Next Article in Journal
Supply Chain Management for Bioenergy and Bioresources: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Analytic Model of Threshold Voltage (VTH) Recovery in Fully Recessed Gate MOS-Channel HEMT (High Electron Mobility Transistor) after OFF-State Drain Stress
Previous Article in Journal
A Geothermal Plant from a Time-Scale Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparisons on Different Innovative Cascode GaN HEMT E-Mode Power Modules and Their Efficiencies on the Flyback Converter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Power Normally-OFF GaN/AlGaN HEMT with Regrown p Type GaN

1
Institut Interdisciplinaire d’Innovation Technologique (3IT), Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Bd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
2
GaNSystems Inc., 1145 Innovation, Ottawa, ON K2K 3G8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(19), 6098; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196098
Submission received: 19 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 21 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wide Bandgap Technologies for Power Electronics)

Abstract

:
In this paper is presented a Normally-OFF GaN HEMT (High Electron Mobility Transistor) device using p-doped GaN barrier layer regrown by CBE (Chemical Beam Epitaxy). The impact of the p doping on the device performance is investigated using TCAD simulator (Silvaco/Atlas). With 4E17 cm−3 p doping, a Vth of 1.5 V is achieved. Four terminal breakdowns of the fabricated device are investigated, and the origin of the device failure is identified.
Keywords:
HEMT; normally-OFF; P-GaN; CBE

1. Introduction

Gallium nitride (GaN) High Electron Mobility Transistors (HEMTs) offer outstanding performance at high power and high switching frequency [1], thanks to the material’s robust electrical and thermal properties. The fundamental GaN-HEMT is a depletion mode device (D-mode) also called Normally-ON, meaning that the device is in conduction mode at Vgs = 0 V. The reason for this is that the conduction channel (2DEG) is spontaneously present when the AlGaN/GaN or another barrier alloy is in contact with the GaN channel layer [2]. For high power application and for safety reasons, the circuit designers need an enhancement mode device called Normally-OFF that can block the current at Vgs = 0 V, thanks to its positive pinch-off voltage (Vth). So, to shift the Vth from negative values to positive values, several approaches are investigated in the literature: (A) Fluorine (F ions) implantation in the upper part of the barrier layer to deplete the channel [3]; (B) Gate recess on the barrier layer [4]; (C) Etching of the barrier layer using an etch-stop layer [5]; (D) p-doped GaN layer on top of the AlGaN barrier layer [6]. This last approach is used in this paper. In the literature, the reported papers present a process where the p-doped GaN is grown in the same epitaxy with the HEMT active layer. During the device fabrication, this p-doped GaN layer is removed in the device access region using plasma etching and left only below the gate [7]. The exposure of the access region to the plasma can degrade the device resistances and consequently increase the Ron [8]. In this paper, we are investigating a new approach where the p-doped GaN is selectively re-grown on the AlGaN barrier layer using the CBE (Chemical Beam Epitaxy) technique. Using this approach, the device access region is not exposed to an etching plasma in subsequent step during the device fabrication process. The choice of the CBE technique is an attempt to leverage some of its advantages, such as outstanding selectivity, lower growth temperature compared to the standard MOVPE technique, and the tool compatibility with standard cluster tool technology.
Such an approach has never been reported in the literature and offers a good option to improve the high power HEMT device performance. To determine the appropriate p doping for our device, the Vth vs. the p doping level is investigated using the TCAD simulator (Silvaco). The device is also fabricated and characterized.

2. Simulation Results

To understand the effect of the p doping of the GaN layer on the device performance, TCAD simulation (Silvaco/Atlas) has been performed. Several works in the literature report on the same subject by giving an overview and brief explanation of the real effect of the p doping on the pinch-off voltage of the Normally-OFF HEMT device [6,9]. In this paper, we will take one further step for the understanding of such an effect by using the TCAD tool to explain the impact of the GaN p doping on the device physics.
For that purpose, two structures (Figure 1a) were simulated, structure A (with p-doped GaN layer) and structure B (without p-doped GaN layer). Figure 2 represents the architecture of the simulated device.
In Figure 1b, the band diagram of the two structures is presented. For the 2D simulation to determine the pinch-off of the device, a 50 nm thick p-doped GaN layer is used instead of 100 nm. This is due to the simulator converging problem that appears when the p-doped GaN layer thickness is very thick. So, we decided to reduce the thickness of the p-doped GaN layer to 50 nm to help the simulator to converge correctly. Even if the thickness of this layer is different from that used in the fabricated devices, we can still see a certain similarity between the theoretical and the achieved results.
In Figure 1b, we can observe that the p-doped GaN layer will lift-up the conduction band and then deplete the channel. Therefore, the fabricated device using structure A will be Normally-OFF, while the one using Structure B will be Normally-ON.
In Figure 3 are presented the pinch-off voltage extracted at Ids = 1 mA/mm @ Vds = 10 V and the p-doped GaN layer depletion region thickness vs. the GaN p doping values. This depletion region is extracted for the hole density equal to 1E14 cm−3 in the p-doped GaN layer. In this curve, we can observe three regions (Figure 3):
Region 1: for p doping lower than 4E17 cm−3, the gate contact is Schottky type. In this region, we can consider that the p-doped GaN layer is quasi-depleted at Vgs = 0 V as shown in Figure 3b. Consequently, an important part of the gate voltage is directly applied to the channel and can easily switch on the device. In this region, the Vth is around 1 V.
Region 2: in this region, the p-doped GaN layer is partially depleted. The gate voltage, therefore, needs to first deplete the p-doped GaN layer and then it will have access to the channel to increase the electron density in the 2D electron gas. For doping in the 5E17–1E18 cm−3 range, the un-depleted part of the p-doped GaN layer is relatively thin with less hole density; therefore, it requires less than 2V bias for total depletion. For this p doping range, the increase in the Vth is low. For higher p doping, full depletion of the p-doped GaN layer becomes more difficult, forcing an increase in Vth. This can be illustrated in Figure 4. In Figure 4a, for p-doping equal 1E19 cm−3 and by varying Vgs from 0 to 5 V, as expected, the depletion region of the p-doped GaN layer becomes wider by increasing Vgs. At the same time, the conduction band and the electron density in the channel did not change (Figure 4b). Consequently, the gate voltage only depletes the p-doped GaN layer and needs to deplete it completely to allow access to the channel. This can explain why the Vth is very high for the p doping around 1E19 cm−3.
Region 3: when the p GaN doping level starts to be high enough to stop the depletion region very close to the gate contact at Vgs = 0 V (Figure 5), the tunneling phenomenon starts to take place through this thin layer and the Gate contact becomes ohmic instead of Schottky. In this region, the p-doped GaN layer will be equivalent to a gate serial resistance with no voltage consumption (negligeable) because the gate leakage current of the device is very low. Consequently, we can consider that the Vgs will be applied directly at the p-doped GaN/AlGaN interface. So, Vth decreases to a value comparable to, or even lower than the one achieved for low p doping levels in Region 1.
The p doping level in the fabricated device was 4E17 cm−3, producing a Vth of around 1.5 V.

3. Devices Fabrication and Results

For the device fabrication, the structure B, was grown by EpiGaN on a Si (111) commercial wafer. The device fabrication and p-doped GaN layer regrowth were performed in the 3IT facility. For the p-doped GaN layer regrowth process, the wafer is protected by a 100 nm thick PECVD silicon oxide layer (SiO2) that acts as a mask for the regrowth. Following the patterning of this SiO2 layer, 100 nm of p-doped GaN was selectively grown using a CBE reactor. The growth temperature was 900°C and the targeted Mg atomic doping was 4E19 cm−3. With an expected activation ratio of 1% [10], the targeted hole concentration was 4E17 cm−3. In Figure 6b, we can observe that the growth is happening only on the open area, with no observable growth on the SiO2 mask. After removing such mask using the wet etching, the device fabrication could be initiated with the Ti/Al/Ni/Au ohmic contact deposition step, using E-beam evaporation followed by a rapid thermal annealing. Then, device isolation is performed by N+ ion multiple implantations. Afterwards, the gate electrode was fabricated using (Ti/Au /Ni) metallization deposited by E-beam evaporation. Finally, three passivation and metallization process have been performed to fabricate the two field plates and the final interconnection layer: first passivation (100 nm of SiO2), first field plate (Ti/Au, 20 nm/600 nm), second passivation (200 nm of SiO2), second field plate (Ti/Au, 20 nm/600 nm), third passivation (600 nm of SiO2) and final interconnexion metallization (Ti/Au, 40 nm/800 nm) (Figure 6a).
The two types of devices have been fabricated on the same wafer: the first is Normally-OFF (Structure A) and the second is Normally-ON where the gate electrode is deposited directly on the AlGaN barrier layer.
The transfer plots of these two devices are presented in Figure 7. We can observe that the presence of the regrown p-doped GaN layer is shifting the Vth from −3 to +1.5 V. The gate contact of the Normally-ON device is simple Schottky type, which explain the relatively high off-state leakage current of this device, compared to the Normally-OFF one.
In Figure 8 are presented the Ids(Vds) and Ids(Vgs) plots. The two plots are showing a negligeable level of hysteresis. Thanks to the p-doped GaN layer, the PN junction located between the gate electrode and the channel is reversely biased and then reduces the gate leakage current.
The Coss capacitance of the device A is presented in in Figure 9a for Vds up to 400 V. In this plot, we can observe the presence of two steps: one at 75 V and the other at around 200 V. These two steps are indicative of the two field plates of the device.
Four terminal breakdown measurements have been performed on the fabricated device (Figure 9b). Indeed, at Vgs = 0 V, the Vds was swept up to 600 V. We can observe that for Vds below 400 V, the drain and the source current are quite similar. After 400 V, the substrate current starts to increase and, consequently, the drain current increases faster than the source current. This increase in the drain current will lead to the breakdown of the device. In these measurements, we observed that the difference between the drain and the source currents is equivalent to the substrate current. Furthermore, on the same device, the source and gate probes were lifted up to perform two terminal measurements by probing only the drain and the backside of the substrate. After measuring the I(V) characteristics, we observed that the substrate current vs. the drain voltage is similar to that presented in Figure 9b. So, we can conclude that the breakdown of the device is due to substrate current and will happen underneath the drain electrode.

4. Conclusions

This paper introduces a new Normally-OFF HEMT using a CBE regrowth process of the p-doped GaN layer on top of the AlGaN barrier layer. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time in the literature where such an approach is used for this purpose. The impact of the p doping on the Vth of the device is investigated and explained using TCAD simulator (Silvaco/Atlas). With a p doping value of 4E17 cm−3, a transistor with Vth = 1.5 V is fabricated. The I(V) characteristics of the fabricated device present a negligeable hysteresis and a breakdown voltage over 600 V depending on the gate to drain distance. Special attention has been given to the device breakdown mechanism. After several measurements, we conclude that the origin of the breakdown is coming from the extrinsic part of the device, which is the vertical leakage current between the drain and the back-side electrodes (Substrate).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.; methodology, H.M.; software, G.R.; validation, C.R.; formal analysis, H.M.; investigation, G.G., A.B., A.C., M.B., M.C.P., F.E.H. and S.M.; resources, H.M.; data curation, H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, H.M.; visualization, H.M.; supervision, R.A.; project administration, H.M.; funding acquisition, T.M. and H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), PROMPT-FRQNT (Fonds Québécois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies) and GaNSystems: project RDC-Quartz.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wong, J.; Shinohara, K.; Corrion, A.L.; Brown, D.F.; Carlos, Z.; Williams, A.; Tang, Y.; Robinson, J.F.; Khalaf, I.; Fung, H.; et al. Novel Asymmetric Slant Field Plate Technology for High-Speed Low-Dynamic R on E/D-mode GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shur, M.S. Physics of electron transport in nitride-based material. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices, COMMAD 2002, Proceedings (Cat. No.02EX601), Sydney, Australia, 11–13 December 2002; pp. 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, L.; Hou, B.; Mi, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Cao, Y.; Lv, L.; Zhou, X.; Ma, X.; et al. Normally-Off Fluoride-Based Plasma Treatment AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Maximum fT and fmax of 61GHz/130GHz Using TiN-Based Source Ledge. In Proceedings of the 2018 15th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting: International Forum on Wide Bandgap Semiconductors China (SSLChina: IFWS), Shenzhen, China, 23–25 October 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chakroun, A.; Jaouad, A.; Bouchilaoun, M.; Arenas, O.; Soltani, A.; Maher, H. Normally-off AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT using ultra-thin Al0.45Ga0.55N barrier layer. Phys. Status Solidi A 2017, 214, 1600836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, B.; Sun, M.; Palacios, T. An Etch-Stop Barrier Structure for GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meneghini, M.; Hilt, O.; Wuerfl, J.; Meneghesso, G. Technology and Reliability of Normally-Off GaN HEMTs with p-Type Gate. Energies 2017, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chiu, H.-C.; Chang, Y.-S.; Li, B.-H.; Wang, H.-C.; Kao, H.-L.; Hu, C.-W.; Xuan, R. High-Performance Normally Off p-GaN Gate HEMT With Composite AlN/Al0.17Ga0.83N/Al0.3Ga0.7N Barrier Layers Design. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2018, 6, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roccaforte, F.; Greco, G.; Fiorenza, P.; Iucolano, F. An Overview of Normally-Off GaN-Based High Electron Mobility Transistors. Materials 2019, 12, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Efthymiou, L.; Longobardi, G.; Camuso, G.; Chien, T.; Chen, M.; Udrea, F. On the physical operation and optimization of the p-GaN gate in normally-off GaN HEMT devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 123502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Li, J.; Jiang, H.; Han, Y.; Xia, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yin, J.; Hu, S. High Conductivity of Mg-Doped Al0.3Ga0.7N with Al0.4Ga0.6N/AlN Superlattice Structure. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2014, 2014, 784918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Cross section of the epitaxial structures (left). (b) Band diagram of the two epi-structures (right).
Figure 1. (a) Cross section of the epitaxial structures (left). (b) Band diagram of the two epi-structures (right).
Energies 14 06098 g001
Figure 2. Architecture of the simulated device.
Figure 2. Architecture of the simulated device.
Energies 14 06098 g002
Figure 3. (a) Vth vs. p doping, (b) Band diagram for different p doping in the p-doped GaN layer.
Figure 3. (a) Vth vs. p doping, (b) Band diagram for different p doping in the p-doped GaN layer.
Energies 14 06098 g003
Figure 4. (a) Band diagram of structure A device with p doping at 1E19 cm−3. (b) Electrons and holes density below the gate of this device.
Figure 4. (a) Band diagram of structure A device with p doping at 1E19 cm−3. (b) Electrons and holes density below the gate of this device.
Energies 14 06098 g004
Figure 5. (a) Band diagram of structure A device with p doping equal to 5E20 cm−3. (b) Electrons and holes density below the gate of this device.
Figure 5. (a) Band diagram of structure A device with p doping equal to 5E20 cm−3. (b) Electrons and holes density below the gate of this device.
Energies 14 06098 g005
Figure 6. (a) Description of the fabricated device (left). (b) p-doped GaN layer regrowth (right).
Figure 6. (a) Description of the fabricated device (left). (b) p-doped GaN layer regrowth (right).
Energies 14 06098 g006
Figure 7. Hysteresis Ids(Vgs) at Vds = 10 V of structureA and StructureB devices.
Figure 7. Hysteresis Ids(Vgs) at Vds = 10 V of structureA and StructureB devices.
Energies 14 06098 g007
Figure 8. (a) Hysteresis measurement of Ids (Vgs), (b) Ids(Vds) of structure A.
Figure 8. (a) Hysteresis measurement of Ids (Vgs), (b) Ids(Vds) of structure A.
Energies 14 06098 g008aEnergies 14 06098 g008b
Figure 9. (a) Coss of the deviceA. (b) Drain, substrate, source and gate currents measurements at Vgs = 0 V and at Vds up to 600 V.
Figure 9. (a) Coss of the deviceA. (b) Drain, substrate, source and gate currents measurements at Vgs = 0 V and at Vds up to 600 V.
Energies 14 06098 g009aEnergies 14 06098 g009b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rolland, G.; Rodriguez, C.; Gommé, G.; Boucherif, A.; Chakroun, A.; Bouchilaoun, M.; Pepin, M.C.; El Hamidi, F.; Maher, S.; Arès, R.; et al. High Power Normally-OFF GaN/AlGaN HEMT with Regrown p Type GaN. Energies 2021, 14, 6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196098

AMA Style

Rolland G, Rodriguez C, Gommé G, Boucherif A, Chakroun A, Bouchilaoun M, Pepin MC, El Hamidi F, Maher S, Arès R, et al. High Power Normally-OFF GaN/AlGaN HEMT with Regrown p Type GaN. Energies. 2021; 14(19):6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rolland, Gwen, Christophe Rodriguez, Guillaume Gommé, Abderrahim Boucherif, Ahmed Chakroun, Meriem Bouchilaoun, Marie Clara Pepin, Faissal El Hamidi, Soundos Maher, Richard Arès, and et al. 2021. "High Power Normally-OFF GaN/AlGaN HEMT with Regrown p Type GaN" Energies 14, no. 19: 6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop