Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures—An Alternative to Manual Evaluation
Abstract
:Introduction
Materials and Methods
Study Design
Study Variables
Manual Measurements
Semiautomatic Fracture Dimension Measurement and Workflow
Statistical Analysis
Results
Intra-Observer Variability
Inter-Observer Variability
Agreement Between Manual and Automatic Measurements
Discussion
Conclusions
Authors’ Note
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dubois, L.; Steenen, S.A.; Gooris, P.J.; Mourits, M.P.; Becking, A.G. Controversies in orbital reconstruction—I. Defect-driven orbital reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015, 44, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Schouman, T.; Scolozzi, P. Simple CT-based calculations of orbital floor fracture defect size are not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015, 73, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia, B.G.; Ferrer, A.D. Indicaciones quirúrgicas de las fracturas orbitarias atendiendo al taman˜o del defecto de fractura determinado por tomografía computarizada: una revisión sistemática. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2016, 38, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Park, S.W.; Kim, J.; Park, J.; Kim, J.S. Predicting late enophthalmos: differences between medial and inferior orbital wall fractures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016, 69, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, S.H.; Kang, D.H. Prediction of late enophthalmos using preoperative orbital volume and fracture area measurements in blowout fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2017, 28, 1717–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kunz, C.; Sigron, G.R.; Jaquiéry, C. Functional outcome after nonsurgical management of orbital fractures—the bias of decisionmaking according to size of defect: critical review of 48 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013, 51, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schouman, T.; Courvoisier, D.S.; Imholz, B.; Van Issum, C.; Terzic, A.; Scolozzi, P. Can systematic computed tomographic scan assessment predict treatment decision in pure orbital floor blowout fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012, 70, 1627–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raskin, E.M.; Millman, A.L.; Lubkin, V.; Della Rocca, R.C.; Lisman, R.D.; Maher, E.A. Prediction of late enophthalmos by volumetric analysis of orbital fractures. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998, 14, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; An, J.; Zwahlen, R.A. Correlation between volume of herniated orbital contents and the amount of enophthalmos in orbital floor and wall fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012, 70, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jansen, J.; Schreurs, R.; Dubois, L.; Maal, T.J.; Gooris, P.J.; Becking, A.G. Orbital volume analysis: validation of a semi-automatic software segmentation method. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016, 11, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahn, H.B.; Ryu, W.Y.; Yoo, K.W.; et al. Prediction of enophthalmos by computer-based volume measurement of orbital fractures in a Korean population. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 24, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kärkkäinen, M.; Wilkman, T.; Mesimäki, K.; Snäll, J. Primary reconstruction of orbital fractures using patient-specific titanium milled implants: the Helsinki protocol. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018, 56, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bland, J.M.; Altman, D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986, 327, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bland, J.M.; Altman, D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999, 8, 135–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dubois, L.; Jansen, J.; Schreurs, R.; et al. How reliable is the visual appraisal of a surgeon for diagnosing orbital fractures? J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016, 44, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vicinanzo, M.G.; McGwin GJr Allamneni, C.; Long, J.A. Interreader variability of computed tomography for orbital floor fracture. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 1393–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruneau, S.; De Haller, R.; Courvoisier, D.S.; Scolozzi, P. Can a specific computed tomography-based assessment predict the ophthalmological outcome in pure orbital floor blowout fractures? J Craniofac Surg. 2016, 27, 2092–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, W.T.; Kim, H.K.; Chung, S.M. Relationship between smallsize medial orbital wall fracture and late enophthalmos. J Craniofac Surg. 2009, 20, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goggin, J.; Jupiter, D.C.; Czerwinski, M. Simple computed tomography-based calculations of orbital floor fracture defect size are not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015, 73, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schouman, T.; Courvoisier, D.S.; Imholz, B.; Van Issum, C.; Scolozzi, P. Computational area measurement of orbital floor fractures: reliability, accuracy and rapidity. Eur J Radiol. 2012, 81, 2251–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ang, C.H.; Low, J.R.; Shen, J.Y.; et al. A protocol to reduce interobserver variability in the computed tomography measurement of orbital floor fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2015, 8, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doerfler, H.M.; Huempfner-Hierl, H.; Kruber, D.; Schulze, P.; Hierl, T. Template-based orbital wall fracture treatment using statistical shape analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017, 75, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the author. The Author(s) 2020.
Share and Cite
Saloniemi, M.; Lehtinen, V.; Snäll, J. Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures—An Alternative to Manual Evaluation. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2021, 14, 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520962691
Saloniemi M, Lehtinen V, Snäll J. Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures—An Alternative to Manual Evaluation. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2021; 14(3):209-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520962691
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaloniemi, Mikko, Valtteri Lehtinen, and Johanna Snäll. 2021. "Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures—An Alternative to Manual Evaluation" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 14, no. 3: 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520962691
APA StyleSaloniemi, M., Lehtinen, V., & Snäll, J. (2021). Computer-Aided Fracture Size Measurement in Orbital Fractures—An Alternative to Manual Evaluation. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 14(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520962691