model of the problem: (a) longitudinal section and (b) 3D view. Electric field strengths below 0.8 kV/mm are not shown since they do not contribute to ozone production.
Figure 6. The electric field distribution, given in kV/mm, which was calculated for an input RMS voltage of 10 kV, obtained using our electromagnetic model of the problem: (a) longitudinal section and (b) 3D view. Electric field strengths below 0.8 kV/mm are not shown since they do not contribute to ozone production.
Energies 16 06947 g006
Figure 7. The distribution of the ozone concentration (ppb) and air velocity vector field obtained numerically for the fluid dynamics pathways in the reaction chamber. The ozone distribution was calculated considering the input RMS voltage of 10 kV. The air velocity at the inlet and outlet ports was 2.46 m/s.
Figure 7. The distribution of the ozone concentration (ppb) and air velocity vector field obtained numerically for the fluid dynamics pathways in the reaction chamber. The ozone distribution was calculated considering the input RMS voltage of 10 kV. The air velocity at the inlet and outlet ports was 2.46 m/s.
Energies 16 06947 g007
Figure 8. The Ozone parameters given as functions of the input RMS voltage ΔV: (a) experimental ozone concentration CO3 obtained at the chamber gas output and (b) the calculated, corresponding ozone reaction rate R by CFD and the proposed Equation (5). The inlet air velocity is 2.46 m/s.
Figure 8. The Ozone parameters given as functions of the input RMS voltage ΔV: (a) experimental ozone concentration CO3 obtained at the chamber gas output and (b) the calculated, corresponding ozone reaction rate R by CFD and the proposed Equation (5). The inlet air velocity is 2.46 m/s.
Energies 16 06947 g008aEnergies 16 06947 g008b
Figure 9. The PD power maps obtained from the experimental PRPD data as the input RMS voltage is increased: (a) for ΔV = 4 kV, and (b) for ΔV = 9 kV; and the PD power maps obtained from the experimental PRPD data as the RMS voltage is decreased: (c) for ΔV = 4 kV, and (d) for ΔV = 9 kV.
Figure 9. The PD power maps obtained from the experimental PRPD data as the input RMS voltage is increased: (a) for ΔV = 4 kV, and (b) for ΔV = 9 kV; and the PD power maps obtained from the experimental PRPD data as the RMS voltage is decreased: (c) for ΔV = 4 kV, and (d) for ΔV = 9 kV.
Energies 16 06947 g009
Figure 10. The absolute PD counts obtained experimentally as functions of the input RMS voltage. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Figure 10. The absolute PD counts obtained experimentally as functions of the input RMS voltage. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Energies 16 06947 g010
Figure 11. The experimental power of PDs versus the input RMS voltage: (a) mean power PM and (b) total (cumulative) power PT. The estimate of PM from (6) seems to agree with the experimental data. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Figure 11. The experimental power of PDs versus the input RMS voltage: (a) mean power PM and (b) total (cumulative) power PT. The estimate of PM from (6) seems to agree with the experimental data. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Energies 16 06947 g011
Figure 12. The reaction rate per total power of PDs’ R/PT as a function of the input RMS voltage. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Figure 12. The reaction rate per total power of PDs’ R/PT as a function of the input RMS voltage. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Energies 16 06947 g012
Figure 13. The reaction rate R as a function of the cumulative power of the micro-discharges PT. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Figure 13. The reaction rate R as a function of the cumulative power of the micro-discharges PT. Black and red arrows indicate increasing and decreasing voltages, respectively.
Energies 16 06947 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira, R.M.S.; Zampolo, R.F.; Alcantara, L.D.S.; Girotto, G.G.; Lopes, F.H.R.; Lopes, N.M.; Brasil, F.S.; Nascimento, J.A.S.; Dmitriev, V. Analysis of Ozone Production Reaction Rate and Partial Discharge Power in a Dielectric-Barrier Acrylic Chamber with 60 Hz High-Voltage Electrodes: CFD and Experimental Investigations. Energies 2023, 16, 6947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196947

AMA Style

de Oliveira RMS, Zampolo RF, Alcantara LDS, Girotto GG, Lopes FHR, Lopes NM, Brasil FS, Nascimento JAS, Dmitriev V. Analysis of Ozone Production Reaction Rate and Partial Discharge Power in a Dielectric-Barrier Acrylic Chamber with 60 Hz High-Voltage Electrodes: CFD and Experimental Investigations. Energies. 2023; 16(19):6947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196947

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira, Rodrigo M. S., Ronaldo F. Zampolo, Licinius D. S. Alcantara, Gustavo G. Girotto, Frederico H. R. Lopes, Nathan M. Lopes, Fernando S. Brasil, Júlio A. S. Nascimento, and Victor Dmitriev. 2023. "Analysis of Ozone Production Reaction Rate and Partial Discharge Power in a Dielectric-Barrier Acrylic Chamber with 60 Hz High-Voltage Electrodes: CFD and Experimental Investigations" Energies 16, no. 19: 6947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196947

APA Style

de Oliveira, R. M. S., Zampolo, R. F., Alcantara, L. D. S., Girotto, G. G., Lopes, F. H. R., Lopes, N. M., Brasil, F. S., Nascimento, J. A. S., & Dmitriev, V. (2023). Analysis of Ozone Production Reaction Rate and Partial Discharge Power in a Dielectric-Barrier Acrylic Chamber with 60 Hz High-Voltage Electrodes: CFD and Experimental Investigations. Energies, 16(19), 6947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop