Next Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of a Double-Nozzle Crossflow Hydroturbine
Next Article in Special Issue
Persistence of Oil Prices in Gas Import Prices and the Resilience of the Oil-Indexation Mechanism. The Case of Spanish Gas Import Prices
Previous Article in Journal
Stability Analysis in Determining Safety Drilling Fluid Pressure Windows in Ice Drilling Boreholes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2018, 11(12), 3379;

The Rebound Effect of Energy Efficiency Policy in the Presence of Energy Theft

Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Department of Economics, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34467, Turkey
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 October 2018 / Revised: 5 November 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 3 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Policy and Policy Implications)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1848 KB, uploaded 3 December 2018]   |  


Introduction: Estimating the effectiveness of energy efficiency policy in reducing energy use requires a full understanding of the energy efficiency rebound effect, where energy use reductions differ from engineering expectations. Prior models that estimate the size of the total rebound effect ignore energy theft, which is a common feature in developing economies. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the role that energy theft plays in determination of the size of the rebound effect of energy efficiency policy in developing countries, using the Turkish economy and the specific Turkish regulation regarding compensation for energy theft as an example. Methods: We construct two energy-economy computable general equilibrium (CGE) models for Turkey that do and do not incorporate energy theft. Costs of energy theft are passed on to consumers through a recovery surcharge. Two energy efficiency policies are modeled; one leading to a 42% energy efficiency increment for the service sector and another leading to a 48% energy efficiency increment for households. Results: Without energy theft, rebound effects for both policies are small: between −1.4% and 3.1% for the service sector and between 0.4% and 2.1% for households. With energy theft, we see a −7.9% to −19.7% rebound for the service sector and a 10.4% to 40.7% rebound for households. The recovery surcharge on energy sales rises when energy efficiency gains affect the service sector but fall when they affect households. Conclusions: The interaction between energy efficiency and energy theft may be critical in accurate estimation of rebound effects where energy theft is prevalent. Where energy efficiency gains disproportionately reduce electricity sales rather than theft, the rising recovery surcharge leads to a negative rebound or super-conservation. However, where theft is disproportionately reduced rebound will be higher. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy efficiency; rebound; energy theft; computable general equilibrium analysis energy efficiency; rebound; energy theft; computable general equilibrium analysis

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Somuncu, T.; Hannum, C. The Rebound Effect of Energy Efficiency Policy in the Presence of Energy Theft. Energies 2018, 11, 3379.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top