Next Article in Journal
An Active Direct Cell-to-Cell Balancing Circuit in Continuous Current Mode for Series Connected Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Measuring Impact of Uncertainty in a Stylized Macroeconomic Climate Model within a Dynamic Game Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Wave-to-Wire Model Development and Validation for Two OWC Type Wave Energy Converters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysing the Energy Efficiency of EU Member States: The Potential of Energy Recovery from Waste in the Circular Economy
Open AccessArticle

Energy Commodities: A Review of Optimal Hedging Strategies

Laboratory of Operations Research, Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 33888 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(20), 3979; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203979
Received: 11 August 2019 / Revised: 15 October 2019 / Accepted: 16 October 2019 / Published: 18 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment of Energy–Environment–Economy Interrelations)
Energy is considered as a commodity nowadays and continuous access along with price stability is of vital importance for every economic agent worldwide. The aim of the current review paper is to present in detail the two dominant hedging strategies relative to energy portfolios, the Minimum-Variance hedge ratio and the expected utility maximization methodology. The Minimum-Variance hedge ratio approach is by far the most popular in literature as it is less time consuming and computationally demanding; nevertheless by applying the appropriate multivariate model Garch family volatility model, it can provide a very reliable estimation of the optimal hedge ratio. However, this becomes possible at the cost of a rather restrictive assumption for infinite hedger’s risk aversion. Within an uncertain worldwide economic climate and a highly volatile energy market, energy producers, retailers and consumers had to become more adaptive and develop the necessary energy risk management and optimal hedging strategies. The estimation gap of an optimal hedge ratio that would be subject to the investor’s risk preferences through time is filled by the relatively more complex and sophisticated expected utility maximization methodology. Nevertheless, if hedgers share infinite risk aversion or if alternatively the expected futures price is approximately zero the two methodologies become equivalent. The current review shows that when evidence from the energy market during periods of extremely volatile economic climate is considered, both hypotheses can be violated, hence it becomes reasonable that especially for extended hedging horizons it would be wise for potential hedgers to take into consideration both methodologies in order to build a successful and profitable hedging strategy. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy commodities; hedging strategies; minimum-variance hedge ratio; expected utility maximization; risk aversion energy commodities; hedging strategies; minimum-variance hedge ratio; expected utility maximization; risk aversion
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Halkos, G.E.; Tsirivis, A.S. Energy Commodities: A Review of Optimal Hedging Strategies. Energies 2019, 12, 3979.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop