Monitoring and Automation of Complex Power Systems
Overview of Challenges and Contributions
- Sensors and measurements: These are the field components that sense and measure the electrical quantities of interest, so that it is possible to infer the operating conditions of the grid. Since measurements are always affected by uncertainties, it is important to have a proper understanding of the metrological performance of the deployed instruments, so that this can be duly taken into account in the subsequent steps of the automation chain.
- Communication: The communication channel is used to transmit the measurements from the field to the control center or to the computational nodes where the grid intelligence runs. The latency, robustness, and security of the communication are some of the aspects that may be relevant to consider for setting up the desired automation functionalities.
- Monitoring tools: This refers to the specific techniques adopted to process the measurement data and to derive from them the most likely operating conditions of the grid at a given instant of time. Different techniques, each one with specific pros and cons, can be adopted for this purpose, and different challenges may be present depending on the considered level and characteristics of the grid to be monitored.
- Automation functions: This includes both the core algorithms designed to deal with a specific optimization or management functionality and the sequence of steps put in place to send the corresponding actuation commands to the controllable field components. In this case also, different automation functionalities and grid characteristics may require devising ad hoc solutions.
- IT architecture: As a transversal layer, different features of the IT architecture (e.g., hierarchical vs. decentralized, on premises vs. cloud-based, etc.) may affect the overall implementation of the desired automation schemes.
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Crotti, G.; D’Avanzo, G.; Giordano, D.; Letizia, P.S.; Luiso, M. Extended SINDICOMP: Characterizing MV Voltage Transformers with Sine Waves. Energies 2021, 14, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mingotti, A.; Costa, F.; Peretto, L.; Tinarelli, R. Characterization Procedure for Stand-Alone Merging Units Based on Hardware-in-the-Loop Technology. Energies 2021, 14, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macii, D.; Fontanelli, D.; Barchi, G. A Distribution System State Estimator Based on an Extended Kalman Filter Enhanced with a Prior Evaluation of Power Injections at Unmonitored Buses. Energies 2020, 13, 6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, M.Q.; Zamzam, A.S.; Nguyen, P.H.; Pemen, G. Multi-Area Distribution System State Estimation Using Decentralized Physics-Aware Neural Networks. Energies 2021, 14, 3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerraiche, K.; Dekhici, L.; Chatelet, E.; Zeblah, A. Multi-Objective Electrical Power System Design Optimization Using a Modified Bat Algorithm. Energies 2021, 14, 3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pau, M.; Pegoraro, P.A. Monitoring and Automation of Complex Power Systems. Energies 2022, 15, 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082949
Pau M, Pegoraro PA. Monitoring and Automation of Complex Power Systems. Energies. 2022; 15(8):2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082949
Chicago/Turabian StylePau, Marco, and Paolo Attilio Pegoraro. 2022. "Monitoring and Automation of Complex Power Systems" Energies 15, no. 8: 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082949
APA StylePau, M., & Pegoraro, P. A. (2022). Monitoring and Automation of Complex Power Systems. Energies, 15(8), 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082949