Next Article in Journal
Control and Design of a Boost-Based Electrolytic Capacitor-Less Single-Phase-Input Drive
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Capture and Utilization: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2007–2021
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Relationship between Green Economy and Energy Utilization Level: Evidence from China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Containing Adsorbents for Carbon Capture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS

by
Wentao Gong
1,
Eryk Remiezowicz
2,
Philip Loldrup Fosbøl
1 and
Nicolas von Solms
1,*
1
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Center for Energy Resources Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 229, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
2
Air Products, Kiełczowska 62A, 51-315 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(16), 5928; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 3 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)

Abstract

In this work, CO2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS sequestration are modelled using the software APSEN HYSYS V11. This study uses the captured CO2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed stream contains water, H2S, and CO as contaminants. The purification processes for dehydration, desulfurization, and CO removal are reviewed. Two liquefaction approaches, the open-cycle and the closed-cycle liquefaction, are modelled and compared for transport pressures 7 and 15 bar. It is found that the energy requirement of the open-cycle process is higher than that of the closed-cycle liquefaction process. For the closed-cycle design, two refrigerants, ammonia and propane, are considered. Results show that the energy requirement of the process using ammonia is lower than that of propane. When comparing the two transport pressures, it is found that liquefaction at 15 bar requires less energy than 7 bar. On top of that, both refrigerants are unsuited for the liquefaction of CO2 at 7 bar, as their operating pressures are below 1 atm. Several optimization concepts are tested on the closed-cycle liquefaction design. The net power consumption of the closed-cycle liquefaction is reduced when CO2 is precooled using the intermediate pressure ammonia streams and the cold from the CO stripper.
Keywords: CO2 capture; DMXTM process; CO2 conditioning; CO2 liquefaction; CCS hub Dunkirk CO2 capture; DMXTM process; CO2 conditioning; CO2 liquefaction; CCS hub Dunkirk

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, W.; Remiezowicz, E.; Fosbøl, P.L.; von Solms, N. Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS. Energies 2022, 15, 5928. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928

AMA Style

Gong W, Remiezowicz E, Fosbøl PL, von Solms N. Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS. Energies. 2022; 15(16):5928. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gong, Wentao, Eryk Remiezowicz, Philip Loldrup Fosbøl, and Nicolas von Solms. 2022. "Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS" Energies 15, no. 16: 5928. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928

APA Style

Gong, W., Remiezowicz, E., Fosbøl, P. L., & von Solms, N. (2022). Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS. Energies, 15(16), 5928. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop