Next Article in Journal
Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Mine Ventilation in Mineral Development
Previous Article in Journal
Design Optimization of Auxetic Structure for Crashworthy Pouch Battery Protection Using Machine Learning Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock: A Review

by
Line Schultz Jensen
,
Christian Kaul
,
Nilas Brinck Juncker
,
Mette Hedegaard Thomsen
and
Tanmay Chaturvedi
*
AAU Energy, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs Vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Energies 2022, 15(22), 8396; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228396
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section A5: Hydrogen Energy)

Abstract

The need for renewable and sustainable fuel and energy storage sources is pressing. Biohydrogen has the potential to be a storable energy carrier, a direct fuel and a diverse building block for various downstream products. Utilizing microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) to produce biohydrogen from residue streams, such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), agricultural residues and wastewater facilitate utilization and energy recovery from these streams, paving the path for a circular economy. The advantages of using hydrogen include high gravimetric energy density and, given the MEC pathway, the ability to capture heavy metals, ammonia and phosphates from waste streams, thereby allowing for multiple revenue streams emanating from MECs. A review of the MEC technology and its application was carried out to investigate the use of MEC in sustainable biohydrogen production. This review summarizes different MEC designs of varying scales, including anode materials, cathode materials, and configuration possibilities. This review highlights the accomplishments and challenges of small-scale to large-scale MECs. Suggestions for improving the successful upscaling of MECs are listed, thus emphasizing the areas for continued research.
Keywords: MEC; green hydrogen; OFMSW; wastewater MEC; green hydrogen; OFMSW; wastewater

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jensen, L.S.; Kaul, C.; Juncker, N.B.; Thomsen, M.H.; Chaturvedi, T. Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 8396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228396

AMA Style

Jensen LS, Kaul C, Juncker NB, Thomsen MH, Chaturvedi T. Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock: A Review. Energies. 2022; 15(22):8396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jensen, Line Schultz, Christian Kaul, Nilas Brinck Juncker, Mette Hedegaard Thomsen, and Tanmay Chaturvedi. 2022. "Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock: A Review" Energies 15, no. 22: 8396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228396

APA Style

Jensen, L. S., Kaul, C., Juncker, N. B., Thomsen, M. H., & Chaturvedi, T. (2022). Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock: A Review. Energies, 15(22), 8396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop