Responsible Knowledge Management in Energy Data Ecosystems

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is to showcase and evaluate Data Ecosystems and the International Data Space concept for advanced business services in the energy sector. As a consequence, a new paradigm shift in data management is devised towards tracing down data integration during query processing. 

It presents an interesting and new shot. I recommend it for publication.

 

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your consideration. Please find attached a letter that  compiles the answers to all reviewers. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Article: Responsible Knowledge Management in Energy Data Ecosystems

 

Objective: To analyze and evaluate the requirements necessary to establish Energy Data Ecosystem as data-driven infrastructure that overcome the limitation of currently fragmented energy application. The focus is to achieve the targets of the latest EU Energy Strategy.

 

Comments:

• It recognizes the limitations of currently fragmented energy applications.
• The phase “The approach will boost the adoption of new business models in future energy data spaces” is very strong   à The approach can contribute to ….  Line 10
• Impossible à partial      Line 39
• The phase “A detailed software architecture for semantic data integration and business analytics” is not presented (It is presented a proposal not a detailed software architecture )   Line 79
• “The description of the detailed design and implementation of advanced analytical services” some details must be included to help the reader to understand your proposal, as suggested below,

Line 91.

• In my point of view the phase “Therefore, the goal of the case study is to” the paper do not present a case study. It is only a proposal. Line 107
• Verify if in the line 10 the authors are referring to “ an innovative energy management” If it is change they à it   Line 108.
• The IDS reference architecture IDS aims at correct the phase.    Line 139.
• The authors use abbreviations before the definition. The authors must define RES and other abbreviations before the use. Line 158.
• the à The    line 158
• The connector is the most important part of the proposed architecture. I suggest to introduce a section dedicated to it.
• An example of SPARQL Filter should be presented. Use electrical component as for example transformer, or a service data of costumer
• Figure 3 at page 7 should be redraw, because it's blurry.
• Example: Should be interesting to present a diagram of components or objects   line 312
• It is necessary to present a real example with RDF and SPARQL. line 384

The work only mentions that it will be used, but there is no ACTUAL modelled example. Furthermore, Figure 7 presents a web page for querying with a time interval, it should express an example of SPARQL with RDF.

“The federated query engine can select results based on the user query set via a graphical user interface, see Figure 7”.  Line 432  .  The figure 7 is not clear to show the proposal. Please, give an example

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your consideration. Please find attached a letter that compiles the answers to all reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is of interest, both presentation and organisation are satisfactory.

Minor issues have to be addressed :

• Figure 6  and 7 are not clear
• to enrich the document, can you add a concrete example.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your consideration. Please find attached a letter that compiles the answers to all reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf