Next Article in Journal
Long Memory in the Volatility of Selected Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Bargaining Power in Real Estate Pricing Models: Conceptual and Empirical Issues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness based on Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressions
Open AccessArticle

Competition, Debt Maturity, and Adjustment Speed in China: A Dynamic Fractional Estimation Approach

1
Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China
2
Rennes School of Business, 35065 Rennes, France
3
UVAS Business School, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
4
Faculty of Management Science, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(5), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050106
Received: 28 March 2020 / Revised: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 20 May 2020 / Published: 23 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Time Series Econometrics)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the capital structure adjustment rate in different levels of product market competitions. We classified Chinese non-financial listed firms into highly, moderately, and less competitive firms and applied an unbiased dynamic panel fractional estimator on unbalanced panel data of 10,941 firm-year observations during the period of 1998 to 2015. We find that the adjustment rate of highly and less competitive firms towards long-term target capital structure is higher (28.2–29.1%) as compared to the adjustment rate towards short-term target capital structure (18.8–18.9%). On the other hand, the adjustment rate of moderately competitive firms towards long-term target capital structure is slower (22.3%) as compared to the adjustment rate towards short-term target capital structure (25.3%). Further, the adjustment rate of highly and less competitive firms differs significantly between long-term and short-term target capital structure, while the adjustment rate of moderately competitive firms remains steady. Highly competitive large firms follow the limited liability model to adjust their target capital structure and support trade-off theory, while both small and large firms follow the limited liability and predation models in moderately and less competitive environments, respectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: adjustment rate; product market competition; dynamic panel fractional estimator; China adjustment rate; product market competition; dynamic panel fractional estimator; China
MDPI and ACS Style

Mirza, S.S.; Ahsan, T.; Safdar, R.; Rehman, A.U. Competition, Debt Maturity, and Adjustment Speed in China: A Dynamic Fractional Estimation Approach. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 106.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop