Day-Ahead Dynamic Assessment of Consumption Service Reserve Based on Morphological Filter
, Qinqin Cai 2,*, Hengzhen Wang 2, Zhangying Cheng 1, Zhijun Wang 1, Tingxiang Zhang 2 and Ying Xu 2
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I am honored to read your paperwork and congratulation for your work. However, I do have few observations with the wish to take them into account, if you find them useful, for the following scientific articles.
1. Introduction too long and conclusions too short.
2. More explanation of logic diagrams
3. It is advisable to use bibliographic references from different corners of the world when you want to publish at international level.
Thank you and I wish you good luck with the future research.
Minor editing of English language required.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Authors present the results of the day-ahead dynamic assessment of consumption service reserve based on morphological filter. Article and the methodology is based on assumptions and on proposed scenarios (conditions). There are a lot of errors that need to be modified in paper.
Page n, Row n: Article looks inconsistent. There is missing overall revision before submitting. The topic is actual, but the elaboration of authors is poor. The paper is senseless. Nevertheless, below you can find the main errors that need to be modified.
Page 1, Row 2: Unify the upper letters in title.
Page n, Row n: As it was mentioned, paper is written as a draft version and meaning of the paper and sentences is senseless. Correct the English in the paper.
Page 1, Row 7-12: It is not possible to identify authors. Use proper addresses of authors and correct e-mail addresses (use not just phantom e-mail address, but institutional e-mail address).
Page n, Row n: Text of the paper is copy pasted from another document and there are a lot of split words.
Page n, Row n: Why authors state for example “306 million kW” instead of “306 GW”? Modify it and also similar unit denotation.
Page n, Row n: Use the proper signs for erosion and dilatation operators and unify them in the whole text and formulas.
Page n, Row n: Use minus sign, not hyphen in proper places (also in graphs, tables and text).
Page n, Row n: Unify the fonts for quantities (also in text and equations), because it is not possible to identify what is variable, vector, function, unit and what is index or different quantity (expressions are therefore not valid). Check also figures and tables.
Page 9-11, Row n: There are missing legends for graphs.
Page 11, Row n: The conclusion does not correspond to obtained results.
Correct the English in the paper.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Authors present in the revised version of the paper the results of the day-ahead dynamic assessment of consumption service reserve based on morphological filter. Article and the methodology is based on assumptions and on proposed scenarios. Authors accepted mostly all of my previous comments (some of my comments authors marked as addressed, but in general, they did not realized any change or significant modification). The paper is readable, has compact structure and is written according to prescribed form. Therefore, I suggest accepting this paper in the present form.
