Exploring Patients’ Perspectives on Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Team and Reflexivity
2.2. Study Design
2.3. Analysis and Findings
3. Results
3.1. How Patients React after Treatment for Colorectal and Anal Cancer
3.1.1. Period after Discharge
#10: “So there I was, done with all of that, and then you’re sort of left to yourself again. You don’t have Herlev (name of the Hospital) in the background anymore, so to speak.”
3.1.2. Coping Strategies
#1: “I have Googled for advice myself, I know it’s wrong to self-diagnose.”
#4: “And I think it is important, you are honest with yourself—not least with yourself, but also with the people you are with, because then you get—it gives you peace of mind that—“well, they know very well that this is how … (name of the patient) is and he has to (go)—because of this and that and that”. Then, I have to go. And I think it’s important to be honest with the other people you’re with and to say, well, that’s just the way the situation is.”
3.2. Experienced Symptoms
3.2.1. Stool Symptoms
#11: “I wear diaper during daytime, at night I wear women’s pads, it is to absorb if I—what is it called—if I shit in my pants.”
3.2.2. Other Symptoms
#12: “And I also have some dysfunction regarding erection, which is just arghhhh very annoying.”
#5: “So I have developed some other late complications where I have been experiencing pelvic pain. They believe it’s the radiation therapy that has caused it.”
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rosenberg, J.; Oggesen, B.T.; Hamberg, M.L.S.; Danielsen, A.K. Establishment of a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer surgery: A descriptive study. Support. Care Cancer 2022, 30, 6243–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simard, J.; Kamath, S.; Kircher, S. Survivorship guidance for patients with colorectal cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2019, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verkuijl, S.J.; Jonker, J.E.; Trzpis, M.; Burgerhof, J.G.M.; Broens, P.M.A.; Furnée, E.J.B. Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2021, 47, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Heinsbergen, M.; den Haan, N.; Maaskant-Braat, A.J.; Melenhorst, J.; Belgers, E.H.; Leijtens, J.W.; Bloemen, J.G.; Rutten, H.J.; Bouvy, N.D.; Janssen-Heijnen, M.L.; et al. Functional bowel complaints and quality of life after surgery for colon cancer: Prevalence and predictive factors. Color. Dis. 2020, 22, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Emmertsen, K.J.; Laurberg, S. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score. Ann. Surg. 2012, 255, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Dai, Z.; Zang, Y.; Lu, J.; Xiao, Y. The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection symdrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta analysis. Support Care Cancer 2020, 29, 7249–7258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varghese, C.; Wells, C.I.; O’Grady, G.; Christensen, P.; Bissett, I.P.; Keane, C. The Longitudinal Course of Low-anterior Resection Syndrome. Ann. Surg. 2022, 276, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Den Oudsten, B.L.; Traa, M.J.; Thong, M.S.Y.; Martijn, H.; De Hingh, I.H.J.T.; Bosscha, K.; Van De Poll-Franse, L.V. Higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction in colon and rectal cancer survivors compared with the normative population: A population-based study. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 3161–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilmore, B.; Ezekian, B.; Sun, Z.; Peterson, A.; Mantyh, C. Urinary dysfunction in the rectal cancer survivor. Curr. Bladder Dysfunct. Rep. 2016, 11, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duran, E.; Tanriseven, M.; Ersoz, N.; Oztas, M.; Ozerhan, I.H.; Kilbas, Z.; Demirbas, S. Urinary and sexual dysfunction rates and risk factors following rectal cancer surgery. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2015, 30, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunesen, K.G.; Nørgaard, M.; Lundby, L.; Havsteen, H.; Buntzen, S.; Thorlacius-Ussing, O.; Laurberg, S. Long-term anorectal, urinary and sexual dysfunction causing distress after radiotherapy for anal cancer: A Danish multicentre cross-sectional questionnaire study. Color. Dis. 2015, 17, O230–O239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismail, F.Q.; Öberg, S.; Oggesen, B.T.; Hageman, I.; Rosenberg, J. Patient-reported outcome measures to screen for depressive symptoms and depression in patients with colorectal and anal cancer: A systematic scoping review. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2022, 4, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coyne, I.T. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J. Adv. Nurs. 1997, 26, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pedersen, B.; Delmar, C.; Falkmer, U.; Grønkjaer, M. Bridging the gap between interviewer and interviewee: Developing an interview guide for individual interviews by means of a focus group. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2016, 30, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallio, H.; Pietilä, A.M.; Johnson, M.; Kangasniemi, M. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J. Adv. Nurs. 2016, 72, 2954–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kvale, S.; Brinkmann, S. Interviews—Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sandelowski, M.M.; Polit, D.F.; Beck, C.T. Sample size in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 1995, 18, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandelowski, M. Notes on transcription. Res. Nurs. Health 1994, 17, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 62, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCaughan, E.; Prue, G.; Parahoo, K.; McIlfatrick, S.; McKenna, H. Exploring and comparing the experience and coping behaviour of men and women with colorectal cancer after chemotherapy treatment: A qualitative longitudinal study. Psychooncology 2012, 21, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morgan, O.; Schnur, J.; Caban-Martinez, A.J.; Duenas-Lopez, M.; Huang, M.; Portelance, L.; Elkhadem, A.; Marshall, D.C. A qualitative analysis of female patient perspectives on physician communication regarding sexual dysfunction associated with pelvic radiotherapy. J. Sex. Med. 2023, 20, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, N.K.; Kim, Y.W.; Cho, M.S. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: Expert technical tips for robotic surgery. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 24, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carduff, E.; Murray, S.A.; Kendall, M. Methodological developments in qualitative longitudinal research: The advantages and challenges of regular telephone contact with participants in a qualitative longitudinal interview study. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 1964. [Updated 9 July 2018]. Available online: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ (accessed on 27 June 2023).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oggesen, B.T.; Hamberg, M.L.S.; Thomsen, T.; Rosenberg, J. Exploring Patients’ Perspectives on Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 7532-7541. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080546
Oggesen BT, Hamberg MLS, Thomsen T, Rosenberg J. Exploring Patients’ Perspectives on Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Current Oncology. 2023; 30(8):7532-7541. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080546
Chicago/Turabian StyleOggesen, Birthe Thing, Marie Louise Sjødin Hamberg, Thordis Thomsen, and Jacob Rosenberg. 2023. "Exploring Patients’ Perspectives on Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study" Current Oncology 30, no. 8: 7532-7541. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080546
APA StyleOggesen, B. T., Hamberg, M. L. S., Thomsen, T., & Rosenberg, J. (2023). Exploring Patients’ Perspectives on Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Current Oncology, 30(8), 7532-7541. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080546