Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Barriers to Knowledge and Experience Transfer in Major Maintenance Activities
Previous Article in Journal
A Mixed Binary Linear Programming Model for Optimal Energy Management of Smart Buildings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of NiFe-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution in Anion-Exchange Membrane Electrolysis

Institute for Advanced Energy Technologies “Nicola Giordano” (ITAE) of the Italian National Research Council (CNR), 98126 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(7), 1720; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071720
Submission received: 20 February 2020 / Revised: 16 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 4 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section D1: Advanced Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
NiFe electrodes are developed for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in an alkaline electrolyser based on an anion exchange membrane (AEM) separator and fed with diluted KOH solution as supporting electrolyte. This study reports on the electrochemical behaviour of two different NiFe-oxide compositions (i.e., Ni1Fe1-oxide and Ni1Fe2-oxide) prepared by the oxalate method. These catalysts are assessed for single-cell operation in an MEA including a Sustainion™ anion-exchange membrane. The electrochemical polarization shows a current density of 650 mA cm−2 at 2 V and 50 °C for the Ni1Fe1 anode composition. A durability test of 500 h is carried out using potential cycling as an accelerated stress-test. This shows a decrease in current density of 150 mA cm−2 mainly during the first 400 h. The performance achieved for the anion-exchange membrane electrolyser single-cell based on the NiFeOx catalyst appears promising. However, further improvements are required to enhance the stability under these operating conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The role of H2 as an energy vector is becoming progressively a solid choice [1]. Although various processes to produce pure H2 are available (i.e., catalytic-, thermal- and electrochemical-based routes) [2,3,4,5], research is looking at how to improve the efficiency and reliability of these technologies. Electrolysis of liquid water is one of the most used technologies to produce pure and green H2, but several issues regarding to the use of a highly concentrate caustic solution (7 M KOH) as liquid electrolyte have hindered its wide use. For example, liquid alkaline electrolyte based electrolysers, using concentrated solution of KOH or NaOH [6,7,8,9,10], have shown significant corrosion effects on the hardware. These drawbacks have affected the wide use of this technology. On the other hand, several positive aspects mainly related to the low cost of materials used for the electrodes (i.e., noble metal-free materials) characterize these alkaline systems [11]. A solution to the issues caused by the use of concentrated liquid electrolytes is to develop alkaline electrolysers based on a solid polymer electrolyte separator with a zero gap configuration (membrane-electrode assembly) requiring less concentrated KOH solution [12].
Several important achievements concerning the electrolysis of liquid water are reported in the literature especially for the use of solid proton-conducting polymer membrane [13,14,15,16,17]. Although this technology sounds to be safer than the liquid alkaline-based electrolyser, issues remain because of materials cost. Nafion® membrane-based assemblies represent the proof-of-concept for this technology [7,18]. As this electrolyte operates under acidic conditions, this implies the use of noble materials for the electrodes. This is avoidable under an alkaline environment. Therefore, a technology that may combine the positive aspects of both acidic and alkaline electrolysers is nowadays under investigation. In the meantime, novel types of polymeric membranes characterized by hydroxide ion conductivity have emerged [19,20,21,22,23,24], although their stability is still an issue. Such electrolytes promise to solve the issues raising from the cost of materials for electrodes and from the use of concentrated liquid alkaline electrolytes [17]. As a result, developing advanced critical raw materials free (CRM-free)-based electrocatalysts has also become an important topic for research [17,25,26]. A key aspect in this context is to find a proper oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst for the anionic electrolysers since the kinetics of the anodic reaction are also slow in alkaline conditions [27]. Unsupported iridium-based catalysts represent the state-of-the-art OER catalysts for this technology [9,28]. However, iridium is expensive and one of the rarest element on earth [29]. Nickel/iron (NiFe)-based materials have shown good catalytic activity towards OER for many applications [30] and therefore, many synthetic methods are under development [31]. Pérez-Alonso et al. have prepared different Ni/Fe wt.% compositions for OER. The durability tests carried out at a fixed current density of 300 mA cm−2 during 70 h showed a potential of 2.1 V for the alkaline water electrolysis cell [32].
Huang et al. [33] have reported the performances of several Ni/Fe oxides prepared from metal hexacyanometallates precursors. They reported a stable anodic overpotential during about 10 h durability test. They have also shown a relatively low degradation during 1000 current–voltage cycles considered as benchmark for an accelerated stress test.
A review about NiFe-oxides as electrocatalysts for OER was published by Gong and Dai in 2015. They analysed the main properties of these materials in terms of structure and electronic properties and how these catalysts can enhance the oxygen evolution reaction rate [31]. However, most of the reported experiments were regarding half-cell studies [31].
Some recent studies have addressed novel ternary electrocatalysts based on Ni-Fe-M (where M indicates Mo, Cr, V, Co, etc.). Yang et al. [34] have reported on the promising stability of the Ni-Fe-Cr alloy. Fan et al. [35] have also recently reported on the “ultra-stable performances” of Ni-Fe-V. These works were essentially regarding experiments carried out in half-cell configuration.
Recently Qin et al. [36] have reported on experiments carried out in a complete cell based on KOH electrolyte. However, this was a non-zero gap cell [36]. By using Ni–Fe-Mo as an electrocatalyst for both HER (hydrogen evolution reaction) and OER, promising performances were achieved [36]. In particular, Ni–Fe-Mo was used both as electrocatalyst for HER and as a “pre-catalyst” for OER.
Chanda et al. [37] have found that by forming a ternary spinel oxide after partial replacement of Co in the NiCo2O4 spinel oxide with Fe, an important increase of current density can be achieved.
On the other hand, it has been largely demonstrated that a spinel phase is more performing compared the pure Ni oxide and Fe oxide [38,39].
The outstanding properties of NiFe-oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in the alkaline environment, shown in the recent literature, have prompted us to carry an investigation under practical operating conditions by selecting relevant NiFe electrocatalyst formulations. Thus, in the present paper, two compositions of NiFeOx electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an alkaline environment have been investigated. As discussed, most of the aforementioned work on Ni/Fe has been carried out with a three-electrode configuration in alkaline media at room temperature, whereas the present work presents the electrochemical performance achieved in a solid state membrane electrode assembly(zero-gap configuration) single cell operating under real conditions at different temperatures. Operation of an anion exchange membrane electrolyser with pure water feed is at the moment not affordable for the present hydroxide conducting membranes. This will cause large increase of overpotential at practical current density producing large loss of efficiency. Whereas the trend in the field of electrolysis is to increase the operating efficiency and decrease capital costs as well as operating expenditures. A dilute KOH solution (1 M) may represent a trade-off with respect to these requirements.
In the present work, we have prepared the NiFeOx electrocatalysts by using a simple and cost-effective procedure based on the oxalate method [40] which is also amenable to scaling-up. The aim was to assess this preparation procedure as an appropriate method to produce CRM-free anode electrocatalysts suitable for application in AEM electrolysis. In this regard, a standard Pt cathode for hydrogen evolution was used. The results of the electrochemical experiments have been discussed in relation to the structural, morphological, and chemical surface properties of the developed materials. The presence of different phases on the catalysts surface may affect interaction with water and hydroxide species in solution producing different performance and stability characteristics under practical operating conditions in single cell.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation and Physico-Chemical Properties of Non-Precious Catalysts for Alkaline Electrolysis

This synthetic procedure is referred to the oxalate method (Patent WO2004049491) [13,16]. In brief, Ni and Fe nitrates (purity ≥ 99.95% trace metals basis, Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy) have been dissolved in an aqueous solution of oxalic acid (purity ≥ 99%, Merck, Milano, Italy) neutralized at pH 6.5 with NaOH (purity ≥ 99%, Merck) to form an organic complex. The subsequent step consisted on its decomposition at 80 °C with hydrogen peroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) to form a precipitate. The sample was washed with hot water and treated at 450 °C for 120 min to achieve a proper morphology and structure.

2.2. Physico-Chemical Characterizations

An X-pert 3710 X-ray diffractometer (Panalytical Italia, Lissone, Italy) equipped with a Cu Kα radiation operating at 40 kV and 20 mA was used to analyse the crystalline phase of the specimens. The crystallite size was determined from the peaks broadening using the Debye-Scherrer equation and the Marquardt algorithm (Table 1). An ASAP 2020 M machine (Micrometrics, Pioltello, Italy) was used to analyse the specific surface area of specimens through the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method whereas the pore size distribution was studied through the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. An XL 30 scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI, Milano, Italy) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was used to investigate the samples composition. The morphology was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM - FEI CM12 equipped with a LaB6 filament). A Physical Electronics 5800-01 spectrometer (PHI, Feldkirchen, Germany) mounting a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source was used for the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

2.3. Electrodes Preparation and Membrane-Electrode Assembly

The preparation of catalytic inks consisted in 33 wt. % of anionic ionomer and 67 wt. % of catalyst dispersed in ethanol. The electrodes have been prepared by spray coating the inks based on in-house prepared NiFe anode catalyst–ketjenblack mixture 70:30 wt. % or the Pt/C catalyst, HISPEC 4000 supplied by Johnson Matthey Fuel Cell (Sonning Common, UK) onto carbon cloth backings (GDL-HT ELAT from ETEK, Natick Massachusetts, USA), according to the procedure reported in our previous paper [17]. Based on this procedure, the total metal loading for the anode was 2.5 mg cm−2, whereas the cathode catalyst loading was 1 mg Pt cm−2. The Pt-based catalyst was used as a reference cathode since its characteristics are well known and highly reproducible [41,42]. The aim was to study the anode performance in combination with the anion exchange membrane. A Sustainion™ X37-50 (Dioxide Materials, Champaign, Illinois, USA) anion exchange membrane conducting OH ions was used. Finally, membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs), with a geometrical area of 5 cm2 have been prepared by a cold-assembly procedure to avoid any unwanted membrane degradation during hot pressing.

2.4. Electrochemical Characterization in an Alkaline Electrolysis Single Cell

The electrochemical experiments were carried out in a single-cell configuration, in the temperature range 30–60 °C and under atmospheric pressure. Humidified N2 was pre-heated at the cell temperature and then fed to the cathode compartment at a flow rate of 50 ml min–1. A peristaltic pump was used to supply a KOH solution (1M) to the anode compartment at a flow rate of 4 mL min−1. Polarization curves (cell potential versus current density) and chronoamperometric curves were carried out with a Keithley power supply system (Tektronic, Roma, Italy) at 10 mV s−1 scan rate. The series resistance (Rs) was determined using an impedance bridge (4338B, Agilent, Roma, Italia) at a frequency of 1 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physico-Chemical Properties of (CRM)-Free Catalysts for Alkaline Electrolysis

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) of NiFeOx/KB and NiFe2Ox/KB electrocatalysts. A significant difference in the crystallographic structure has been observed, although both electrocatalysts were treated at the same temperature (i.e., 450 °C). The NiFeOx catalyst (Ni:Fe = 1:1 at.) showed a crystalline structure ascribed to a spinel phase (i.e., JCPDS card n° 10-0325 of NiFe2O4) although also the presence of Fe2O3 and NiO phases (JCPDS cards n° 24-0072 and 22-1189, respectively) was recognized. Therefore, the amount of these three main phases was evaluated through the least-square full-profile quantitative analysis procedure. Accordingly, the relative content of the three main phases was NiO (61.1 wt. %), NiFe2O4 (26.3 wt. %), and Fe2O3 (12.6 wt. %). All these phases have been shown to be active towards the oxygen evolution in alkaline solutions [39,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Their combination may produce a synergistic effect towards the oxygen evolution reaction. On the other hand, the NiFe2Ox (Ni:Fe = 1:2 at.) has shown a less crystalline structure with a different phase composition. In this case, the quantitative analysis provided the following composition: NiO (26.1 wt. %), NiFe2O4 (66.8 wt. %), and Fe2O3 (9.7 wt. %). As consequence, the NiFe2Ox showed an enrichment in trevorite and a significant depletion in hematite and NiO phases.
The EDX analyses (Figure 2) revealed that in the case of NiFeOx the atomic ratio between the two metals was 1:1; whereas, in the case of NiFe2Ox, there was an enrichment of Fe with a Ni:Fe ratio close to 1:2.
Figure 3 shows the TEM images of the bare catalysts. This analysis shows fine particles with an average crystallite size of about 5 nm for the NiFe2Ox and 10 nm for the NiFeOx. A high grade of agglomeration for both specimens is observed, although the NiFeOx seems to be slightly less agglomerated.
Table 1 reports the main physico-chemical properties determined from XRD, TEM, BET characterizations.
Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show a surface characterization of the bare NiFe samples carried out by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The survey analysis (Figure 4) has shown similar electronic surface composition for both NiFeOx and NiFe2Ox. Furthermore, the surface of calcined catalysts has not shown any relevant impurities. On the other hand, the signals ascribed to Ni2p have shown relevant differences between the two specimens (Figure 5). The deconvolution of the asymmetric peak at around 855 eV associated to the Ni2p3/2 orbital has generated two peaks at 853.85 eV (band I) and at 855.42 eV (band II) and these have been ascribed to NiFe2O4 and NiO, respectively [14]. Although both compounds contain mainly Ni2+, the peak of Ni2p3/2 for the NiFe2O4 is shifted to lower binding energy as consequence of the presence of larger content Fe which is less electronegative compared to the Ni. This may have an impact on the intrinsic catalytic activity. Therefore, by comparing the Ni2p3/2 bands for the two specimens under investigation, there is a clear enrichment of NiO on the surface of the NiFeOx based specimen (Figure 5), as recognized also by XRD analysis (Figure 1). Concerning the bands ascribed to Fe2p (Figure 6, there is no relevant difference in the surface composition for both specimens.

3.2. Electrochemical Experiments

Figure 7a shows the raw single cell polarization curves for the electrolysis process at a membrane-electrode assembly based on the Ni1Fe1-oxide catalyst as anode. Figure 7b shows the same curves IR-corrected. Experiments were carried out in a single cell with recirculation of KOH 1 M at the anode (Figure 7c) and in the temperature range 30–60 °C. As discussed, recirculation of diluted KOH in AEM electrolysers avoids dramatic loss of efficiency that would otherwise occur with pure water feed. On the other hand, concentrated KOH feed can exacerbate membrane degradation. 1 M KOH was considered as a trade-off between these two effects [51].
The polarization curves in Figure 7a show an activation control (Butler-Volmer behaviour) up to 50 mA cm−2. At higher current density, the polarization curves were controlled by the ohmic drop showing a linear dependence of the potential as function of current density in a wide range. The NiFeOx KB (1:1) catalyst showed an increase in performance with an increase of temperature because of the kinetic constraints observed especially at low current densities. At 50 mA cm−2 the cell voltage decreased by more than 100 mV passing from 30 °C to 60 °C. In contrast, the increase of temperature affected only slightly the ohmic loss (Figure 7b). This because the membrane ionic resistance was almost constant in the temperature range investigated. The slope of the curves was constant between 50 and 600 mA cm−2. However, the membrane resistance played a relevant role in determining the voltage efficiency. The voltage gain was more than 100 mV at 0.6 A cm−2 in the IR-free curves. Although the increased temperature seems to affect positively the catalytic reactions on both electrodes, the anionic membrane generally suffers during operation temperatures close or higher than 60 °C because of degradation issues [52,53,54]. As a result, the best performance in this work has been achieved at 50 °C whereas at 60 °C a slight decrease in performance starting from 100 mA cm−2 has been observed. The MEA containing the NiFe2Ox (Ni:Fe = 1:2) catalyst at the anode showed a different polarization behaviour with strong activation control in the overall range of current densities and larger series resistance compared to the MEA based on NiFeOx (Ni:Fe = 1:1).
The activation control indicates poor reaction kinetics (Figure 8a,b). Much lower performances have been achieved for NiFe2Ox vs NiFeOx in the temperatures range here investigated. The main difference between the polarization curves of NiFeOx and NiFe2Ox concerns with a strong activation control observed for the composition enriched in the spinel structure compared to that enriched in NiO. This may be related to the different absorption strength of oxygen species on the surface and the synergistic role of the different phases. As a result, the NiFe2Ox containing large excess of spinel phase is less active than the NiFeOx towards the OER. The NiFe2Ox shows a slight shift of the Ni2p3/2 to lower binding energy possibly causing an increase of the strength of adsorption of oxygen species with a decrease of the rate of desorption of O2 molecules.
The NiFeOx is instead characterized by a proper content of NiO compared to NiFe2Ox and Fe2O3 phases. NiO is a good catalyst for oxygen evolution in alkaline systems [55]. Its synergy with the spinel phase appears relevant to promote the OER process under practical conditions.
The performance of the present NiFeOx catalyst synthesized by the oxalate method appears superior than what has been previously reported in the literature for NiFe catalyst formulations in an alkaline water electrolysis cell [32]. A cell potential of 1.78 V is here recorded versus 2.1 V shown in the literature at 300 mA cm–2 [32]. This corresponds to a gain of 13 % in terms of voltage efficiency.
Table 2 resumes the mass activities achieved at 1.5 V. At this potential the reactions are mainly affected by the kinetic control, as a result the best performances have been achieved at 60 °C (the highest temperature).
Based on these preliminary experiments, the NiFeOx has been selected for a durability cycle (1–1.8 V) test of 500 h. The potential cycling experiment represents an accelerated stress test to evaluate the dynamic behaviour which is required to an electrolysis device in grid balancing service to convert the surplus of renewable energy in hydrogen. A life-time test has been carried out for 500 hours through the potential cycling between 1–1.8 V at room temperature and by feeding KOH 1 M at the anode. As shown in Figure 9a, the maximum current density was more than halved during the stress test. Some discontinuities, essentially related to the replenishment of fresh KOH, have affected the experiment. However, the trend of performance loss was clear during the first 400 h. Figure 9b shows the polarization curves before and after the life-time test. Based on the differences found in the polarization curves, the degradation is mainly ascribed to the catalyst (increase of the activation loss), whereas the ohmic drop was not significantly affected by the stress test.
Therefore, based on these preliminary experiments, the NiFeOx used for the OER needs to be improved especially in terms of stability under operation in alkaline conditions. This may be related to the excess of NiO compared to the spinel phase in the catalyst. A spinel structure is usually considered a robust option but the performance observed for the present NiFe2Ox needs to be ameliorated. An important aspect that requires further investigation is the effect of the crystallite size. The NiFeOx shows larger crystallite size compared the NiFe2Ox (10 nm vs 5 nm). The OER is a structure sensitive reaction and its rate can be enhanced by modulating lattice characteristics. Tailoring composition and crystallographic properties may be also relevant to provide better stability under dynamic conditions.

4. Conclusions

Critical raw materials-free catalysts are a key topic to develop electrochemical technologies for hydrogen generation. In this regard, alkaline solid membrane-based electrolysers represent an interesting technology. Although Ni-Fe based materials are largely investigated as electrodes for OER reaction, further enhancements are still necessary in terms of composition, stability and facile synthesis methods for their preparation and utilisation in practical devices. In this paper, a simple method for the synthesis of two compositions of NiFe based materials (i.e., Ni:Fe = 1:1 and 1:2) was presented. These two materials were treated at the same temperature (i.e., 450 °C) showing different structures and surface compositions. The increased content of Fe affected the crystallinity and the occurrence of a spinel phase in the final electrocatalyst. A larger occurrence of the spinel phase on the surface of the catalyst containing a higher Fe content (i.e., NiFe2Ox) has been observed. As a result of the electrochemical tests, the increased content of NiO on the NiFeOx electrocatalyst surface positively affects the OER reaction rate. However, the electrochemical stress test consisting in a cycle (1–1.8 V) operation showed that the MEA based on NiFeOx was not sufficiently stable within the time investigated (500 h). Further efforts in preparing NiFe-based catalysts should be addressed to improve the composition of the catalyst’s surface and to modulate crystallographic properties and chemical characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.A. and S.C.Z.; methodology, A.S.A. and S.C.Z.; software, S.T.; analysis, S.C.Z. and M.L.F.; investigation, S.C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.Z., M.L.F and A.S.A..; writing—review and editing, S.C.Z., M.L.F. and A.S.A.; project administration, A.S.A.; funding acquisition, A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EU H2020 LOTERCO2M project “CRM-free Low Temperature Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Methanol” Grant Agreement number: 761093.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vincent, I.; Bessarabov, D. Low cost hydrogen production by anion exchange membrane electrolysis: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1690–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Holladay, J.; Hu, J.; King, D.; Wang, Y. An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal. Today 2009, 139, 244–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santo, V.D.; Gallo, A.; Naldoni, A.; Guidotti, M.; Psaro, R. Bimetallic heterogeneous catalysts for hydrogen production. Catal. Today 2012, 197, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferrero, D.; Lanzini, A.; Santarelli, M.; Leone, P. A comparative assessment on hydrogen production from low- and high-temperature electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 3523–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faro, M.L.; Trocino, S.; Zignani, S.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A. Production of syngas by solid oxide electrolysis: A case study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 27859–27865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dionigi, F.; Strasser, P. NiFe-Based (Oxy)hydroxide Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Non-Acidic Electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schalenbach, M.; Tjarks, G.; Carmo, M.; Lueke, W.; Mueller, M.; Stolten, D. Acidic or Alkaline? Towards a New Perspective on the Efficiency of Water Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, F3197–F3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bandal, H.; Jadhav, V.H.; Kim, H. Facile synthesis of bicontinuous Ni3Fe alloy for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 726, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; Sajjad, S.D.; Gao, Y.; Kaczur, J.; Masel, R. An Alkaline Water Electrolyzer with Sustainion™ Membranes: 1 A/cm² at 1.9V with Base Metal Catalysts. ECS Trans. 2017, 77, 71–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hwang, G.-J.; Gil, B.-M.; Ryu, C.-H. Preparation of the electrode using NiFe 2 O 4 powder for the alkaline water electrolysis. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 48, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phillips, R.; Gannon, W.J.F.; Dunnill, C.W. Chapter 2: Alkaline electrolysers. In RSC Energy and Environment Series; Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC): London, UK, 2020; Volume 2020-January, pp. 28–58. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dekel, D.R. Review of cell performance in anion exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Takenaka, H.; Torikai, E.; Kawami, Y.; Wakabayashi, N. Solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1982, 7, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Millet, P.; Andolfatto, F.; Durand, R. Design and performance of a solid polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1996, 21, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leroy, R. Industrial water electrolysis: Present and future. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1983, 8, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, P.W.T.; Srinivasan, S. Advances in water electrolysis technology with emphasis on use of the solid polymer electrolyte. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1979, 9, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carmo, M.; Fritz, D.L.; Mergel, J.; Stolten, D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 4901–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Busacca, C.; Zignani, S.C.; Di Blasi, A.; Di Blasi, O.; Faro, M.L.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A. Electrospun NiMn2O4 and NiCo2O4 spinel oxides supported on carbon nanofibers as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an anion exchange membrane-based electrolysis cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 20987–20996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Couture, G.; Alaaeddine, A.; Boschet, F.; Améduri, B. Polymeric materials as anion-exchange membranes for alkaline fuel cells. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1521–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Danks, T.N.; Slade, R.; Varcoe, J.R. Alkaline anion-exchange radiation-grafted membranes for possible electrochemical application in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tsai, T.-H.; Maes, A.M.; Vandiver, M.A.; Versek, C.; Seifert, S.; Tuominen, M.; Liberatore, M.W.; Coughlin, E.B. Synthesis and structure-conductivity relationship of polystyrene- block -poly(vinyl benzyl trimethylammonium) for alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2012, 51, 1751–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morandi, C.; Peach, R.; Krieg, H.; Kerres, J. Novel imidazolium-functionalized anion-exchange polymer PBI blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 476, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aili, D.; Kraglund, M.R.; Tavacoli, J.; Chatzichristodoulou, C.; Jensen, J.O. Polysulfone-polyvinylpyrrolidone blend membranes as electrolytes in alkaline water electrolysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 598, 117674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, D.J.; Lee, B.-N.; Nam, S.Y. Synthesis and characterization of PEEK containing imidazole for anion exchange membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 23759–23767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Davydova, E.S.; Mukerjee, S.; Jaouen, F.; Dekel, D.R. Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction in Alkaline Electrolytes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 6665–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Massari, S.; Ruberti, M. Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies. Resour. Policy 2013, 38, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Di Vona, M.L.; Narducci, R.; Pasquini, L.; Pelzer, K.; Knauth, P. Anion-conducting ionomers: Study of type of functionalizing amine and macromolecular cross-linking. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 14039–14049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Di Blasi, A.; D’Urso, C.; Baglio, V.; Antonucci, V.; Arico, A.S.; Ornelas, R.; Matteucci, F.; Orozco, G.; Beltran, D.; Meas, Y.; et al. Preparation and evaluation of RuO2-IrO2, IrO2-Pt and IrO2-Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2008, 39, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McCrory, C.C.L.; Jung, S.; Peters, J.C.; Jaramillo, T.F. Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16977–16987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benrabaa, R.; Boukhlouf, H.; Löfberg, A.; Rubbens, A.; Rose-Noëlle, V.; Bordes-Richard, E.; Barama, A. Nickel ferrite spinel as catalyst precursor in the dry reforming of methane: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, M.; Dai, H. A mini review of NiFe-based materials as highly active oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. Nano Res. 2014, 8, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pérez-Alonso, F.; Adán, C.; Rojas, S.; Peña, M.A.; Jose, F. Ni/Fe electrodes prepared by electrodeposition method over different substrates for oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline medium. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 5204–5212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, L.; Ge, X.; Dong, S. A facile conversion of a Ni/Fe coordination polymer to a robust electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 32819–32825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, Y.; Dang, L.; Shearer, M.; Sheng, H.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, Y.; Hamers, R.J.; Jin, S. Highly Active Trimetallic NiFeCr Layered Double Hydroxide Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fan, H.; Chen, W.; Chen, G.; Huang, J.; Song, C.; Du, Y.; Li, C.; Ostrikov, K.K. Plasma-heteroatom-doped Ni-V-Fe trimetallic phospho-nitride as high-performance bifunctional electrocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 268, 118440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qin, F.; Zhao, Z.; Alam, K.; Ni, Y.; Hernandez, F.C.R.; Yu, L.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z.; Wang, Z.; Bao, J. Trimetallic NiFeMo for Overall Electrochemical Water Splitting with a Low Cell Voltage. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chanda, D.; Hnát, J.; Paidar, M.; Bouzek, K. Evolution of physicochemical and electrocatalytic properties of NiCo2O4 (AB2O4) spinel oxide with the effect of Fe substitution at the A site leading to efficient anodic O2 evolution in an alkaline environment. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 5713–5722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pebley, A.; Decolvenaere, E.; Pollock, T.; Gordon, M. Oxygen evolution on Fe-doped NiO electrocatalysts deposited: Via microplasma. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 15070–15082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paulraj, A.R.; Kiros, Y.; Göthelid, M.; Johansson, M.B. NiFeOx as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction (OR) and evolution (OE) reaction in alkaline media. Catalysts 2018, 8, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lo Faro, M.; Frontera, P.; Antonucci, P.; Aricò, A.S. Ni-Cu based catalysts prepared by two different methods and their catalytic activity toward the ATR of methane. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 93, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zignani, S.C.; Antolini, E.; Gonzalez, E.R. Stability of Pt-Ni/C (1:1) and Pt/C electrocatalysts as cathode materials for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Effect of ageing tests. J. Power Sources 2009, 191, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Linares, J.J.; Zignani, S.C.; Rocha, T.A.; Gonzalez, E.R. Ethanol oxidation on a high temperature PBI-based DEFC using Pt/C, PtRu/C and Pt3Sn/C as catalysts. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 43, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Friebel, D.; Louie, M.W.; Bajdich, M.; Sanwald, K.E.; Cai, Y.; Wise, A.M.; Cheng, M.J.; Sokaras, D.; Weng, T.C.; Alonso-Mori, R.; et al. Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1305–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Landon, J.; Demeter, E.; Inoǧlu, N.; Keturakis, C.; Wachs, I.E.; Vasić, R.; Frenkel, A.I.; Kitchin, J.R. Spectroscopic characterization of mixed Fe-Ni oxide electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline electrolytes. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1793–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fominykh, K.; Chernev, P.; Zaharieva, I.; Sicklinger, J.; Stefanic, G.; Döblinger, M.; Müller, A.; Pokharel, A.; Böcklein, S.; Scheu, C.; et al. Iron-doped nickel oxide nanocrystals as highly efficient electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 5180–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Han, G.Q.; Liu, Y.R.; Hu, W.H.; Dong, B.; Li, X.; Shang, X.; Chai, Y.M.; Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, C.G. Three dimensional nickel oxides/nickel structure by in situ electro-oxidation of nickel foam as robust electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 359, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, J.; Zhu, D.; Ling, T.; Vasileff, A.; Qiao, S.Z. S-NiFe2O4 ultra-small nanoparticle built nanosheets for efficient water splitting in alkaline and neutral pH. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, J.; Zhang, C.; Ai, L. Hierarchical iron nickel oxide architectures derived from metal-organic frameworks as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochimica Acta 2016, 208, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, J.; Hu, L.; Wang, M.; Gan, L.; Chen, C.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, B.; Lai, Y.; Li, J. NiO-Fe2O3/carbon nanotubes composite as bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable Zn-air batteries. Mater. Lett. 2018, 218, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, J.; Zuo, S.; Wei, G.; Niu, Y.; Guo, L.; Chen, Z. Investigation of Fe-based integrated electrodes for water oxidation in neutral and alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 12313–12320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pushkareva, I.V.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Grigoriev, S.A.; Modisha, P.; Bessarabov, D.G. Comparative study of anion exchange membranes for low-cost water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arges, C.G.; Zhang, L. Anion exchange membranes’ evolution toward high hydroxide ion conductivity and alkaline resiliency. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 2991–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hickner, M.A.; Herring, A.M.; Coughlin, E.B. Anion exchange membranes: Current status and moving forward. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2013, 51, 1727–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, N.; Leng, Y.; Hickner, M.A.; Wang, C.Y. Highly stable, anion conductive, comb-shaped copolymers for alkaline fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10124–10133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mamlouk, M.; Manolova, M. Chapter 6: Alkaline anionic exchange membrane water electrolysers. In RSC Energy and Environment Series; Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC): London, UK, 2020; Volume 2020-January, pp. 180–252. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx catalysts calcined at 450°C. The catalyst formulations NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx refer to a nominal atomic ratio Ni:Fe equal to 1:2 and 1:1, respectively.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx catalysts calcined at 450°C. The catalyst formulations NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx refer to a nominal atomic ratio Ni:Fe equal to 1:2 and 1:1, respectively.
Energies 13 01720 g001
Figure 2. Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis of the NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx catalysts calcined at 450 °C. C is related to the carbon tape.
Figure 2. Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis of the NiFe2Ox and NiFeOx catalysts calcined at 450 °C. C is related to the carbon tape.
Energies 13 01720 g002
Figure 3. TEM images of the NiFeOx (a) and NiFe2Ox (b) catalysts.
Figure 3. TEM images of the NiFeOx (a) and NiFe2Ox (b) catalysts.
Energies 13 01720 g003
Figure 4. XPS survey analysis of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Figure 4. XPS survey analysis of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Energies 13 01720 g004
Figure 5. Ni2p XPS signals of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Figure 5. Ni2p XPS signals of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Energies 13 01720 g005
Figure 6. Fe2p XPS signals of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Figure 6. Fe2p XPS signals of the NiFe-oxide catalysts.
Energies 13 01720 g006
Figure 7. (a) Polarization curves carried out at 1 M KOH for MEAs including the NiFeOx-based electrocatalysts at the anode; (b) IR-free polarisation curves; (c) Schematic illustration of the AEM electrolysis cell used in these experiments.
Figure 7. (a) Polarization curves carried out at 1 M KOH for MEAs including the NiFeOx-based electrocatalysts at the anode; (b) IR-free polarisation curves; (c) Schematic illustration of the AEM electrolysis cell used in these experiments.
Energies 13 01720 g007
Figure 8. Polarization curves carried out at 1 M KOH for MEAs including the NiFe2Ox-based electrocatalysts at the anode. (a) Polarisation curves; (b) IR-free polarization curves.
Figure 8. Polarization curves carried out at 1 M KOH for MEAs including the NiFe2Ox-based electrocatalysts at the anode. (a) Polarisation curves; (b) IR-free polarization curves.
Energies 13 01720 g008
Figure 9. Potential cycling test (1–1.8V) for the NiFeOx KB (1:1) catalyst with the Sustainion™ membrane in 1M KOH (a) and polarization curves for the NiFeOx KB 70:30 catalyst based MEA before and after the accelerated stress test (b).
Figure 9. Potential cycling test (1–1.8V) for the NiFeOx KB (1:1) catalyst with the Sustainion™ membrane in 1M KOH (a) and polarization curves for the NiFeOx KB 70:30 catalyst based MEA before and after the accelerated stress test (b).
Energies 13 01720 g009aEnergies 13 01720 g009b
Table 1. Structural characteristics of the non-CRM Ni-Fe electrocatalysts.
Table 1. Structural characteristics of the non-CRM Ni-Fe electrocatalysts.
Catalyst FormulaConcentration of Metal Oxide %Crystallite Size (nm) XRDParticle Size (nm) TEMBET (m2 gr–1)
NiFeOx / KB70121050
NiFe2Ox / KB7055141
Table 2. In-situ mass activity for the NiFeOx/KB and NiFe2Ox/KB catalysts with the Sustainion™ membrane.
Table 2. In-situ mass activity for the NiFeOx/KB and NiFe2Ox/KB catalysts with the Sustainion™ membrane.
Catalyst FormulaConditions30 °C
A g−1NiFe @ 1.5 V
40 °C
A g−1NiFe @ 1.5 V
50 °C
A g−1NiFe @ 1.5 V
60 °C
A g−1NiFe @ 1.5 V
NiFeOx KB (70:30)1M KOH481624
NiFe2Ox KB (70:30)1M KOH4448

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campagna Zignani, S.; Lo Faro, M.; Trocino, S.; Aricò, A.S. Investigation of NiFe-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution in Anion-Exchange Membrane Electrolysis. Energies 2020, 13, 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071720

AMA Style

Campagna Zignani S, Lo Faro M, Trocino S, Aricò AS. Investigation of NiFe-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution in Anion-Exchange Membrane Electrolysis. Energies. 2020; 13(7):1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campagna Zignani, Sabrina, Massimiliano Lo Faro, Stefano Trocino, and Antonino Salvatore Aricò. 2020. "Investigation of NiFe-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution in Anion-Exchange Membrane Electrolysis" Energies 13, no. 7: 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop