Next Article in Journal
Impacts of Endogenous Sunk-Cost Investment on the Islamic Banking Industry: A Historical Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Cryptocurrency Returns before and after the Introduction of Bitcoin Futures
Previous Article in Journal
Competition, Debt Maturity, and Adjustment Speed in China: A Dynamic Fractional Estimation Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is Bitcoin Similar to Gold? An Integrated Overview of Empirical Findings
Open AccessArticle

Long Memory in the Volatility of Selected Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple

1
Department of Business Informatics, Faculty of Business Administration, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
2
Department of Capital markets, School of Banking & Insurance, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
3
Department of Insurance, School of Banking & Insurance, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
4
Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(6), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13060107
Received: 6 March 2020 / Revised: 26 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
This paper examines the volatility of cryptocurrencies, with particular attention to their potential long memory properties. Using daily data for the three major cryptocurrencies, namely Ripple, Ethereum, and Bitcoin, we test for the long memory property using, Rescaled Range Statistics (R/S), Gaussian Semi Parametric (GSP) and the Geweke and Porter-Hudak (GPH) Model Method. Our findings show that squared returns of three cryptocurrencies have a significant long memory, supporting the use of fractional Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) extensions as suitable modelling technique. Our findings indicate that the Hyperbolic GARCH (HYGARCH) model appears to be the best fitted model for Bitcoin. On the other hand, the Fractional Integrated GARCH (FIGARCH) model with skewed student distribution produces better estimations for Ethereum. Finally, FIGARCH model with student distribution appears to give a good fit for Ripple return. Based on Kupieck’s tests for Value at Risk (VaR) back-testing and expected shortfalls we can conclude that our models perform correctly in most of the cases for both the negative and positive returns. View Full-Text
Keywords: volatility modelling; cryptocurrency; value at risk; expected shortfall; long memory volatility modelling; cryptocurrency; value at risk; expected shortfall; long memory
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaya Soylu, P.; Okur, M.; Çatıkkaş, Ö.; Altintig, Z.A. Long Memory in the Volatility of Selected Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 107.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop