Next Article in Journal
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Brief Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin D and Sun Exposure: A Community Survey in Australia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Non-Emergent Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis

1
Division of Surgical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
2
Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
3
Clinical Trials Office, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(2), 2482-2492; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020189
Submission received: 28 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 18 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)

Abstract

:
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) dataset was used to identify perioperative variables associated with the length of stay (LOS) and early discharge among cancer patients undergoing colectomy. Patients who underwent non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer from 2012 to 2019 were identified from the NSQIP and colectomy-targeted databases. Postoperative LOS was analyzed based on postoperative day (POD) of discharge, with patients grouped into Early Discharge (POD 0–2), Standard Discharge (POD 3–5), or Late Discharge (POD ≥ 6) cohorts. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with early discharge. The NSQIP query yielded 26,072 patients: 3684 (14%) in the Early Discharge, 13,414 (52%) in the Standard Discharge, and 8974 (34%) in the Late Discharge cohorts. The median LOS was 4.0 days (IQR: 3.0–7.0). Thirty-day readmission rates were 7% for Early Discharge, 8% for Standard Discharge, and 12% for Late Discharge. On multivariable regression analysis, risk factors significantly associated with a shorter LOS included independent functional status, minimally invasive approach, and absence of ostomy or additional bowel resection (all p < 0.001). Perioperative variables can be used to develop a model to identify patients eligible for early discharge after right colectomy for colon cancer. Efforts to decrease the overall median length of stay should focus on optimization of modifiable risk factors.

1. Introduction

The postoperative length of stay (LOS) has become an increasingly scrutinized metric for both surgeons and administrators. Widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) perioperative protocols, particularly among colorectal surgery patients, have helped decrease the postoperative LOS over the last two decades [1,2,3,4,5]. The adoption of minimally invasive surgical approaches, early postoperative mobilization, and other ERAS principles have been associated with decreased postoperative complications and a reduced LOS. Among colorectal surgery patients, the historical published median LOS of 6–7 days has been reduced to a median of 4 days in more recent cohorts and large series [6,7,8]. Several smaller series have noted the feasibility of even earlier discharge after colorectal procedures, with LOS targets of 24–72 h being successfully achieved [9,10,11]. Our own institutional review of patients undergoing elective right colectomy demonstrated that approximately 30% may be clinically ready for discharge on postoperative day one (POD 1) [12]. Other studies, however, have reported an increased risk of postoperative readmission among colorectal cancer patients discharged before POD 4 [13], and efforts to identify patient populations amenable to safe discharge within 48 h post-colectomy have not been widely adopted. Perioperative factors among colorectal cancer patients that may be predictive of successful early discharge have not been well described.
In addition, previous studies have suggested that additional procedures performed during elective colon surgery are associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications [14]; one would hypothesize that additional procedures would similarly be associated with a longer postoperative LOS. The complexity of concurrent procedures has been difficult to quantify; thus, we also sought to create a methodology that would account for all additional procedures in the creation of multivariate models. We sought to characterize postoperative length of stay and readmission risk among patients undergoing colectomy for a right-sided colon cancer within a large, modern cohort, and to analyze perioperative clinical factors associated with early discharge.

2. Materials and Methods

Institutional Review Board approval was confirmed prior to initiation of this study (Atrium Health IRB #02-20-31E). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) [15] general participant use data file (PUF) and colectomy-targeted PUF for 2012–2019 were merged using case ID and subsequently queried by the current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 44205 and 44160 for patients who underwent non-emergent right colectomy for a diagnosis of colon cancer. Emergency cases, cases with missing postoperative LOS, cases with missing operative variables, and cases with an endoscopic approach were excluded.
The postoperative LOS was analyzed as a categorical variable, with patients divided into cohorts designated as Early Discharge (discharge on POD 0–2), Standard Discharge (discharge on POD 3–5), or Late Discharge (discharge on POD ≥ 6). The Discharge cohorts were compared across demographic (age, sex, and race), clinical, and operative characteristics, using chi-square and t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Clinical characteristics included comorbidities (diabetes, dyspnea, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and bleeding disorders), ascites, pre-operative dialysis, pre-operative weight loss, pre-operative sepsis, steroid use, functional status prior to surgery, and tumor stage. Operative characteristics included surgical approach and wound class, and perioperative variables included 30-day readmission and post-operative complications such as wound infection, anastomotic leak (all grades), deep incisional surgical site infection, organ space surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and deep vein thrombosis.
The NSQIP database captures CPT codes for the primary procedure (colectomy) and up to 10 “Other Procedures” and 10 “Concurrent Procedures” performed at the time of the index operation. We analyzed the nine most common and/or complex additional or concurrent operative procedures as discrete variables: ureteral stent placement, enterolysis, ileostomy, additional bowel resection, cholecystectomy, peritoneal abscess drainage, hysterectomy, ureterolysis, and hepatectomy. The relative value unit (RVU) is a metric to reflect the time and complexity of specific surgical procedures, as designated by the procedural CPT codes. To better analyze the potential complexity of all additional procedures performed at the time of colectomy, we created a new variable termed the “sum RVU” to represent the sum of the RVUs corresponding to CPT codes for all additional or concurrent procedures performed at the time of colectomy, excluding the above nine procedures. The complexity of a surgical case compromising multiple additional procedures in addition to the right colectomy should be reflected in the RVU sum for that case.
To identify risk factors associated with Early Discharge, a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model was fit by including individually prognostic variables and then by using backwards elimination. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 26,072 patients who underwent non-emergent right colectomy for a diagnosis of colon cancer from 2012 to 2019 were identified from the NSQIP query (Figure 1). The median LOS was 4.0 days (interquartile range, IQR: 3.0–7.0) for all patients. The study population comprised 3684 patients (14%) within the Early Discharge (POD 0–2) cohort, 13,414 patients (52%) within the Standard Discharge (POD 3–5) cohort, and 8974 patients (34%) within the Late Discharge (POD ≥ 6) cohort. Thirty-day readmission rates were 7% for the Early Discharge cohort, 8% for the Standard Discharge cohort, and 12% for the Late Discharge cohort.
The clinicopathologic features of the patients across these three cohorts are summarized in Table 1. There was a clear trend towards increasing rates of Early Discharge with each subsequent year, over the course of the 8-year period (2.8% in 2012 vs. 20.2% in 2019). Patients within the Early Discharge cohort were less likely to have diabetes, tobacco use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, congestive heart failure, hypertension, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, disseminated cancer, non-independent preoperative functional status, preoperative wound infection, chronic steroid use, >10% body weight loss in prior 6 months, bleeding disorders, or a preoperative diagnosis of sepsis. Patients in the Early Discharge cohort were less likely to undergo any additional procedures at the time of colectomy and less likely to require urgent surgery. Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or MIS with open assist were more likely to fall within the Early Discharge cohort than those undergoing open colectomy or MIS converted to open resection.
The results from the multivariable ordinal logistic regression model, demonstrating the odds of a shorter length of stay, are included in Table 2. Of the significant univariate factors, ureterolysis, total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), and body mass index (BMI) were not significant after backwards elimination in the final multivariable model and thus do not appear in Table 2. The impact of preoperative variables on early discharge is shown in Figure 2, while the impact of intraoperative and postoperative variables is shown in Figure 3.

4. Discussion

Using the NSQIP dataset, we aimed to identify perioperative variables associated with LOS and early discharge among patients undergoing colectomy for cancer. The indication for surgery has been shown to be correlated with postoperative LOS, with the suggestion that colon cancer diagnosis was negatively associated with Early Discharge [11]. Our institutional experience, however, had suggested that colon cancer diagnosis was not an obvious independent predictor of longer LOS and that up to a third of these patients might be safely discharged by POD 2 [12]. By limiting the current NSQIP analysis to patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer, we sought to eliminate the potential confounding impact of non-malignancy diagnoses. In addition, we elected to focus our analysis on patients undergoing right colectomy for colon cancer to create a more homogenous cohort and minimize some of the confounding operative variables that would have been introduced by including patients undergoing resection of left-sided colon cancers or rectal cancers.
The analysis focused on perioperative clinicopathologic variables associated with postoperative LOS and Early Discharge, using the definition of <48 h. Out of 26,072 patients in the entire study, 3684 (14%) were within the Early Discharge cohort, 13,414 (52%) were within the Standard Discharge cohort, and 8974 (34%) were within the Late Discharge cohort. Importantly, the 30-day postoperative readmission rate was in fact the lowest among the Early Discharge cohort (7% Early Discharge vs. 8% Standard Discharge vs. 12% Late Discharge), suggesting that efforts to appropriately and safely reduce the LOS after colectomy have not led to increased risk of readmission. Previous studies have largely focused on the interaction of postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission risk; predictably, postoperative complications were found to be associated with an increased postoperative length of stay and decreased likelihood of early discharge [8,11,16,17]. As a clinical goal of the current study was to assist the clinician in identifying which patients might be the best candidates for successful discharge within 48 h after colectomy, we did not include postoperative complications in the multivariable analysis, as these obviously can impact overall LOS but almost invariably would occur after POD 2, the primary endpoint.
Among intraoperative variables, the surgical approach was the single most impactful variable, with patients undergoing MIS colectomy associated with a nearly four-fold increased likelihood of Early Discharge compared to those undergoing an open approach. These data also demonstrated that MIS with open assist was still associated with significantly greater odds of Early Discharge than the open approach or MIS converted to the open approach, suggesting that, when appropriate, the use of a hand port to facilitate completion of safe resection may be a much more beneficial intermediate step than conversion to laparotomy. Not surprisingly, the need for additional bowel resection or ostomy creation were negatively associated with likelihood of Early Discharge. The novel RVU metric we calculated to account for the complexity of additional procedures at the time of colectomy may also serve as a useful tool for discharge predictions and planning. In fact, the mean sum RVUs was the lowest for the Early Discharge cohort and the highest for the Late Discharge cohort.
Among preoperative variables, the presence of ascites, preoperative end stage renal disease with dialysis, preoperative sepsis, and non-independent functional status had the largest negative effect on the likelihood of Early Discharge. By comparison, the negative associations of age, diabetes, smoking status, hypertension, and dyspnea with Early Discharge were modest. There was a modest association of race with the discharge cohort, with Black patients less likely to fall in the Early Discharge cohort. A striking temporal trend was observed, with the proportion of Early Discharge patients steadily increasing over the 8-year study period, from 2.8% in 2012 to 20.2% in 2019. This phenomenon is likely partially attributable to increasing adoption of ERAS protocols across institutions, although these data are not captured within the NSQIP data set. The impact of year of surgery on the likelihood of Early Discharge was notably independent of the surgical approach on multivariable regression analysis, suggesting that improving perioperative management of colectomy patients is associated with the increased likelihood of Early Discharge, independent of the increasing adoption of MIS approaches for colorectal cancer. Interestingly, the proportion of patients in the Standard Discharge cohort (POD 3–5) did not change at all over the study period (51.7% in 2012 vs. 51.6% in 2019), suggesting that there is likely a significant subset of patients within this cohort who could be targeted and would be amenable to safe earlier discharge.
Limitations of the current study include the retrospective nature of the analysis, and while the NSQIP data set is quite comprehensive, data are limited to those derived from participating hospitals. In addition, specific perioperative variables, for example details of ERAS pathway components, are not included. Machine learning and predictive analytics may offer another avenue for the development of postoperative discharge and hospital readmission risk models, although few of these studies to date have included postoperative patients [16,18,19]. A recent study by Xue et al. utilized machine learning algorithms to predict five common postoperative complications based on preoperative and intraoperative data [20]. Predictive modeling using such granular data at an institutional level may offer additional opportunities to shape personalized postoperative care pathways for patients undergoing colectomy in the future [21] but NSQIP provides a unique, high-quality dataset to currently study postoperative outcomes at a national level.
The decision-making process regarding when to discharge a postoperative patient after surgery is a complex one that requires skilled clinical judgement. The current study provides insights from a large, modern cohort by using the NSQIP database to examine postoperative length of stay and the perioperative clinical factors associated with early discharge among patients undergoing colectomy for right-sided colon cancers. Risk factors significantly associated with early discharge on multivariable analysis included independent functional status, minimally invasive approach, and the absence of ostomy or additional bowel resection. Importantly, Early Discharge was not associated with any increase in readmission, suggesting that early recovery strategies as currently practiced do not represent a risk to patient safety. The use of RVU-based metrics to quantify surgical complexity further aids in the discharge decision-making process by confirming that patients undergoing less complex operations are more likely to qualify for Early Discharge. Together, these observations provide valuable information for clinical decision-making in surgical patients. Efforts to safely decrease the median length of stay and improve resource utilization after non-emergent colectomy should focus on the optimization of modifiable risk factors and the identification of patient populations from this model in which early discharge could be safely achieved.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.H.S. and J.C.S.; formal analysis, E.E.D. and S.J.T.; data curation, R.E.S. and N.F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.S. and M.L.W.; writing—review and editing, M.L.W., M.H.S., J.C.S. and J.S.H.; project administration, R.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Atrium Health (#02-20-31E; 19 February 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to research involving materials that had been collected solely for non-research purposes.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gustafsson, U.O.; Scott, M.J.; Schwenk, W.; Demartines, N.; Roulin, D.; Francis, N.; McNaught, C.E.; MacFie, J.; Liberman, A.S.; Soop, M.; et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 31, 783–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ljungqvist, O.; Scott, M.; Fearon, K.C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017, 152, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sarin, A.; Litonius, E.S.; Naidu, R.; Yost, C.S.; Varma, M.G.; Chen, L.L. Successful implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016, 16, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Stephen, A.E.; Berger, D.L. Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 2003, 133, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van Vugt, J.L.; Reisinger, K.W.; Derikx, J.P.; Boerma, D.; Stoot, J.H. Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 12445–12457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hoffman, R.L.; Bartlett, E.K.; Ko, C.; Mahmoud, N.; Karakousis, G.C.; Kelz, R.R. Early discharge and readmission after colorectal resection. J. Surg. Res. 2014, 190, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marcus, R.K.; Lillemoe, H.A.; Rice, D.C.; Mena, G.; Bednarski, B.K.; Speer, B.B.; Ramirez, P.T.; Lasala, J.D.; Navai, N.; Williams, W.H.; et al. Determining the Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Major Oncologic Surgery: An Institutional NSQIP Analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 26, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Turrentine, F.E.; McMurry, T.L.; Adams, R.B.; Jones, R.S.; Zaydfudim, V.M. Early Patient Discharge in Selected Patients is Not Associated with Higher Readmission After Major Abdominal Operations. Ann. Surg. 2020, 276, e698–e705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lawrence, J.K.; Keller, D.S.; Samia, H.; Ermlich, B.; Brady, K.M.; Nobel, T.; Stein, S.L.; Delaney, C.P. Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using Enhanced Recovery Pathways. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2013, 216, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Levy, B.F.; Scott, M.J.; Fawcett, W.J.; Rockall, T.A. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 2009, 52, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Saadat, L.V.; Mahvi, D.A.; Jolissaint, J.S.; Gabriel, R.A.; Urman, R.; Gold, J.S.; Whang, E.E. Twenty-Three-Hour-Stay Colectomy Without Increased Readmissions: An Analysis of 1905 Cases from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. World J. Surg. 2020, 44, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Watson, M.; Gower, N.; Sierra, B.; Salo, J.C.; Hill, J.S. Enhanced Recovery for Colectomy and Discharge One Day after Operation: How Low Can We Go? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2018, 227, e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hendren, S.; Morris, A.M.; Zhang, W.; Dimick, J. Early discharge and hospital readmission after colectomy for cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum 2011, 54, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hassan, I.; Pacheco, P.E.; Markwell, S.J.; Ahad, S. Additional procedures performed during elective colon surgery and their adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015, 19, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Available online: https://www.Facs.Org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip (accessed on 30 November 2022).
  16. Francis, N.K.; Mason, J.; Salib, E.; Allanby, L.; Messenger, D.; Allison, A.S.; Smart, N.J.; Ockrim, J.B. Factors predicting 30-day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Color. Dis. 2015, 17, O148–O154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kulaylat, A.N.; Dillon, P.W.; Hollenbeak, C.S.; Stewart, D.B. Determinants of 30-d readmission after colectomy. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 193, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, Y.; Talwar, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Aparasu, R.R. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: A scoping review of the literature. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2021, 21, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, W.; Stansbury, C.; Singh, K.; Ryan, A.M.; Sukul, D.; Mahmoudi, E.; Waljee, A.; Zhu, J.; Nallamothu, B.K. Predicting 30-day hospital readmissions using artificial neural networks with medical code embedding. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0221606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Xue, B.; Li, D.; Lu, C.; King, C.R.; Wildes, T.; Avidan, M.S.; Kannampallil, T.; Abraham, J. Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e212240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Brom, H.; Carthon, J.M.B.; Ikeaba, U.; Chittams, J. Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning to Tailor Nursing Care for Patients at High Risk for Readmissions. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 2020, 35, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Consort diagram. LOS, length of stay; CPT, current procedural terminology.
Figure 1. Consort diagram. LOS, length of stay; CPT, current procedural terminology.
Curroncol 30 00189 g001
Figure 2. Impact of preoperative variables on likelihood of early discharge (odds ratio > 1) after non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHF, congestive heart failure.
Figure 2. Impact of preoperative variables on likelihood of early discharge (odds ratio > 1) after non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHF, congestive heart failure.
Curroncol 30 00189 g002
Figure 3. Impact of intraoperative factors on likelihood of early discharge (odds ratio > 1) after non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer. MIS, minimally-invasive surgery; RVU, relative value unit.
Figure 3. Impact of intraoperative factors on likelihood of early discharge (odds ratio > 1) after non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer. MIS, minimally-invasive surgery; RVU, relative value unit.
Curroncol 30 00189 g003
Table 1. Clinical and demographic factors of patients undergoing non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer from 2012 to 2019, stratified by postoperative length of stay.
Table 1. Clinical and demographic factors of patients undergoing non-emergent right colectomy for colon cancer from 2012 to 2019, stratified by postoperative length of stay.
Factor TotalEarlyStandardLate
N = 26,072DischargeDischargeDischarge
N = 3684N = 13,414N = 8974
Age, mean (SD), years 69.1 (12.9)65.3 (11.9)68.3 (12.8)71.8 (12.8)
SexFemale13,874 (53.2%)1899 (13.7%)7422 (53.5%)4553 (32.8%)
Male12,198 (46.8%)1785 (14.6%)5992 (49.1%)4421 (36.2%)
RaceBlack2839 (10.9%)359 (12.6%)1421 (50.1%)1059 (37.3%)
Other750 (2.9%)119 (15.9%)396 (52.8%)235 (31.3%)
Unknown4306 (16.5%)487 (11.3%)2226 (51.7%)1593 (37.0%)
White18,177 (69.7%)2719 (15.0%)9371 (51.6%)6087 (33.5%)
Current SmokerNo22,895 (87.8%)3270 (14.3%)11,832 (51.7%)7793 (34.0%)
Yes3177 (12.2%)414 (13.0%)1582 (49.8%)1181 (37.2%)
DiabetesNo20,753 (79.6%)3079 (14.8%)10,663 (51.4%)7011 (33.8%)
Yes5319 (20.4%)605 (11.4%)2751 (51.7%)1963 (36.9%)
DyspneaNo23,188 (88.9%)3434 (14.8%)12,058 (52.0%)7696 (33.2%)
At Rest142 (0.5%)9 (6.3%)58 (40.8%)75 (52.8%)
Moderate Exertion2742 (10.5%)241 (8.8%)1298 (47.3%)1203 (43.9%)
History of Severe COPDNo24,474 (93.9%)3572 (14.6%)12,718 (52.0%)8184 (33.4%)
Yes1598 (6.1%)112 (7.0%)696 (43.6%)790 (49.4%)
CHF (30 Days Before
Surgery)
No25,647 (98.4%)3659 (14.3%)13,254 (51.7%)8734 (34.1%)
Yes425 (1.6%)25 (5.9%)160 (37.6%)240 (56.5%)
Hypertension Requiring MedicationNo10,957 (42.0%)1767 (16.1%)5825 (53.2%)3365 (30.7%)
Yes15,115 (58.0%)1917 (12.7%)7589 (50.2%)5609 (37.1%)
AscitesNo25,889 (99.3%)3680 (14.2%)13,372 (51.7%)8837 (34.1%)
Yes183 (0.7%)4 (2.2%)42 (23.0%)137 (74.9%)
Currently on Dialysis
(Pre-operative)
No25,895 (99.3%)3674 (14.2%)13,343 (51.5%)8878 (34.3%)
Yes177 (0.7%)10 (5.6%)71 (40.1%)96 (54.2%)
T StageT0 or Tis530 (2.0%)118 (22.3%)292 (55.1%)120 (22.6%)
T12388 (9.2%)446 (18.7%)1339 (56.1%)603 (25.3%)
T23809 (14.6%)659 (17.3%)2065 (54.2%)1085 (28.5%)
T312,360 (47.4%)1669 (13.5%)6437 (52.1%)4254 (34.4%)
T44728 (18.1%)430 (9.1%)2180 (46.1%)2118 (44.8%)
Tx, N/A, Unknown2257 (8.7%)362 (16.0%)1101 (48.8%)794 (35.2%)
N StageN013,795 (52.9%)2071 (15.0%)7257 (52.6%)4467 (32.4%)
N16454 (24.8%)857 (13.3%)3314 (51.3%)2283 (35.4%)
N23472 (13.3%)385 (11.1%)1705 (49.1%)1382 (39.8%)
Nx, N/A, Unknown2351 (9.0%)371 (15.8%)1138 (48.4%)842 (35.8%)
M StageM0 or Mx13,313 (51.1%)2085 (15.7%)6909 (51.9%)4319 (32.4%)
M11780 (6.8%)119 (6.7%)781 (43.9%)880 (49.4%)
N/A, Unknown10,979 (42.1%)1480 (13.5%)5724 (52.1%)3775 (34.4%)
Disseminated CancerNo23,397 (89.7%)3495 (14.9%)12,266 (52.4%)7636 (32.6%)
Yes2675 (10.3%)189 (7.1%)1148 (42.9%)1338 (50.0%)
Pre-Operative Weight Loss (>10% in Last 6 Months)No24,618 (94.4%)3581 (14.5%)12,793 (52.0%)8244 (33.5%)
Yes1454 (5.6%)103 (7.1%)621 (42.7%)730 (50.2%)
Bleeding DisordersNo25,030 (96.0%)3617 (14.5%)12,969 (51.8%)8444 (33.7%)
Yes1042 (4.0%)67 (6.4%)445 (42.7%)530 (50.9%)
Pre-Operative SepsisNo25,435 (97.6%)3672 (14.4%)13,241 (52.1%)8522 (33.5%)
Yes637 (2.4%)12 (1.9%)173 (27.2%)452 (71.0%)
Steroid Use for Chronic ConditionsNo25,084 (96.2%)3579 (14.3%)12,960 (51.7%)8545 (34.1%)
Yes988 (3.8%)105 (10.6%)454 (46.0%)429 (43.4%)
Functional HealthIndependent25,166 (96.5%)3647 (14.5%)13,115 (52.1%)8404 (33.4%)
Status Prior to SurgeryPartially Dependent719 (2.8%)29 (4.0%)230 (32.0%)460 (64.0%)
Totally Dependent91 (0.3%)0 (0.0%)25 (27.5%)66 (72.5%)
Unknown96 (0.4%)8 (8.3%)44 (45.8%)44 (45.8%)
Year of Operation20121411 (5.4%)40 (2.8%)729 (51.7%)642 (45.5%)
20131530 (5.9%)68 (4.4%)810 (52.9%)652 (42.6%)
20142357 (9.0%)184 (7.8%)1233 (52.3%)940 (39.9%)
20153066 (11.8%)313 (10.2%)1565 (51.0%)1188 (38.7%)
20163716 (14.3%)497 (13.4%)1893 (50.9%)1326 (35.7%)
20173993 (15.3%)629 (15.8%)2077 (52.0%)1287 (32.2%)
20184581 (17.6%)858 (18.7%)2314 (50.5%)1409 (30.8%)
20195418 (20.8%)1095 (20.2%)2793 (51.6%)1530 (28.2%)
Surgery ApproachMIS10,645 (40.8%)2270 (21.3%)6040 (56.7%)2335 (21.9%)
MIS Converted Open1883 (7.2%)80 (4.2%)833 (44.2%)970 (51.5%)
MIS with Open6907 (26.5%)1167 (16.9%)3948 (57.2%)1792 (25.9%)
Assist
Open6637 (25.5%)167 (2.5%)2593 (39.1%)3877 (58.4%)
Any Additional ProcedureNo16,898 (64.8%)2824 (16.7%)9169 (54.3%)4905 (29.0%)
Yes9174 (35.2%)860 (9.4%)4245 (46.3%)4069 (44.4%)
Urgent SurgeryNo21,138 (81.1%)3489 (16.5%)11,579 (54.8%)6070 (28.7%)
Yes4934 (18.9%)195 (4.0%)1835 (37.2%)2904 (58.9%)
Ureteral StentNo25,436 (97.6%)3655 (14.4%)13,125 (51.6%)8656 (34.0%)
Yes636 (2.4%)29 (4.6%)289 (45.4%)318 (50.0%)
EnterolysisNo24,110 (92.5%)3488 (14.5%)12,518 (51.9%)8104 (33.6%)
Yes1962 (7.5%)196 (10.0%)896 (45.7%)870 (44.3%)
IleostomyNo25,787 (98.9%)3676 (14.3%)13,357 (51.8%)8754 (33.9%)
Yes285 (1.1%)8 (2.8%)57 (20.0%)220 (77.2%)
Bowel ResectionNo25,535 (97.9%)3670 (14.4%)13,231 (51.8%)8634 (33.8%)
Yes537 (2.1%)14 (2.6%)183 (34.1%)340 (63.3%)
CholecystectomyNo25,611 (98.2%)3652 (14.3%)13,212 (51.6%)8747 (34.2%)
Yes461 (1.8%)32 (6.9%)202 (43.8%)227 (49.2%)
Abscess RequiringNo26,050 (99.9%)3684 (14.1%)13,411 (51.5%)8955 (34.4%)
DrainageYes22 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)3 (13.6%)19 (86.4%)
Total Abdominal
Hysterectomy
No25,983 (99.7%)3679 (14.2%)13,375 (51.5%)8929 (34.4%)
Yes89 (0.3%)5 (5.6%)39 (43.8%)45 (50.6%)
UreterolysisNo26,028 (99.8%)3682 (14.1%)13,398 (51.5%)8948 (34.4%)
Yes44 (0.2%)2 (4.5%)16 (36.4%)26 (59.1%)
HepatectomyNo25,861 (99.2%)3678 (14.2%)13,344 (51.6%)8839 (34.2%)
Yes211 (0.8%)6 (2.8%)70 (33.2%)135 (64.0%)
Sum RVUs Remaining
Additional Procedures, Mean (SD)
4.0 (11.0)1.6 (5.2)2.9 (8.2)6.6 (15.2)
Wound InfectionNo25,836 (99.1%)3677 (14.2%)13,333 (51.6%)8826 (34.2%)
Yes236 (0.9%)7 (3.0%)81 (34.3%)148 (62.7%)
Wound ClassClean/23,928 (91.8%)3520 (14.7%)12,563 (52.5%)7845 (32.8%)
Contaminated
Contaminated1575 (6.0%)138 (8.8%)687 (43.6%)750 (47.6%)
Dirty/Infected569 (2.2%)26 (4.6%)164 (28.8%)379 (66.6%)
Anastomotic LeakNo25,373 (97.3%)3637 (14.3%)13,229 (52.1%)8507 (33.5%)
Yes643 (2.5%)43 (6.7%)153 (23.8%)447 (69.5%)
Unknown56 (0.2%)4 (7.1%)32 (57.1%)20 (35.7%)
Deep Incisional Surgical Site InfectionNo25,924 (99.4%)3675 (14.2%)13,377 (51.6%)8872 (34.2%)
Yes148 (0.6%)9 (6.1%)37 (25.0%)102 (68.9%)
Organ Space Surgical Site InfectionNo25,159 (96.5%)3635 (14.4%)13,193 (52.4%)8331 (33.1%)
Yes913 (3.5%)49 (5.4%)221 (24.2%)643 (70.4%)
PneumoniaNo25,543 (98.0%)3676 (14.4%)13,352 (52.3%)8515 (33.3%)
Yes529 (2.0%)8 (1.5%)62 (11.7%)459 (86.8%)
Urinary Tract InfectionNo25,639 (98.3%)3662 (14.3%)13,284 (51.8%)8693 (33.9%)
Yes433 (1.7%)22 (5.1%)130 (30.0%)281 (64.9%)
DVT/ ThrombophlebitisNo25,744 (98.7%)3668 (14.2%)13,317 (51.7%)8759 (34.0%)
Yes328 (1.3%)16 (4.9%)97 (29.6%)215 (65.5%)
The Early Discharge cohort included patients discharged on postoperative day 0–2, the Standard Discharge cohort included patients discharged on postoperative day 3–5, and the Late Discharge cohort included patients discharged on postoperative day ≥6. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; RVU, relative value unit; SD, standard deviation.
Table 2. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model of risk factors associated with Early Discharge (POD 0–2).
Table 2. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model of risk factors associated with Early Discharge (POD 0–2).
Factor Odds Ratio95% CIp Value
Age, 1-year increase 0.9720.970, 0.974<0.0001
SexMale vs. Female0.8870.843, 0.932<0.0001
RaceBlack vs. White0.7280.671, 0.791<0.0001
Other vs. White0.8640.746, 1.0020.0534
Unknown/Not Reported vs. White0.6640.620, 0.712<0.0001
Smoking statusYes vs. No0.8590.794, 0.9280.0001
DiabetesYes vs. No0.9340.877, 0.9960.0367
DyspneaAt Rest vs. No0.8470.592, 1.2130.3661
Moderate Exertion vs. No0.8310.763, 0.906<0.0001
History of Severe COPDYes vs. No0.6500.581, 0.727<0.0001
CHF (30 Days Before Surgery)Yes vs. No0.6230.505, 0.769<0.0001
AscitesYes vs. No0.3460.239, 0.499<0.0001
Currently on Dialysis
(Pre-Operative)
Yes vs. No0.4890.355, 0.673<0.0001
Disseminated CancerYes vs. No0.7290.667, 0.797<0.0001
Pre-Operative Weight Loss
(>10% in Last 6 Months)
Yes vs. No0.8020.716, 0.8980.0001
Bleeding DisorderYes vs. No0.6610.580, 0.754<0.0001
Pre-Operative SepsisYes vs. No0.3680.304, 0.446<0.0001
SteroidYes vs. No0.7330.643, 0.837<0.0001
Functional StatusPartially Dependent vs.
Independent
0.4340.366, 0.513<0.0001
Totally Dependent vs.
Independent
0.2280.136, 0.380<0.0001
Unknown vs. Independent0.7610.502, 1.1530.1973
Year of Operation2013 vs. 20121.1991.031, 1.3960.0188
2014 vs. 20121.3351.162, 1.533<0.0001
2015 vs. 20121.4931.308, 1.704<0.0001
2016 vs. 20121.7221.513, 1.958<0.0001
2017 vs. 20122.0481.802, 2.327<0.0001
2018 vs. 20122.2832.013, 2.589<0.0001
2019 vs. 20122.5382.242, 2.873<0.0001
Surgery ApproachMIS vs. Open3.9343.672, 4.214<0.0001
MIS converted open vs. Open1.2091.087, 1.3450.0005
MIS with open assist vs. Open3.0162.802, 3.247<0.0001
Ureteral StentYes vs. No0.6690.566, 0.791<0.0001
EnterolysisYes vs. No0.8450.768, 0.9300.0006
IleostomyYes vs. No0.2860.211, 0.388<0.0001
Bowel ResectionYes vs. No0.5450.449, 0.661<0.0001
CholecystectomyYes vs No0.7140.587, 0.8670.0007
Drainage AbscessYes vs. No0.2470.061, 1.0050.0509
HepatectomyYes vs. No0.5690.417, 0.7750.0004
Sum Remaining RVUs additional procedures (one unit increase) 0.9820.979, 0.985<0.0001
Wound InfectionYes vs. No0.6010.448, 0.8080.0007
Wound ClassContaminated vs.
Clean/Contaminated
0.7190.646, 0.800<0.0001
Dirty/Infected vs.
Clean/Contaminated
0.5530.454, 0.674<0.0001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Squires, M.H.; Donahue, E.E.; Wallander, M.L.; Trufan, S.J.; Shea, R.E.; Lindholm, N.F.; Hill, J.S.; Salo, J.C. Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Non-Emergent Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 2482-2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020189

AMA Style

Squires MH, Donahue EE, Wallander ML, Trufan SJ, Shea RE, Lindholm NF, Hill JS, Salo JC. Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Non-Emergent Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis. Current Oncology. 2023; 30(2):2482-2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Squires, Malcolm H., Erin E. Donahue, Michelle L. Wallander, Sally J. Trufan, Reilly E. Shea, Nicole F. Lindholm, Joshua S. Hill, and Jonathan C. Salo. 2023. "Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Non-Emergent Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis" Current Oncology 30, no. 2: 2482-2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020189

APA Style

Squires, M. H., Donahue, E. E., Wallander, M. L., Trufan, S. J., Shea, R. E., Lindholm, N. F., Hill, J. S., & Salo, J. C. (2023). Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Non-Emergent Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis. Current Oncology, 30(2), 2482-2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020189

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop