Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The current stage of research and scientific considerations of the S.C. idea;
- The state and level of research on this concept.
- What is the most significant influence characterizing keywords from the area of S.C., and what are the relationships between them?
- Which areas of S.C.’s scope are the most relevant now?
- What are the correlations, properties, and connection patterns among the keywords identified in the cluster analysis?
2. Literature Review
- Smart economy, meaning a highly efficient and technologically advanced economy, focused on developing new products and services, developing new business models, and striving to establish local and global relations with the simultaneous exchange of goods, services, and knowledge.
- Smart mobility in the form of integrated transport and logistics systems, powered by clean energy.
- Smart environment, meaning the sustainable use of natural resources by the city, striving to increase the use of renewable energy sources. A smart environment also means controlling power and water networks, street lighting, and other public services to optimize the environmental and financial costs of their operation. It also includes ongoing control and monitoring of the level of pollution or thermo-modernization of buildings in order to reduce their energy consumption.
- Smart people or social capital, which is created in an environment characterized by diversity, a high level of tolerance, creativity, and commitment.
- Smart living, which means a safe and healthy life in the city, offering a broad and diverse housing and cultural situation, and ensuring universal access to ICT infrastructure, which in turn enables the creation of one’s lifestyle, behavior, and consumption.
- Smart governance consisting of managing the city in which the participation of city residents in the strategic decision-making process, transparency of operations, and a high level of quality and availability of public services play an essential role [21]. Moreover, intelligent smart governance enables better organization and integrates the above-mentioned remaining elements [22,23,24].
- Urban openness defined as systems’ degree of openness, which enables user-driven innovation in existing and new services;
- Service innovation, understood as the development of innovative services through exploration of a variety of service areas as well as the exploitation of higher interoperability;
- Partnerships formation, which is the determination of types of partnerships formed to promote smart city development. Examination of funding types, whether top-down from government or bottom-up led by the private sector;
- Urban proactiveness, defined as the extent to which smart city services are moving toward sustainable energy use as well as IT-enabled services, through sensors, internet connectivity, or intelligent controls;
- Smart city infrastructure integration—ICT infrastructure for supporting smart city initiatives and creating higher network effects with multiple complementary devices;
- Smart city governance, which is an effective institutional governance structure, impacts sources and uses of resources through dedicated organization support. Innovative institutional approach or governance model to bring together multiple stakeholders to drive growth and foster smart services usage.
3. The Purpose of Bibliometric Analysis
- Quantitative—objectified, difficult to manipulate, precise, and consistent;
- Normalizable—allow comparing research areas or centers with different productivity;
- Direct—easy to interpret;
- Based on publications and citations—that is, measurable research results and not hard-to-verify expert opinions on achievements;
- Characterized by a short time interval—between the moment of conducting the analyses and obtaining their results;
- Scalable—they allow for the analysis of both small and vast datasets;
- Enable analyses to be conducted by people who are not involved—in most cases, the analyses may be carried out by analysts who do not conduct their scientific research in the analyzed area and therefore do not represent the interests of any of the assessed entities;
- Non-invasive—they do not require collecting data through questionnaires or interviews; they can be carried out repeatedly based on available databases.
- Subjects of scientific activity in the area of S.C.;
- Assessing the importance of individual achievements and the position of researchers, institutions, regions, and countries;
- Defining the directions and potential for further development of the S.C. idea;
- Gathering and sharing knowledge on trends in the field of research on S.C., which may serve as inspiration for further research.
- Number of documents published in the years 2005–2020;
- The types of documents published in the years 2005–2020;
- The list of the most productive sources, in the form of journals and conference proceedings (minimum 10 documents for the adopted period);
- The types of sources;
- The list of the most productive authors (five or more documents for the adopted period);
- The list of the most often affiliated institutions (20 or more documents for the adopted period);
- The list of the most productive countries (50 or more documents for the adopted period);
- The most often mentioned keywords in analyzed documents (50 or more documents in the adopted period);
- The list of the most often used keywords in analyzed documents.
4. Citations Analysis
5. Keyword Occurrence Analysis—Visualization Maps
6. The Research Results Interpretation
- As we could predict, keywords in the form of “Smart City” and “Smart Cities”, treated as synonyms, were the most common words in scientific publications. In second place, however, were keywords in the form of “Internet of Things” (including the phrase “IoT”), “Sustainable Development (including the phrase “Sustainability”), and “Urban Development “(including the phrase “Urban Growth”). These most common keywords indicate that the smart city idea is inextricably linked to the Internet of Things, sustainable development, and urban development. The keyword “Internet of Things” emphasizes the use of the smart city idea in the most modern ICT solutions, and “Sustainable Development” emphasizes that the idea of smart cities is also based on social and ecological pillars. However, “Urban Development” indicates entities in which the idea of smart cities is implemented. As it was previously mentioned, definitions determining the idea of smart cities can be divided into two groups—those that emphasize the use of ICT solutions, and those that take into account aspects such as people or the environment. At the same time, the second group provides the first extension, as ICT solutions are mentioned in them. On the other hand, the common point of these definitions is that they concern the city as the primary entity of this concept.
- Analysis of crucial words carried out in a further stage indicated that the most common words were characterized by the most significant total link strengths to: smart city, urbanization, sustainable development, city, technology, and Internet of Things. At the same time, it is worth noting that a bibliometric analysis was carried out in the first stage of this study, and the obtained results were based on the so-called raw data. On the other hand, analysis of the co-occurrence of keywords was carried out based on data subjected to a cleaning process under which synonyms were removed. Some words that were more general were changed, or literary errors were liquidated. What, however, was not changed was that the fact that “Smart City” is the most common keyword and characterized by the highest value of the total link strength—568. The word “Urbanization” was replaced by the earlier phrases “Urban Development” and “Urban Growth”, wand it was characterized by a more than three times smaller total link strength force. In third place was the phrase “Sustainable Development”—characterized by the value of 100 in its total link strength. Therefore, it can be assumed that the greatest impact is characterized by “Smart City”, which can be taken for obviousness. On the other hand, “urbanization” indicates that the smart city idea is focused on one type of entity: cities. Another phrase again emphasizes that the idea of smart cities is largely based on the concept of sustainable development; if, however, S.D., in these assumptions, is a very general concept, its three pillars are underlined in the idea of smart cities. Subsequent words “City” and “Technology” re-emphasize that the smart city idea is implemented concerning cities, and that the latest technologies are used as part of this idea, but not included in the ICT area, and this combination was placed in eighth position. The results of the coexistence analysis indicate that the most critical areas and research trends in the S.C. idea include urbanization, sustainable development, city, technology, and Internet of Things.
- As part of the analysis of the coexistence of keywords, it was also possible to identify compounds that result from a distance between individual clusters (Figure 15). Lines between clusters also represent the strongest links. A very close relation can be observed between S.C. and Internet of Things, blockchain, entrepreneurship, economy, and environment. This can be called a first-degree relation. However, entrepreneurship, economy, and environment can be treated as the pillars that make up the concept of sustainable development: entrepreneurship as a social pillar, economy as an economic pillar, and environment as an ecology pillar. On the other hand, the Internet of Things is inextricably linked with ICT—one of the effects of the continuous development of ICT. Moreover, the blockchain plays a crucial role in the S.C. idea. It enables network participants to exchange information and data, ensuring a high level of transparency and reliability. Additionally, bearing in mind that cities have a lot of stakeholders (inhabitants), the information and data exchange is essential for highly convenient city services. Thus, the blockchain is now treated as an integral part of the idea of S.C.
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Szymańska, D. Pojęcie inteligentnego miasta. In Inteligentne Miasta—Idea, Koncepcje I Wdrożenia; Szymańska, D., Korolko, M., Eds.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika: Toruń, Poland, 2015; pp. 65–78. [Google Scholar]
- Sikora-Fernandez, D. Koncepcja Smart City w założeniach polityki rozwoju miasta—Polska perspektywa. Acta Univ. Lodz. Folia Oeconomica 2013, 290, 83–94. [Google Scholar]
- The World’s Cities in 2018. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/events/citiesday/assets/pdf/the_worlds_cities_in_2018_data_booklet.pdf (accessed on 22 February 2021).
- 68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050, Says UN. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (accessed on 22 February 2021).
- Jong, M.; Joss, S.; Schraven, D.; Zhan, C.; Weijnen, M. Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McKinsey Global Institute. Smart Cities: Digital Solutions for a More Livable Future. June 2018. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/capital%20projects%20and%20infrastructure/our%20insights/smart%20cities%20digital%20solutions%20for%20a%20more%20livable%20future/mgismart-cities-full-report.ashx (accessed on 3 March 2021).
- Stawasz, D.; Sikora-Fernandez, D.; Turała, M. Koncepcja Smart City jako wyznacznik podejmowania decyzji związanych z funkcjonowaniem i rozwojem miasta. Studia Inform. 2012, 29, 97–109. [Google Scholar]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Tallinn, Estonia, 26–29 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hammi, B.; Khatoun, R.; Zeadally, S.; Fayad, A.; Khoukhi, L. Internet of Things (IoT) Technologies for Smart Cities. IET Res. J. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Giourka, P.; Sanders, M.W.J.L.; Angelakoglou, K.; Pramangioulis, D.; Nikolopoulos, N.; Rakopoulos, D.; Tryferidis, A.; Tzovaras, D. The Smart City Business Model Canvas—A Smart City Business Modeling Framework and Practical Tool. Energies 2019, 12, 4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hjorland, B.; Gnoli, C. Knowledge Organization. Knowl. Organ. 2016, 43, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjorland, B. What is Knowledge Organization (KO)? Knowl. Organ. 2008, 35, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Gong Hancock, M.; Hu, M.-C. Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technol. Forecast. Social Chang. 2014, 89, 80–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryba, M. What is a ‘smart city’ concept and how we should call it in Polish. Res. Pap. Wrocław Univ. Econ. 2017, 467, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allwinkle, S.; Cruickshank, P. Creating Smarter Cities: An Overview. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulton, A.; Brunn, S.D.; Devriendt, L. Cyberinfrastructures and ‘Smart’ World Cities: Physical, Human and Soft Infrastructures. In International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities; Derudder, B., Hoyler, M., Taylor, P.J., Witlox, F., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Chourabi, H.; Nam, T.; Walker, S.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Mellouli, S.; Nahon, K.; Pardo, T.A.; Scholl, H.J. Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hollands, R. Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up? City 2008, 12, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Dirks, S.; Gurdgiev, C.; Keeling, M. Smarter Cities for Smarter Growth: How Cities Can Optimize Their Systems for the Talent-Based Economy; IBM Global Business Services: Somers, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. The Changing Face of a City Government: A Case Study of Philly311. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giffinger, R.; Fertner, C.; Kramar, H.; Kalasek, R.; Pichler-Milanovic, N.; Meijers, E. Smart Cities—Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities (Report), Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT. 2007. Available online: http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2021).
- Manville, C.; Cochrane, G.; Cave, J.; Millard, J.; Pederson, J.K.; Thaarup, R.K.; Liebe, A.; Wissner, M.; Massink, R.; Kotterink, B. Maping Smart Cities in the EU, Study, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy; European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, B. The Top 10 Smartest European Cities. Available online: http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680856/the-top-10-smartest-european-cities (accessed on 24 February 2021).
- Chatterton, P. Will the real creative city please stand up. City 2000, 4, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smart City Koncept Model—Guide to Establishing a Model for Data Interoperability; The British Standard Institution: London, UK, 2014; pp. 5–50.
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woetzel, J.; Remes, J.; Boland, B.; Lv, K.; Sinha, S.; Strube, G.; Means, J.; Law, J.; Cadena, A.; von der Tann, V. Smart Cities: Digital Solutions for a More Livable Future; McKinsey Global Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1–152. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, G.V.; Cunha, M.A.; Lampoltshammer, T.J.; Parycek, P.; Testa, M.G. Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2017, 23, 526–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paskaleva, K.; Cooper, I.; Linde, P.; Peterson, B.; Götz, C. Stakeholder Engagement in the Smart City: Making Living Labs Work. In Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities; Rodríguez-Bolívar, M., Ed.; Public Administration and Information Technology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, R.G.; Lippez-De Castro, S. Technology helps, people make: A smart city governance framework grounded in deliberative democracy. In Smarter as the New Urban Agenda; Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T., Eds.; Springer International: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 333–347. [Google Scholar]
- Glasmeier, A.; Christopherson, S. Thinking about smart cities. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2015, 8, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komninos, N. Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces; Spon Press: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Lazaroiu, G.C.; Roscia, M. Definition Methodology for the Smart City Model. Energy 2012, 47, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciemcioch, J. Wybrane Problemy Zarządzania Bezpieczeństwem Smart City; AGH: Kraków, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Azkuna, I. Smart Cities: International Study and the Situation of ICT, Innowaction and Knowledge in Cities; The Committee of Digital and Knowledge-based Cities of UCLG: Bilbao, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hitachi Review. 2021, 61, 103–171. Available online: https://www.hitachi.com/rev/pdf/2012/r2012_03_all.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2021).
- A Vision of Smarter Cities. How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future; IBM Institute for Business Value: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Available online: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/2JYLM4ZA (accessed on 24 February 2021).
- Lekamge, S.; Marasinghe, A. Developing a smart city model that ensures the optimum utilization of existing resources in cities of all sizes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Biometrics and Kansei Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 5–7 July 2013; pp. 202–207. [Google Scholar]
- What Is a Smart City? Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/industries/smart-connected-communities/what-is-a-smart-city.html (accessed on 26 February 2021).
- Smart Cities: Samsung and Toyota Sketch Future Urban Life at CES. Available online: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/CES-2020/Smart-cities-Samsung-and-Toyota-sketch-future-urban-life-at-CES (accessed on 26 February 2021).
- Smart Cities—Smart Living. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/smart-cities-smart-living (accessed on 26 February 2021).
- Napolitano, R.; Reinhart, W.; Gevaudan, J.P. Smart cities built with smart materials. Science 2021, 371, 1200–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bricout, J.; Baker, P.M.A.; Moon, N.W.; Sharma, B. Exploring the smart future of participation: Community, inclusivity, and people with disabilities. Int. J. E-Plan. Res. 2021, 10, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reggi, L.; Gil-Garcia, J.R. Addressing territorial digital divides through ICT strategies: Are investment decisions consistent with local needs? Gov. Inf. Q. 2021, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, A.; Minevich, M.; Abdoullaev, A. The Future of the Future: Being Smart about Smart Cities. Available online: http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Column/The-Future-of-the-Future/The-Future-of-the-Future-Being-smart-about-smart-cities-77848.aspx (accessed on 27 February 2021).
- Schaffers, H.; Komninos, N.; Pallot, M.; Trousse, B.; Nilsson, M.; Oliveira, A. Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, the future internet. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2011, 6656, 431–446. [Google Scholar]
- Dodgson, M.; Gann, D.; Salter, A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag. 2006, 36, 333–346. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, P. Creative Cities and Economic Development. Urban Stud. 2000, 37, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsa-Maestre, I.; Lopez-Carmona, M.A.; Velasco, J.R.; Navarro, A. Mobile agents for service personalization in smart environments. J. Netw. 2008, 3, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neirotti, P.; De Marco, A.; Cagliano, A.C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylized facts. Cities 2014, 38, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jelonek, D.; Wysłocka, E. Co-creation of Innovation Using the Potential of Web 2.0 Tools. Online J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
- Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P. Smart Cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correia, L.M.; Wunstel, K. Smart Cities Applications and Requirements. White Paper of the Experts Working Group, Net!Works European Technology Platform. Available online: http://www.scribd.com/doc/87944173/White-Paper-Smart-Cities-Applications (accessed on 3 March 2021).
- Winters, J.V. Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. J. Reg. Sci. 2011, 51, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rios, P. Creating “the Smart City”. Available online: http://archive.udmercy.edu:8080/bitstream/handle/10429/393/2008_rios_smart.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 3 March 2021).
- Toppeta, D. The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT can Build Smart, ‘‘Liveable’’, Sustainable Cities; Think! Report; The Innovation Knowledge Foundation: Milano, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gretzel, U.; Werthner, H.; Koo, C.; Lamsfus, C. Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 50, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawadhi, S.; Aldama-Nalda, A.; Chourabi, H.; Gil-Garica, J.R.; Leung, S.; Mellouli, S. Building understanding of Smart City initiatives. Electron. Gov. 2012, 7443, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
- Piro, G.; Cianci, I.; Grieco, L.A.; Boggia, G.; Camarda, P. Information centric services in smart cities. J. Syst. Softw. 2014, 88, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desouza, K.C.; Flanery, T.H. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities 2013, 35, 88–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wey, W.-M.; Hsu, J. New Urbanism and Smart Growth: Toward achieving a smart National Taipei University District. Habitat Int. 2014, 42, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S.-H. An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 286–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, P.; Hunter, W.C.; Chung, N. Smart Tourism City: Developments and Transformations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D.; Amaranggana, A. Smart Tourism Destinations. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 553–564. [Google Scholar]
- Zubizarreta, I.; Seravalli, A.; Arrizabalaga, S. Smart City Concept: What It Is and What It Should Be. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2016, 142, 04015005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wei, J.; Rodriguez, A.F.C. Development of a strategic value assessment model for smart city. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2014, 12, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Farouh, H.; Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2012, 25, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Deakin, M.; Nijkamp, P.; Kourtit, K.; Farouh, H. An Advanced Triple-Helix Network Model for Smart Cities Performance; IGI Global: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 59–73. [Google Scholar]
- Batty, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Giannotti, F.; Pozdnoukhov, A.; Bazzani, A.; Wachowicz, M.; Ouzounis, G.; Portugali, Y. Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spéc. Top. 2012, 214, 481–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calvillo, C.; Sánchez-Miralles, A.; Villar, J. Energy management and planning in smart cities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anthopoulos, L. Understanding the smart city Domain: A Literature Review. In Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities; Bolivar, M.P., Ed.; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Naphade, M.; Banavar, G.; Harrison, C.; Paraszczak, J.; Morris, R. Smarter Cities and Their Innovation Challenges. IEEE Computer 2011, 44, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakıcı, T.; Almirall, E.; Wareham, J. A Smart City Initiative: The Case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelidou, M. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities 2014, 41, S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthopoulos, L.; Janssen, M.; Weerakkody, V. A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for Smart City Conceptualization and Benchmarking. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 2016, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Centrum Globalizacji i Strategii IESE Business School. Available online: https://www.smartcity.press/top-10-smart-cities-of-2020/ (accessed on 13 March 2021).
- Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; López-Cózar, E.D. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J. Inf. 2018, 12, 1160–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prichard, A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J. Doc. 1969, 25, 348–349. [Google Scholar]
- Price, D.D.S. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1976, 27, 292–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J. Doc. 2014, 64, 45–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazar, S.; Klimecka-Tatar, D.; Obrecht, M. Sustainability Orientation and Focus in Logistics and Supply Chains. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tijssen, R.J. Measuring and Evaluating Science—Technology Connections and Interactions. Handb. Quant. Sci. Technol. Res. 2004, 695–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, P. Bibliometria, Webometria. Podstawy. Wybrane Zastosowania; Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM: Poznań, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Hicks, D.; Albert, M.; Breitzman, A.; Cheney, P. Bibliometric Analysis of Core Papers Fundamental to Tissue Engineering; CHI Research, Inc.: Haddon Heights, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Marszakowa-Szajkiewicz, I. Badania Ilościowe Nauki—Podejście Bibliometryczne I Webometryczne; Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza: Poznań, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Marszakowa-Szajkiewicz, I. Bibliometryczna Analiza Współczesnej Nauki; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego: Katowice, Poland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Grygiel, P.; Rębisz, S.; Humenny, G. Analiza bibliometryczna jako narzędzie badania efektywności nauczycieli akademickich na przykładzie Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Zarządzanie Publiczne 2009, 3, 65–84. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, J.; Zhao, R.; Yang, S.; Dong, K. Methods of Citation Analysis. In Informetrics; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 207–309. [Google Scholar]
- Hashem, I.A.T.; Chang, V.; Anuar, N.B.; Adewole, K.; Yaqoob, I.; Gani, A.; Ahmed, E.; Chiroma, H. The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In Advances in Data Analysis; Studies in Classification Data Analysis and Knowledge Organization; Decker, R., Lenz, H.J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 299–306. [Google Scholar]
- Zeraatkar, N. Radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging: A bibliometric study in Iran. Iran. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 21, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
Article Title | Authors | Journal | Publication Year | No. of Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts | Neirotti P., De Marco A., Cagliano A. C., Mangano G., Scorrano F. | Cities | 2014 | 976 |
The role of big data in smart city | Hashem I. A. T., Chang V., Anuar N. B., Adewole K., Yaqoob I., Gani A., Ahmed E., Chiroma H. | International Journal of Information Management | 2016 | 445 |
Modelling the smart city performance | Lombardi P., Giordano S., Farouh H., Yousef W. | Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research | 2012 | 395 |
What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? | Ahvenniemi H., Huovila A., Pinto-Seppa I., Airaksinen M. | Cities | 2017 | 373 |
Smart city policies: A spatial approach | Angelidou M. | Cities | 2014 | 364 |
Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco | Lee J. H., Hancock M. G., Hu M.-C. | Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 2014 | 362 |
Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization | De Jong M., Joss S., Schraven D., Zhan C., Weijnen M. | Journal of Cleaner Production | 2015 | 357 |
Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces | Angelidou M. | Cities | 2015 | 306 |
An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development | Lee J. H., Phaal R., Lee S.-H. | Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 2013 | 230 |
Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities | Sun J., Yan J., Zhang K. Z. K. | Financial Innovation | 2016 | 207 |
How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model | Ben Letaifa S. | Journal of Business Research | 2015 | 199 |
Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative | Marsal-Llacuna M.-L., Colomer-Llinas J., Melendez-Frigola J. | Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 2015 | 183 |
Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness | Boes K., Buhalis D., Inversini A. | International Journal of Tourism Cities | 2016 | 164 |
How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective | Kummitha R. K. R., Crutzen N. | Cities | 2017 | 163 |
By No. of Articles | By No. of Citations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author Name | No. of Articles | No. of Citations | Author Name | No. of Articles | No. of Citations |
Dameri, R. P. | 10 | 241 | De Marco A., | 2 | 991 |
Anthopoulos, L. G. | 9 | 320 | Neirotti P., | 1 | 976 |
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. | 9 | 90 | Cagliano A. C., | 1 | 976 |
Ferraris, A. | 8 | 508 | Mangano G., | 1 | 976 |
Graham, G. | 7 | 299 | Scorrano F. | 1 | 976 |
Bresciani, S. | 6 | 467 | Chang V. | 5 | 534 |
Kourtit, K. | 6 | 218 | Hashem I. A. T, | 2 | 449 |
Lam, P. T. I. | 6 | 49I | Anuar N. B., | 1 | 445 |
Caragliu, A. | 5 | 143 | Adewole K., | 1 | 445 |
Cooper, I. | 5 | 42 | Yaqoob I., | 1 | 445 |
Dupont, L. | 5 | 44 | Gani A., | 1 | 445 |
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L. | 5 | 298 | Ahmed E., | 1 | 445 |
Paskaleva, K. | 5 | 42 | Chiroma H. | 1 | 445 |
Vanolo, A. | 5 | 196 | Lombardi P., | 3 | 414 |
de Castro Neto, M. | 5 | 8 | Giordano S., | 1 | 395 |
Farouh H., | 1 | 395 | |||
Yousef W. | 1 | 395 |
By the Year of Publication | By the No. of Citations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Year of Publication | No. of Publications | No. of Citations | The Year of Publication | No. of Publications | No. of Citations |
2005 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 222 | 2859 |
2008 | 3 | 18 | 2016 | 114 | 2545 |
2009 | 2 | 1 | 2017 | 220 | 2525 |
2010 | 3 | 21 | 2019 | 326 | 2483 |
2011 | 9 | 103 | 2014 | 39 | 2271 |
2012 | 17 | 1086 | 2015 | 88 | 2251 |
2013 | 18 | 365 | 2012 | 17 | 1086 |
2014 | 39 | 2271 | 2020 | 292 | 963 |
2015 | 88 | 2251 | 2013 | 18 | 365 |
2016 | 114 | 2545 | 2011 | 9 | 103 |
2017 | 220 | 2525 | 2010 | 3 | 21 |
2018 | 222 | 2859 | 2008 | 3 | 18 |
2019 | 326 | 2483 | 2005 | 1 | 9 |
2020 | 292 | 963 | 2009 | 2 | 1 |
By the No. of Publications | By the No. of Citations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | No. of Publications | No. of Citations | Journal Title | No. of Publications | No. of Citations |
Cities | 77 | 4606 | Cities | 77 | 4606 |
Public Administration and Information Technology | 70 | 425 | Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 65 | 2489 |
Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 65 | 2489 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 52 | 1543 |
Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business Iceb | 55 | 653 | Proceedings of The International Conference on Electronic Business Iceb | 55 | 653 |
Journal of Cleaner Production | 52 | 1543 | Public Administration and Information Technology | 70 | 425 |
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering | 41 | 30 | Lecture Notes in Business Information | 31 | 235 |
Lecture Notes in Business Information | 31 | 235 | International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering | 41 | 30 |
International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research | 23 | 14 | Creating Smart Cities | 15 | 26 |
2019 Ctte Fitce Smart Cities and Information and Communication Technology Ctte Fitce 2019 | 15 | 8 | International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research | 23 | 14 |
Creating Smart Cities | 15 | 26 | 2019 Ctte Fitce Smart Cities and Information and Communication Technology Ctte Fitce 2019 | 15 | 8 |
Keyword | Occurrences | Total Link Strength |
---|---|---|
smart city | 272 | 272.00 |
smart cities | 182 | 182.00 |
Internet of Things | 37 | 37.00 |
big data | 32 | 32.00 |
iot | 29 | 29.00 |
sustainability | 25 | 25.00 |
innovation | 24 | 24.00 |
technology | 22 | 22.00 |
governance | 15 | 15.00 |
blockchain | 13 | 13.00 |
entrepreneurship | 13 | 13.00 |
open data | 12 | 12.00 |
Internet of Things (iot) | 11 | 11.00 |
urban development | 11 | 11.00 |
urban planning | 11 | 11.00 |
sustainable development | 10 | 10.00 |
Keyword | Occurrences | Total Link Strength | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | smart city | 568 | 568 |
2. | urbanization | 149 | 149 |
3. | sustainable development | 100 | 100 |
4. | City | 96 | 96 |
5. | Technology | 92 | 92 |
6. | Internet of Things | 92 | 92 |
7. | smart system | 75 | 75 |
8. | ICT | 72 | 72 |
9. | data | 72 | 72 |
10. | innovation | 70 | 70 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bajdor, P.; Starostka-Patyk, M. Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas. Energies 2021, 14, 4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144288
Bajdor P, Starostka-Patyk M. Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas. Energies. 2021; 14(14):4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144288
Chicago/Turabian StyleBajdor, Paula, and Marta Starostka-Patyk. 2021. "Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas" Energies 14, no. 14: 4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144288
APA StyleBajdor, P., & Starostka-Patyk, M. (2021). Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas. Energies, 14(14), 4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144288