Next Article in Journal
Etiopathogenesis of Trismus in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: An Exploratory Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Inferior Oblique Entrapment After Orbital Fracture With Transection and Repair
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Anomalous Radial Artery: A Rare Vascular Variant and Its Implications in Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer

by
Maximilian H. Staebler
1,
Charles Lane Anzalone
2 and
Daniel L. Price
2,*
1
Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
2
Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2020, 13(3), 215-218; https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520904206
Submission received: 1 December 2019 / Revised: 31 December 2019 / Accepted: 1 February 2020 / Published: 7 April 2020

Abstract

:
The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has become a workhorse for soft tissue reconstruction following surgical ablation of head and neck cancer. Given the popularity of the RFFF, it is important to understand potential variants of upper extremity vascular anatomy and the effects of these findings on pre- and intraoperative planning. The purpose of this series is to synthesize the existing literature to raise awareness for potential radial artery aberrations during planned reconstruction.

Introduction

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a workhorse of head and neck soft tissue reconstruction. The RFFF is immensely popular due to its thin yet pliable skin, ability to include a variety of tissues along with the flap, and low donor-site morbidities. Although ulnar and radial artery anatomical abnormalities are rare, familiarity with them and their impact is of paramount importance to the reconstructive surgeon. We present two cases of radial artery abnormalities discovered during elevation of an RFFF. In addition, we outline the spectrum of radial artery anomalies as described in the English literature.

Discussion

The anatomy of the forearm vasculature is generally quite consistent. The radial artery branches off the brachial artery in the antecubital fossa, along with the ulnar artery. Distal to its origin, at the level of the radial head, the radial artery gives off a recurrent radial artery, which anastomoses with the radial collateral artery via the deep brachial artery. Septocutaneous branches from the radial artery supply the majority of the vascular needs of the forearm. Venous drainage typically involves two vena comitans, which follow the path of the radial artery.[1]
Given the nature of the RFFF and its role in reconstructive surgery, it is important to be aware of the possible aberrations found in its vascular supply. Literature review reveals several previously reported radial artery anomalies (Table 1).[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]
Cadaveric research by McCormack found radial artery variations in 4.3% of subjects.[8] Arteriographic examination by Uglietta and Kadir found aberrations in 9%.[9] Radial artery anomalies, primarily aplasia and hypoplasia, can be found in association with congenital malformation but quite often these vascular abnormalities are found in patients with no associated disorders.[5,6,7] Venkatanarasimha et al. most recently described a hypoplastic radial artery noted on computed tomography (CT) angiogram for evaluation of a hypothenar mass.[21] The contralateral side was not commented on; if the contralateral radial artery is present and patent, RFFF reconstructive planning can proceed accordingly, otherwise surgeons should pursue alternative options. In 2001, Porter and Mellow described an entirely absent radial artery.[29] In instances of absent radial artery, there is a described dominant anterior interosseous artery supplemented by an ulnar artery of varying caliber and a persistent small median artery. Given the anatomical abnormality, surgeons adjusted their preoperative planning to other reconstructive sites.
By far, the most described abnormality is a high radial origin, which has been described extensively in the literature.[8,9,10,24,25,26,27,28] High-origin radial arteries branch away from the axillary artery more proximally than normally described; this anomalous branching does not impact RFFF. Another abnormality reported is radial artery duplication. Li et al. documented duplication in 0.1% of 1400 transradial coronary angiography patients sampled via preprocedural ultrasound.[16] Occasionally, ultrasound may identify a dominant radial artery; consideration may also be given to the contralateral side (there was no note of bilaterality of findings) or the alternative site.
Accessory branches to the radial artery can occur (Figure 1), though locations at which the accessory vessels diverge and rejoin the radial artery are variable. Mordick described an aberrant vessel which originated at the axillary artery and paralleled the brachial artery on its course distally.[10] Funk et al. described a radial artery passing deep to the pronator teres rather than superficial to it.[17,23] In this report, preoperative Allen testing was normal, and the pronator teres was divided to secure the vessel.
We report a superficial dorsal branch of the radial artery (Figure 2); there are few previous reports in the literature of this anomaly.[8,11,18,19,20] Sasaki et al. discovered this anomaly intraoperatively and proceeded with the flap following equivocal intraoperative Allen testing. They noted cold intolerance in the affected hand postoperatively and recommended the use of either the contralateral forearm or an alternative flap site if this anomaly is detected preoperatively. Acaturk et al. described an accessory branch of the radial artery coursing superficially, naming it the superficial radial artery (SRA) in their report. In their report, the deep branch of the radial artery was taken leaving the superficial branch to perfuse the forearm and hand. Vadodaria, Brotherston, and Page recommended duplex scanning if this anomaly is suspected and disagreed with Sasaki et al. that a new flap site should be considered, proposing instead that if the SRA is identified preoperatively, the forearm flap could be based entirely on the SRA, leaving the dorsal branch to perfuse the forearm and hand.[34] To determine the viability of such a flap intraoperatively, the authors recommended releasing the tourniquet, performing an Allen’s test, and clamping the radial artery to evaluate perfusion of the flap.
Madaree and McGibbon discovered a radial artery that did not supply any fasciocutaneous perforators to the forearm.[13] In this case, the ulnar artery was chosen for the flap since it was providing all fasciocutaneous vascularization. Bhatt et al. discovered an aberrant vessel supplying the skin paddle, and this vessel was taken in favor of the radial artery to utilize the flap, the intraoperative Allen’s test was utilized in this case to determine which vessel was providing dominant supply to the skin paddle.[12]
Identification of these anomalies does not have to necessitate flap abandonment. The Allen’s test is useful in determining many of these abnormalities as described above, however cases exist in which Allen’s testing may be falsely favorable such as the superficial dorsal antebrachial arteries described by Funk et al. and Heden et al.[19] Ultrasound may be considered as an adjunct for vessel identification, specifically if abnormal Allen’s test is identified on examination. Many of the cases presented in the literature saw completion of reconstruction through either unchanged or adjusted procedures. These examples highlight the importance of early identification and evaluation of flap viability for reconstructive success.

Conclusion

Radial artery anomalies are rare, and their presence can have serious implications on the viability of the RFFF in select cases. Given this flap’s immense appeal to the reconstructive surgeon, it is important to be aware of possible abnormalities of the radial artery vasculature. Identifying these anatomical deviations may elicit change in surgical planning and prevent poor surgical outcomes.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Authors’ Note

This work was previously presented at MAO Midwinter CME Minneapolis, MN, USA on January 13, 2018.

References

  1. Mardini, S.; Wei, F.-C. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery; Saunders: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martín-Granizo, R.; Gómez, F.; Sánchez-Cuéllar, A. An unusual anomaly of the radial artery with potential significance to the forearm free flap. Case report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002, 30, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gray, H.; Williams, P.L.; Warwick, R. Gray’s anatomy; Churchill Livingstone: London, England, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Foreman, A.; de Almeida, J.R.; Gilbert, R.; Goldstein, D.P. The Allen’s test: revisiting the importance of bidirectional testing to determine candidacy and design of radial forearm free flap harvest in the era of trans radial endovascular access procedures. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015, 44, 47. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lo, N.; Leung, P.; Lau, K.; Yeung, C. Congenital cardiovascular malformations in Chinese children with Down’s syndrome. Chin Med J. 1989, 102, 382–386. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bass, J. Radial artery hypoplasia: a further association with the VATER syndrome? J Urol. 1991, 146, 824–825. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, W.-T.; Wang, P.-J.; Young, C.; Lai, M.-W.; Shen, Y.-Z. Thenar hypoplasia in Klippel-Feil syndrome due to aberrant radial artery. Pediatr Neurol. 1995, 13, 343–345. [Google Scholar]
  8. McCormack, L.J.; Cauldwell, E.W.; Anson, B.J. Brachial and antebrachial arterial patterns; a study of 750 extremities. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953, 96, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
  9. Uglietta, J.P.; Kadir, S. Arteriographic study of variant arterial anatomy of the upper extremities. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1989, 12, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mordick, T.G. Vascular variation of the radial forearm flap: a case report. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1995, 11, 345–346. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sasaki, K.; Nozaki, M.; Aiba, H.; Isono, N. A rare variant of the radial artery: clinical considerations in raising a radial forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000, 53, 445–447. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhatt, V.; Green, J.; Grew, N. Dealing with aberrant vessels in radial forearm flaps–report of a case and review of literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009, 37, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  13. Madaree, A.; McGibbon, I.C. Anatomic variation in the blood supply of the radial forearm flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993, 9, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Acarturk, T.O.; Newton, E.D. Aberrant branch of the radial artery encountered during elevation of the radial forearm free flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004, 20, 611–614. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kadanoff, D.; Balkansky, G. 2 cases with rare variations of arteries of the upper extremities [In German]. Anat Anz. 1966, 118, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, L.; Zeng, Z.-Y.; Zhong, J.-M.; et al. Features and variations of a radial artery approach in southern Chinese populations and their clinical significance in percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013, 126, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar]
  17. Small, J.; Millar, R. The radial artery forearm flap: an anomaly of the radial artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1985, 38, 501–503. [Google Scholar]
  18. Morris, L.G.; Rowe, N.M.; Delacure, M.D. Superficial dorsal artery of the forearm: case report and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2005, 55, 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hedén, P.; Gylbert, L. Anomaly of the radial artery encountered during elevation of the radial forearm flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1990, 6, 139–141. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodríguez-Niedenführ, M.; Vazquez, T.; Nearn, L.; Ferreira, B.; Parkin, I.; Sanudo, J. Variations of the arterial pattern in the upper limb revisited: a morphological and statistical study, with a review of the literature. J Anat. 2001, 199, 547–566. [Google Scholar]
  21. Venkatanarasimha, N.; Manghat, N.; Wells, I. Unusual presentation of ulnar artery aneurysm and dissection with associated anomalous radial artery: appearances on multi-detector row CT angiography. Emerg Radiol. 2007, 14, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  22. Otsuka, T.; Terauchi, M. An anomaly of the radial artery—relevance for the forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1991, 44, 390–391. [Google Scholar]
  23. Funk, G.F.; Valentino, J.; McCulloch, T.M.; Graham, S.M.; Hoffman, H.T. Anomalies of forearm vascular anatomy encountered during elevation of the radial forearm flap. Head Neck. 1995, 17, 284–292. [Google Scholar]
  24. Icten, N.; Süllü, Y.; Tuncer, I. Variant high-origin radial artery: a bilateral case. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996, 18, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Konarik, M.; Knize, J.; Baca, V.; Kachlik, D. Superficial brachioradial artery (radial artery originating from the axillary artery): a case report and embryological background. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2009, 68, 174–178. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yoo, B.-S.; Yoon, J.; Ko, J.-Y.; et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol. 2005, 101, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  27. Coleman, S.S.; Anson, B.J. Arterial patterns in the hand based upon a study of 650 specimens. Surg Gyneco Obste. 1961, 113, 409–424. [Google Scholar]
  28. Loukas, M.; Louis, R.G.; Almond, J.; Armstrong, T. A case of an anomalous radial artery arising from the thoracoacromial trunk. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005, 27, 463–466. [Google Scholar]
  29. Porter, J.C.; Mellow, C.G. Anatomically aberrant forearm arteries: an absent radial artery with co-dominant median and ulnar arteries. Br J Plast Surg. 2001, 54, 727–728. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bumbaširević, M.; Lešić, A.; Filipović, B. Duplication of the radial artery in the radial forearm flap. Clin Anat. 2005, 18, 305–307. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gober, C.A.; Mujadzic, T.; Hershman, J.E.; Mujadzic, M.M. Anomalous radial artery as an incidental finding during a routine carpal tunnel release. Hand (N Y). 2017, 12, NP101–NP103. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mersa, B.; Ozcelik, B.; Kuvat, S.; Pilanci, O. An anomalous course of the radial artery: dissect rather than resect. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010, 43, 228–229. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gwynne-Jones, D.P.; Hartnett, N.I. Aberrant radial artery seen in the carpal tunnel at carpal tunnel decompression: case report. J Hand Surg. 2008, 33, 885–887. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vadodaria, S.; Brotherston, T.; Page, R. Best use of anomaly of radial artery. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2001, 54, 180–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. An 85-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx underwent resection and reconstruction via RFFF. As the radial aspect of the flap was elevated, it was clear that there was a small arterial vessel along the cephalic portion of the forearm lateral to the assumed position of the radial artery. The flexor retinaculum was opened and a diminutive radial artery was identified. The tourniquet was let down, and the flap was reperfused. Through Doppler evaluation, flow was confirmed through the radial artery, ulnar artery, and an accessory radial artery. The radial artery was divided, and the accessory radial artery clamped. We then demonstrated a good arterial waveform through the thenar artery. We proceeded with the flap elevation with no evidence of vascular compromise. RFFF indicates radial forearm free flap.
Figure 1. An 85-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx underwent resection and reconstruction via RFFF. As the radial aspect of the flap was elevated, it was clear that there was a small arterial vessel along the cephalic portion of the forearm lateral to the assumed position of the radial artery. The flexor retinaculum was opened and a diminutive radial artery was identified. The tourniquet was let down, and the flap was reperfused. Through Doppler evaluation, flow was confirmed through the radial artery, ulnar artery, and an accessory radial artery. The radial artery was divided, and the accessory radial artery clamped. We then demonstrated a good arterial waveform through the thenar artery. We proceeded with the flap elevation with no evidence of vascular compromise. RFFF indicates radial forearm free flap.
Cmtr 13 00032 g001
Figure 2. A 53-year-old male underwent reconstruction of the right maxilla with a planned RFFF reconstruction after history of trauma. Preoperative ultrasound discovered that the patient had a nondominant radial artery and a superficial dorsal branch of the radial artery. This led to the revision of the flap design to include these vessels. Intraoperatively, the radial artery and vena comitans were identified; in addition, the superficial dorsal radial branch was dissected in a subcutaneous plane in a similar fashion to the true radial vascular bundle. RFFF indicates radial forearm free flap.
Figure 2. A 53-year-old male underwent reconstruction of the right maxilla with a planned RFFF reconstruction after history of trauma. Preoperative ultrasound discovered that the patient had a nondominant radial artery and a superficial dorsal branch of the radial artery. This led to the revision of the flap design to include these vessels. Intraoperatively, the radial artery and vena comitans were identified; in addition, the superficial dorsal radial branch was dissected in a subcutaneous plane in a similar fashion to the true radial vascular bundle. RFFF indicates radial forearm free flap.
Cmtr 13 00032 g002
Table 1. Literature Review of Radial Artery Anomalies.
Table 1. Literature Review of Radial Artery Anomalies.
Radial Artery AnomalySource
Duplication of radial artery[15,16]
Radial artery passing deep to pronator teres[17]
Superficial dorsal antebrachial artery[8,11,18,19,20]
Hypoplasia of radial artery[6,7,21]
Aberrant dorsal course of radial artery around Lister’s tubercle[22]
Absence of perforators from the radial artery to the skin[13]
Distal origin of radial artery deep to pronator teres[23]
Superficial dorsal antebrachial artery
High origin of radial artery
Aberrant midaxial vessel arising directly from the axial artery[10]
High origin of the radial artery[8,9,10,20,24,25,26,27,28]
Absent radial artery[29]
Superficial radial artery lateral to normal vessel originating from it[2]
Accessory branch of the radial artery at the level of mid forearm extending laterally subcutaneously into the dorsal wrist[14]
Accessory branch of the radial artery[5,26]
Duplication of the radial artery close to cephalic vein[30]
Radial artery in the carpal tunnel[31,32,33]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staebler, M.H.; Anzalone, C.L.; Price, D.L. The Anomalous Radial Artery: A Rare Vascular Variant and Its Implications in Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2020, 13, 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520904206

AMA Style

Staebler MH, Anzalone CL, Price DL. The Anomalous Radial Artery: A Rare Vascular Variant and Its Implications in Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2020; 13(3):215-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520904206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staebler, Maximilian H., Charles Lane Anzalone, and Daniel L. Price. 2020. "The Anomalous Radial Artery: A Rare Vascular Variant and Its Implications in Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 13, no. 3: 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520904206

APA Style

Staebler, M. H., Anzalone, C. L., & Price, D. L. (2020). The Anomalous Radial Artery: A Rare Vascular Variant and Its Implications in Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 13(3), 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520904206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop