Dynamic Capabilities in Electrical Energy Digitalization: A Case from the Norwegian Ecosystem
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Transition toward Service Platforms Model in Electrical Energy Services
2.2. Dynamic Capabilities in Information Systems and Strategic Management
3. Research Design and Methodology
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Source and Process of Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
- Preparation:In the preparation step, we derived the themes based on the original conceptual DC framework by Teece [29] and Witschel et al. [24]. We clustered the themes/categories based on the identified DC’s by Teece [29,43]; these main DC’s were: sensing, seizing, and transforming. In addition, we imported the transcribed video interviews and additional documents into NVIVO, a computer-aided software for qualitative data analysis.
- Extraction and Analysis:We analyzed the data material of the interviews one by one. We discussed the emerging findings and how the organizations interact with the transition. From the interviews, we identified the activities related to dynamic capabilities. Also, we used the activities (sensing, seizing, and transforming) as main units of analysis Figure 1.
4. Case Description
5. Case Study Analysis: Dynamic Capabilities for Electrical Energy Services Digitalization
5.1. Sensing Threats and Opportunities
5.1.1. Market Trends and Dynamics
“It will enable the company actually to go into this markets that would’ve been impossible earlier without this digitalization initiative”.(I2)
“That’s mainly done by the part of the organization that is primarily tasked with business development. So, the driving force is there. But, its tightly connected with the top management for how to prioritize different initiatives and get financing. So, the business development department does all groundwork and analyzes and suggests initiatives to the top management who does all the prioritization on how to choose different initiatives and also at the same time financing them”.(I3)
“We’re also a shareholder in (…) funds that are specialized on the energy transition and digital. So you get sort of direct insights through these kind of investments”(I4)
“evaluate the potential and the risks for becoming a flexibility provider, one must also understand relatively complex concepts such as grid balancing, security of supply, ancillary services, and market requirements. The complexity of these technical and commercial concepts represents a barrier to new players, as establishing a sufficient understanding requires significant amounts of research”.(Doc 1, I1)
5.1.2. Integration of Customers into Ideas Creation
“if we have new ideas or new initiatives or even on the existing one. We always try it out with proof of concept. So, we select few customers and try out their ideas and then the actual solutions before we get them to the market. So, proof of concept is the thing that we always do”.(I3)
“We always try it out with proof of concept. So, we select a few customers and try out their ideas and then the actual solutions before we get them to the market. So, proof of concept is the thing that we always do”.(I3)
“I think that’s part of the maturing that we have been doing over the last year; since that we are recognizing the importance of working closely with the customer for insights and basically utilizing methodologies like design thinking in order to create services that the customers are requesting. I think we’re also in the sort of the early stages on this side. I think that’s a Working with the customers and working with design as a discipline That way we will probably have to strengthen going forward”.(I4)
“it’s basically a partly the same answer, but you need to have feedback loops where you can test things in the market, get direct insights and then sort of do the circle again. So having an iterative approach is what we’re trying to do in order to do that”.(I4)
5.1.3. Partners Involvement in Pilots
“we’re part in +cityxchange https://cityxchange.eu/ (accessed on 23 December 2021) and we’re working with other partners Volue and ABB and we developed this platform and it was for testing purposes. What we talking about here, the decentralized energy system is not there yet. So, it in the future, but then we know how to operate it”.(I2)
“If you look at the partner level, we are working closely with a few larger corporations like Microsoft and Volue, ⋯ on the European side, (⋯). I think that’s the sort of the major players that we deal with. On the more downstream business where we are; now more niche segments and then (Ease) is an example of a charge box provider that we work closely with both on the hardware and software side, and the end users can range from our in house operators or in house trader to a user of a charging service in a condominium, basically it’s a large stretch”.(I4)
5.1.4. Value Proposition Modeling and Value Capturing Mechanism
“So we have business developers that identify opportunities, and then they in sort of open markets where we see opportunities in some direction either as an energy provider or yeah that we can sort of get a larger part of the what we expect to become the new market and then the way we build up startup companies that tries to capture this market and then part of this at digitalization is, part of the solution, which means that we have to provide some services to their customer user interfaces and sort of this is the way the service is provided either a selling it partially digitally and then reporting digitally but also we use AI system to optimize through energy uses for instance, or forecasting, but we are involved. There are departments involved and very late stage of when we are not in the early stages; there are some ideas where we can provide value. And when we have a sort of a setup here and we’ve started getting customers then we can build solutions, but as you know, sort of in this sort of digitalization Pyramids that there is, there’s AI you have to collect data, You have to visualize data many steps before you can sort of do or autonomy or make decisions or automatically, Maybe we have to forecast first. But all these lower steps have to be done before we usually are involved. Sometimes we actually help in the slower parts as well with collecting data but mostly that is a part of what that the products are”.(I2)
“In terms of benefits, we are dealing with energy markets that are that are operating quicker and quicker. The time frames allowed for taking stations are just shrinking. So in order to be competitive, we need to digitize.so that’s one aspect. In order to get the best out of our assets, we need to digitize, we need to get into Preventive maintenance and all these kind of things in order to know how our assets are doing, to get list out of them ; and then the third parties we talked about earlier are there, is it B2B modern market or end customer side of it in order to be competitive in order to create services that are customers will enjoy, we need to manage the digital components in them”.(I4)
5.2. Capabilities for Seizing Opportunities
5.2.1. Organizational Development and Competence
“It affect the organization heavily, with different competence, different people, different organization, and knocked all like the old organization were focusing on hydro and wind production”.(I3)
“Around the last one and half year we’ve hired around 70++ people which come from different areas and markets to build this downstream goal/initiative”.(I3)
“It’s knowledge, rearranging from domain expertise to deep expertise on key sort of key systems To support the development, project management design as I mentioned, it’s structured basically in two main teams where we have the centralized team that are working both upstream and downstream and supporting them in different aspects of the sort of the total digital landscape. And then we have an additional team that is only focused on the downstream and developing this B2B services”.(I4)
5.2.2. Agile and Lean Mode for Developing Business Model
“I think that that’s part of the maturing that we have been doing over the last year; since that we are recognizing the importance of working closely with the customer for insights and basically utilizing methodologies like design thinking in order to create services that the customers are requesting”.(I4)
“The management is very much on top of and very much involved to grow.so, they’re actively seeking the opportunity to grow. We’ve been growing a lot now as we’ve been discussing, we will see also other areas yet to come. The company is highly motivated to grow and its not necessarily clear in what areas, but of course we see opportunities in other areas of production. For instance, wind and solar. And in downstream markets we have lots of ideas that are not tested out yet. So, its continuous process and the main goal is how to into new market”.(I3)
“Very much cross collaboration, my department for instance is having the responsibility for lots of this things which are organized within energy management division today. But, now we re-organizing it.so, we are setting new division called ‘technology and development’ which tasked with supporting the rest of organization with both technology and development resources”(I3)
5.2.3. Customer Integration into Development and Testing
“To large degree they we provide services to them and we sell in services to them and which means that we have we need to involve them in our product development so that we are sure that Our systems fit their need and this is for the company in general, but for the AI team we have a very similar approach, when we develop an AI solution we have domain experts that could tell us basically what they need and how everything works and what’s important for the systems that we are going to build and then we develop them accordingly and we show our results with them and we discussed whether we are able to capture the their needs and whether this works”.(I2)
“I think if you see in the customer side, I think the main issue for us now is the customer interaction via the customer portal. So, to develop the customer portal is necessary to have the functions that are asked for. So, that’s the key for us to get better customer interaction and that in both downstream and upstream”.(I3)
5.2.4. IT Key Activities Implementation
“I’m starting new initiative to come to the whole field with future strategy for the platform and IT solutions combined. We’re moving into new era, and the platform and software support has to be different from what it is today”.(I3)
“We of course have some resources, such as power plants and ohmia chain. And we have software platform SaaS, we have workshop machine software. We have domain experts in different areas to make us have the best practice. Also we have collaborative approach to achieve all this”.(I2)
“We joined Nordpool (another ecosystem), we provided them with a protocol and must adhere to this protocol. So we defined certain processes and they provide us with API and we connected this with several platforms provided by Volue. We don’t want to do this by our self.its sort of boring job”.(I2)
Capabilities for Transforming
5.2.5. Organizational Design and Transformation
“For instance, at our organization, we changed the organization to reflect this. So, we have the energy management unit that am part of it, it contains the IT services, the trading, AI organization and the operating center. We have changed the organization in order to meet this market changes. It has been sort of cognizant move in order for us to meet the market changes and in a best way we changed our organization to reflect this , so we can coordinate in house in a better fashion and also the fact that you have an AI department, so you have someone using the product of digitalization and in this way you have someone internally get the organization moving when it comes to digitalization because the organization need the fruit of digitalization process”.(I2)
“but on top of those initiatives we have built it and bought it ourselves and in one location we have bought a company with software platform. Also, we are considering other initiatives for farming areas. Companies are ohmia charging, ohmia retail and ohmia construction , the fourth one is ohmia energy, selling energy to other companies and third party markets”.(I3)
5.2.6. Sustainability of Developing of Key Competence
“That a key question for us, because we come from place where the maintenance and development of platform was the main task actually, and that has evolved that we need more capacity and knowledge about the solutions, we need capacity to both buy and selling to production new system and build new system, and we’ve been hiring lots of people in that areas in the last years and we will continue to find the needed competence .so, it’s been kind of evolving from platform development and maintenance to more about full modular where we aiming at digitalized platform for every considerable need. So, now we’re recruiting and developing new competence through the existing employees”.(I3)
“we have an internal platform where you can go through lots of different courses on many different topics from how to register travel expenses to sort of IT security and lots of other topics, maybe sustainability and how it’s achieved in a company like this, and then you can go through this courses and learn sort of quick bites, we also have opportunity to take courses at university or at where Coursera or similar courses where we can develop needed skills in parts of the organization”.(I2)
“In AI department, at least we have internal Projects that we only have for learning where we do, we have do things together and for instance, now we’re focusing on time series and we’re making a benchmark for many different algorithms, and we are putting this benchmark up in a four way and the goal is to publish this and then the whole department is involved in this effort. So we this is one way of learning and to build the competency in the team and of course we go to conferences as well. So there are many different ways that we learn and change”.(I2)
5.2.7. Customer Support and Interaction
“to develop the customer portal is necessary to have the functions that are asked for. So, that’s the key for us to get better customer interaction and that in both downstream and upstream”.(I3)
“But, all this is planned to go on new initiative we have with new customer portal, so, everything is going to be modernized and digitalized, and that’s also on production side, we have lots of customers who owns power plants, where we today give them a report once a month, but, from next year we will have customer portal to both get al.l the information and send the information back. So, we’re digitalizing all the customer experience we have”.(I3)
5.2.8. Rising the Business Model through Partnership
“We have some of the initiatives we started from the ground up. So, we started with more or less nothing and build up the organization ourselves that’s around charging area and construction area, but in the retail one we bought three small companies”.(I3)
“We provide services, we bid on prices. so the companies are focusing partnerships rather than providing services”(I2)
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions and Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
DV | Dynamic Capabilities |
DCV | Dynamic Capabilities View |
IS | Information Systems |
DRR | Distributed Renewable Resources |
IT | Information Technology |
OT | Operational Technology |
CPS | cyber-physical system |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
IoT | Internet of Things |
DER | Distributed Energy Resources |
SDG | Sustainable Development Goal |
SDL | Service Dominant Logic |
TSO | Transmission Service Operator |
B2B | Business to Business |
MVP | Minimum Viable Products |
ICT | Information and Communication Technology |
DSO | Distribution Service Operator |
B2C | Business to Concsumer |
EV | Electrical Vehicle |
SAAS | Software As A Service |
References
- Xing, L.; Sizov, G.; Gundersen, O.E. Digital Transformation in Renewable Energy: Use Cases and Experiences from a Nordic Power Producer. In Digital Transformation in Norwegian Enterprises; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 63–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lahiri, S.; Dasgupta, M.; Tapasvi, S. Product development and innovation: Dynamic capabilities in base of the pyramid off-grid energy market in India. Int. J. Indian Cult. Bus. Manag. 2021, 23, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, O.; Daddi, T.; Iraldo, F. The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 3018–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statnett. Distributed Balancing of the Power Grid Results from the eFleks Pilot in the mFRR-Market 2019/2020; Technical Report; Statnett: Oslo, Norway, 2021; Available online: https://www.statnett.no/contentassets/5f177747331347f1b5da7c87f9cf0733/2021.02.24-results-from-the-efleks-pilot-in-the-mfrr-market–.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2021).
- IEA. Digitalization and Energy; Technical Report; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2017; Available online: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/b1e6600c-4e40-4d9c-809d-1d1724c763d5/DigitalizationandEnergy3.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2021).
- Palmié, M.; Boehm, J.; Friedrich, J.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J.; Kahlert, J.; Gassmann, O.; Sjödin, D. Startups versus incumbents in ‘green’ industry transformations: A comparative study of business model archetypes in the electrical power sector. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2021, 96, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idries, A.; Krogstie, J.; Rajasekharan, J. Challenges in platforming and digitizing decentralized energy services. Energy Inform. 2022, 5, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP. Issue Brief SDG 7 Ensuring Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy for All; Technical Report; United Nations Environmental Program: Nairobi, Kenya, 2015; Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25762/SDG7_Brief.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Constantinides, P.; Henfridsson, O.; Parker, G.G. Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Inf. Syst. Res. 2018, 29, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ardolino, M.; Saccani, N.; Eloranta, V. Complexity Management in Service Businesses through Platform Adoption. IFAC-PapersOnline 2018, 51, 1329–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blaschke, M.; Haki, K.; Aier, S.; Winter, R. Capabilities for Digital Platform Survival: Insights from a Business-to-Business Digital Platform. 2018. Available online: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/255598/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- de Reuver, M.; Sørensen, C.; Basole, R.C. The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 2018, 33, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, Y.; Ahokangas, P.; Yrjölä, S.; Koivumäki, T. The Blockchain Marketplace as the Fifth Type of Electricity Market; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilieva, I.; Rajasekharan, J. Energy storage as a trigger for business model innovation in the energy sector. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), Limassol, Cyprus, 3–7 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, L.L.; Pollitt, M.G. Which smart electricity service contracts will consumers accept? The demand for compensation in a platform market. Energy Econ. 2018, 72, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Psara, K.; Papadimitriou, C.; Efstratiadi, M.; Tsakanikas, S.; Papadopoulos, P.; Tobin, P. European Energy Regulatory, Socioeconomic, and Organizational Aspects: An Analysis of Barriers Related to Data-Driven Services across Electricity Sectors. Energies 2022, 15, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adil, A.M.; Ko, Y. Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, L.; Zhou, Y.; Long, C.; Wu, J.; Jenkins, N. A general form of smart contract for decentralized energy systems management. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tikka, V.; Mashlakov, A.; Kulmala, A.; Repo, S.; Aro, M.; Keski-Koukkari, A.; Honkapuro, S.; Järventausta, P.; Partanen, J. Integrated business platform of distributed energy resources—Case Finland. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 6637–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wehlitz, R.; Häberlein, D.; Zschörnig, T.; Franczyk, B. A Smart Energy Platform for the Internet of Things—Motivation, Challenges, and Solution Proposal. In International Conference on Business Information Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Yu, J.; Yu, Y.; Qian, Y.; Zeng, D.; Guo, S.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, J. A Survey on Energy Internet: Architecture, Approach, and Emerging Technologies. IEEE Syst. J. 2018, 12, 2403–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, M.; Fang, Y.; Lv, J.; Zheng, S.; Zhou, Z. Research on Power Trading Platform Based on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Technology. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 486, 012109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favoretto, C.; de Sousa Mendes, G.H.; Filho, M.G.; de Oliveira, M.G.; Ganga, G.M.D. Digital transformation of business model in manufacturing companies: Challenges and research agenda. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2021, 37, 748–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witschel, D.; Döhla, A.; Kaiser, M.; Voigt, K.I.; Pfletschinger, T. Riding on the wave of digitization: Insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change. J. Bus. Econ. 2019, 89, 1023–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, K.S.; Wäger, M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 326–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Witschel, D.; Baumann, D.; Voigt, K.I. How manufacturing firms navigate through stormy waters of digitalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, organizational factors and environmental turbulence for business model innovation. J. Manag. Organ. 2022, 28, 681–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocken, N.M.; Geradts, T.H. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 2020, 53, 101950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 51, pp. 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paavola, L.; Cuthbertson, R. Redefining capabilities as drivers of adaptation, incremental change, and transformation: Recognizing the importance of strategic and operational intent on performance. J. Manag. Organ. 2022, 28, 522–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Day, G.S.; Schoemaker, P.J. Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2016, 58, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathiassen, L. Designing Engaged Scholarship: From Real-World Problems to Research Publications. Engaged Manag. Rev. 2017, 1, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, S.; Gaiardelli, P.; Rapaccini, M. Exploring technology-driven service innovation in manufacturing firms through the lens of Service Dominant logic. IFAC-PapersOnline 2018, 51, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications; Sage Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Winter, S.G.; Szulanski, G. Replication as Strategy. Organ. Sci. 2001, 12, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Debi, M.M.; El-Haddadeh, R.; Avison, D. Defining the business model in the new world of digital business. In AMCIS 2008 Proceedings; 2008; p. 300. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1350&context=amcis2008 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
- Kumar, N.; Stern, L.W.; Anderson, J.C. Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants. Acad. Manag. J. 1993, 36, 1633–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhojailan, M.I. Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East J. Soc. Sci. 2012, 1, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
- van de Ven, A.H. Engaged Scholarship; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Oates, B.J. Researching Information Systems and Computing; Sage Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Walsham, G. The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6, 376–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldkuhl, G. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2012, 21, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teece, D.; Peteraf, M.; Leih, S. Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2016, 58, 13–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kovalenko, B.; Kovalenko, E.; Yakovleva, T. Digital business models and company growth opportunities in the energy market. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 250, 06006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karami, M.; Baber, W.W.; Ojala, A. The effectual process of business model innovation for seizing opportunities in frontier markets. Technovation 2022, 117, 102595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altunay, M.; Bergek, A.; Palm, A. Solar business model adoption by energy incumbents: The importance of strategic fit. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2021, 40, 501–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santa-Maria, T.; Vermeulen, W.J.V.; Baumgartner, R.J. How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 31, 1308–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pressmair, G.; Kapassa, E.; Casado-Mansilla, D.; Borges, C.E.; Themistocleous, M. Overcoming barriers for the adoption of Local Energy and Flexibility Markets: A user-centric and hybrid model. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peñarroya-Farell, M.; Miralles, F. Business Model Dynamics from Interaction with Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigel, P.; Fischedick, M. Review and Categorization of Digital Applications in the Energy Sector. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dellermann, D.; Fliaster, A.; Kolloch, M. Innovation risk in digital business models: The German energy sector. J. Bus. Strategy 2017, 38, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, P.; Savickas, R.; Buettner, S.; Struker, J.; Kjeldsen, O.; Wang, X. Digitalization: Enabling the New Phase of Energy Efficiency; Group of Experts on Energy Efficiency, GEEE-7; 2020; pp. 2020-12. Available online: https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/246750940/2020_09_16_PUBLICATION_GEEE_7.2020.INF.1_Digitalization_enabling_the_new_phase_of_EE_2_.pdf (accessed on 18 July 2022).
- Gong, C.; Ribiere, V. Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation 2021, 102, 102217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanelt, A.; Bohnsack, R.; Marz, D.; Marante, C.A. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 58, 1159–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carell, A.; Lauenroth, K.; Platz, D. Using Design Thinking for Requirements Engineering in the Context of Digitalization and Digital Transformation: A Motivation and an Experience Report. In The Essence of Software Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Company Name | Employees | Revenue (Euros M) | Industry/Role in Value Chain | Type of Business Model Change | Strategic Intention | Business Model Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TrønderEnergi | 400 | 150 | Renewable Energy Producer, Grid Operator and Distribution Systems Operator | Innovation and Adaptation | Better managing of uncertainty can lead to better bids and increased trading autonomy. Multiple renewable resources should be combined, and appropriate trading techniques should be devised, to achieve the final aim of maximizing profit and stability. Predictive maintenance for wind farms and hydroelectric plants using transfer learning and hybrid AI. | Digital Business model includes an AI-driven platform. Digital Capabilities driven by AI capabilities |
Interviewee | Position | Experience (Years) | Interview Length (Minutes) | Secondary Data Source | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I1 | Expert, Senior Adviser System operation and Market development | 15 | replied through email | Internal reports (N = 7) | |
I2 | Chief AI Officer | 15 | 92 | 2 follow up interviews | |
I3 | Chief Digitalization Officer/Head of Digitalization and IT | 22 | 50 | ||
I4 | Head of Energy Markets and Services | 16 | 40 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Idries, A.; Krogstie, J.; Rajasekharan, J. Dynamic Capabilities in Electrical Energy Digitalization: A Case from the Norwegian Ecosystem. Energies 2022, 15, 8342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228342
Idries A, Krogstie J, Rajasekharan J. Dynamic Capabilities in Electrical Energy Digitalization: A Case from the Norwegian Ecosystem. Energies. 2022; 15(22):8342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228342
Chicago/Turabian StyleIdries, Ahmed, John Krogstie, and Jayaprakash Rajasekharan. 2022. "Dynamic Capabilities in Electrical Energy Digitalization: A Case from the Norwegian Ecosystem" Energies 15, no. 22: 8342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228342
APA StyleIdries, A., Krogstie, J., & Rajasekharan, J. (2022). Dynamic Capabilities in Electrical Energy Digitalization: A Case from the Norwegian Ecosystem. Energies, 15(22), 8342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228342