Next Article in Journal
Delayed Periorbital Abscess After Silicone Implant to Orbital Floor Fracture
Previous Article in Journal
The Big Bang: Facial Trauma Caused by Recreational Fireworks
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography

by
Ryan Williams
,
Matthew K. Lee
and
Sam P. Most
*
Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5739, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(2), 181-184; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570073
Submission received: 17 May 2015 / Revised: 28 July 2015 / Accepted: 28 July 2015 / Published: 21 December 2015

Abstract

:
Septal perforations present a challenging dilemma for surgical intervention when medical therapy fails. Multiple techniques have been described in the literature to address perforations using numerous techniques; however, there have been varying rates of success and reproducibility reported. The use of a large, pericranial flap was previously described to repair large septal perforation. The objective of this case report is to describe the use of a pedicled pericranial flap in combination with intraoperative fluorescence angiography to quantify vascular perfusion. This article presents a 31-year-old man with an idiopathic, septal perforation measuring 1.7 × 1.7 cm who previously failed medical therapy and surgical repair. He underwent a combined, coronal incision and external rhinoplasty approach with a tunneled pericranial flap resulting in a successful repair. This case report illustrates robust reconstructive capability of pericranial flaps for repair of septal perforations, as well as the potential value of intraoperative fluorescence angiography in determining the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Septal perforations affect around 1% of the general population. They may arise from numerous etiologies, including idiopathic, infectious, traumatic, inflammatory, or drug induced and are most commonly iatrogenic in nature. Symptomatic patients may present with complaints associated with disruption of laminar nasal airflow, such as mucosal crusting and desiccation, epistaxis, whistling, and nasal airway obstruction depending on the size and location of the perforation [1]. Asymptomatic perforations are commonly untreated.
Treatment of a symptomatic perforation ranges from conservative treatment with moisturizing agents, placement of a prosthetic button, to surgical management. The goal of surgical treatment is to restore functional laminar flow in the nasal airway by reconstructing the perforation using local pedicled mucosal flaps with or without free interpositional grafts [2]. Surgical management of septal perforations remains challenging for otolaryngologists. Multiple techniques have been described, with reproducibility of outcomes depending on both patient factors and experience of the surgeon. Perforations larger than 2 cm have been associated with increased rates of failures [3].
The pericranium provides a robust source of native vascularized tissue that is commonly used in the reconstruction of the anterior skull base. Paloma et al previously described the use of a pericranial flap for repair of a single, large, anterior septal perforation [4]. The aim of our study was to present our experience with this technique and furthermore to describe our use of intraoperative angiography using laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging to confirm flap perfusion.

Case Report

A 31-year-old man presented to the senior author’s (S.M.) clinic for repair of a septal perforation. He had previously undergone an attempted surgical repair by an outside surgeon which was unsuccessful. His past medical history was significant only for a history of allergic rhinitis treated with nasal steroid sprays, and he denied any illicit drug use. An autoimmune workup had been completed previously and was unremarkable.
On examination, the perforation was noted to be anterior in location, measuring 1.7 cm × 1.7 cm (Figure 1). The patient was taken to the operating room and a septal perforation repair was performed using a combination of a standard external rhinoplasty approach and a tunneled pericranial flap harvested through a coronal incision (see section “Surgical Technique” for details). Intraoperatively, the viability of the pericranial flap was confirmed using intraoperative laser angiography using the SPY system. The patient was admitted for pain control and wound management. He was discharged on postoperative day 5. Intranasal Silastic splints were left in place for 21 days postoperatively. Nasal endoscopy performed at 3 months follow-up demonstrated complete closure of perforation with mild mucosal crusting (Figure 1). Follow up at 1, 3, and 10 weeks confirmed a stable repair with well-healed mucosa and no evidence of recurrent perforation. Follow up at 5 years revealed a completely healed repair.

Surgical Technique

The septum is first exposed using a left-sided hemitransfixion incision and a left submucoperichondrial flap is elevated releasing the edges of the perforation circumferentially. This dissection is then carried around the anterocaudal septum, and elevation of the contralateral submucoperichondrial flap is performed in the same plane. A standard external rhinoplasty approach is then performed using transcolumellar and marginal incisions for maximum exposure. The upper lateral cartilages are then released from the dorsal septum, allowing the surgeon access to the septum and septal perforation from above. A coronal incision is then performed and carried down to the deep temporal fascia laterally and superficial to the pericranium in the central compartment. The scalp is then elevated anteriorly toward the orbital rim, sharply dividing the conjoint tendon and staying deep to the frontal branch of the facial nerve.
A rectangular pericranial flap pedicled on the supratrochlear vessels is designed (Figure 3) and incised with electrocautery, followed by elevation with a Cottle elevator. Through the external rhinoplasty approach, the nasal skin and soft-tissue envelope is then elevated superiorly in the subcutaneous plane and connected to the superior dissection. The tunnel is widened to 3 cm at the nasofrontal area appropriately and the flap passed through this into the nasal cavity (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The narrowest point is at the nasal dorsum at approximately 2 cm. Intra-operative laser angiography with the SPY system is performed to verify distal perfusion of the flap (Figure 6).
The central septal perforation was elevated along all of its edges and onto the floor. The flap is then placed over the perforation and its edges are tucked underneath the elevated mucoperichondrium on both sides providing complete coverage of the septal perforation in a double layer. The pericranial flap is then sutured in place using interrupted 5–0 chromic gut sutures as well as a 4–0 plain gut mattress suture. The hemitransfixion, margin, columellar, and coronal incisions are then closed in standard fashion. Bilateral Doyle splints are placed taking care not to disrupt the pericranial flap, and sutured securely to the septum using a 4–0 nylon suture.

Discussion

The repair of septal perforations is a challenging endeavor, as the treating physician must take into account the etiology, location, size, patient considerations, and availability of reconstructive options when formulating a treatment plan. Complicating this is the lack of standardization in operative techniques, in particular for larger perforations. Varying rates of successful closure have been reported. A recent systematic review of the literature demonstrated that use of local mucosal advancement flaps in combination with an interpositional graft demonstrated overall higher rates of successful perforation closure when compared with local mucosal flaps alone. However, this conclusion was tempered by the quality of the current literature as no level 1, 2, or 3 studies have been published to date [5]. In addition, size of perforation has been demonstrated to be predictive of a higher rate of failure, with perforations >2 cm in maximal diameter being at higher risk for persistent septal perforation following surgery [3].
Given the elevated risk of failure with larger perforations approaching or exceeding 2 cm in maximal dimension, vascularized flaps may provide additional benefits over free interpositional grafts. The pericranial flap provides a well-vascularized tissue that may be used to cover bone or cartilage. Deep branches from the supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries provide a robust, proximal vascular supply [6]. The location of the supratrochlear arteries is consistent making selection of this flap reliable [7]. Importantly, the use of a pedicled vascularized flap allows for immediate intraoperative assessment of flap perfusion and viability using laser angiography. This ensures a robustly vascularized interpositional flap and eliminates the uncertain viability associated with use of large free grafts by providing real-time quantitative information [8,9]. A low perfusion index may predict likelihood of postoperative failure. This additional information may lead surgeons to alter intraoperative plans for reconstruction or counsel patients on the need for revision surgery in the future. In the cases for treatment of septal perforations, this would be an invaluable tool to ensure the highest likelihood of successful perforation closure. Use of this flap for nasal reconstructions offers the additional advantages of a large volume flap to cover larger septal defects as well as use of autologous tissue with decreased infection rates [4].
Excellent results were achieved with use of the pericranial flap. The external rhinoplasty approach provided a wide field of exposure and no aesthetic deformities were noted. In our experience, the keys to success in management of septal perforations are consideration of flap design, surgical approach, and incorporation of a tension-free graft. This case represents our experience with the pericranial flap via an external rhinoplasty approach and provides another tool in the arsenal for repair of large perforations. Selection of this flap should be made at the discretion of the operating surgeon after consideration of reconstructive options.

References

  1. Watson, D.; Barkdull, G. Surgical management of the septal perforation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009, 42, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Giacomini, P.G.; Ferraro, S.; Di Girolamo, S.; Ottaviani, F. Large nasal septal perforation repair by closed endoscopically assisted approach. Ann Plast Surg 2011, 66, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, S.W.; Rhee, C.S. Nasal septal perforation repair: Predictive factors and systematic review of the literature. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012, 20, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Paloma, V.; Samper, A.; Cervera-Paz, F.J. Surgical technique for reconstruction of the nasal septum: The pericranial flap. Head Neck 2000, 22, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goh, A.Y.; Hussain, S.S. Different surgical treatments for nasal septal perforation and their outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 2007, 121, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Potparić, Z.; Fukuta, K.; Colen, L.B.; Jackson, I.T.; Carraway, J.H. Galeo-pericranial flaps in the forehead: A study of blood supply and volumes. Br J Plast Surg 1996, 49, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kleintjes, W.G. Forehead anatomy: Arterial variations and venous link of the midline forehead flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007, 60, 593–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Woodard, C.R.; Most, S.P. Intraoperative angiography using laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging to map perfusion of forehead flaps. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012, 14, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yeoh, M.S.; Kim, D.D.; Ghali, G.E. Fluorescence angiography in the assessment of flap perfusion and vitality. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013, 25, 61–66, vi. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preoperative endoscopic view demonstrating large, anterior septal perforation with surrounding inflammation and crusting around the mucosal edges.
Figure 1. Preoperative endoscopic view demonstrating large, anterior septal perforation with surrounding inflammation and crusting around the mucosal edges.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g001
Figure 2. Endoscopic view of the healed perforation from right and left nasal cavities at the 3-week postoperative visit. The septum (S) is shown with minimum crusting and complete closure of the perforation.
Figure 2. Endoscopic view of the healed perforation from right and left nasal cavities at the 3-week postoperative visit. The septum (S) is shown with minimum crusting and complete closure of the perforation.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g002
Figure 3. Superior view demonstrating designation of broad-based pericranial flap incorporating supratrochlear vessels. Lines demarcate the planned pericranial flap cuts.
Figure 3. Superior view demonstrating designation of broad-based pericranial flap incorporating supratrochlear vessels. Lines demarcate the planned pericranial flap cuts.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g003
Figure 4. The pericranial flap has been elevated and is tunneled into the nasal cavity via a combined coronal and external rhinoplasty approach.
Figure 4. The pericranial flap has been elevated and is tunneled into the nasal cavity via a combined coronal and external rhinoplasty approach.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g004
Figure 5. Demonstration of the length and orientation of the flap attained after dissection and tunneling through the nasal cavity prior to inset.
Figure 5. Demonstration of the length and orientation of the flap attained after dissection and tunneling through the nasal cavity prior to inset.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g005
Figure 6. Intraoperative angiography is obtained prior to inset, demonstrating perfusion to the distal portion of the flap. Arrows denote the supratrochlear vessels.
Figure 6. Intraoperative angiography is obtained prior to inset, demonstrating perfusion to the distal portion of the flap. Arrows denote the supratrochlear vessels.
Cmtr 09 i2f181 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, R.; Lee, M.K.; Most, S.P. Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9, 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570073

AMA Style

Williams R, Lee MK, Most SP. Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2016; 9(2):181-184. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Ryan, Matthew K. Lee, and Sam P. Most. 2016. "Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 9, no. 2: 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570073

APA Style

Williams, R., Lee, M. K., & Most, S. P. (2016). Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 9(2), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570073

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop