Balance and Gait Disturbances Linked to Falls and Fall Risk
There were 12 articles reviewed to describe the link between balance and gait disturbances and falls. Overall there were five observational studies and one review article describing the link between balance and falls, and there were two observational and five review articles supporting the link between gait and falls. These articles provide moderate (Oxford rated II and III) evidence when evaluating each of the articles in isolation using the evaluation tools. However, when summarizing the body of work as a whole there are numerous studies that provide evidence of a direct link between balance and gait disturbances and the incidence of reported falls. This is in contrast to the other lower-limb factors reviewed that predominantly support a link to fall risk rather than fall incidence directly.
The assessment of balance in older adults has predominantly focused on the measurement of center of mass or center of pressure (COP) as a surrogate measure of the response to center-of-mass movement. These measures have shown positive links to falls across the following set of studies: Melzer et al [
80] showed that older persons who had fallen in the past had a greater mediolateral sway movement and sway area than nonfallers, suggesting high positive predictive value. However, in a study by Brauer et al [
84], measures of COP were not able to predict fallers, although they could correctly identify nonfallers, suggesting stronger use as a negative predictor of falls. Merlo et al [
79], in a retrospective study, found that when standing on a compliant surface with eyes open, the ability to control balance showed a high degree of association with a fall history. Kurz et al [
82] determined that those who went on to fall with serious injury had a greater anteroposterior COP movement than those who fell without serious injury. Contrary to these findings, Caterino et al [
83] did not find a relationship with static measures of COP movement or dynamic balance during Timed Up and Go testing, but this study had the smallest sample, consisting of 53 participants, of those reviewed. Compared with the use of COP metrics, studies using more functional screening have also shown positive links between balance and falls. Lusardi et al's [
81] well-executed systematic review concluded that a Berg Balance Scale score of 50 or less increases fall probability and a score of 51 or more decreases fall probability. They also found that the single-leg balance test and the five times sit-to-stand test were capable of predicting the likelihood of falls. Overall, balance measures show a strong link to falls and fall risk in older adults but with varying sensitivity and specificity based on samples tested, outcomes measured, and measurement technique.
In addition to measures of balance demonstrating a link to falls and fall risk, dynamic balance typically measured during walking or gait has also shown a strong association with falls and fall risk in older adults. In a systematic review, Mortaza et al [
87] concluded that temporal measurements of gait were able to distinguish fallers from nonfallers. Fallers have a tendency toward a slower walking speed and cadence and longer stride time and double support duration. They also show a shorter stride and step length and wider step width. In a study by Nakakubo et al [
86], a variable called the
walk ratio (step length/cadence) was a specific temporal characteristic that was helpful in identifying fall risk for those who walked at 1 m/sec or faster. Interestingly, if subjects walked slower that 1 m/sec there was no relationship between walk ratio and fall rate, suggesting that some older adults may compensate with slower gait speeds to maintain balance and prevent falls. Another important trend in the literature is that many of the temporal gait parameters used to assess gait in older adults can be paired with cognitive tests with reported improvements in sensitivity and specificity for falls. Montero-Odasso et al [
88] wrote a review paper concluding that untangling the relationship between early gait disturbances and early cognitive changes may be helpful for identifying older adults at higher risk for falls. According to Amboni et al [
90] in a review article, there is a growing body of evidence indicating a pivotal role of cognition in gait control and fall prevention. In a systematic review by Kearney et al [
89] it was determined that studies that looked at executive function and gait found a relationship between poor executive function and declines in gait speed. Impaired executive function was also associated with fall risk, and impaired executive function was associated with more serious fall patterns. Commandeur et al [
85], in an observational study, looked at the difference in gait parameters between dual-task gait (walking while counting backward in serial sevens) and single-task gait (just walking). In summary, the variables that correctly identified fallers were stride timing, stride width, stride length, variability in stride width, and stride velocity. These measures could correctly classify fallers and nonfallers with 92.3% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. There is evidence of a connection between gait disturbances and cognition that is also explored in the pain risk factor.
The relationship between balance and gait disturbance and falls in older adults has been highlighted previously herein and provides a common pathway element for the remainder of the lower-limb factors described in this review. It is understood that although in most cases it is not a direct relationship, the lower-limb factors included herein may play an important role in falls and fall risk in older adults through a pathway that includes altered balance and gait function.
Risk Factor 1. Age-Related Changes in Plantar Skin and Soft Tissues and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Aging has been shown to alter the biomechanical properties of the skin and plantar soft tissue of the foot. These soft tissues, which anchor the plantar skin to the underlying bony architecture of the foot, serve as a protection to the underlying neurovascular structures, provide resistance against frictional shear force, and attenuate the pressure and force during collision impact [
20]. Skin changes are among the most visible signs of aging; however, there is limited evidence on how these changes may contribute to increased fall risk.
There are numerous changes that occur to the skin and dermoepidermal junction during aging, with some changes linked to impaired balance and falls in older adults (
Fig. 1). Smith [
91] described the association between age-related plantar skin changes and demonstrated that the dermoepidermal junction of the skin, which provides resistance against shear stress, becomes flattened, thinner, and dehydrated with aging. Periyasamy et al [
14] demonstrated the loss of elasticity (increase in stiffness) in the foot sole skin due to aging. Several studies have suggested that age-related changes in plantar skin properties might predispose older adults to develop foot problems such as hyperkeratosis, foot pain, and foot deformity. Thoolen et al [
15] described the need for hydration to preserve the resiliency on the sole of the foot. The increase in localized areas of hardness and thickening (keratosis) of the skin can increase the risk of a person developing xerosis and the development of painful hyperkeratosis [
92]. Furthermore, Menz et al [
16] observed a significant increase in plantar pressure under the callused region of the foot, which if untreated could lead to other consequences, such as foot pain and foot deformities. As discussed in the following sections, foot pain and foot deformities contribute to poor balance, deterioration in gait, risk of falls, and, ultimately, more likelihood of falls.
Figure 1.
Pathway for age-related changes in plantar skin and soft tissues linked to falls.
Figure 1.
Pathway for age-related changes in plantar skin and soft tissues linked to falls.
In addition to the changes in the skin noted previously herein there are also changes in the tissue properties interfacing with the plantar surface of the foot. Using a tissue ultrasound palpation system, Kwan et al [
12] demonstrated that with aging these tissues under the foot become stiffer. These results suggested that the loss of compliance in the plantar soft tissue due to aging could be one of the factors for the high prevalence of foot problems (eg, foot pain and foot deformity) in older adults. Furthermore, the increase in soft-tissue stiffness could be postulated to contribute to the decrease in tactile sensation and could limit sensory feedback. Over time this change can reduce the load-bearing capacity of the plantar soft tissues, which might result in reduced shock absorption as well as slower recovery after compression [
11]. This can result in an increase in plantar pressure [
16], leading to foot pain and foot deformity [
13]. A systematic review by Wrobel and Najafi [
17] demonstrated that the changes in the properties of soft tissues led to impaired gait function and adaptation to uneven or irregular surfaces, which may result in falls. In addition, Najafi et al [
10] linked the poor plantar sensory feedback to poor balance.
These studies demonstrate the need to identify problems that may precipitate changes in the plantar skin and plantar soft tissues and their contribution to increased fall risk due to aging. Early identification of changes in plantar skin and soft tissue may provide a time window for an effective and timely intervention to avoid development of these risk factors, which could be harder to manage once they have developed into more severe and irreversible problems, such as foot deformity. Potentially effective solutions to manage risk factors associated with age-related changes in plantar skin properties could be effective footwear/insoles to reduce high plantar pressure because of hardening of plantar skin [
17] and regular hydration to retain plantar sensation.
Risk Factor 2. Age-Related Changes in Lower-Limb Range of Motion and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Several studies have shown that age-related musculoskeletal changes occur at specific joints in the foot and ankle that negatively affect balance and gait in older adults. These data inform the three pathways at the top of the range-of-motion diagram. However, there are also data supporting improving range-of-motion that may have a beneficial effect on balance and falls in older adults. These data inform the green pathway at the bottom of
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pathway for age-related changes in range of motion linked to falls. MPJ, metatarsophalangeal joint.
Figure 2.
Pathway for age-related changes in range of motion linked to falls. MPJ, metatarsophalangeal joint.
Data across two studies have suggested that older individuals demonstrate a significantly smaller range of motion at the ankle, and particularly a loss in ankle dorsiflexion that limits gait and balance [
20,
23]. Menz et al [
21], in an observational study of independent ambulators, looked at balance in an elderly population using a sway meter and sit-to-stand time. They found that there was a significant negative correlation between ankle and metatarsophalangeal joint flexibility, suggesting that a loss in range of motion was associated with impaired balance. Spink et al [
28], in a cross-sectional study of an elderly population, reported similar findings while also demonstrating a significant association between balance and reduced ankle inversion/eversion. These findings support the three pathway items linking ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion, ankle inversion/eversion, and metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion to balance. Ankle range of motion during gait has also been linked to falls [
22,
93]. Participants who had fallen more than twice in the previous year exhibited less ankle range compared with nonfallers. In a prospective observational study, Menz et al [
94] measured ankle and first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion and then recorded the number of falls in the following year. There was no significant relationship between first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion and falls, but the fallers exhibited reduced ankle flexibility [
19].
There is some evidence to support treating ankle range of motion to improve balance, which is included in the green pathway toward the bottom on the range-of-motion diagram. Yang et al [
25], in an observational study, looked at the effect of whole-body vibration on ankle range of motion in older adults. They found that after training with this modality, dorsiflexion and plantarflexion increased significantly. In a systematic review/meta-analysis by Schwenk et al [
27] it was concluded that there was a small effect of stretching exercise on ankle dorsiflexion and inversion/eversion. There is also evidence relating the effect of treating ankle range of motion for the purpose of reducing falls. Spink et al [
28], in an RCT, looked at the effect of a multifaceted podiatric medical intervention on ankle range of motion and determined that those in the intervention group showed significantly increased ankle dorsiflexion, increased ankle inversion/eversion range of motion, and a reduced number of falls. However, this trial included a multitude of interventions, not just those addressing range of motion.
Hence, there is evidence that older individuals demonstrate reduced range of motion of the ankle joint and the first metatarsophalangeal joint and that these age-related changes impair gait and balance. However, there are promising results to address this loss in range of motion with interventions such as vibration and stretching therapy. Because range of motion is negatively correlated with balance and balance as previously mentioned is linked to fall risk, it may be advisable to attempt to improve range of motion for the sake of reducing fall risk. There is some direct evidence that fallers exhibit reduced ankle range of motion and that treatment of this impairment reduces the number of falls.
Risk Factor 3. Age-Related Changes in Lower-Limb Strength and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Loss of muscle mass is an age-related change that has been linked to changes in balance performance and even directly to fall risk in a small sample of studies [
28,
34]. Type II muscle fibers are lost at a greater rate than type I, resulting in significant decline in force and power production used in the maintenance of balance [
36,
95]. To provide information about the influence of lower-limb strength in older adults, inferences can be drawn from studies that address strengthening as an intervention and from observational studies that compare older adults who are weak with younger controls or those who are stronger. There is more limited literature on distal musculature that attaches at the foot and/or ankle. The pathway figure included for this risk factor explores lower-limb (foot and ankle) weakness, found along the bottom of the pathway, and is more limited in scope (
Fig. 3). A larger body of literature can be referenced and describes various strengthening programs and is included along the top of the pathway, coded in green. This strengthening pathway also includes studies that have included more proximal muscles in the leg for completeness.
Figure 3.
Pathway for age-related changes in strength linked to falls.
Figure 3.
Pathway for age-related changes in strength linked to falls.
Decline in force and power production is due to two primary mechanisms, neural and mechanical adaptation, resulting in neuromuscular impairment. [
36,
96] Age-related reduction of neural activation results from decreases in alpha motor neuron excitability. [
36] This decrease in neural drive slows nerve conduction and motor unit discharge rates. Such a decrease results in slower muscle responses and reduced ability to develop rapid muscle activation and power. [
36] In addition to age-related decline in the speed of muscle activation there is also impaired coordination of agonist/antagonist muscle contraction, resulting in increased difficulty maintaining and/or recovering from a loss of balance, further increasing an older adult's risk of falling. [
36] Mechanical adaption, including muscle fiber atrophy (loss of muscle fibers) and tendon stiffness, change with aging and are correlated with ability to maintain postural control measured by single-limb stance and tandem stance. [
29,
36]
Major lower-extremity muscle groups required for postural stability include tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, hamstrings, and quadriceps. [
36,
95] Distal lower-extremity musculature has been found to be associated with balance impairments and/or gait impairments. A pair of studies by Spink et al [
28] and Mickle et al [
34] explore the link between hallux and lesser toe weakness, with findings that suggest they are related to impaired balance performance. Of particular interest is the study by Mickle et al [
34] that also provides a direct link between findings of hallux and lesser toe weakness and the incidence of falls reported by 312 participants in the study. Ankle weakness has also been linked to impaired balance performance. Data from two studies suggest that altered muscle mechanics (changes in muscle stiffness) and muscle weakness are associated with impaired mobility, either directly measured or reported. [
29,
33]
Strengthening programs used in subject samples consisting of older adults also suggest a link between lower-limb muscle performance and balance or falls. A pair of RCTs explored the use of foot-specific exercises to improve strength with mixed results. The study by Mickle et al provides data in support of improved foot strength with a supervised strengthening program and improved single-limb balance. However, the study by Hartmann et al [
30] provides data of more modest improvements compared with a general strengthening program. Note that intervention groups improved in both of these studies compared with control groups, underscoring the potential positive impact of general strengthening programs in older adults with perhaps more moderate effect that are more protocol specific when looking at targeted foot and ankle exercise. These study results are in agreement with the meta-analysis and systematic review by Schwenk et al [
27] and Orr [
36], respectively. Overall, small to moderate effects are reported in both reviews in favor of lower-limb exercise positively affecting ankle range of motion, strength, and measures of balance performance. Finally, two RCTs [
32,
37] and two reviews [
31,
36] provide evidence of more general lower-extremity and balance interventions used in older adults. The RCTs link exercise to balance outcomes, and the two reviews also provide direct links to reducing the number of reported falls. The interventions in these studies ranged from square-stepping exercise to multicomponent interventions that included strengthening as well as balance training. The study by Ishigaki et al ([
31] p111) provides a nice summary of this literature and concluded that “[t]he methodological quality of the studies in this area appears to leave little doubt regarding the effectiveness of lower limb strengthening exercises for preventing falls in elderly subjects, however, the interventions in these studies were poorly reported.”
The previously mentioned evidence highlights the importance of assessing and addressing lower-extremity strength to prevent falls. The best clinical measures of lower-extremity and, more specifically foot, strength continues to be use of standard manual muscle testing. However, the use of handheld dynamometry to objectively measure strength may provide improved clinical assessments. Finally, strengthening programs that focus on large muscles of the lower extremities as well as specific foot and ankle strengthening may improve balance and reduce falls in older adults. Health-care professionals such as physical and occupational therapists may help screen for and manage muscle weakness in older adults, and general strengthening for the lower extremities, and the foot and ankle specifically, should be recommended to all older adults.
Risk Factor 4. Age-Related Changes in Lower-Limb Deformity and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
The aging of the biomechanical structure of the musculoskeletal system could also predispose older adults to a higher risk of developing foot deformity. Scott et al [
26] observed more patients with hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities in an elderly population compared with a younger comparison group. The prevalence rates for hallux valgus for older adults in clinical settings can be as high as 74%. [
41] Furthermore, hallux rigidus affects approximately one in 40 people older than 50 years, whereas lesser toe deformities (hammer toe, claw toe, and mallet toe) have reported incidences of 24% to 60% in clinical settings. In addition, with advancing age there is a general tendency for the arch to flatten (
Fig. 4).
Figure 4.
Pathway for age-related changes in lower-limb deformity linked to falls.
Figure 4.
Pathway for age-related changes in lower-limb deformity linked to falls.
Foot deformities have been linked to changes in balance performance. Spink et al [
28] and Sadra et al [
42] found that individuals with hallux valgus had less lateral stability and greater coordinated stability errors. Nix et al [
40] found similar results, with significantly greater sway in the mediolateral direction observed in patients with hallux valgus compared with matched participants without foot deformity. Sadra et al [
42], using a cross-sectional observational study, found that older adults who underwent hallux valgus surgery exhibited 29% less center-of-mass sway in double support and 63% less center-of-mass sway in single support than preoperative participants with hallux valgus. Note, however, that some of these findings on foot deformity come from study samples that include participants younger than 55 years.
Minkle et al [
39] and Menz and Lord [
38] documented an association between foot deformity and gait abnormalities (kinetic and kinematic). Not only have foot deformities been linked to reduced balance performance, but Menz et al [
94] determined that fallers had significantly more severe hallux valgus deformity than nonfallers, suggesting that there may be a link. This link was further explored in a meta-analysis (combining data from three studies) indicating that falls were significantly associated with hallux valgus. [
19]
With advancing age there is a general tendency for the arch to flatten. The relationship between lowering of the arch, or pes planus as a term used to describe a foot with a low arch, and fall risk is only beginning to be recognized. According to Scott et al [
26], older participants exhibit flatter and more pronated feet than younger participants, and this finding is independent of sex and BMI. [
26,
97] As the foot flattens, loading under the foot moves medially during mobility tasks, such as walking. [
43,
44] In addition, flattening of the foot is associated with an increase in reports of foot symptoms. [
18] Menz et al [
18] showed that compared with normal foot posture, a flattened arch was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of foot pain. So, although there may not be a direct link between the height of the arch and falls, the association with pain and altered gait may make older adults at risk for falls. In addition, pes planus foot posture was associated with increased odds of foot deformities, which is also linked to falls. The odds of having hallux valgus and overlapping toes was significantly increased in those with pronated foot function, whereas the odds of having hallux valgus and hallux rigidus was significantly decreased in those with supinated function. [
18] These study findings might suggest that supporting the arch using shoes or orthotic devices might be helpful for older adults. In addition, strengthening the foot may help support the arch and be a helpful intervention to mitigate balance and gait disturbance from arch collapse.
The previously mentioned evidence highlights the importance of assessing and addressing lower-extremity deformities to prevent falls. The best clinical measures include assessing for the presence of hallux valgus and pes planus. Health-care professionals such as physicians and physical and occupational therapists can screen for these abnormalities when assessing patients at risk for falls and prescribe appropriate interventions as indicated, which may include orthoses, advice on proper footwear, and activity modifications. Surgical evaluation may be indicated if nonoperative interventions are not successful.
Risk Factor 5. Age-Related Use of Footwear and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Although the potential for footwear to influence fall risk is widely acknowledged [
8] and many effective multifactorial fall prevention interventions include footwear assessments and education [
98], the evidence available to inform fall prevention recommendations regarding shoes remains weak. Two systematic reviews [
46,
55] provide some evidence that elevated heel height, low-collared shoes, and thick, soft-soled shoes may increase fall risk. These three footwear characteristics are featured in the pathway figure presenting potential footwear-related contributions to fall risk (
Fig. 5). As indicated by the pathway diagram, compared with studies investigating low-collared shoes and thick, soft-soles shoes, more studies have investigated the association between elevated heel height and compromised balance or fall risk. Based on their review of the literature, Aboutorabi et al [
55] and Menant et al [
45] concluded that older people should wear low heels. The observational study involving 29 people older than 70 years by Menant et al [
47] is cited by both systematic reviews as evidence of the detrimental effect of high heels. Menant et al [
45] highlight the fact that Menant et al [
47] found that the study participants showed greater postural sway when standing in shoes with elevated heels (4.5-cm heel height) compared with standard shoes (2.7-cm heel height). Shoes with elevated heels also elicited increased double support time, heel horizontal velocity at heel strike, and toe clearance [
47] compared with standard shoes. Both the nested case-control study by Tencer et al [
99] and the case-control study by Keegan et al [
100] were also cited by Aboutorabi et al [
55] and Menant et al [
45] and are of particular interest. Findings from Tencer et al [
99] showed that fall risk was nearly double in persons wearing shoes with a heel height of 2.5 cm or greater. Keegan et al [
100] found that medium-/high-heeled shoes and shoes with a narrow heel increased the risk of fractures of the distal forearm, foot, proximal humerus, pelvis, and tibia/fibula. This is not surprising given the well-documented detrimental influence of elevated heels on stability and gait. [
101-
106]
Figure 5.
Pathway for age-related use of footwear linked to falls.
Figure 5.
Pathway for age-related use of footwear linked to falls.
Whereas Menant et al [
45] recommend more research to investigate the potential benefits of shoes with high collars on balance, the more recent systematic review by Aboutorabi et al [
55] concludes that older people should be advised to wear shoes with high collars to reduce the risk of falling. The relevant published studies typically investigate the effects of low- versus high-collared shoes on variables associated with balance control. Because the pathway diagram related to footwear is highlighting negative influences on balance and fall risk, the pathway for low-collared shoes is presented.
Overall, the evidence regarding the benefits of high-collared shoes compared with low-collared shoes is limited but promising. Both systematic reviews cite Lord et al [
107], who conducted a study involving 42 women aged 60 to 92 years and observed significant improvements in postural sway and leaning balance when study participants were in laced boots versus low-collared shoes. Likewise, both systematic reviews point out that Menant et al [
46] found no difference in tests of balance and stepping in their study of 29 community-dwelling older adults wearing low-collared shoes versus 11-cm high-collared shoes. Interestingly, the subsequent study undertaken by Menant et al [
47] that involved ten young and 26 older adults demonstrated that increasing collar height led to greater double support time and step width. The authors explain that they were unable to infer whether those gait adaptations were constructive in response to increased mechanical and sensory input around the ankle or “maladaptive” to compensate for the restricted subtalar joint inversion and eversion movements. [
47] Lord et al [
107] concur with the early hypothesis by Edelstein et al [
108] that footwear with a high collar probably improves balance stability in older people by improving lateral stability at the ankle, and other researchers offer a hypothesis that is consistent with that of Menant et al [
47] that high collars increase proprioception/position sense. [
107,
109,
110]
Collectively, the observational studies cited by Aboutorabi et al [
55] and Menant et al [
45] demonstrate the detrimental effect of soft and thick midsoles on positional sense [
111,
112] and balance control. [
113] Note that the findings reported by Koepsell et al [
114] are not represented in the pathway diagram and were contrary to gait laboratory–based studies. Specifically, in their large, nested case-control study investigating how the risk of a fall in an older adult varies in relation to style of footwear worn, those authors found that athletic and canvas shoes (sneakers) were associated with the lowest risk of a fall. The study was cited by Aboutorabi et al [
55] and Menant et al [
45] and was discussed in some detail by Aboutorabi et al [
55], who concluded that older people should be advised to wear thin, hard-soled footwear.
Additional footwear characteristics that may affect fall risk have been investigated to a limited extent. These have not been included in the pathway diagram due to the limited evidence to guide recommendations but are briefly described here for completeness. Specifically, Brenton-Rule et al [
48] found that the ASICS Gel-Odyssey and Cardio Velcro athletic shoes (ASICS Corp, Kobe, Japan) improved postural stability in older adult patients; in another study, Brenton-Rule et al [
49] found that sandals may negatively affect postural stability through their study of women with rheumatoid arthritis (mean age, 67.6 years); Thies et al [
50] found that sole geometry may have an effect on toe clearance and stability during walking; and finally, Yamaguchi et al [
51] found that a small increase in sole width improved postural stability during lateral perturbation and step reactions. Menant et al [
45] call for further studies to investigate the potential benefits of tread-soled shoes for preventing slips.
Findings regarding the benefit or risk of going barefoot are heterogeneous [
45,
55,
101,
102,
107,
110-
114,
115-
117], and, therefore, a diagram of the relationship between going barefoot and balance or fall risk is not provided. Note, however, that key evidence regarding the dangers of going barefoot comes from the previously mentioned nested, case-control study by Koepsell et al. [
114] Those investigators found that going barefoot or in stocking feet was associated with sharply increased risk, even after controlling for measures of health status (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 11.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–51.8). Furthermore, the recommendation by Menant et al [
45] to wear shoes both inside and outside of the home is supported by a later prospective study by Kelsey et al. [
52] In that study, among those who fell in their own home, the adjusted OR for a serious injury in those who were shoeless or wearing slippers compared with those who were wearing other shoes at the time of the fall was 2.27 (95% CI, 1.21–4.24). Shoes may be especially important for older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). [
53] Findings from Najafi et al [
53] suggest that gait alteration in patients with DPN is most pronounced while walking barefoot over longer distances and that footwear may improve gait steadiness in patients with DPN. Looking beyond footwear characteristics, the qualitative study by Paton et al [
54] involving older adults with diabetes and neuropathy who had recently fallen highlights the importance of patient education, as the participants in that study reported that they did not believe that the footwear contributed to their fall.
In summary, older adults should be educated about the importance of avoiding heel height greater than 2.5 cm and low-collared shoes and that thick, soft-soled shoes may increase fall risk. Finally, older adults should be advised to wear shoes inside and outside of the home.
Risk Factor 6. Age-Related Use of Orthoses and the Pathway to Reduce Fall Risk
Foot orthoses (FOs) and ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are hypothesized to improve balance through multiple mechanisms. Plantar cutaneous information comes from mechanoreceptors that are widely distributed under the foot sole. As the feet interface directly with the ground, cutaneous cues provide detailed spatial and temporal information about the support surface properties. It has been proposed that balance may be improved by supporting and aligning the foot. Joint alignment alone may provide enhanced stability, or the position of the joints may help mechanoreceptors detect sensory information from the floor. Also, numerous studies have proposed improvement in balance as a result of increased tactile stimulation. These mechanisms are hypothesized to explain findings across studies showing improved balance performance with the use of various FO designs. Last, AFOs are thought to most directly affect alignment of the foot similar to FO as described previously herein but may further stabilize the ankle joint. The pathway diagram for this risk factor is first divided by orthosis design (AFO versus FO), and then the pathways are described according to the mechanisms of action cited in the reviewed literature (
Fig. 6). This hopefully guides the reader to recognize the hypothesized mechanisms used by various orthoses and helps facilitate clinical use of orthoses through a review of their outcomes.
Figure 6.
Pathway for age-related use of orthoses linked to falls.
Figure 6.
Pathway for age-related use of orthoses linked to falls.
In a systematic review of the effect of FOs in healthy older adults, Aboutorabi et al [
55] reviewed 11 studies and concluded that FOs improve postural stability when tested statically and dynamically. A combined 231 patients were included across this review, which included two RCTs and nine observational studies. An additional RCT [
56] of 94 women with osteoporosis and three single-cohort–designed studies [
57,
59,
60] with a total of 102 participants add to the findings that use of an FO improves balance. This literature all focuses on proposed mechanisms such as distribution of pressure, skeletal alignment, or enhanced cutaneous mechanoreceptors to explain the hypothesized improvement seen with the use of FOs.
A series of studies has directly reported on the use of textured insoles to specifically target the proposed mechanism of enhancing cutaneous mechanoreceptors to improve balance in older adults. [
58,
61-
63] Collectively, these studies examined 89 individuals wearing textured insoles or textured sandal foot beds and found mixed effects on the outcomes of balance performance. Hatton et al [
58] found that a low-profile textured insert was associated with a lower gait velocity, step length, and stride length compared with smooth inserts, suggesting a limited effect with immediate testing. However, the study by Perry et al [
63] reported improved measures of lateral stability during gait, and this effect was sustained after 12 weeks of wear. Measures of postural stability standing and walking were also seen in the study by Palluel et al [
62] when tested immediately and after 5 min of walking.
In a series of studies examining a custom AFO, data suggest that postural stability was improved when wearing the AFO bilaterally. It was also noted in the studies that increased stability did not limit functional reach distance or Timed Up and Go test completion times. Furthermore, the study by Wang et al [
64] suggests that along with improved balance, performance at 6 months compared with a control group wearing walking shoes alone, the AFO group reported less fear of falling. Finally, in a study by Wang et al [
66] the same custom AFO was used while following a group of older adults across 12 months, with findings supporting a reduction in the number of reported falls. Some caution should be used due to the relatively small sample size in the clinical trial, but the results are promising. This study, and others examining the use of AFOs for older adults with neurologic conditions, hypothesizes a mechanism related to ankle stability and improved ankle proprioception. This is in contrast to studies on FOs that rely on theories of cutaneous input.
Most of the data from this body of literature are cross-sectional and observational, making the findings important for advancing our understanding of the mechanisms that may be used while wearing an AFO or FO in older adults. Further clinical validation should be performed using controlled trials to improve the translation of this work to clinical care. The AFO studies cited previously herein are the highest-level evidence using controlled clinical trial designs suggesting the beneficial use of custom AFOs to improve balance, reduce fear of falling, and the potential for a direct reduction in falls.
Risk Factor 7. Age-Related Lower-Limb Pain and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Approximately 76% of older adults struggle with pain [
69], and 24% of older adults specify foot pain [
68]. This pain is concerning because it increases the odds of falling. According to the meta-analysis by Stubbs et al [
69], individuals with foot pain have an increased probability of falling by 87% to 260% (OR = 1.87–3.60) compared with those without foot pain. According to a meta-analysis by Menz et al [
19], individuals with foot pain have an increased odds of falling by 38% to 176% (OR = 1.38–2.76) compared with those without foot pain. This finding suggests that older adults with a history of falls are almost twice as likely to report having foot pain than those without a history of falls [
19]. Furthermore, comparing acute and chronic pain with no pain, individuals with chronic pain have 80% greater odds of falling and individuals with acute pain have 61% greater odds of falling compared with those without pain [
69]. When evaluating this further, it was identified that individuals with plantar fasciitis are at significantly greater risk for falling compared with those with other types of foot pain [
67]. More specifically, they found that individuals with plantar fasciitis were 6.8 times more likely to fall compared with those with no pain [
67].
Despite the significant association between pain and falls, the literature examining the mechanisms between the two is limited. Some studies, including a systematic review, have directly associated foot pain and fall rates [
19,
67,
69]. Other studies have identified an association between foot pain and fall-related risk factors that results in impaired balance and gait [
68,
118]. This has resulted in six different pathways from foot pain to increased fall rate, including a direct link, a link through the associated factors of decreased physical activity level, fear of falling, a neuromuscular effect, and a cognitive factor [
68,
118].
A population-based longitudinal study that examines the effect of chronic musculoskeletal pain and the occurrence of falls in older adults has found that chronic pain, including foot pain, can be due to three pain-fall relationships. The first relationship is due to the association with local joint pathology, such as arthritis, which has been found to be associated with falls. The second relationship is due to the neuromuscular effects of pain, which can result in increased muscle weakness or slowed neuromuscular response to a perturbation. The third relationship is due to a central mechanism that affects executive function and cognition by serving as a distraction or interference with other cognitive activities [
118]. These are all associated with impaired balance, a fall risk factor. Visually, this can be seen through the top portion of the diagram (
Fig. 7).
Figure 7.
Pathway for age-related lower-limb pain linked to falls.
Figure 7.
Pathway for age-related lower-limb pain linked to falls.
According to a recent observational descriptive study, individuals who have foot pain illustrate gait impairments, including decreased gait speed (
P = .010), decreased stride length (
P = .005), increased double limb support (
P = .004), and decreased physical activity (
P = .007) [
68]. In the same article they also identified that older adults with foot pain have 13.3 times greater odds of reporting fear of falling compared with individuals with no foot-related impairments. They then took this information and the other components of frailty and found that compared with individuals without foot pain, individuals with foot pain had 17 times greater odds of being frail. Muchna et al [
68] identified an older adult as frail according to the Fried criterion, which is defined as having three or more of the following criteria: unintentional weight loss (10 lb in the past year), self-reported exhaustion, weakness (grip strength), slow gait speed, and low levels of physical activity [
119]. The association between foot pain and frailty is not surprising, particularly when examining the previous finding that linked foot pain and decreased physical activity. Decreased physical activity also explains the 17.9 times greater odds of having muscle weakness and the 9.7 times odds of reporting exhaustion [
68]. All of these factors are associated with increased fall risk and can be visualized in the bottom two sections of the diagram (
Fig. 7).
Although there are multiple consequences of increased foot pain, the fact that so many are associated with increased fall risk or fall rate highlights the importance of including current foot pain level, pain characteristics, and pain-related mobility and balance deficits in fall risk assessments [
19,
69,
118].
Risk Factor 8. Age-Related Changes in Sensory Input and the Pathway to Increased Fall Risk
Age-related sensory neuropathy has been associated with a characteristic loss of sensation in the feet, paresthesia, pain, and muscle weakness [
73]. These changes may increase the risk of falls for older adults. Loss of sensation may lead to an inability to accommodate or recognize changes in the walking surface. Furthermore, obstacles may not be felt under the foot. Changes in sensation may also manifest as a loss in the ability to determine joint position, known as proprioception. A loss in joint position sense increases the risk of loss of balance due to failure to recognize altered joint position during mobility tasks (
Fig. 8).
Figure 8.
Pathway for age-related changes in sensory input linked to falls.
Figure 8.
Pathway for age-related changes in sensory input linked to falls.
Most previous studies linking the association between neuropathy and risk of falling quantified neuropathy by using vibratory perception threshold, with higher thresholds associated with higher plantar numbness. For example, Martin et al [
75] showed that there is a higher prevalence of plantar numbness with aging, and these findings are associated with gait changes and poorer balance in older adults who reported falls [
74]. Also note that plantar numbness has been correlated with a higher fear of falling, in addition to the number of falls compared with controls [
78]. Finally, these findings are also extended to diabetic patients who demonstrate plantar numbness and altered gait parameters [
70].
Another component of the sensory system is proprioception, defined as the ability to sense motion and the position of a joint, using feedback from muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs when visual cues are not available. Deshpande et al [
72] determined that age was significantly correlated with a variable called
threshold for perception of passive movement. It is the minimum amount of movement to know that a joint has moved. Participants exhibited a larger threshold for perception of passive movement and also showed significantly poorer balance, mobility, and physical function. This finding was recently confirmed in a study by Chen and Qu [
71] that also found that older individuals had trouble accurately describing joint position.
There are some early data to support the management of these changes with the use of plantar stimulation to improve tissue perfusion, which may help reduce fall risk in patients with sensation loss and diabetes [
120]. With increased plantar numbness and reduced proprioception in the lower extremity there is poorer balance and increased fear of falling (which is a separately identifiable risk factor for falls) [
76], both of which lead to an increased risk of falls [
77].