Next Article in Journal
Influence of Operating Conditions and Crushing Chamber on Energy Consumption of Cone Crusher
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Airflow Patterns in a New Design of Wind Tower with a Wetted Surface
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Stator Main Insulation Temperature Field of Air-Cooled Turbo-Generator after Main Insulation Shelling

1
Electric Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2
Beijing BEIZHONG Steam Turbine Generator Co., Ltd., Beijing 100040, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(5), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051101
Submission received: 16 February 2018 / Revised: 23 March 2018 / Accepted: 20 April 2018 / Published: 30 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section F: Electrical Engineering)

Abstract

:
The stator main insulation is the key component of turbo-generator, which is related to the thermal aging of turbo-generator. It is vital to accurately judge the generator aging by calculating the temperature distribution under main insulation normal operation and fault operation. In this paper, taking a 150 MW air-cooled turbo-generator as an example, the temperature field of the main insulation was studied after the stator main insulation shelling. Based on the finite element method, the stator temperature field after the main insulation shelling was calculated. The main insulation position of maximum temperature drop and the temperature distribution of the stator main insulation along the circumference and the axial direction were analyzed. At the same time, with the shelling gap of main insulation increases, the temperature distribution between shelling gap δ = 0.5 mm and δ = 1.0 mm was compared. The results can provide a theory for fault monitoring and diagnostics of the large-scale turbine generator.

1. Introduction

Under the influence of electric, thermal, vibration and mechanical stresses, the stator and rotor main insulation of the generator may be caused serious faults such as aging, shelling and discharging. Many specialists make researches about generator insulation failure mechanism, discharging and fault monitoring after insulation aging [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Dr. H. Zhu and C. Morton made a detailed research on the diagnosis about thermal aging of stator windings [11,12]. It can be defined that main insulation occurs delamination and shelling by evaluating the insulation conditions after thermal cycling test. Dr. Greg C. Stone made a comprehensive research on electrical insulation for rotating machines, especially in design, evaluation, aging, testing and repair [13,14,15,16,17]. However, the insulation temperature distribution after insulation aging is still the effective way to evaluate insulation fault of machines. Therefore, a 150 MW air-cooled turbo-generator is taken as an example to study the stator main insulation temperature field of the air-cooled turbo-generator after the main insulation shelling in this paper, which can provide a theory for the diagnosis of the generator after the fault operation.

2. Stator Calculation Model of Turbo-Generator

2.1. Basic Parameters and Physical Model of Air-Cooled Turbine Generator

According to the fault statistics of the stator main insulation from the power plant, the generator main insulation occur shelling with shelling gap less than 1.0 mm. Once the main insulation shelling gap surpass 1.0 mm, the generator will stop running. A broken bar of a 150 MW air-cooled generator is shown in Figure 1. Thus, a 150 MW air-cooled turbo-generator is taken as an example to study the stator temperature field under the main insulation shelling and given the relevant parameters, as shown in Table 1.
Due to the symmetry of wind path of the generator and the generator structure in the circumferential direction, the calculation model is chosen to calculate one tooth pitch in the circumferential direction and two half of the stator core in the axial direction, as shown in Figure 2.
In Figure 2, the rotor rotation direction is defined as the circumferential direction, denoted by X; the direction from slot opening to base is defined as radial, denoted by Y; the direction from the turbine end to the exciter end is defined as the axial direction, denoted by Z.

2.2. 3D Mathematical Model of Temperature Field of Turbo-Generator Stator

In order to calculate stator temperature field of the air-cooled turbine generator, the 3D temperature field mathematical model is set up by the following equations [18]:
The 3D heat transfer equation in the calculation domain:
x ( λ x T x ) + y ( λ y T y ) + z ( λ z T z ) = q ( x , y , z ) Ω
where λx, λy, λz are the thermal conductivity along x, y, and z axes, respectively, T is temperature, q is the heat density, Ω is solving domain
The law of air flow in the calculation domain abides by the following equations:
Mass conservation equation:
( ρ v r ) = 0
Momentum conservation equation:
( ρ v r 2 ) + ρ ( 2 w × v r + w × w × r ) = p + τ + F
Energy conservation equation:
( ρ T ) t + div ( ρ v T ) = div ( λ c grad T ) + S r
where ρ is mass density, vr is the relative velocity vector, r is position vector of micro cell in rotating coordinate system, p is static pressure acting on micro cell in air, τ is viscous stress in infinitesimal surface generated by molecular viscosity effects, ρ(2w × vr + w × w × r) is Coriolis force, w is angular velocity, F is volume force on micro cell, v is absolute speed, λ is thermal conductivity, c is specific heat in constant pressure, Sr is the ratio of the heat generated in the unit volume and c.
Since the fluid in the stator calculation domain is turbulent flow, standard k-ε model is used to simulate turbulence equation:
{ ( ρ f k ) t + d i v ( ρ f k V ) = d i v [ ( u + u t σ k ) g r a d k ] + G k ρ f ε ( ρ f ε ) t + d i v ( ρ f V ε ) = d i v [ ( u + u t σ ε ) g r a d ε ] + G 1 ε ε k G k G 2 ε ρ f ε 2 k
where k is the turbulent kinetic energy, ε is the diffusion factor; ρf is the fluid density, V is the velocity vector of fluid; t is the time, Gk is turbulent generation rate, ut is turbulent viscosity coefficient, G1ε and G2ε are constant; σk and σε are respectively the equation k and equation ε of Planck’s constant turbulence.

2.3. Calculation Model of 3D Temperature Field of Turbo-Generator Stator

The boundary condition of calculation model of 3D temperature field of turbo-generator stator [19,20]:
(1)
SI, SII, SIII and SIV are adiabatic surfaces, which satisfy:
T n = 0
(2)
Tooth top SV and Yoke back SVI are heat transfer surfaces, which satisfy:
λ T n = α ( T T f )
where n is normal vector of surface, λ is heat transfer coefficient, Tf is ambient temperature.
(3)
The outlet port of stator radial ventilating duct is set a standard atmospheric pressure condition. The inlet air velocity of stator ventilating duct is 15.8, which is calculated by air volume of rotor outlet port and air gap, while the inlet air temperature of the stator ventilating duct is 68 °C which is defined by outlet air temperature of rotor ventilating duct.
According to solving domain and boundary conditions provided by Figure 1, as well as the above theoretical equation, the 3D temperature field mathematical calculation model is solved by using fluid–solid coupled method, and the temperature field can be determined.

3. Main Insulation Temperature Field Calculation Results and Analysis of Air-Cooled Turbo-Generator Stator

By fluid–solid coupled method, the stator temperature field under the main insulation normal operation and fault operation is obtained. The computed results in the temperature measurement point of the normal case, which is 133 °C, are almost the same with the measured value 131 °C, which indicates that the calculation method is correct.

3.1. Research on the Influence of Stator Main Insulation Shelling on Main Insulation Temperature Drop

For convenience of illustration and analysis, the left and right sides of upper main insulation are defined as UP2 and UP3, and the top and bottom sides of the main insulation are defined as UP1 and UP4. The same rules are used to define the lower main insulation as DN1-DN4. The insulation shelling positions in the calculation model are located at UP2 and DN2, as shown in Figure 2.
By solving the above fluid–solid coupling heat transfer equation, the upper and lower main insulation maximum temperature drop value can be obtained, as shown in Table 2.
In Table 2 and Figure 3, the positions of maximum temperature drop of the main insulation are in the same radial height of the left side UP2 and the right side UP3 and the values of maximum temperature drop are basically the same due to the stator circumferential symmetry of the air-cooled turbine generator in normal operation. The maximum temperature drop law of the lower main insulation left side DN2 and right side DN3 is similarly with the upper main insulation UP2 and UP3. The position of maximum temperature drop of DN2 and DN3 is in the central of the lower main insulation in the radial direction and the value is less than the UP2 and UP3.
As also shown in Table 2 and Figure 2, compared with the positions and values of the maximum temperature drop in the upper main insulation UP1, UP4 and the lower main insulation DN1 DN4, their positions are basically same circumferential direction and the value of UP1 is the largest. There are two main reasons: (1) UP1 is located on the upper bar, due to the impact of additional loss, the total loss of upper bar is larger than that of lower bar. (2) UP1 close to the side of the generator air gap, and the heat transfer condition is good. However, interlayer insulation between the UP4 and the DN1, and DN4 close to the yoke core have poor heat transfer conditions, which cause the insulation temperature drop smaller than UP1.
From Table 2, in the cases of the stator main insulation (UP2 and DN2) unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the position of maximum temperature drop of the main insulation appears on UP3, which rises 7 °C than that of the normal conditions and locates at the radial height of Y = 47.5 mm, as same as the radial height of the normal operation. However, the position of the maximum temperature drop in the top side of the upper insulation UP1 and the bottom side UP4 in the circumferential direction is offset 4 mm to the shelling side, and the values of maximum temperature drop is also increased.
Moreover, the maximum temperature drop of the main insulation is located on UP3 and the value is increasing in the case of δ = 0.5 mm, which is because that the heat inside the upper bar is difficult to transfer from UP2 to the stator tooth considering the air of the shelling gap in UP2. At the same time, the temperature of the tooth close to UP3 changes little, so the maximum temperature drop of the un-shelling side also increases.
Similarly, in the case of main insulation of the lower bar DN2 shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the maximum temperature drop appears on the DN3, which is 9.8 °C higher than that in the normal operation, and its radial position at the height Y = 160.5 mm, which is same as the normal operation. In addition, the maximum temperature drop of DN2 is 3.4 °C lower than UP2, while it is about 4.6 °C lower than DN2 at normal operation.
With the same analysis method, in the case of the stator main insulation (UP2 and DN2) unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm, the maximum temperature drop on UP3 and DN3 are respectively 9.7 °C and 13.1 °C higher than that of the normal operation, and their radial position is respectively also at the height Y = 47.5 mm and Y = 160.5 mm. In addition, the maximum temperature drop of DN2 is 5.9 °C lower than that of UP2, and is about 12.4 °C lower than DN2 at normal operation.

3.2. Research on the Main Insulation Temperature Distribution in the Axis–Radial Section under Main Insulation Normal Operation and Fault Operation

The law of the maximum temperature drop of the stator main insulation is studied under main insulation normal and fault operation above. The main insulation temperature distribution of the stator windings in the axial direction is uneven due to the presence of the stator radial ventilation duct. Therefore, it is necessary to study the temperature distribution of stator main insulation in the axis–radial section under main insulation normal and unilateral shelling operation.
For convenience of analysis, the main insulation UP2 and DN2 of upper and lower stator winding along the circumference direction are divided into three equal parts, P1, P2, P3, P4, where P1 is close to the stator windings and P4 is close to the stator teeth core. The P1~P4 temperature field in the normal operation are shown in Figure 4a–d below.
In Figure 4, the maximum temperature of the main insulation of the upper bar is on the surface P1, and the temperature value is 131 °C, where the radial height is Y = 46.5 mm and the axial length is Z = 0. The maximum temperature of the main insulation of the lower bar is also on P1, the temperature is 126 °C, at Y = 160.5 mm, Z = 0. The maximum insulation temperature of the upper bar is 5 °C higher than the lower bar.
The maximum and minimum temperature on the P1P4 values are shown in Table 3 below.
In the case of the main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the shelling side P5P8 main insulation axis–radial section temperature distribution is as follows. Similarly, P5 near the stator winding, P8 near the stator teeth core.
In Figure 5, in the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the maximum temperature of the upper main insulation is on the surface P5, and its value is 119 °C, where the radial height is Y = 46.5 mm and the axial length is Z = 0; and the minimum temperature is 83.2 °C at a position where is Y = 0, Z = 21 mm. The maximum temperature of the lower main insulation is also on P5, the temperature value is 117 °C, at Y = 160.5 mm, Z = 0; and the minimum temperature value is 91.6 °C at a position where is Y = 226 mm, Z = 21 mm. Compared with the temperature distribution under normal operation of the main insulation, the maximum temperature in the shelling side decreases, but the location is not changed, indicating that the air in the shelling gap prevent the heat transfer to the shelling side of main insulation.
From Figure 5 and Table 4, it can be seen that the temperature distribution of P5P8 is completely different. The main insulation temperature close to core is relatively low, and the maximum temperature difference between the upper and lower main insulation temperature close to the core side is very small, which is due to the fact that the core is a very important heat transfer path. Therefore, the maximum and minimum values of the P8 surface are smaller than that of the other three surfaces.
In order to analyze the temperature distribution of the main insulation on the un-shelling side, similarly, the upper and lower main insulations UP3, DN3 are divided into three equal parts, P9P12. Correspondingly, the temperature distribution of P9P12 is shown in Figure 5a–d).
From Figure 6, the temperature distribution in the main insulation un-shelling side is different from the shelling side of the main insulation. In Figure 6a, the maximum temperature of the upper main insulation is on the surface P9, which is 140 °C, and the minimum temperature value is 85.1 °C, while the maximum temperature of the lower main insulation is also on P9, which is 134 °C, and the minimum temperature value is 92.7 °C. The temperature difference (the difference between the maximum and the minimum) of the upper insulation is 55 °C, while the temperature difference of the lower insulation is 41.3 °C. The temperature distribution position is consistent with the previous chapter.
From Figure 6b,c, the value of the maximum temperature and minimum temperature in the un-shelling side P10 and P11 are bigger than those of the shelling side P6 and P7 in the case of the main insulation shelling δ = 0.5 mm, but the temperature distribution is basically same.
In Figure 6d, the minimum temperature of surface P12 close to the core side is substantially same as the minimum temperature of P8, but the maximum temperature is 5 °C higher than that of P8. This is because that the thermal conductivity coefficient of air in the shelling gap is much smaller than the thermal conductivity coefficient of the main insulation. Most of the loss generated by stator winding is passed through the un-shelling main insulation, causing that the main insulation temperature of the un-shelling side is higher than that of the shelling side, and the temperature of the core is slightly increased.
If the main insulation of the stator is further thermal aging from the unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm to unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm, it will further cause the temperature value inside the main insulation rise, and the calculation results are shown in Figure 7. The main insulation temperature distribution of axis–radial surfaces P13P16 is obtained in Figure 7.
From Figure 7a, it can be found that the temperature values of main insulation reduce compared with the temperature values of P5. With the larger shelling gap, heat generated by stator windings is more difficult to pass through the shelling side insulation, part of the heat pass through the inter-layer insulation.
In Figure 7b–d, compared with the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the temperature in the δ = 1.0 mm shelling side is relatively lower, and the temperature difference is also smaller. The shelling gap undertakes most of the main insulation temperature drop, resulting in heat transfer capacity of the main insulation shelling side decreases.
Similarly, Figure 8 is the axis–radial temperature distribution in the main insulation un-shelling side in the case of unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm.
From Figure 8, it can be seen clearly that the main insulation temperature of the un-shelling side changes along the circumference direction in the case of the main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm. The maximum value is 145 °C on the surface P17, and the minimum value is 75.8 °C on the surface P20. Compared with Figure 6, the trend of the main insulation temperature along the circumference direction is basically the same, but the maximum temperature increases of 5 °C.
Compared with Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, it is found that the temperature difference between the shelling side and the un-shelling side in the main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm is larger than that of the unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm. Moreover, with shelling gap increase, the thermal conductivity of the air is only 1/10 of the main insulation, the heat generated by the windings is more difficult to pass through the main insulation in the shelling side. Therefore, the temperature will be further increased, and un-shelling side of the main insulation in effect of the long-term high temperature can lead to the main insulation heat aging, even greatly shorten the un-shelling side of the main insulation life, causing shelling and other accidents. Once both sides of the main insulation are shelled, heat of windings would be more difficult to pass out, which may destroy the main insulation, causing that the windings occur the ground fault, and that the safe operation of the generator has been seriously disturbed.

3.3. Research on the Temperature Distribution of Circumferential–Radial Section under the Main Insulation of Stator Windings Normal Operation and Fault Operation

By analyzing the temperature distribution of the stator main insulation in the axial–radial section, it is found that the main insulation temperature is greatly affected by the ventilation duct. In order to further analyze the influence of the ventilation duct on the main insulation temperature, the main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial section is studied under normal operation and shelling operation at different axial position.

3.3.1. The Main Insulation Temperature Distribution Along the Circumferential–Radial Direction under Normal Operation

The stator main insulation is divided into two parts in the axial direction, Z = 0, Z = 21 mm, Z = 42 mm in the main insulation normal operation. Z = 0 and Z = 42 mm are located in the axial center of the stator teeth, Z = 21 mm is located in the center of the stator radial ventilation duct. The results of the temperature distribution at different axial positions are shown in Figure 9.
In Figure 9, the comparison of Z = 0 and Z = 21 mm shows that the main insulation temperature of Z = 21 mm is lower than the main insulation temperature of Z = 0; the main insulation temperature drop of the stator on the center of the ventilation duct is higher than that of Z = 0 and Z = 42 mm. This is because that the ventilation duct, better heat transfer, makes the main insulation thermal gradient larger. In addition, the stator core tooth temperature is about 95 °C, the air temperature around ventilation duct is about 70 °C.
It can also be seen from Figure 9 that the maximum temperature value of the main insulation is 131 °C, appearing near the windings. In addition, the minimum temperature value of the winding insulation is 76 °C, appearing near the stator wedge. However the minimum temperature at the center of the stator core Z = 0 and Z = 42 mm is 95 °C. This shows that the main insulation of the stator has a large temperature difference in the axial direction, the lowest temperature difference of 19 °C.

3.3.2. The Main Insulation Temperature Distribution along the Circumferential–Radial in the Case of the Stator Main Insulation Unilateral Shelling δ = 0.5 mm

Based on the above calculation, the main insulation temperature distribution in the center of the stator teeth and the center of the ventilation duct of the calculation area in the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm are shown in Figure 10.
The stator main insulation temperature distribution in the circumferential–radial section is shown in Figure 10 in the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm. As the shelling gap makes the main insulation thermal conductivity deteriorate, the maximum temperature of the stator insulation increases, but the minimum temperature is still at the stator wedge. Compared to the temperature distribution between the Z = 0 and Z = 21 mm, the main insulation temperature at the center of the ventilation duct is low. However, due to the effect of shelling gap, in which the air undertakes a part of the temperature drop, the temperature distribution of the main insulation in the shelling side is relatively lower than that of the un-shelling side.
Similarly, it is found that the teeth core temperature of the left side is higher than that of the right side, about 5 °C. This is due to the presence of shelling gaps, which leads to inconsistencies in the temperature on both sides of the main insulation.
Compared with the normal operation of the main insulation, the main insulation temperature rise as a whole, the temperature drop of main insulation un-shelling side is larger, and temperature difference of left and right sides also becomes larger.

3.3.3. The Main Insulation Temperature Distribution along the Circumferential–Radial in the Case of Stator Main Insulation Unilateral Shelling δ = 1.0 mm

Z = 0, Z = 21 mm, Z = 42 mm temperature field in the case of stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm are shown in Figure 11.
The stator main insulation maximum temperature in the case of stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm further increase of 5 °C than that in the unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm. The temperature distribution is consistent with Figure 10.

4. Conclusions

(1)
In the cases of the main insulation unilateral shelling of the stator, the temperature drop of the main insulation of the shelling side is obviously smaller than that of un-shelling side. With the increase of the shelling gap, the main insulation temperature drop of the shelling side becomes smaller, and the temperature drop of the un-shelling becomes larger, which can lead to bilateral shelling of main insulation considering the thermal aging. The maximum temperature drop of the main insulation is on un-shelling side of the upper winding after the unilateral shelling occurs.
(2)
The temperature difference of the main insulation between the upper bar and lower bar close to the stator windings is obvious, but the temperature difference is basically the same in the side of the tooth under main insulation normal operation and fault operation. As the main insulation unilateral shelling gap becomes larger, the maximum temperature value of the main insulation increases, and the maximum, minimum and difference of the temperature in the main insulation shelling side are reduced. The main insulation has a lowest temperature close to the ventilation duct, which is 20 °C lower than that of the lowest temperature in the center of the stator teeth
(3)
In the case of main insulation unilateral shelling of the stator, the minimum temperature close to the core teeth in the shelling side and un-shelling side is different, about a difference of 5 °C. Therefore, it can be effectively monitored and determined the situation of the main insulation overheating and shelling by installing temperature measurement components in the both sides of stator core close to the main insulation.

Author Contributions

Yong Li and Weili Li conceived and designed the experiments; Ying Su performed the experiments; Wenmao Liu and Purui Wang analyzed the data; Yong Li contributed analysis tools; Ying Su wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

We received funds for covering the costs to publish in open access, which name is "Research on main insulation fault mechanism of air cooled turbo-generator stator" and which number is E17JB00290.
All sources of funding of the study should be disclosed. Please clearly indicate grants that you have received in support of your research work. Clearly state if you received funds for covering the costs to publish in open access.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Romary, R.; Demian, C.; Schlupp, P.; Roger, J.Y. Offline and Online Methods for Stator Core Fault Detection in Large Generators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 4084–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nadarajan, S.; Panda, S.K.; Bhangu, B.; Gupta, A.K. Hybrid Model for Wound-Rotor Synchronous Generator to Detect and Diagnose Turn-to-Turn Short-Circuit Fault in Stator Windings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 1888–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamin, L.D.B.; Shaoyu, W. The Influence of Insulation Aging on Stator Temperature Rise. Large Electr. Mach. Hydr. Turbine 1988, 6, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Istad, M.; Runde, M.; Nysveen, A. A Review of Results from Thermal Cycling Tests of Hydro-Generator Stator Windings. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2011, 26, 890–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sumereder, C.; Weiers, T. Significance of Defects Inside In-Service Aged Winding Insulations. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2008, 23, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, P.G.S.; Reddy, K.M. Condition Evaluation of Stator Winding Insulation of Vintage High Voltage Turbine Generator. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies, Coimbatore, India, 5–7 March 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Provencher, H.; Hudon, C.; David, E. Thermal and Thermo-Mechanical Aging of Epoxy-Mica Insulated Stator Bars. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2–5 June 2013; pp. 248–252. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stone, G.C.; Lyles, J.F.; Braun, J.M.; Kaul, C.L. A Thermal Cycling Type Test for Generator Stator Winding Insulation. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 1991, 6, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanaka, K.; Kojima, H.; Onoda, M.; Suzuki, K. Prediction of Residual Breakdown Electrical Field Strength of Epoxy-Mica Paper Insulation Systems for the Stator Winding of Large Generators. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brütsch, R.; Tari, M.; Froehlich, K.; Weiers, T.; Vogelsang, R. Insulation Failure Mechanisms of Power Generators. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2008, 24, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, H.; Morton, C.; Cherukupalli, S. Quality Evaluation of Stator Coils and Bars under Thermal Cycling Stress. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Totonto, ON, Canada, 11–14 June 2006; pp. 384–387. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, H.; Kung, D.; Cowell, M.; Cherukupalli, S. Acoustic Monitoring of Stator Winding Delaminations during Thermal Cycling Testing. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2010, 17, 1405–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stone, G.C.; Stranges, M.K.; Dunn, D.G. Common Questions on Partial Discharge Testing: A Review of Recent Developments in IEEE and IEC Standards for Offline and Online Testing of Motor and Generator Stator Windings. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag. 2016, 22, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stone, G.C.; Boulter, E.A.; Culbert, I.; Dhirani, H. Electrical Insulation for Rotating Machines: Design, Evaluation, Aging, and Repair, 2nd ed.; Wiley Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 180–192. ISBN 978-1118057063. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stone, G.C.; Warren, V. Effect of Manufacturer, Winding Age and Insulation Type on Stator Winding Partial Discharge Levels. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2004, 20, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Griffith, G.; Tucker, S.; Milsom, J.; Stone, G. Problems with Modern Air-Cooled Generator Stator Winding Insulation. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2000, 16, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stone, G.C.; Chan, C.; Sedding, H.G. On-Line Partial Discharge Measurement in Hydrogen-Cooled Generators. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 19–22 June 2016; pp. 194–197. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin, H.Y.; Li, W.L.; Ma, X.H.; Ding, S.Y. Calculation and Analysis of Fluid velocity and Fluid Temperature in Large Air-cooled turbo-generator stator. Proc. CSEE 2006, 26, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, W.; Ding, S.; Zhou, F. Diagnostic Numerical Simulation of Large Hydro-Generator with Insulation Aging. Heat Transf. Eng. 2008, 29, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Hou, Y. Heating Analysis of Stator Strands of Large Hydro-generator Based on Numerical Method. Proc. CSEE 2001, 21, 115–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The photo of a broken bar of the 150 MW turbine generator.
Figure 1. The photo of a broken bar of the 150 MW turbine generator.
Energies 11 01101 g001
Figure 2. Stator temperature field calculation model and boundary conditions.
Figure 2. Stator temperature field calculation model and boundary conditions.
Energies 11 01101 g002
Figure 3. The position definition of stator main insulation and the maximum temperature drop in three cases.
Figure 3. The position definition of stator main insulation and the maximum temperature drop in three cases.
Energies 11 01101 g003
Figure 4. The main insulation axis–radial section temperature distribution under normal operating of the generator: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P1 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial-radial P2 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P3 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P4 temperature distribution.
Figure 4. The main insulation axis–radial section temperature distribution under normal operating of the generator: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P1 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial-radial P2 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P3 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P4 temperature distribution.
Energies 11 01101 g004
Figure 5. In the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the shelling side: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P5 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P6 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P7 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P8 temperature distribution.
Figure 5. In the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm, the main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the shelling side: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P5 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P6 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P7 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P8 temperature distribution.
Energies 11 01101 g005
Figure 6. The main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the un-shelling side in the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P9 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P10 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P11 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P12 temperature distribution.
Figure 6. The main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the un-shelling side in the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P9 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P10 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P11 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P12 temperature distribution.
Energies 11 01101 g006
Figure 7. In the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm, the main insulation axis-radial temperature distribution in the shelling side: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P13 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P14 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P15 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P16 temperature distribution.
Figure 7. In the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm, the main insulation axis-radial temperature distribution in the shelling side: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P13 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P14 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P15 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P16 temperature distribution.
Energies 11 01101 g007
Figure 8. The main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the un-shelling side in the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P17 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P18 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P19 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P20 temperature distribution.
Figure 8. The main insulation axis–radial temperature distribution in the un-shelling side in the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm: (a) The main insulation axial–radial P17 temperature distribution; (b) The main insulation axial–radial P18 temperature distribution; (c) The main insulation axial–radial P19 temperature distribution; (d) The main insulation axial–radial P20 temperature distribution.
Energies 11 01101 g008
Figure 9. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial section under normal operation.
Figure 9. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial section under normal operation.
Energies 11 01101 g009
Figure 10. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial in the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm.
Figure 10. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial in the case of the stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 0.5 mm.
Energies 11 01101 g010
Figure 11. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial in the case of stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm.
Figure 11. The main insulation temperature distribution along the circumferential–radial in the case of stator main insulation unilateral shelling δ = 1.0 mm.
Energies 11 01101 g011
Table 1. Generator basic data.
Table 1. Generator basic data.
Main DataPower (W)Voltage (V)Current (A)Rotating Speed (r/min)Frequency (Hz)Power Factor
Rated data15015,75064693000500.85
Table 2. The calculation results of the stator insulation temperature drop.
Table 2. The calculation results of the stator insulation temperature drop.
PositionUP1UP2UP3UP4DN1DN2DN3DN4
TEMP. (°C)
Normal operation31.9540.3540.356.6613.7926.3126.3117.83
Shelling 0.5 mm35.4325.1347.388.9310.7721.7236.1318.7
Shelling 1.0 mm36.6119.7950.011113.7413.8839.4424.64
Table 3. The maximum and minimum temperature on P1P4.
Table 3. The maximum and minimum temperature on P1P4.
Upper Main InsulationLower Main Insulation
Maximum Temperature (°C) Minimum Temperature (°C)Maximum Temperature (°C)Minimum Temperature (°C)
P1131108126111
P2122105119104
P311194.210995.9
P410385.310389.7
Table 4. The maximum and minimum temperature on P5P8.
Table 4. The maximum and minimum temperature on P5P8.
Upper Main InsulationLower Main Insulation
Maximum Temperature (°C)Minimum Temperature (°C)Maximum Temperature (°C)Minimum Temperature (°C)
P511983.211791.6
P611480.511290.2
P710677.410587.8
P810174.910185

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Li, Y.; Su, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, W. Research on Stator Main Insulation Temperature Field of Air-Cooled Turbo-Generator after Main Insulation Shelling. Energies 2018, 11, 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051101

AMA Style

Li W, Li Y, Su Y, Wang P, Liu W. Research on Stator Main Insulation Temperature Field of Air-Cooled Turbo-Generator after Main Insulation Shelling. Energies. 2018; 11(5):1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weili, Yong Li, Ying Su, Purui Wang, and Wenmao Liu. 2018. "Research on Stator Main Insulation Temperature Field of Air-Cooled Turbo-Generator after Main Insulation Shelling" Energies 11, no. 5: 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop