Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Concentration of Mineral Oil in Synthetic Ester Based on the Density of the Mixture and the Capacitance of the Capacitor Immersed in It
Next Article in Special Issue
A Multiphysics Analysis of Coupled Electromagnetic-Thermal Phenomena in Cable Lines
Previous Article in Journal
Reduction of Resistance, Fuel Consumption and GHG Emission of a Small Fishing Vessel by Adding a Bulbous Bow
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of a Small Wind Power Plant for Annual Wind Speed Distribution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simulation and Experimental Investigation of a Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
2
Faculty of Control, Robotics and Electrical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(7), 1838; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071838
Submission received: 16 February 2021 / Revised: 15 March 2021 / Accepted: 22 March 2021 / Published: 25 March 2021

Abstract

:
Gears are common and important components of many types of propulsion systems applied in mechanical engineering. The aim of this paper is to present the mechanical design and performance analysis of a novel two-stage magnetic precession gear (MPG). The main advantage of the proposed design is the ability to obtain higher transmission ratios than other currently known magnetic gear types. A detailed analysis of the performance of the MPG was carried out employing a developed numerical model of the magnetic field in the proposed gear. The MPG model is based on the finite element method (FEM) and allows determining the relations between the torque acting on the main components of the gear, load angles, and air-gap lengths. To validate the developed FEM model, the prototype of an MPG with a 1/144 gear ratio was built and tested. The experiments were also focused on determining the mechanical efficiency as well as the influence of rotational speed and lengths of air gaps on the maximum load torque. The tests indicated that the maximum efficiency of the studied MPG is about 30%, which is comparable to the efficiency of mechanical two-stage precession gears with face meshing.

1. Introduction

Gear transmissions are components of propulsion systems commonly used to transform parameters of mechanical energy (torque and speed) between load and drive systems. In other words, gears are applied to fit the values of the rotational speed and mechanical torque of a power source to the required values of their output parameters [1]. Nowadays, in most commonly applied mechanical gears, the power is transmitted by meshing the gear teeth. The undeniable advantages of mechanical gears are high torque density, efficiency, and ease of manufacture. However, their inherent disadvantages include high noise and vibration levels [1,2,3], friction between teeth [4], as well as a substantial maintenance cost. The use of magnetic forces for the transmission of mechanical power instead of physical contact removes at least some of the unwanted features of mechanical gears. Magnetic gears (MGs) provide contactless transmission of torque, which allows reducing vibrations and noise as well as increasing the durability [5,6,7,8], which decreases maintenance cost. Another advantage of the MG is its natural protection against overload [9]. The concept of the MG is not new. The first magnetic gear (shown in Figure 1a) was patented more than 100 years ago by Armstrong [10]. The torque transmission was achieved by using the system of electromagnets located on the driving wheel, which were supplied by mechanically commutated currents. The magnetic flux excited by the system of electromagnets was coupled to the driven wheel having non-silent magnetic poles producing reluctance torque. Despite the discussed advantages of reluctance-torque-based designs of MGs, they could not compete with mechanical gears in terms of torque density, due to the limited exploitation of the magnetic circuit and magnetic flux density, which limited the focus on MGs for many years.
Nevertheless, a dynamic growth of interest in MGs can be observed in recent years. The observed rapid development of many different MG designs has become possible, mainly thanks to the invention of neodymium magnets (NdFeB) in the 1980s [11], as well as the availability of advanced analytical and numerical methods and tools for the analysis and design of complex magnetic circuits such as magnetic equivalent circuits (MECs) [12], current sheet models (CSMs) [13,14,15], and the finite element method [16].
Currently, the most common type of magnetic transmissions are the improved topologies of the coaxial magnetic gear (CMG) with ferromagnetic pole-pieces, proposed by Atallah and Howe in 2001 [17] (Figure 1b). A change in speed between the inner and outer rotors in a CMG is achieved thanks to the use of ferromagnetic pole pieces (modulators) for modulation of the magnetic field spatial distribution in the working air gaps. The main advantage of CMGs, in contrast to other MG types, is the high torque density (max. 150 Nm/dm3) resulting from the high exploitation of the magnetic circuit (the torque is transmitted over the whole circumference of the working air gaps). Based on the CMG design, the pseudo direct drive (PDD) was proposed by Magnomatics (shown schematically in Figure 2). The PDD is an integration of a motor and an MG in one drive unit that consists of an outer stator with electrical windings and an integrated CMG. Such a drive unit offers a much higher torque density in comparison with a conventional drive unit combined with a motor and a gearbox [18,19].
According to [18], the PPD is suitable for many applications ranging from aerospace, automotive, and marine propulsion systems to generators in wind turbines.
Despite its undeniable advantages, CMG and PDD designs allow obtaining only very low transmission ratios (max. 1/10) [17], which might be a significant limitation in applications requiring high transmission ratios, for example, robots and positioners [20]. To overcome this limit, a new two-stage magnetic precession gear (MPG) was developed by the authors. It enables obtaining a transmission ratio even higher than 1/1000, which is an unattainable value for any other currently known magnetic gear type. Thanks to this feature and the durability of magnetic gears in general, the MPG may be applied, for example, in precise robots for working in places and environments hard to reach by humans, e.g., in outer space. The detailed 3D finite element method (FEM) analysis of this new type of magnetic gear as well as the experimental investigations of its prototype will be presented in this paper.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the design, principle of operation, and brief kinematical analysis are presented. The description of the developed numerical model employing a 3D finite element method is given in Section 3. Next, the design of the MPG prototype as well as the experimental setup are described in Section 4. In Section 5, the results of numerical and experimental tests are presented and discussed. Finally, the conclusions resulting therefrom are formulated in Section 6.

2. Design of a Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear

The idea of an MPG was preceded by mechanical precession gears with face meshing [20]. Their main advantages were a wide range of possible ratios and a large number of meshing teeth, which allowed transmission of high torque. However, their main drawback turned out to be low maximum efficiency, usually around 20–30% [21]. To address this problem, the traditional teeth were replaced with neodymium magnets. This eliminated the problem of energy losses associated with the friction occurring in the meshing teeth by the contactless transmission of torque. The magnetic type of precession gear is also considered easier to manufacture as the precise machining of face gears can be challenging [22].
The main components of the proposed two-stage MPG (shown in Figure 3) are (a) an input shaft, (b) an immovable ring, (c) an intermediate ring, and (d) an output ring with an output shaft. On the circumferences of these rings, permanent magnets are fixed. To achieve a high value of transmitted torque, neodymium, iron and boron magnets of high magnetic energy are applied.
The rotational speed of the output disk (n2 in Figure 3) depends on the number of magnets on each disk and is expressed by the formula
n 2 = n 1 · 1 N 1 N 2 · N 3 N 4
where n1 is the input rotational speed, n2 is the output rotational speed, and Ni is the number of neodymium magnets on the i-th ring.
However, a necessary condition is
N2N1 and N3N4.
The maximal transmission ratio i m a x = 1 N 2 is achieved when
N 1 = N 1 ,   N 2 = N ,   N 3 = N + 1 , and   N 4 = N .
The input shaft and the output ring rotate about the same main axis of gear rotation (labeled as Z axis in Figure 3). The precession movement of the intermediate ring, which is angularly mounted with bearings on the input shaft, has two components. The first one is the rotation about the main Z axis of gear rotation, forced by the rotational movement of the input shaft. The other is the rotation of the intermediate ring about its own axis (Zp axis in Figure 3), inclined relative to the main axis by a precession angle. The rotation about Zp is caused by the interaction of the magnets placed on the intermediate disk with the magnets on the stationary disk. The magnets fixed to the other side of the intermediate ring interact with the magnets located on the output disk, which causes its rotation.
The movement of the intermediate ring is described by the relation [23]
Ω = ω i n · K ^ + ω p · k ^
where Ω is the angular velocity of the intermediate ring, ωin is the angular speed of the input shaft around the Z axis, K ^ is the unit vector in the Z direction, ωp is the angular speed of the intermediate ring around its own axis, and k ^ is the unit vector in the Zp direction.
The angular speed of the intermediate ring rotation about the Zp axis is expressed by the formula
ω p = ω in · N 1 N 2 .
The detailed geometrical and kinematical analysis of the presented MPG has been discussed in [24].

3. Calculation of Torque Transmission

The torque transmitted by the magnetic gears originates from the magnetic forces exerted on the elements of the gear by the interaction of magnetic fields excited by magnetically active materials, i.e., permanent magnets, windings, and ferromagnetic components. To calculate the value of the torque transmitted by the gear, a model allowing one to determine the magnetic fields in the studied transducer must be developed. For determining the distribution of the magnetic fields and calculating the transmitted torque of MGs, an analytical technique based on the current sheet model (CSM) of permanent magnets is often proposed [13,14,15]. The application of the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) method [12] and CSM allows for the determination of the magnetic flux density within the air gaps between movable elements of the MG. The magnetomotive force (MMF) of each permanent magnet is represented by a series of infinitesimal current sheets placed along the magnet height. Despite low computational complexity, the suitability of this method for designing the MG is rather limited. The main reasons for this are the high number of assumptions needed to be made and the complexity of model formulation. The limited usefulness of the analytical methods for designing the MG is especially apparent for MGs with sophisticated geometries and kinematics. Due to the complex structure of the magnetic circuit of the studied MPG, to calculate the transmitted torque in the considered system, a numerical model of the magnetic field was proposed and developed. A detailed discussion about magnetic gear modeling techniques has been given in [24]. However, in contrast to the previously developed numerical model, the major dimensions of the magnetic circuit (precession angle, magnet sizes, air-gap lengths, as well as the thickness of yokes) were parameterized in order to enable optimized calculations. The application of the FEM to determine the magnetic field distribution allows the precise analysis of the torque transmission process in the studied MPG. Nevertheless, due to the high complexity of the magnetic circuit of the proposed precession gear, a number of simplifications have been imposed in order to find a balance between the computational complexity and the credibility of the results.
First, the geometry of the model was limited to the magnetically active materials such as ferromagnetic discs and permanent magnets. All structural components not interacting directly with the magnetic field, like an enclosure, bearings, shafts, and screws, were neglected. In the development of the mechanical design of the prototype, all auxiliary components potentially electromagnetically active (ferromagnetic, conductive components) were intentionally located at a minimum distance of 20 to 30 mm from the working air gaps in the magnetic field. Moreover, in the studies of torque transmission, the angular positions of the magnetically active elements of the gear were assumed to be known in advance according to the presented kinematical analyses. In other words, the model did not include equations of mechanical equilibrium of the system. Therefore, at the current stage of the research, the impact of the eddy currents induced in the massive conductive elements of the magnetic circuit was neglected. It should be emphasized that the calculation of the eddy currents in the magnetic circuit of such a complex structure is a challenging task in terms of the numerical analysis of systems with an electromagnetic field, and in general, it leads to the necessity of development and application of a model of coupled transient electromagnetic and mechanical phenomena. Such models have extremely high computational complexity, and thus their usefulness at the design stage of MPGs is limited. The general structure of the studied MPG model is shown in Figure 4a,b. The blue and red colours of the permanent magnet indicate its magnetization directions.
To achieve the precise distribution of the magnetic field allowing for detailed analysis of a torque transmission process, the studied domains were subdivided into more than 830,000 tetrahedral elements. The mesh was refined for magnetically active regions as magnets and air gaps. The visualization of the finite element mesh excluding the air region at the selected position of the gear elements is shown in Figure 5a, while the corresponding distribution of the magnetic field lines is depicted in Figure 5b. It can be observed that the studied magnetic circuit is not saturated since the maximum value of the magnetic flux density does not exceed 1.4 T. The increased value of the magnetic flux density can be observed in the regions of the minimum value of the air-gap lengths. It can also be noticed that in these regions, a closed loop of the magnetic flux is formed according to the magnetization direction of the magnets. This flux contributes to the transmission of torque by the gear.
To calculate the transmitted torque between the movable elements of the proposed gear, the Maxwell stress tensor method [25] was applied. In this approach, the value of the torque acting on each movable component of the gear is calculated as an integral of Maxwell stress tensor components over the integration surface Γ located in the air region that encloses the magnetically active materials of each component highlighted in Figure 6.
The characteristic feature of magnetic gears, in general, is significantly lower stiffness when compared to mechanical gears. The relation of torque and a mechanical angle between movable elements, due to the similarity of distribution of the magnetic field and occurring physical phenomena, can be understood as an analogue of the dependence of the internal load angle on the load torque value in the synchronous motors [26,27].
For example, if the mechanical angle β2m between the intermediate ring and the output ring is expressed by its relation to a number of magnetic pole pairs p on the output ring (β2 = β2m N4/2), the output torque Tout can be approximated by a sine function of the load angle β2. By analogy, Tbase can be expressed as sinusoidal dependence on the load angle β1 = β1m N1/2. A more complex situation occurs for torque Tin, in general, when the input torque is affected by both angles, i.e., it depends on the magnetic field distribution on each side of the intermediate ring. The load angles β2 and β1 defined for the studied system are illustrated in Figure 7a,b, respectively. The blue arrows indicate the direction of rotation, and the red ones indicate the direction of load torque.
In the proposed approach, the dependencies of the torques Tbase, Tout, and Tin on the load angles β1 and β2 and air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2 (see Figure 6) are determined on the basis of the developed 3D FEM model of the magnetic field in the proposed MPG. To prove both the correctness and the accuracy of the developed FEM model, the prototype of the gear was designed and built. The design of the MPG prototype as well as the experimental setup are described in the next section of this paper.

4. Prototype and Test Stand

The construction of the two-stage MPG (Figure 8) was designed to enable adjustment (with the use of gauge blocks and hex keys) of the length of both air-gaps, i.e., between the input ring and the intermediate ring as well as independently between the intermediate ring and the output ring. All the metal parts were made of S235 grade steel. Permanent magnets were glued to rings with the use of special 3D-printed cages. The prototype was built to confirm the principle of MPG operation. Due to the high cost of custom-made magnets, NdFeB magnets in stock were used instead. This affected other geometrical dimensions of the designed MPG, which led to a transmission ratio of 1/144. A precession angle was assumed through initial finite element analysis to achieve the highest output torque. The most important parameters of the prototype of the investigated gear are presented in Table 1, and its technical drawing, as well as photograph, is shown in Figure 8.
The research stand (shown in Figure 9) consists of a servo motor drive produced by BECKHOFF, placed at the input and composed of a servomotor (AM8042) and a servo controller (AX5000); two torque transducers (MT5 and KTR DATAFLEX 22/20) to measure torque at the input and output of the tested gear; as well as a brake (EMA—ELFA P80) to load the gear at the output. Additionally, an encoder (LIKA CK59) was installed at the output to measure the uniformity of the gear operation. The main purpose of this test stand was to determine the gear efficiency as well as the maximum allowable torque for a given rotational speed and given air-gap lengths.
During the tests, no excessive warming of the prototype was registered. The noise level appeared to be lower than in mechanical transmissions with similar ratios; however, thermal and noise-level measurements were not conducted at the current stage of the research. Three repetitions of the same measurements were made under identical conditions.
The results of the conducted experimental investigations and numerical simulations carried out were compared and are discussed in Section 5.

5. Results and Discussion

This section is organized as follows. First, the results of the experiments are presented and discussed. The conducted tests enable determining the efficiency and examining the influence of rotational speed and air-gap lengths on the maximum load torque. Subsequently, these experimental results are supplemented with simulation results, which show the dependence of the load angle on the length of the air gaps. Finally, a comparison of the characteristics of the load torque as a function of the load angle determined experimentally and by the FEM analysis conducted for selected air-gaps lengths is presented and discussed.
First, the dependence of the maximum load torque carried by the tested gearbox at different values of rotational speed of the input shaft was examined. The obtained characteristic is shown in Figure 10. A decrease in the maximum load torque transmitted by the examined gear at higher rotational speeds can be observed. Such behavior of the MPG can be explained by the impact of the eddy current losses induced in the steel cores [28] and the permanent magnets as well as magneto-mechanical resonances occurring in the studied gear [29,30].
The impact of the load torque on the input torque of the studied MPG was examined next. The tests were carried out for two selected rotational speeds of the input shaft. The obtained characteristic is shown in Figure 11.
As can be observed, when the load torque increases, so does the input torque. Assuming that the efficiency of the MPG is equal to 100%, the input torque should depend only on the gear ratio and for the studied MPG design should be 144 times less than the load torque. For example, when the load torque equals 3 Nm, the input torque should be 0.021 Nm. Due to frictional and eddy current losses, the measured values of the input torque are about five times higher than in the ideal case.
The maximum load torque that can be transmitted by the gear depends also on the air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2. When the length of the air gaps increases, the lower value of the torque can be transmitted because of the decreasing strength of the magnetic coupling; see the characteristics of the maximum load torque determined for two rotational speeds of the input shaft shown in Figure 12.
When the rotational speed is low, the losses in the system are mainly generated by the bearings, whereas with an increase in the rotational speed, the contribution of the eddy current losses becomes more crucial, which also results in deterioration of the overall efficiency. An increase in the load torque leads to an increase in the load angle between movable elements (described in Section 3) and, in consequence, to an increase in the magnetic torque, which influences the transmission efficiency. To illustrate the dependence of efficiency on rotational speed and load torque value, the efficiency map is shown in Figure 13.
Next, the dependence of MPG efficiency on air-gap lengths was examined. The obtained gear efficiency vs. load torque characteristics determined for an input speed equal to 50 rpm and different values of air-gap lengths are shown in Figure 14. Dotted vertical lines in Figure 14 indicate the maximum load torque that the gear is able to transmit. It can be noticed that the air-gap lengths have a marginal impact on the slope of the efficiency characteristic; however, due to a change in Tout max, the maximum value of efficiency undergoes significant changes.
Then, the dependencies of the magnetic torques affecting magnetically active components of the studied gear on the air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2, as well as load angles β1 and β2, were determined. The use of the developed numerical model of the magnetic field in the studied MPG allows studying the influence of each parameter independently. In this study, the influence of the discussed parameters of the magnetic circuit on values of the torques Tout, Tbase, and Tin were examined. The obtained results are summarized in Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17.
It can be noticed that the output torque Tout depends on the length of the air gap, δ2, and the load angle β2 and is independent of β1 and δ1. As expected, the torque vs. load angle characteristic Tout = f (β2) is close to sinusoidal in shape. The dependence of the output torque Tout on the air-gap length δ2 shows that decreasing the value of the air-gap length increases the torque value at a given load angle.
It can also be noted that the torque acting on the immovable ring of the gear, Tbase, depends on the length of the air gap, δ1, and the load angle β1, while it is independent of β2 and δ2. Analogically to the output torque, the torque vs. load angle characteristic Tbase = f (β1) is sinusoidal in shape and Tbase, at a given load angle, increases with the shorter length of the air gap, δ1.
Regarding the dependence of the input torque Tin on the studied parameters, it can be seen that it is much more complex than for Tbase and Tout. The input torque depends on magnetic field distributions in both air gaps, and therefore, its value will be affected by both air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2 as well as both load angles β1 and β2.
Experimental verification of whether the developed numerical model of the magnetic field inside the gear is credible is a challenging task. In practice, the most technically difficult is to measure the dependence of the input torque on parameters of the magnetic circuit. To carry out such experiments, precise angular position sensors, as well as torque sensors, should be installed to accurately measure the angular positions of all movable elements of the studied gear. In the proposed approach, to mitigate the discussed problems and experimentally verify the proposed 3D FEM model, the angular positions of the input shaft of the prototype as well as the intermediate disk were fixed. Then, the angular position of the output shaft was forced by the external drive, and the output torque and the angular position of the shaft were measured, allowing one to determine the output torque vs. the internal load angle. The results of the simulations and measurements carried out are compared in Figure 18. The achieved concordance between the results of the simulations and measurements proves satisfactory accuracy of the developed 3D FEM model. For all analyzed cases, the root-mean-square error does not exceed 10% of the maximum transmitted torque, which is considered a good agreement between the model and the experiment.

6. Conclusions

The concept of a two-stage magnetic precession gear was proposed and analyzed. A detailed analysis of the performance of the proposed gear was carried out using a developed numerical model of the magnetic field exploiting the FEM. To validate the developed model and study the gear efficiency, the prototype of an MPG with a 1/144 gear ratio was built and examined. The comparison results of the experiments and calculations were presented and discussed. The efficiency of the energy transmission via the studied gear was examined.
Due to lower exploitation of magnetically active materials, the proposed MPG cannot compete with a CMG in terms of torque density. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the proposed MPG enables one to obtain the value of a transmission ratio even higher than 1/1000, which is an unattainable value for other known types of magnetic gears.
The main conclusions from this research can be formulated as follows:
  • The concept of the proposed magnetic gear was validated via simulations and experiments.
  • The maximum obtained efficiency (approx. 30%) was limited by the maximum load torque carried by the gear as well as losses in the bearings and was related to the eddy current induced in the steel cores.
  • The maximum obtained efficiency of the MPG is a value comparable to the efficiency of mechanical two-stage precession transmission with face meshing [21].
  • The shorter the lengths of the air gaps, the bigger the torque that the gear is able to carry because of the increasing strength of the magnetic coupling.
  • The model, determined by the developed numerical FEM, torques vs. load angle characteristics, can be further applied to develop a numerical model of the dynamic operation of the studied gear.
The authors will carry out further research on the development of the MPG, focusing on the analysis and optimization of its magnetic circuit to improve its performance, i.e., efficiency, torque density, as well as energy conversion quality, in terms of torque ripples. The coverage of the pole pitch by the magnet, as well as the magnet’s shape, will be optimized to increase the value of transmitted torque, allowing one to obtain an efficiency above 30%. The application of a soft magnetic composite as a core material as well as the segmentation of the permanent magnets are considered to reduce losses in the magnetic circuit. According to [31,32], the eddy current power loss in the permanent magnets decreases as a quadratic function of the number of circumferential permanent magnet segments. Simultaneously, efforts will be made to develop a numerical model of gear dynamics based on the obtained simulation results.

Author Contributions

This was a collaborative work: conceptualization, L.M. and A.M.; prototype construction, L.M. and A.M.; test stand, L.M.; methodology, L.M. and C.J.; experiments, L.M.; FEM simulations, C.J. and L.M.; analysis of the results, L.M and C.J.; writing, L.M. and C.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland as a part of research subsidy (project nos. 0614/SBAD/1529 and 0212/SBAD/0514).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tomasz Bartkowiak for his thoughtful comments on this research and for proofreading the original manuscript. We also would like to thank Michał Kowal for his technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in writing the manuscript; and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. He, Z.; Zhang, T.; Lin, T. Novel Mathematical Modelling Method for Meshing Impact of Helical Gear. Mech. Mach. Theory 2020, 152, 103949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramadani, R.; Belsak, A.; Kegl, M.; Predan, J.; Pehan, S. Topology Optimization Based Design of Lightweight and Low Vibration Gear Bodies. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2018, 17, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yuan, B.; Chang, L.; Liu, G.; Chang, S.; Liu, L.; Shen, Y. An Efficient Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contact Model for Cylindrical Gear Pairs with Distributed Tooth Flank Errors. Mech. Mach. Theory 2020, 152, 103930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Macyszyn, Ł.; Pabiszczak, S. Frictionless Gears as an Alternative for the Traditional Gears. Mechanik 2016, 1770–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miladinović, S.; Ivanovic, L.; Blagojevic, M.; Stojanovic, B. The development of magnetic gears for transportation applications. Mobil. Veh. Mech. 2017, 43, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tlali, P.M.; Wang, R.; Gerber, S. Magnetic Gear Technologies: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Berlin, Germany, 2–5 September 2014; pp. 544–550. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kołodziej, J.; Kowol, M.; Mynarek, P.; Gabor, R.; Łukaniszyn, M. Forces in Axial Flux Magnetic Gears with Integer and Fractional Gear Ratios. Energies 2021, 14, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Filippini, M.; Bianchi, N.; Alotto, P. A Review on Magnetic Gears: Topologies, Computational Models, and Design Aspects. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 4557–4566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Łukaniszyn, M.; Kowol, M.; Kołodziej, J. Analiza pracy przekładni magnetycznej. Performance analysis of the magnetic gear. Masz. Elektr. Zesz. Probl. 2014, 4, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  10. Armstrong, C.G. Power-Transmitting Device. US Patent 687 292, 1901, 24 March 2021. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US687292.
  11. Li, X.; Chau, K.-T.; Cheng, M.; Hua, W. Comparison of magnetic-geared permanent-magnet machines. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2013, 133, 177–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Derbas, H.W.; Williams, J.M.; Koenig, A.C.; Pekarek, S.D. A Comparison of Nodal- and Mesh-Based Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Models. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2009, 24, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Boules, N. Two-Dimensional Field Analysis of Cylindrical Machines with Permanent Magnet Excitation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1984, IA-20, 1267–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-W. Transmitted Torque Analysis of a Magnetic Gear Mechanism with Rectangular Magnets. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2015, 9, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, S.M.; Sung, C.K. Analytical Analysis of Magnetic Couplings with Parallelepiped Magnets. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2002, 239, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, Y.C.; Jian, B.S. Finite-Element Analysis of the Magnetic Field in a Magnetic Gear Mechanism. Available online: https://www.scientific.net/AMM.479-480.230 (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  17. Atallah, K.; Howe, D. A Novel High-Performance Magnetic Gear. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2001, 37, 2844–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bouheraoua, M.; Wang, J.; Atallah, K. Rotor Position Estimation of a Pseudo Direct-Drive PM Machine Using Extended Kalman Filter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dragan, R.S.; Clark, R.E.; Hussain, E.K.; Atallah, K.; Odavic, M. Magnetically Geared Pseudo Direct Drive for Safety Critical Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grajdek, R.; Staniek, R.; Ptaszynski, W. Przekładnie Precesyjne w Napędach Robotów i Urządzeń Pozycjonujących (Eng. Precession Gears in Robotic Drives and Positioning Devices). Mechanik 1996, 15, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Macyszyn, Ł.; Myszkowski, A.; Staniek, R.; Pabiszczak, S. Two-Stage Precession Type Gear: Design, Geometric and Kinematic Analysis. In Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, Tampa, FL, USA, 3–9 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Staniek, R. Shaping of the Face Worm Gear by Means of the Single Edge Cutting Tool. In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 9th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Haifa, Israel, 7–9 July 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saribay, Z.B.; Bill, R.C. Design Analysis of Pericyclic Mechanical Transmission System. Mech. Mach. Theory 2013, 61, 102–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Macyszyn, Ł.; Jedryczka, C.; Staniek, R. Design and Finite Element Analysis of Novel Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2019, 18, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Coulomb, J. A Methodology for the Determination of Global Electromechanical Quantities from a Finite Element Analysis and Its Application to the Evaluation of Magnetic Forces, Torques and Stiffness. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1983, 19, 2514–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ionel, D.M.; Eastham, J.F.; Miller, T.J.E.; Demeter, E. Design Considerations for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors for Flux Weakening Applications. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl. 1998, 145, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stumberger, B.; Stumberger, G.; Hadziselimovic, M.; Marcic, T.; Virtic, P.; Trlep, M.; Gorican, V. Design and Finite-Element Analysis of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor With Flux Barriers. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2008, 44, 4389–4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fukuoka, M.; Nakamura, K.; Ichinokura, O. Experimental Tests and Efficiency Improvement of Surface Permanent Magnet Magnetic Gear. IEEJ J. Ind. Appl. 2014, 3, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Desvaux, M.; Le Goff Latimier, R.; Ben Ahmed, H.; Multon, B.; Sire, S. Analysis of the Dynamic Behaviour of Magnetic Gear with Nonlinear Modelling for Large Wind Turbines. In Proceedings of the XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Lausanne, France, 4–7 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Komiyama, H.; Uchimura, Y. Contactless Magnetic Gear for Robot Control Application. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 2013, 184, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, W.; Bettayeb, A.; Kaczmarek, R.; Vannier, J. Optimization of Magnet Segmentation for Reduction of Eddy-Current Losses in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2010, 25, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Filippini, M.; Alotto, P.; Cirimele, V.; Repetto, M.; Ragusa, C.; Dimauro, L.; Bonisoli, E. Magnetic Loss Analysis in Coaxial Magnetic Gears. Electronics 2019, 8, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The first patented magnetic gear (MG) [10]: (a) and currently the most commonly used coaxial magnetic gear with neodymium magnets and ferromagnetic pole pieces (b).
Figure 1. The first patented magnetic gear (MG) [10]: (a) and currently the most commonly used coaxial magnetic gear with neodymium magnets and ferromagnetic pole pieces (b).
Energies 14 01838 g001
Figure 2. Pseudo direct drive (PDD) patented by Magnomatics [18].
Figure 2. Pseudo direct drive (PDD) patented by Magnomatics [18].
Energies 14 01838 g002
Figure 3. Concept and kinematic scheme of the magnetic two-stage precession gear: a, input shaft; b, immovable ring; c, intermediate ring; and d, output ring with output shaft.
Figure 3. Concept and kinematic scheme of the magnetic two-stage precession gear: a, input shaft; b, immovable ring; c, intermediate ring; and d, output ring with output shaft.
Energies 14 01838 g003
Figure 4. Concept of a magnetic precession gear: (a) general view of magnetically active components and (b) structure of the intermediate ring with marked directions of magnetization of the magnets.
Figure 4. Concept of a magnetic precession gear: (a) general view of magnetically active components and (b) structure of the intermediate ring with marked directions of magnetization of the magnets.
Energies 14 01838 g004
Figure 5. Details of the numerical model: (a) applied finite element mesh (excluding the air region) and (b) magnetic field line distribution at selected positions of the gear elements for a precession angle equal to 6° and a gear ratio equal to 1/144.
Figure 5. Details of the numerical model: (a) applied finite element mesh (excluding the air region) and (b) magnetic field line distribution at selected positions of the gear elements for a precession angle equal to 6° and a gear ratio equal to 1/144.
Energies 14 01838 g005
Figure 6. The components of a magnetic precession gear (MPG) for the calculation of: (a) torque Tbase acting on the base of the gear (immovable ring), (b) torque Tin acting on the intermediate ring (input shaft), and (c) output torque Tout acting on the output shaft.
Figure 6. The components of a magnetic precession gear (MPG) for the calculation of: (a) torque Tbase acting on the base of the gear (immovable ring), (b) torque Tin acting on the intermediate ring (input shaft), and (c) output torque Tout acting on the output shaft.
Energies 14 01838 g006
Figure 7. Illustration of the load angles: (a) β2 and (b) β1.
Figure 7. Illustration of the load angles: (a) β2 and (b) β1.
Energies 14 01838 g007
Figure 8. MPG prototype: (a) construction and (b) picture.
Figure 8. MPG prototype: (a) construction and (b) picture.
Energies 14 01838 g008
Figure 9. Overview of the test stand: a, servomotor; b, torque transducer 1; c, MPG prototype; d, torque-measuring interface; e, torque transducer 2; f, brake; and g, encoder.
Figure 9. Overview of the test stand: a, servomotor; b, torque transducer 1; c, MPG prototype; d, torque-measuring interface; e, torque transducer 2; f, brake; and g, encoder.
Energies 14 01838 g009
Figure 10. Maximum load as a function of the input rotational speed (for symmetrical air-gap length = 1 mm).
Figure 10. Maximum load as a function of the input rotational speed (for symmetrical air-gap length = 1 mm).
Energies 14 01838 g010
Figure 11. Input torque dependence on the load torque (for symmetrical air-gaps length = 1 mm).
Figure 11. Input torque dependence on the load torque (for symmetrical air-gaps length = 1 mm).
Energies 14 01838 g011
Figure 12. Maximum output torque dependence on the air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2 for: (a) δ2 = const = 1 mm and (b) δ1 = const = 1 mm.
Figure 12. Maximum output torque dependence on the air-gap lengths δ1 and δ2 for: (a) δ2 = const = 1 mm and (b) δ1 = const = 1 mm.
Energies 14 01838 g012
Figure 13. Dependence of the efficiency of the gear on the rotational speed of the input shaft and the load torque (for symmetrical air gaps, δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm).
Figure 13. Dependence of the efficiency of the gear on the rotational speed of the input shaft and the load torque (for symmetrical air gaps, δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm).
Energies 14 01838 g013
Figure 14. The dependence of the efficiency of the gear on the lengths of the air gaps δ1 and δ2 at n1 = 50 rpm for: (a) δ1 = 1 mm and different values of δ2 and (b) δ2 = 1 mm and different values of δ1.
Figure 14. The dependence of the efficiency of the gear on the lengths of the air gaps δ1 and δ2 at n1 = 50 rpm for: (a) δ1 = 1 mm and different values of δ2 and (b) δ2 = 1 mm and different values of δ1.
Energies 14 01838 g014aEnergies 14 01838 g014b
Figure 15. The output torque Tout as a function of: (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) β2, δ1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°); and (c) β2, δ2 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°).
Figure 15. The output torque Tout as a function of: (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) β2, δ1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°); and (c) β2, δ2 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°).
Energies 14 01838 g015
Figure 16. The base torque Tbase as a function of: (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) δ1, β1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β2 = 48°); and (c) δ2, β1 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β2 = 48°).
Figure 16. The base torque Tbase as a function of: (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) δ1, β1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β2 = 48°); and (c) δ2, β1 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β2 = 48°).
Energies 14 01838 g016
Figure 17. The input torque Tin as a function of (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) β2, δ1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°); and (c) β2, δ2 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°).
Figure 17. The input torque Tin as a function of (a) β2, β1 (for δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm); (b) β2, δ1 (for δ2 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°); and (c) β2, δ2 (for δ1 = 1 mm, β1 = 58°).
Energies 14 01838 g017
Figure 18. Comparison of measured and calculated output torque Tout with internal load angle β2 characteristics for (a) δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm; (b) δ1 = 1 mm, δ2 = 1.5 mm; and (c) δ1 = 1 mm, δ2 = 2 mm.
Figure 18. Comparison of measured and calculated output torque Tout with internal load angle β2 characteristics for (a) δ1 = δ2 = 1 mm; (b) δ1 = 1 mm, δ2 = 1.5 mm; and (c) δ1 = 1 mm, δ2 = 2 mm.
Energies 14 01838 g018
Table 1. Prototype parameters.
Table 1. Prototype parameters.
ParameterValue
Transmission ratio1/144
Precession angle
Outside diameter164 mm
Height (without shafts)125 mm
Magnet typeN38
Magnet dimensions15 × 5 × 5 (mm)
Number of magnetsN1 = 22, N2 = 24, N3 = 26, N4 = 24
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Macyszyn, L.; Jedryczka, C.; Myszkowski, A. Simulation and Experimental Investigation of a Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear. Energies 2021, 14, 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071838

AMA Style

Macyszyn L, Jedryczka C, Myszkowski A. Simulation and Experimental Investigation of a Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear. Energies. 2021; 14(7):1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Macyszyn, Lukasz, Cezary Jedryczka, and Adam Myszkowski. 2021. "Simulation and Experimental Investigation of a Two-Stage Magnetic Precession Gear" Energies 14, no. 7: 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop