Next Article in Journal
An Improved Method for Energy and Resource Assessment of Waves in Finite Water Depths
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Looping Combustion of Hematite Ore with Methane and Steam in a Fluidized Bed Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Refurbishment of an Office Building with Hybrid Photovoltaic System and Demand-Side Management
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(8), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081176

Risk Assessment of Micro Energy Grid Protection Layers

1
Faculty of Energy Systems and Nuclear Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H7K4, Canada
2
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H7K4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Gianfranco Chicco
Received: 13 June 2017 / Revised: 8 July 2017 / Accepted: 3 August 2017 / Published: 10 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Conservation in Infrastructures 2016)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1980 KB, uploaded 11 August 2017]   |  

Abstract

Micro energy grids (MEGs) are used extensively to meet the combined electricity, heating, and cooling energy demands for all types of customers. This paper develops a hazard matrix for a MEG and utilizes two advanced risk modeling approaches (fault tree and layer of protection analysis (LOPA)) for MEGs’ risk analysis. A number of independent protection layers (IPLs) have been proposed to achieve a resilient MEG, hence increasing its safety integrity level (SIL). IPLs are applied using co-generators and thermal energy storage (TES) techniques to minimize the hazards of system failure, increase efficiency, and minimize greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed modeling and risk assessment approach aims to design a resilient MEG, which can utilize those potentials efficiently. In addition, an energy risk analysis has been applied on each MEGs’ physical domains such as electrical, thermal, mechanical and chemical. The concurrent objectives achieve an increased resiliency, reduced emissions, and sustained economy. View Full-Text
Keywords: micro energy grid (MEG); risk assessment; layer of protection analysis (LOPA); fault tree analysis; independent protection layer (IPL) micro energy grid (MEG); risk assessment; layer of protection analysis (LOPA); fault tree analysis; independent protection layer (IPL)
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gabbar, H.A.; Koraz, Y. Risk Assessment of Micro Energy Grid Protection Layers. Energies 2017, 10, 1176.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top