Next Article in Journal
Mandibular Reconstruction Using a Custom-Made Titanium Prosthesis: A Case Report on the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning and Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Indications for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Congenital Craniofacial Reconstruction
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Bolt from the Blue: A Large Foreign Body in the Maxillary Antrum Necessitating Delayed Primary Reconstruction with Split Cranial Bone Graft

by
Ramesh K. Sharma
*,
Guru Karna Vemula
and
Jerry R. John
Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(3), 242-245; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563699
Submission received: 8 December 2014 / Revised: 13 June 2015 / Accepted: 13 June 2015 / Published: 1 September 2015

Abstract

:
We report an unusual case of a large metallic foreign body embedded in the maxillary antrum leading to extensive bony destruction of the mid-face following a road side accident in a 12-year-old boy. There was extensive bony loss that necessitated reconstruction for both aesthetic and functional reasons. The same was accomplished by using split cranial bone graft in a delayed primary manner after a gap of 7 days following initial debridement. There was primary healing with good aesthetic and functional results.

A foreign body in the maxillary antrum is not unusual. They can be of traumatic origin [1,2,3,4] or can be found iatrogenically such as after dental procedures [5]. Metallic foreign bodies are readily detected on imaging. The posttraumatic lodging of foreign bodies in the mid-face can be accompanied with extensive contamination and soft tissue loss. This can lead to both aesthetic and functional deformities necessitating an early reconstruction as the delay in reconstruction can lead to compromised results. We report an unusual case of a large metallic foreign body lodged deep inside the maxillary antrum in a 12-year-old boy following a roadside trauma. This was successfully managed with delayed primary reconstruction with autogenous split cranial bone graft.

Case Report

A 12-year-old boy was admitted to the Emergency Department with alleged history of roadside accident. There was a curvilinear laceration in right nasolabial fold that had already been sutured elsewhere. Computed tomography scan face revealed a foreign body in right maxillary sinus with extensive bony comminution of orbital walls. There was fracture comminution of the right zygoma and parasagittal split of the right maxilla (Figure 1). The wound was explored through the laceration under general anesthesia. A large metallic bolt was found embedded deep in the maxillary antrum. There was gross contamination with dirt and gravel and the fractured bones were comminuted. Debridement and foreign body removal was done (Figure 2).The wound was kept open and daily irrigations were done with antibiotic saline solution till the discharge became minimal and the wound appeared clean. A week later, the wound was explored again by extending the existing laceration and the bony defect was displayed (Figure 3, upper row). There was loss of infraorbital rim, orbital floor, anterior wall of maxilla, and fracture of the zygoma. The zygoma was fixed at the frontozygomatic suture with miniplate. The bony defect was planned to be reconstructed with appropriately contoured split cranial bone grafts. Three pieces of the bone were harvested, one each for the floor, infraorbital rim, and the anterior wall. These were fixed with miniplates (Figure 3, middle row). This permitted reconstruction of the bony orbit of near normal dimensions can be seen in the postoperative scans (Figure 3, lower row).
The postoperative course was uneventful. Figure 4 shows result at 4 months postoperative period (upper row) with good eye movements (lower row).Although there is slight hypoglobus and enophthalmos, the patient is well adjusted and is able to carry out his daily activities without any head tilt.

Discussion

The foreign bodies lodged inside the facial skeleton are not rare and can present in a variety of situations following trauma or even dental procedures. They may be noted soon after the injury or may lie hidden initially and may be discovered on investigation following appearance of symptoms as a result of pressure effects or secondary infection.
Our patient had reported soon after the injury and had no idea of the foreign body lodged after the accident; this was noted only after radiological examination conducted in the emergency room.
The foreign body was removed and a thorough debridement performed. The mid-face region had fractures and bone loss affecting the zygoma, orbital floor, infraorbital margin, and the anterior wall of maxilla. There was total disorganization of the orbital socket. We decided against the use of titanium mesh in an open contaminated maxillary antrum with unstable soft tissue coverage. The use of a viable autogenous bone graft such as cranial bone graft was chosen for reconstruction. The split cranial bone graft has stood the test of time since it has been popularized by Tessier. The appropriately contoured bone pieces were harvested that were used to reconstruct the floor, infraorbital margin, and the missing anterior wall of maxilla. It may be emphasized that this was done after about a week of initial debridement to minimize infection. The provision of good skin cover was possible by designing a cheek rotation flap incorporating the existing laceration. The delayed primary bone reconstruction has helped us achieve the dual purpose of good functional and aesthetic goals. Autogenous bone graft is gold standard method for facial bone defect reconstruction [6,7]. Tessier popularized different techniques and uses of cranial bone graft harvest [8]. It is popular because of its histocompatibility, mechanical properties, and very slow resorption rate [9]. These bone grafts are cost effective [10], have low infection rate compared with alloplastic material, low donor site morbidity, and get osteointegration with surrounding tissue. Soft tissue coverage to sinuses is not required when cranial bone grafts are used due to excellent revascularization [10].
This case report emphasizes the role of delayed primary bone grafting in maxillofacial trauma in a growing skeleton.

References

  1. Jagannathan, M.; Nayak, B.B.; Baliarsing, A.S.; Babu, N.D. An unusual case of orbital trauma with a large foreign body in the maxilla. Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52, 507–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Akdogan, O.; Ozcan, I.; Selcuk, A.; Bilal, N.; Saricaoğlu, S.; Ensari, S. Orbital foreign body penetrating from the cheek. J Craniofac Surg 2008, 19, 439–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, J.A.; Lee, H.Y. A case of retained wooden foreign body in orbit. Korean J Ophthalmol 2002, 16, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kharel Sitaula, R.; Gautam, V.; Kc, K.; Shah, D.N. Impacted iron nail in the orbit and maxillary sinus through a corneo-scleral perforation: a case report. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2013, 5, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kaushik, S.; Singh, A.; Karthikeyan, A. Unusual foreign body in the maxillary antrum: a case report. The Internet J Otorhinolaryngol 2009, 12, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Frodel, J.L. Calvarial bone graft harvesting techniques: considerations for their use with rigid fixation techniques in the craniomaxillofacial region. In Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Bone Surgery; Greenberg A, Prein J, Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2002; pp. 700–712. [Google Scholar]
  7. Elsalanty, M.E.; Genecov, D.G. Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2009, 2, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tessier, P. Autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium for facial and cranial applications. Clin Plast Surg 1982, 9, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bauer, T.W.; Muschler, G.F. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hayward, R.D. Cranioplasty: don’t forget the patient’s own bone is cheaper than titanium. Br J Neurosurg 1999, 13, 490–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Upper row: (left) showing already sutured lacerated wound; (right) plain radiograph skull showing large foreign body. Lower row: showing fracture zygoma and fractures of floor, lateral and medial wall infraorbital margin, and anterior maxillary wall and parasagittal split maxilla.
Figure 1. Upper row: (left) showing already sutured lacerated wound; (right) plain radiograph skull showing large foreign body. Lower row: showing fracture zygoma and fractures of floor, lateral and medial wall infraorbital margin, and anterior maxillary wall and parasagittal split maxilla.
Cmtr 09 i3f242 g001
Figure 2. (Left) Large foreign body seen lodged deep inside the maxillary antrum; (right) removed metallic bolt.
Figure 2. (Left) Large foreign body seen lodged deep inside the maxillary antrum; (right) removed metallic bolt.
Cmtr 09 i3f242 g002
Figure 3. Upper row: exploration of the wound and extent of bony defect. Middle row: three pieces of split cranial bone harvested, fixed with miniplates. Lower row: showing reconstructed orbit and zygoma and maxilla; the donor site of the split cranial graft can also be appreciated.
Figure 3. Upper row: exploration of the wound and extent of bony defect. Middle row: three pieces of split cranial bone harvested, fixed with miniplates. Lower row: showing reconstructed orbit and zygoma and maxilla; the donor site of the split cranial graft can also be appreciated.
Cmtr 09 i3f242 g003
Figure 4. Upper row: postoperative appearance at 4 months. Middle and lower row: showing eye position and movements at 4 months. There is slight hypoglobus and enophthalmos.
Figure 4. Upper row: postoperative appearance at 4 months. Middle and lower row: showing eye position and movements at 4 months. There is slight hypoglobus and enophthalmos.
Cmtr 09 i3f242 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, R.K.; Vemula, G.K.; John, J.R. Bolt from the Blue: A Large Foreign Body in the Maxillary Antrum Necessitating Delayed Primary Reconstruction with Split Cranial Bone Graft. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9, 242-245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563699

AMA Style

Sharma RK, Vemula GK, John JR. Bolt from the Blue: A Large Foreign Body in the Maxillary Antrum Necessitating Delayed Primary Reconstruction with Split Cranial Bone Graft. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2016; 9(3):242-245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Ramesh K., Guru Karna Vemula, and Jerry R. John. 2016. "Bolt from the Blue: A Large Foreign Body in the Maxillary Antrum Necessitating Delayed Primary Reconstruction with Split Cranial Bone Graft" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 9, no. 3: 242-245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563699

APA Style

Sharma, R. K., Vemula, G. K., & John, J. R. (2016). Bolt from the Blue: A Large Foreign Body in the Maxillary Antrum Necessitating Delayed Primary Reconstruction with Split Cranial Bone Graft. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 9(3), 242-245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563699

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop