Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Monitoring of Sensible Thermal Storage in an Extremely Cold Region
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Solving of Uncertain Process Abnormity Diagnosis Problem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Potentiality of Animal Fat Based-Bio Phase Change Materials (PCM) for Building Applications: An Innovative Multipurpose Thermal Investigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building

Building Energy Technique and Technology Research Group (BETTER), Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(8), 1582; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081582
Submission received: 22 March 2019 / Revised: 19 April 2019 / Accepted: 21 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019

Abstract

This paper analyzes the use of hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) collectors in nearly zero-energy buildings (NZEBs). We present a design methodology based on the dynamic simulation of the whole energy system, which includes the building energy demand, a reversible heat pump as generator, the thermal storage, the power exchange with the grid, and both thermal and electrical energy production by solar collectors. An exhaustive search of the best equipment sizing and design is performed to minimize both the total costs and the non-renewable primary energy consumption over the system lifetime. The results show that photovoltaic/thermal technology reduces the non-renewable primary energy consumption below the nearly zero-energy threshold value, assumed as 15 kWh/(m2·yr), also reducing the total costs with respect to a non-solar solution (up to 8%). As expected, several possible optimal designs exist, with an opposite trend between energy savings and total costs. In all these optimal configurations, we figure out that photovoltaic/thermal technology favors the production of electrical energy with respect to the thermal one, which mainly occurs during the summer to meet the domestic hot water requirements and lower the temperature of the collectors. Finally, we show that, for a given solar area, photovoltaic/thermal technology leads to a higher reduction of the non-renewable primary energy and to a higher production of solar thermal energy with respect to a traditional separate production employing photovoltaic (PV) modules and solar thermal (ST) collectors.
Keywords: hybrid photovoltaic/thermal collectors; nearly zero-energy buildings; cost-benefit analysis; dynamic simulation; solar technology hybrid photovoltaic/thermal collectors; nearly zero-energy buildings; cost-benefit analysis; dynamic simulation; solar technology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Conti, P.; Schito, E.; Testi, D. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building. Energies 2019, 12, 1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081582

AMA Style

Conti P, Schito E, Testi D. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building. Energies. 2019; 12(8):1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conti, Paolo, Eva Schito, and Daniele Testi. 2019. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building" Energies 12, no. 8: 1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081582

APA Style

Conti, P., Schito, E., & Testi, D. (2019). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building. Energies, 12(8), 1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop