Next Article in Journal
Advances in Hydrogen-Powered Trains: A Brief Report
Next Article in Special Issue
Transformation of the Polish Heating Sector Based on an Example of Select Heat Energy Companies Supplying Energy to Local Government Units
Previous Article in Journal
Bilinear Quadratic Feedback Control of Modular Multilevel Converters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Influence of Innovation and Technology on Climate Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Precursors of Renewable Energy Portfolio Diversification Using TPB

by
Oana-Daniela Lupoae
*,
Riana Iren Radu
,
Alexandru Capatina
,
Violeta Maria Isai
and
Nicoleta Bărbuță-Mișu
Department of Business Administration, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 800008 Galați, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(18), 6714; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186714
Submission received: 16 August 2023 / Revised: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 13 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:
Renewable energy is produced from natural sources that can regenerate quickly, such as the sun, wind, water, biomass and the earth’s heat. This implies that the resources used do not have a significant negative impact on the environment, which aligns with current concerns for protecting the planet and ecosystems. This study aims to explore the behavior of entrepreneurs regarding the processing of resources that can be introduced in the circular economy and the development of the renewable energy portfolio by transforming horse manure into bioenergy. Employing Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and based on an extensive dataset comprising 104 responses from entrepreneurs engaged in or aspiring to participate in the renewable energy sector, this research reveals a noteworthy finding. Contrary to prevailing expectations, it demonstrates that the perceived interest in safeguarding future resources and the environment among these entrepreneurs is currently low. This study not only enriches the understanding of entrepreneurial behavior within the renewable energy domain but also extends the Theory of Planned Behavior. In doing so, it underscores the critical significance of sustainability factors as drivers of future business development and underscores the need for comprehensive policy initiatives that compel greater commitment to renewable energy and circular economy practices.

1. Introduction

Energy plays an important role in the development of an economy, and its shortage is one of the main problems in developing countries. There is an urgent need to switch to renewable energy sources to save the ecological system and reduce pollution. To meet the demand and need for energy, special attention is paid to alternative sources of renewable energy, such as wind energy, solar energy or energy produced from biomass. Renewable energy, unlike thermal energy, also contributes to sustainable development, as it does not result in any direct emission of greenhouse gases [1].
Global greenhouse gas emissions could be reduced by up to 63% by 2050 by adopting low-carbon and resource-efficient strategies [2].
Renewable energies are essential parts of the energy revolution, in which the goal is to replace the production of fossil fuels with those from renewable sources. Photovoltaic energy and wind energy are such green energies, but they can be quite challenging for entrepreneurs because they are dependent on weather conditions [3]. Biomasses are the sources that can present the greatest impact [4], thus the use of renewable energy produced from manure helps to develop energy independence and fits into the concept of a circular economy, where waste and resources are capitalized and reused in a sustainable way, contributing to reducing the consumption of natural resources [5].
Utilizing horse manure for renewable energy can contribute to the diversification of energy sources in Romania. Reducing dependence on fossil fuels and promoting renewable energy can enhance energy security.
Historically, as it can be seen in Figure 1, Romania has had a significant reliance on coal and natural gas for electricity generation. However, there has been a gradual shift away from coal in favor of cleaner and more sustainable sources.
Romania has a significant hydropower capacity, primarily from its numerous rivers and mountainous regions, wind power and solar photovoltaic (PV) installations. Romania has been making efforts to transition toward a more sustainable and decarbonized energy system, which includes reducing its reliance on fossil fuels and increasing its share of renewables.
In recent years, Romania has shown an increased interest in renewable energy and the development of sustainable energy sources produced by the sun and wind, as can be seen in Figure 2, and a very low interest in other sources, such as the processing of horse manure, presented in Figure 3.
The transformation of manure into bioenergy can be met with skepticism by entrepreneurs due to fears related to investment, technological risk, logistics and the supply of raw materials. However, the transformation of manure into bioenergy can bring significant advantages, including the diversification of economic activity, a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and the promotion of sustainable development, and an important fact is that the behavior of an entrepreneur can influence society’s attitude towards the environment.
On the other hand, it is important for Romanian entrepreneurs to diversify their portfolio regarding green energy and to give greater importance to the environment. Civil society is becoming more and more aware of the negative impact that pollution has, and they tend to appreciate and collaborate more with entrepreneurs educated in the spirit of eco-friendly decisions [6]. Also, Cutcu et al. [7] argued that quality of life is affected by the harmful effects of industrialization, even if it leads to economic growth and commercial openness. Consumers have become aware of these aspects and focus on purchasing products or services from entrepreneurs who adopt cleaner methods and who do not harm the environment.
Based on this research gap, we proposed the following research questions:
RQ1:
Are entrepreneurs’ intentions for exploring renewable energy business opportunities motivated by concerns for sustainability and requirements to protect the environment?
RQ2:
Are entrepreneurs aware of the sustainability of a business and the needs of society in the long term, or do they focus on short-term financial returns?
RQ3:
What behavior is adopted or should be adopted by entrepreneurs in order to diversify their renewable energy portfolio by processing horse manure?
To answer these research questions, the present study proposes a model based on the Theory of Planned Behavior [8]. According to the cognitive Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), an individual’s decision to engage in a certain action can be influenced by their level of motivation to carry it out. The greater an entrepreneur’s purpose in undertaking sustainable behavior, the greater the chance of developing it. The adoption of renewable energy through manure processing can be influenced by perceived behavioral control, environmental attitude, cost value and social influence.
This research is based on the use of PLS-SEM structural equations, where it is examined by extracting the linear correlations of the observed variables under which conditions entrepreneurs want to change their sustainable behavior and where the desire for change in the production of renewable energy should be encouraged more. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of entrepreneurs’ attitude towards sustainable behavior.
Green energy from organic waste, like horse manure, is a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels. In regions where horse breeding or agriculture is a significant industry, investing in horse-manure-based green energy can support rural development by creating jobs and providing additional income streams for local communities.
This study brings an element of novelty by understanding entrepreneurs’ attitude in this area, because it can accelerate this transition to reducing carbon footprints and contributing to a healthier planet. Entrepreneurial interest often drives innovation. Studying entrepreneurs’ interest in horse-manure-based green energy can lead to the development of improved technologies.
By delving into the motivations, awareness and behavioral patterns of entrepreneurs in the renewable energy sector, we hope to contribute valuable insights that can guide policy decisions and societal perspectives on environmental responsibility.
The structure of our study is outlined as follows: We begin with an exploration of the literature and theoretical foundations, followed by a detailed methodology section elucidating our employment of SEM-PLS and TPB. We then present our empirical findings and discuss their implications for both the entrepreneurial community and the broader field of sustainable energy. By investigating the behavior of entrepreneurs who are transforming horse manure into bioenergy, this study not only contributes valuable insights but also advances the cause of eco-friendly, renewable energy solutions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Circular Economy

Over time, humans have exerted continuous pressure on the natural environment through the excessive use of resources and the generation of waste. The circular economy has emerged as a potential solution for solving these problems.
Kirchherr et al. [9] tried to find a widely accepted definition of the circular economy but found that it has been defined in almost as many ways as there are researchers and practitioners, but the one common denominator in all definitions is the effort to better use resources. The circular economy involves building a balance between the use of existing resources and energy needs [10].
The depletion of natural resources continues to accelerate, while mountains of waste still accumulate [11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to minimize resource exploitation and maximize the reintroduction of waste into the economy.
The environment can be negatively affected from an ecological point of view also by animal waste, but seen from another perspective, manure can be a valuable resource if it is introduced into the circular economy due to nitrogen and phosphorus, which can be important sources for the production of energy [12]. Yildizbasi [13] considered that an important section of the circular economy is the field of energy, because energy is needed to make some products or perform some services.
The circular economy has been implemented for hundreds of years, where byproducts from one industry form inputs for another [14]; so, the circular economy undoubtedly has significant potential for sustainability. Suárez-Eiroa et al. [15] argue that the circular economy operates under the banner of a sustainable development framework.
The circular economy plays an important role in reducing environmental pollution, as it includes a large potential for decarbonization [16]. However, it must be taken into account that the reduction in emissions from one economic activity may lead to their increase in another. Murray et al. [17] explained how palm oil transformed into biofuel can reduce dependence on fossil fuels but contribute to the accelerated deforestation of palm trees.
The circular economy can contribute to the sustainability of an enterprise or a country, but to prevent inappropriate measures, the weak relationship between the circular economy and sustainable development should be strengthened and rethought [18].
Some principles of the circular economy emerged long ago from resource management, before the sustainable development debate, because waste management has always been an integral part of a community [19].
Kirchherr et al. [9] argue that the circular economy aims to contribute to sustainable development, but various factors have been found to either accelerate or hinder the development of sustainable businesses [5].
The purpose of any business model is to create value, and a business model can only be profitable in the long term if it is able to create value for all actors involved. Business models based on the circular economy can increase long-term financial returns and reduce costs [20].
Circular economy business models are considered to offer the opportunity to enhance social and environmental well-being in an economically viable way [21] and create a better image for the firm [22].

2.2. Renewable Energy Based on Horse Manure Processing

Both the reduction in waste and the development of new ways of reusing it are central objectives in the transition to a circular economy [23]. Business models that capitalize on waste traded on the global market have become quite common in many industries and the target of considerable academic interest [18].
Instead of finding optimal solutions for processing waste, some entrepreneurs have to pay considerable amounts of money to dispose of it. Manure serves as an example of a waste that has negative value to the farmer, because it is continuously generated and difficult to process cost-effectively [24]. It is rich in nitrogen, which means that it is harmful to the environment, especially to rivers and lakes, and to a certain extent, it can be considered dangerous because it can spread diseases [25].
A very important source of energy, but still unexploited to its true potential, is the manure produced by horses. It has been shown that the composition of this type of waste is the most feasible to produce energy, but the implementation costs represent a barrier for entrepreneurs [26].
As pseudoruminants, horse manure is the most ideal compost material due to its high ammonium nitrogen ratio [27]. Since ancient times, this product has been used to fertilize soils and crops and can be an asset if it is managed properly. However, before manure can be legally used as fertilizer, it must be burned or stored for up to nine months [28], and this creates a storage problem and increases costs for an entrepreneur. The correct use of manure promotes sustainable agriculture and increases the production of agricultural crops, while contributing to the recovery and reuse of resources, according to the concept of circular economy.
Due to strict regulations on fertilizers, only a limited amount of manure can be used as fertilizer in agriculture, which makes the disposal of manure quite expensive [29,30,31]. A manure management system that provides the opportunity to utilize it in an ecologically sustainable way would be ideal [32].
Horse manure is generated in the millions of tones in horse-rich countries such as the UK, Germany and France. Horses produce from 18 to 25 kg of manure per day depending on feed, bedding and cleaning systems [33] and can be an important source of income for some entrepreneurs, as it can be used in the production of biogas by extracting lignocellulosic fibers [32]. During anaerobic digestion, lignocellulosic biomass is converted into biogas [34], and biogas produced from manure processing mainly contains methane, which is a much stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.
By capturing and using biogas, methane emissions into the atmosphere are reduced, thus contributing to the fight against climate change, and in addition, it generates renewable energy that can be used to power electrical systems, as well as to produce heat and thermal energy. This contributes to diversifying the energy source and reducing dependence on fossil fuels [35].
The livestock sector is currently facing pressure on sustainability, and the contribution of animals to protecting the environment is often underestimated, as many entrepreneurs or horse owners do not apply recommended manure management practices and a large amount of nutrients can be lost to the environment, which leads to air, water and soil contamination [36].
Entrepreneurs can collaborate with farms and equine centers to gain access to significant amounts of manure. These collaborations can be mutually beneficial, as the entrepreneur obtains the raw material needed for renewable energy production and farmers can reduce waste management costs.

2.3. The Theory of Planned Behavior in Sustainable Entrepreneurship

The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) can be applied in entrepreneurship to understand and improve the behaviors and decisions of entrepreneurs. The TPB was developed by Ajzen [8] in the field of social psychology and is used to predict and explain human behavior in various contexts, including sustainable entrepreneurship.
To study the behavior and motivations of an energy entrepreneur, it was considered appropriate to apply the TPB because it is a well-established theory to predict behavior through intention. Although intention may not always lead to behavior, many studies show that intention is a valid predictor of behavior for various subjects [37].
Behavioral intention is a person’s motivation in terms of their conscious plan, decision or self-instruction to exert effort to achieve the target behavior [38].
TPB is also concerned with environmental behavior research, which examines sustainable and conscious behavior in terms of consumption, energy, food and mobility [39]. The application of the TPB helps to analyze the concern for the environment of the electricity entrepreneurs, the attitude towards the development of the renewable energy portfolio and the subjective norms and financial skills for the intention to use renewable energy through the processing of manure [40].
Climate change has a significant impact on the whole world, and to recover from the crisis situation we are in, altering societal behavior and focusing on technical innovations can help solve the problems [41]. Gansser and Reich [39] argue the same and explain how changes in human behavior and technical innovations can remedy the problems of environmental pollution and avoid a climate catastrophe. Entrepreneurs can assess their level of control over the business environment and develop strategies to cope with the uncertainties and risks of the global economy.
At first, it was thought that investing in the development of technology could fix the problems facing humanity, but over time, some studies have shown that changing society’s behavior towards a sustainable one and adopting an environmentally friendly lifestyle are more important than the development of new technologies [41].
As Conner and Sparks [42] argue, behaviors must be understood not only in terms of beliefs, values, perceived norms and perceived control but also in terms of the individual’s behavioral history and the broader social influences that may be operative.
Therefore, the application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in sustainable entrepreneurship can contribute to the understanding and optimization of the behaviors and decisions of entrepreneurs, thus supporting the development of their business and increasing the chances of success.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample and Data Collection

To test the hypotheses of this study, a questionnaire (Appendix A) was sent online to entrepreneurs who own photovoltaic parks, wind parks or have the intention of developing a business in the energy sector. This research focused on the evaluation of the interest shown for expanding a business based on renewable energy by processing horse manure into bioenergy. Willaby et al. [43] argued that a sample size of 100 is sufficient for the application of the Partial Least Squares method, which is used in this research. Therefore, the 104 answers collected and validated can be considered sufficient for this study. The characteristics of the respondents from different areas of Romania and from different areas of activation can be found in Table 1.
It can be seen that most respondents are female, with ages between 20–35 years, and with fewer than 5 years of entrepreneurial experience.
The main hypothesis and data from which this study started, according to Table 2, were based on the assessment of an entrepreneur’s interest by applying the Theory of Planned Behavior, the main components being the following:
  • Perceived behavioral control: The degree to which the entrepreneur believes that the actions and results related to their business influence the level of environmental pollution and how they can stop this aspect.
  • Attitude: The entrepreneur’s perspective toward a particular action or decision in relation to the business. It is about the subjective assessment of the potential benefits and consequences of an action, such as the storage and processing of horse manure.
  • Subjective norms: The entrepreneur’s perceptions regarding achieving the highest possible profit regardless of the consequences. These rules can ensure a certain status in the family, among friends, investors or other people from their business environment.
Following these aspects, entrepreneurs in the field of renewable energy can evaluate their attitude towards different aspects of the business, such as innovation, risk taking or developing a business plan by expanding the object of activity through manure processing.
In order to identify the intentions of entrepreneurs in the field of renewable energy, we conducted research starting from the hypotheses presented in Table 3.
As a research method, we selected Structural Equation Modeling, using the Partial Least Squares method. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) is an advanced analysis technique used to assess complex relationships between latent variables in scientific research and data analysis [54]. The purpose of this modeling is to identify important covariance-based modeling constructs.

3.2. Conceptual Model

The conceptual model presented in Figure 4 reflects the links between the latent variables, as well as the formative and reflective measurement models of the variables.
Structural models allow the representation of hypotheses and relationships between latent variables, which are examined when PLS-SEM is applied [55]. The structural model presented in Figure 1 presents four latent variables (ECHM, AHMM, IUHM and FBHMP), and the indicators contain the research results, evaluated through a 5-point Likert scale (from 1—Total disagreement to 5—Total agreement).

4. Results

The structural model in Figure 5 shows us that the financial benefits (FBHMP) that can be obtained from the transformation of manure into renewable energy can arouse entrepreneurs’ concern for environmental protection (ECHM) (correlation coefficient 0.670), but entrepreneurs’ concern for environmental pollution does not represent a sufficiently important factor to develop their business portfolio through garbage processing (negative correlation coefficient 0.018).
However, there is interest in developing a sustainable business model through horse manure resulting in renewable energy only if the financial benefits that can be obtained are as expected (relationship coefficient 0.640).
The relationship coefficients are calculated by SmartPLS 4 software and illustrated in Figure 3. The variables Environmental concerns related to horse manure (ECHM), Attitude to horse manure management (AHMM) and Financial benefits of horse manure processing (FBHMP) explain 67.8% of the variance in the variable Intention to use horse manure as renewable energy (IUHM) (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.678).
The variables FBHMP and ECHM explain 65.2% of the variance of the endogenous variable AHMM (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.652), and the variable FBHMP explains 44.9% of the variance of the endogenous variable ECHM (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.449).
An evaluation of the reflective measurement model was also conducted by determining the level of consistency, level of confidence and convergent validity.
Cronbach’s Alpha tests the validity of internal consistency by reflecting how correlated the variables are within the structural model, as can be seen in Table 4. The minimum threshold accepted for this indicator is 0.7, validating only the reflective variables AHMM, FBHMP and IUHM, ECHM being below the threshold at the value of 0.659.
The Composite Reliability (CR) is an indicator of reliability, and acceptable values are generally considered above the threshold of 0.7. For this model, the situation is similar to Cronbach’s Alpha, the ECHM variable being below the minimum accepted threshold.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Rho) is a non-parametric test used to measure the magnitude of association between two variables, where the value r = 1 means a perfect positive correlation and the value r = −1 means a perfect negative correlation. In Table 4, it can be seen that all reflective variables have a positive correlation.
Average variance extracted (AVE) assesses the convergent validity of the model and measures the variance that is captured by a variable relative to the variance due to measurement error. It can be seen that all variables have an AVE above the recommended threshold of 0.5.
The Fornell–Larcker criterion compares the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE) with the correlation of the latent variables. It is recommended that the square root of the AVE of each reflective variable has a higher value than the correlations with other latent variables, a fact confirmed in this empirical research (as the AVE values for AHMM (0.839), ECHM (0.770), FBHMP (0.829) and IUHM (0.919) are higher than the correlations with the other latent variables, illustrated below the main diagonal in Table 5).
The Heterotrait Monotrait Correlation Ratio (HTMT) manages to achieve a higher degree of reliability compared with the cross-loading criterion and the Fornell–Lacker criterion. HTMT values close to 1 indicate a lack of discriminant validity. If the HTMT value is greater than this threshold, it can be concluded that there is a lack of discriminant validity. Most statisticians recommend a minimum threshold of 0.85.
In case of this research, the HTMT is below the threshold of 0.85 only in the case of the structural relationships between the variables AHMM and IUHM, respectively, ECHM and IUHM—Table 6.
PLS-SEM relies on a non-parametric bootstrap procedure to test the significance of relationship coefficients estimated in PLS-SEM. The parameter estimates are used to obtain standard errors for the estimates. With this information, T-test values and asymptotic significances (p-values) are calculated to assess the significance of each estimate and validate or reject the research hypotheses.
Figure 6 reflects the structural model generated after applying the bootstrap procedure, in which the asymptotic significance values (p-value) are highlighted on the link relationships between the latent variables.
Only four hypotheses out of six are validated (Table 7), the p-value exceeds the maximum significance level allowed of 0.05 for the hypothesis ECHM-IUHM (0.855 > 0.05) and AHMM-IUHM (0.078 > 0.05)
The t-test shows the magnitude of the correlation between the latent variables in this structural model. Thus, according to Figure 7, the financial benefits (FBHMP) can have the strongest impact on entrepreneurs to develop their business, taking into account the protection of the environment by processing manure into bioenergy (ECHM) (T-test = 13.794, p-value tends to zero).
Concern for the environment (ECHM) has the lowest impact on the decision to develop a sustainable business model based on the production of renewable energy through horse manure (IUHM), (t-test = 0.183, p value = 0.855).

5. Discussion

Attitude, perceived behavioral control and subjective norms are significant predictors of entrepreneurial intention used in the TPB, and the present study presents the intention of entrepreneurs regarding the development of a business in the field of energy by processing horse manure. The use of renewable energies helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, implicitly, to reduce climate change. Diversifying the renewable energy portfolio by processing horse manure can be an innovative idea for entrepreneurs. This approach involves turning organic waste, such as manure, into biogas and other renewable energy sources. To face the environmental challenges, the development of the renewable energy portfolio would be an optimal solution, as it would represent a basic pillar of energy security and sustainable development in both developed and developing countries [56].
Tang [57] argued that the attitude and traits of an entrepreneur mostly influence the evolution of a society. Given the technological evolution and increasing demand for clean energy, entrepreneurs can find a favorable environment here for business development. Therefore, entrepreneurs who engage in such businesses make a significant contribution in the fight against global warming and environmental pollution.
Communities and consumers show more and more concern for protecting the environment and adopting sustainable solutions, improving quality of life and creating new jobs as social benefits [58]. Thus, entrepreneurs who develop businesses in the field of renewable energies can benefit from a positive image and can more easily attract loyal customers.
Lortie and Castogovianni [59] argued that the link between intentions and the ability of entrepreneurs to identify opportunities should be further examined. However, according to the present study, the surveyed entrepreneurs did not show such a great interest in sustainability and the environment in the development of renewable energy portfolios through the processing of horse manure (RQ1). Zuk and Zuk [60] noted that one of the reasons why entrepreneurs are afraid to apply or develop their business for a sustainable purpose is related to the cost of the energy transition and the implementation of the sustainable project. Allocating funds for research and development in horse manure conversion technologies, especially to improve efficiency and reduce costs, can encourage entrepreneurs to diversify their energy portfolio.
Another solution for accelerating the transition towards diversifying the portfolio with renewable energies can be represented by intersectoral partnerships [61]. However, the attitude of entrepreneurs towards ecological factors may differ depending on the company’s objective and its need to be placed on the market.
It is important to emphasize that entrepreneurs may have different perspectives on the sustainability of a business, and their priorities may vary depending on the economic, social and legislative context in which they operate. Entrepreneurs must carry out detailed market research on the potential of processing manure into renewable energy. This includes analyzing the technologies available to produce biogas and other forms of energy, assessing the demand for renewable energy in the region and identifying possible partnerships or government support.
For some entrepreneurs, the main objective may be to achieve maximum financial return in the short term, without necessarily focusing on sustainability or long-term social and environmental impact. On the other hand, Mustafa et al. [1] stated that if entrepreneurs and others are aware of the benefits that their business can have on the environment, they would be much more determined to invest in biomass-based renewable energy. Yi [62] claims that a rather important role in environmental protection is green entrepreneurship, and an important factor for achieving this requirement is the implementation of ecological entrepreneurial education in school.
There is an acute need to protect communities and the environment and at the same time increase energy independence [63]. Governments and international organizations support the development of renewable energies through policies, subsidy programs and tax incentives. These measures encourage entrepreneurs to invest in such projects, reducing financial risks and facilitating the growth of the sector. Therefore, these financial benefits may be the main reason why an entrepreneur decides to develop a renewable energy business and is less aware of business sustainability factors or long-term societal needs (RQ2).
Sung and Park [64] describe the relationship between sustainability and entrepreneurship as a trade-off relationship—the greater the social and environmental consideration, the lower the economic benefits—but entrepreneurs should strive to achieve a balance between the two key concepts in economics.
Diversifying renewable energy portfolios through manure processing can be a promising initiative for entrepreneurs, with significant ecological and economic benefits. With appropriate research, infrastructure investment and strategic collaborations, this approach can help create a sustainable renewable energy business model (RQ3).

6. Conclusions

The results of this study highlight the influence of factors driving entrepreneurial intentions among energy entrepreneurs. The TPB basic model was tested in the context of sustainable entrepreneurship by processing the manure produced by horses, finding that attitudes towards sustainability, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control determine entrepreneurial intentions from the perspective of economic–financial interests but less from sustainable ones. Kuckertz and Wagner [65] studied individuals’ concern with sustainability issues and found that the exploitation of sustainable-development-oriented entrepreneurial opportunities disappears as business experience is gained.
Developing a business through manure processing is an initiative with multiple benefits, and this research can contribute to changing the attitude and level of awareness of entrepreneurs regarding increasing the sustainability and profitability of a business. It is important to encourage partnerships between research institutions, businesses and government agencies to accelerate innovation and knowledge sharing.
This study was carried out on a sample of entrepreneurs from Romania, but it would be interesting to expand it internationally in order to have a comparative analysis of the results.
This research provides valuable information, as it supports the utility of the TPB in the field of green energy and explains under what conditions entrepreneurs’ attitudes, social norms and control beliefs toward green energy will affect their behavioral intentions. However, measuring these constructs can be difficult, because they are subjective and can vary across context and time.
Studying entrepreneurs’ interest in this field can foster international collaboration and knowledge sharing, as green energy solutions from organic waste can be applied in various regions facing similar environmental and waste management challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.-D.L. and A.C.; methodology, A.C.; software, A.C.; validation, R.I.R.; formal analysis, N.B.-M.; investigation, R.I.R.; resources, V.M.I.; data curation, V.M.I.; writing—original draft preparation, O.-D.L.; writing—review and editing, A.C.; visualization, R.I.R.; project administration, O.-D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

  • I care about soil, water and air pollution due to the non-compostable horse manure.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • I care about the waste of horse manure, which could be used as source of renewable energy.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • Horse manure processing represents a source of bio-fertilizers with high impact on ecological agriculture.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • Horse manure turned into renewable energy could ensure energy independence.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • Renewable energy resulting from horse manure isn’t a seasonal activity, as it doesn’t depend on specific weather conditions.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • My colleagues support the idea to diversify our activities toward the inclusion of horse manure processing.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • The existence of non-refundable funds opportunities offers advantages to identify our business portfolio including horse manure.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • Governmental aids provide support to entrepreneurs for renewable energy field.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • I intend to optimize renewable energy structure by adding horse manure processing in our activities.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • I am highly motivated to develop our business model through the processing of horse manure.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    either agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • I would like to process horse manure to gain new competitive advantages.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree
  • I intend to apply best practices on renewable energy through horse manure from other countries.
    o
    Strongly disagree
    o
    Disagree
    o
    Neither agree nor disagree
    o
    Agree
    o
    Strongly agree

References

  1. Mustafa, S.; Zhang, W.; Sohail, M.T.; Rana, S.; Long, Y. A moderated mediation model to predict the adoption intention of renewable wind energy in developing countries. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Wit, M.; Verstraeten-Jochemsen, J.; Hoogzaad, J.; Kubbinga, B.; Von Daniels, C.; Steenmeijer, M.; Colloricchio, A.; Alvila, D.; Friedl, H.; Douma, A.; et al. Circle Economy, C. 2019. Circularity Gap Report. 2019. Available online: https://shiftingparadigms.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CGR-2.0-report-final-reprint-web-20190326.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  3. Lupoae, O.D.; Radu, R.I. Entrepreneurial opportunities through the recycling of renewable resources in the equestrian sector: An fsQCA approach. In Proceedings of the 16th International Management Conference “Management and Resilience Strategies for a Post-Pandemic Future”, Bucharest, Romania, 3–4 November 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. D’Adamo, I.; Morone, P.; Huisingh, D. Bioenergy: A sustainable shift. Energies 2021, 14, 5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tura, N.; Ahola, T. Towards a circular economy by leveraging hazardous resources: A case study of Fortum HorsePower. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cutcu, I.; Ozkok, Y.; Golpek, F. Environment, education, and economy nexus: Evidence from selected EU countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 7474–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cutcu, I.; Beyaz, A.; Gerlikhan, S.G.; Kilic, Y. Is ecological footprint related to foreign trade? Evidence from the top ten fastest developing countries in the global economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 413, 137517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Re-Sources Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mutezo, G.; Mulopo, J. A review of Africa’s transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy using circular economy principles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Velenturf, A.P.; Purnell, P. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hollas, C.E.; Rodrigues, H.C.; Oyadomari, V.M.A.; Bolsan, A.C.; Venturin, B.; Bonassa, G.; Tápparo, D.C.; Abilhôa, H.C.Z.; Ferri da Silva, J.F.; Michelon, W.; et al. The potential of animal manure management pathways toward a circular economy: A bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 73599–73621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yildizbasi, A. Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era. Renew. Energy 2021, 176, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Desrochers, P.; Leppälä, S. Industrial symbiosis: Old wine in recycled bottles? Some perspective from the history of economic and geographical thought. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2010, 33, 338–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suárez-Eiroa, B.; Fernández, E.; Méndez-Martínez, G.; Soto-Oñate, D. Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barrett, J.; Scott, K. Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Murray, A.; Skene, K.; Haynes, K. The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and ap-plication in a global context. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reike, D.; Vermeulen, W.J.; Witjes, S. The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0?—Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Re-Sources Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 246–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced inter-play of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antikainen, M.; Valkokari, K. A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2016, 6, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bocken, N.M.; De Pauw, I.; Bakker, C.; Van Der Grinten, B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016, 33, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brennan, G.; Tennant, M.; Blomsma, F. 10 Business and production solutions Closing loops and the circular economy. In Sustainability: Key Issues; Kopnina, H., Shoreman-Ouimet, E., Eds.; Key Issues in Environment and Sustainability; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK; EarthScan: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 219–239. ISBN 9780415529860. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rynk, R. Status of dairy manure composting in North America. Compost. Sci. Util. 1994, 2, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Airaksinen, S.; Heinonen-Tanski, H.; Heiskanen, M.L. Quality of different bedding materials and their influence on the composability of horse manure. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2001, 21, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Svanberg, M.; Finnsgård, C.; Flodén, J.; Lundgren, J. Analyzing animal waste-to-energy supply chains: The case of horse manure. Renew. Energy 2018, 129, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mutungwazi, A.; Awosusi, A.; Matambo, T.S. Comparative functional microbiome profiling of various animal manures during their anaerobic digestion in biogas production processes. Biomass Bioenergy 2023, 170, 106728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eriksson, O.; Hadin, Å.; Hennessy, J.; Jonsson, D. Life Cycle Assessment of Horse Manure Treatment. Energies 2016, 9, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 Concerning the Protection of Waters against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A31991L0676 (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  30. Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the Reduction of National Emissions of Certain Atmospheric Pollutants, Amending Directive 2003/35/EC and Repealing Directive 2001/81/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2016.344.01.0001.01.ENG (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  31. Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 Providing for Public Participation in Respect of the Drawing up of Certain Plans and Programs Relating to the Environment and Amending with Regard to Public Participation and Access to Justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32003L0035 (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  32. Weiland, K.; Alge, K.; Mautner, A.; Bauer, A.; Bismarck, A. Horse manure as resource for biogas and nanoligno-cellulosic fibres. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 372, 128688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Böske, J.; Wirth, B.; Garlipp, F.; Mumme, J.; Van den Weghe, H. Anaerobic digestion of horse dung mixed with different bedding materials in an upflow solid-state (UASS) reactor at mesophilic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 158, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kalaiselvan, N.; Glivin, G.; Bakthavatsalam, A.K.; Mariappan, V.; Premalatha, M.; Raveendran, P.S.; Jayaraj, S.; Sekhar, S.J. A waste to energy technology for Enrichment of biomethane generation: A review on operating parameters, types of bio-digesters, solar assisted heating systems, socio economic benefits and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 293, 133486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bui, V.D.; Vu, H.P.; Nguyen, H.P.; Duong, X.Q.; Nguyen, D.T.; Pham, M.T.; Nguyen, P.Q.P. Techno-economic assessment and logistics management of biomass in the conversion progress to bioenergy. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 55, 102991. [Google Scholar]
  36. Marques-dos-Santos, C.; Serra, J.; Attard, G.; Marchaim, U.; Calvet, S.; Amon, B. Available Technical Options for Manure Management in Environmentally Friendly and Circular Livestock Production. In Technology for Environmentally Friendly Livestock Production; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 147–176. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ajzen, I. EBOOK: Attitudes, Personality and Behavior; McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  38. Conner, M. Theory of planned behavior. In Handbook of Sport Psychology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gansser, O.A.; Reich, C.S. Influence of the new ecological paradigm (NEP) and environmental concerns on pro-environmental behavioral intention based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 382, 134629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liobikienė, G.; Dagiliūtė, R.; Juknys, R. The determinants of renewable energy usage intentions using theory of planned behaviour approach. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Von Borgstede, C.; Andersson, M.; Johnsson, F. Public attitudes to climate change and carbon mitigation—Implications for energy-associated behaviors. Energy Policy 2013, 57, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Conner, M.; Sparks, P. Theory of planned behavior and the reasoned action approach. In Predicting and Changing Health Behavior: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models; Open University Press: Berkshire, UK, 2015; Volume 3, pp. 142–188. [Google Scholar]
  43. Willaby, H.W.; Costa, D.S.; Burns, B.D.; MacCann, C.; Roberts, R.D. Testing complex models with small sample sizes: A historical overview and empirical demonstration of what partial least squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2015, 84, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bakry, W.; Mallik, G.; Nghiem, X.H.; Sinha, A.; Vo, X.V. Is green finance really “green”? Examining the long-run relationship between green finance, renewable energy and environmental performance in developing countries. Renew. Energy 2023, 208, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Z.; Umar, M.; Su, C.W.; Mirza, N. Renewable energy, credit portfolios and intermediation spread: Evidence from the banking sector in BRICS. Renew. Energy 2023, 208, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chiumenti, A.; Owono, B.O.; da Borso, F. Biomethane potential of fresh horse manure and straw-based litter. In Proceedings of the 2023 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Omaha, NE, USA, 9–12 July 2023; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2023; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cholis, N.; Nursita, I.W. Biological Quality of Horse Manure Compost with the Addition of Azotobacter Culture Based on the Vegetative Growth of Pennisetum purpureum and Glycine max (L) Merill. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Animal Industry 2022 (ICESAI 2022), Malang, Indonesia, 13 October 2022; Atlantis Press: Zhengzhou, China, 2023; pp. 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  48. Heller, R.; Roth, P.; Hülsemann, B.; Böttinger, S.; Lemmer, A.; Oechsner, H. Effects of Pretreatment with a Ball Mill on Methane Yield of Horse Manure. Waste Biomass Valorization 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Havukainen, J.; Väisänen, S.; Rantala, T.; Saunila, M.; Ukko, J. Environmental impacts of manure management based on life cycle assessment approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 264, 121576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mustapha, H.I.; Okeke, O.S. Management and Remediation of Polluted Soils Using Fertilizer, Sawdust and Horse Manure Under Changing Tropical Conditions. In Soil-Water, Agriculture, and Climate Change: Exploring Linkages; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 205–232. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rout, P.R.; Pandey, D.S.; Haynes-Parry, M.; Briggs, C.; Manuel, H.L.C.; Umapathi, R.; Panigrahi, S.; Goel, M. Sustainable valorization of animal manures via thermochemical conversion technologies: An inclusive review on recent trends. Waste Biomass Valorization 2023, 14, 553–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sharma, B.; Tiwari, S.; Kumawat, K.C.; Cardinale, M. Nano-biofertilizers as bio-emerging strategies for sustainable agriculture development: Potentiality and their limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 860, 160476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zastempowski, M. Analysis and modeling of innovation factors to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources-Evidence from European Union enterprises. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 178, 113262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Richter, N.F.; Hauff, S.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling and complementary methods in international management research. Manag. Int. Rev. 2022, 62, 449–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hair, J.; Alamer, A. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Res. Methods Appl. Linguist. 2022, 1, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gatto, A.; Drago, C. When renewable energy, empowerment, and entrepreneurship connect: Measuring energy policy effectiveness in 230 countries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 78, 101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tang, J.J. Psychological capital and entrepreneurship sustainability. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular economy–From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lortie, J.; Castogiovanni, G. The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research: What we know and future directions. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2015, 11, 935–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Żuk, P.; Żuk, P. On the socio-cultural determinants of polish entrepreneurs’ attitudes towards the development of renewable energy: Business, climate skepticism ideology and climate change. Energies 2021, 14, 3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Furmankiewicz, M.; Hewitt, R.J.; Janc, K.; Kazak, J.K. Europeanisation of energy policy and area-based partnerships: Regional diversity of interest in renewable energy sources in local development strategies in Poland. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Proceedings of the 6th World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–11 September 2020; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 609, p. 012033. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yi, G. From green entrepreneurial intentions to green entrepreneurial behaviors: The role of university entrepreneurial support and external institutional support. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2021, 17, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Surya, B.; Suriani, S.; Menne, F.; Abubakar, H.; Idris, M.; Rasyidi, E.S.; Remmang, H. Community empowerment and utilization of renewable energy: Entrepreneurial perspective for community resilience based on sustainable management of slum settlements in Makassar City, Indonesia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sung, C.S.; Park, J.Y. Sustainability orientation and entrepreneurship orientation: Is there a tradeoff relationship between them? Sustainability 2018, 10, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kuckertz, A.; Wagner, M. The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. J. Bus. Ventur. 2010, 25, 524–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Romania electricity generation by source. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Figure 1. Romania electricity generation by source. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Energies 16 06714 g001
Figure 2. The evolution of electricity generation by wind and solar power. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Figure 2. The evolution of electricity generation by wind and solar power. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Energies 16 06714 g002
Figure 3. The evolution of electricity generation by other renewables. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Figure 3. The evolution of electricity generation by other renewables. Source: https://ember-climate.org, accessed on 4 September 2023.
Energies 16 06714 g003
Figure 4. The structural research model. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Figure 4. The structural research model. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Energies 16 06714 g004
Figure 5. Highlighting the correlation coefficients within the structural model. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Figure 5. Highlighting the correlation coefficients within the structural model. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Energies 16 06714 g005
Figure 6. Asymptotic p- and t-test significance values. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Figure 6. Asymptotic p- and t-test significance values. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Energies 16 06714 g006
Figure 7. Determining the p-values associated with the relations between the model variables after applying the bootstrap procedure. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Figure 7. Determining the p-values associated with the relations between the model variables after applying the bootstrap procedure. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Energies 16 06714 g007
Table 1. Sample demographics.
Table 1. Sample demographics.
CharacteristicPercentage
GenderMale39.4%
Female57.7%
I prefer not to answer2.9%
Group ageLess than 20 years10.6%
Between 20 and 35 years47.1%
Between 36 and 50 years old20.2%
Older than 50 years22.1%
Entrepreneurial experienceWithout experience0%
Less than 5 years64.4%
Between 5 and 10 years18.3%
More than 10 years17.3%
Source: issued by the authors.
Table 2. Main constructs used in the conceptual model and hypotheses.
Table 2. Main constructs used in the conceptual model and hypotheses.
Latent VariablesAcronymIndicatorsSource
Environmental concerns related to horse manureECHM
  • Care about soil, water and air pollution due to non-compostable horse manure.
  • Care about horse manure, which could be used as source of renewable energy.
  • Processing horse manure as a source of bio-fertilizers with high impact on ecological agriculture.
[3,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]
Attitude to horse manure managementAHMM
  • Horse manure turned into renewable energy could ensure the energy independency.
  • Continuous production of renewable energy through the processing of manure due to the independence of meteorological conditions
  • Support of colleagues to diversify the activities toward the inclusion of horse manure processing.
Financial benefits of horse manure processingFBHMP
  • Existence of non-refundable funds to develop business portfolios, including the processing of horse manure.
  • Existence of governmental aids to support entrepreneurs in the renewable energy field.
  • Optimize renewable energy structure by adding horse manure processing
Intention to use horse manure as renewable energyIUHM
  • I am highly motivated to develop our business model through the processing of horse manure.
  • I would like to process horse manure to gain new competitive advantages.
  • I intend to apply best practices on renewable energy through horse manure from other countries.
Source: issued by the authors.
Table 3. Research hypotheses.
Table 3. Research hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1The pollution of the environment by horse manure produced represents for entrepreneurs an important factor in taking the decision to develop their business portfolio based on renewable energy.ECHM → IUHM
Hypothesis 2The concern for the environment determines the entrepreneurs to take an attitude towards improper management regarding the storage and processing of horse manure.ECHM → AHMM
Hypothesis 3The attitude of entrepreneurs towards manure management can significantly influence the development of a sustainable business based on renewable energy through the processing of horse manure.AHMM → IUHM
Hypothesis 4The financial benefits that can be obtained from the transformation of manure into renewable energy can arouse the interest of entrepreneurs to protect the environment.FBHMP → ECHM
Hypothesis 5The financial benefits that can be obtained by processing horse manure lead entrepreneurs to adopt an attitude towards its management and storage conditions.FBHMP → AHMM
Hypothesis 6The financial benefits that can be obtained from the processing of manure arouse the interest of entrepreneurs in renewable energy.FBHMP → IUHM
Source: issued by the authors.
Table 4. Assessment of the internal consistency and convergent validity in the case of the reflective measurement model.
Table 4. Assessment of the internal consistency and convergent validity in the case of the reflective measurement model.
Cronbach’s AlphaComposite Reliability (rho_a)Composite Reliability (rho_c)Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
AHMM0.7930.8050.8770.704
ECHM0.6590.6750.8130.593
FBHMP0.7740.8010.8670.686
IUHM0.9080.9090.9420.844
The red color explains the exceeding of the threshold, and the green color explains that the indicators are in the parameters. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Table 5. Assessment of discriminant validity in the case of the reflective measurement model (Fornell–Larcker criterion).
Table 5. Assessment of discriminant validity in the case of the reflective measurement model (Fornell–Larcker criterion).
AHMMECHMFBHMPIUHM
AHMM0.839
ECHM0.6900.770
FBHMP0.7730.6700.829
IUHM0.7190.5740.8100.919
Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Table 6. Assessment of discriminant validity in the case of the reflective measurement model (Heterotrait Monotrait correlation ratio (HTMT)).
Table 6. Assessment of discriminant validity in the case of the reflective measurement model (Heterotrait Monotrait correlation ratio (HTMT)).
AHMMECHMFBHMPIUHM
AHMM
ECHM0.938
FBHMP0.9470.923
IUHM0.8280.7230.940
The red color explains the exceeding of the threshold, and the green color explains that the indicators are in the parameters. Source: Smart PLS 4 processing software.
Table 7. Synthesis of hypotheses.
Table 7. Synthesis of hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1The pollution of the environment by horse manure produced represents for entrepreneurs an important factor in taking the decision to develop the business portfolio based on renewable energy.ECHM → IUHMRejected
Hypothesis 2The concern for the environment determines the entrepreneurs to adopt an attitude towards improper management regarding the storage and processing of horse manure.ECHM AHMMSupported
Hypothesis 3The attitude of entrepreneurs towards manure management can significantly influence the development of a sustainable business based on renewable energy through the processing of horse manure.AHMM IUHMRejected
Hypothesis 4The financial benefits that can be obtained from the transformation of manure into renewable energy can arouse the interest of entrepreneurs to protect the environment.FBHMP ECHMSupported
Hypothesis 5The financial benefits that can be obtained by processing horse manure lead entrepreneurs to take an attitude towards its management and storage conditions.FBHMP AHMMSupported
Hypothesis 6The financial benefits that can be obtained from the processing of manure arouse the interest of entrepreneurs in renewable energy.FBHMP IUHMSupported
Source: issued by the authors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lupoae, O.-D.; Radu, R.I.; Capatina, A.; Isai, V.M.; Bărbuță-Mișu, N. Exploring Precursors of Renewable Energy Portfolio Diversification Using TPB. Energies 2023, 16, 6714. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186714

AMA Style

Lupoae O-D, Radu RI, Capatina A, Isai VM, Bărbuță-Mișu N. Exploring Precursors of Renewable Energy Portfolio Diversification Using TPB. Energies. 2023; 16(18):6714. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lupoae, Oana-Daniela, Riana Iren Radu, Alexandru Capatina, Violeta Maria Isai, and Nicoleta Bărbuță-Mișu. 2023. "Exploring Precursors of Renewable Energy Portfolio Diversification Using TPB" Energies 16, no. 18: 6714. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop