Next Article in Journal
A Canadian Perspective on the Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Previous Article in Journal
Treatments for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Multiple Options for Precision Medicine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 29
Issue 10
10.3390/curroncol29100559
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Psychoneurological Symptoms and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis

by
Angelina M. M. Santoso
1,2,
Femke Jansen
2,3,*,
Carel F. W. Peeters
4,5,
Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong
6,
Ruud H. Brakenhoff
2,3,
Johannes A. Langendijk
7,
C. René Leemans
2,3,
Robert P. Takes
8,
Chris H. J. Terhaard
9,
Annemieke van Straten
1 and
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
1,2,3
1
Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences & Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Cancer Center Amsterdam Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5
Mathematical & Statistical Methods Group (Biometris), Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
6
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
7
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
8
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
9
Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(10), 7109-7121; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100559
Submission received: 21 August 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 24 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Psychoneurological symptoms are commonly reported by newly diagnosed head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, yet there is limited research on the associations of these symptoms with biomarkers of stress and inflammation. In this article, pre-treatment data of a multi-center cohort of HNC patients were analyzed using a network analysis to examine connections between symptoms (poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and oral pain), biomarkers of stress (diurnal cortisol slope), inflammation markers (c-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α]), and covariates (age and body mass index [BMI]). Three centrality indices were calculated: degree (number of connections), closeness (proximity of a variable to other variables), and betweenness (based on the number of times a variable is located on the shortest path between any pair of other variables). In a sample of 264 patients, poor sleep quality and fatigue had the highest degree index; fatigue and CRP had the highest closeness index; and IL-6 had the highest betweenness index. The model yielded two clusters: a symptoms—cortisol slope—CRP cluster and a IL-6—IL-10—TNF-α—age—BMI cluster. Both clusters were connected most prominently via IL-6. Our findings provide evidence that poor sleep quality, fatigue, CRP, and IL-6 play an important role in the interconnections between psychoneurological symptoms and biomarkers of stress and inflammation in newly diagnosed HNC patients.

1. Introduction

Head and neck cancers (HNC) include a range of cancers located in the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and salivary glands. Every year, more than 550,000 people in the world are newly diagnosed with HNC [1]. The period between diagnosis of HNC and the start of treatment is often stressful. Patients usually present to the healthcare facilities with orofacial pain, swallowing problems, neck lump, hoarseness, or weight loss [2]. Besides dealing with cancer symptoms and multiple diagnostic procedures, HNC patients are often anxious about the disease prognosis and effect of cancer treatment on their daily life [3]. Newly diagnosed HNC patients often report not only pain (especially in the mouth and neck area) [4] but also poor sleep quality [5], psychological distress [6], and fatigue [7]. These symptoms often co-occur in cancer patients, and they are often referred to as ‘psychoneurological symptoms’ [8,9].
It is hypothesized that psychoneurological symptoms are related to biomarkers of stress and inflammation. Cortisol, a stress-related hormone produced in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, plays an important role in the regulation of metabolism, the cardiovascular system, and the inflammation response [10]. Under normal circumstances, the concentration of cortisol follows a diurnal rhythm: it is high at wakening, increases rapidly until it peaks within 30–45 min after awakening, and then decreases steadily towards its lowest level around midnight [11]. This normal fluctuation is found to be altered upon stress, e.g., in the presence of psychoneurological symptoms: the cortisol peak either shifts to a later timepoint or completely disappears, showing a blunted or flatter diurnal cortisol slope [12]. Such diurnal rhythm disruption (i.e., flatter diurnal cortisol slope) was found to be associated with higher inflammatory markers [13]. Higher inflammation is hypothesized to promote HNC progression by stimulating cancer proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis [14].
Previous studies in newly diagnosed lung, ovarian, and colorectal cancer patients suggested associations between: (1) worse sleep quality and a flatter cortisol slope [15] and (2) worse psychoneurological symptoms (i.e., poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and fatigue) and a higher level of inflammation markers [16,17,18]. In newly diagnosed HNC patients specifically, significant associations were demonstrated between fatigue and higher levels of the inflammation markers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and c-reactive protein (CRP) [19], and between pain and a higher level of CRP [20]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated associations between psychoneurological symptoms, cortisol, and inflammatory markers altogether in newly diagnosed HNC patients. This information is needed to understand the pathophysiology of psychoneurological symptoms in newly diagnosed HNC patients and, eventually, to design a better strategy for monitoring and intervention of these symptoms.
Psychoneurological symptoms and biomarkers of stress and inflammation may influence each other by providing positive or negative feedback [21,22]. Hypothetically, the association between two specific elements (i.e., a specific symptom or a biomarker) may also be influenced by their associations with the other remaining elements. Network analysis takes this complexity into account, and it is used increasingly in mental health research [23]. Therefore, we used this novel approach to examine the associations between psychoneurological symptoms (poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and oral pain), and biomarkers of stress (a diurnal cortisol slope) and inflammation (CRP, IL-6, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)) among newly diagnosed HNC patients. Based on the available literature, we expected positive connections between psychoneurological symptoms and inflammation markers (i.e., worse symptoms are associated with higher inflammation markers) [16,17,18,19,20], and negative connections between the cortisol slope with psychoneurological symptoms and inflammation markers (i.e., a flatter cortisol slope is associated with worse psychological symptoms and with higher inflammation markers) [13,15].

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Baseline data from the ongoing NETherlands Quality of Life and Biomedical Cohort study in head and neck cancer (NET-QUBIC) were used [24]. From March 2014 to June 2018, all HNC patients who were newly diagnosed at 5 university hospitals and 3 satellite hospitals were assessed for their eligibility to participate in the study. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam (2013.301(A2018.307)-NL45051.029.13).
Descriptive characteristics were obtained as follows. Sex, age, and clinical characteristics (HNC subsite, HNC stage, performance status, and comorbidity) were obtained from electronic medical records. Education level and living situation were obtained from interviews or questionnaires. Smoking status (smoking daily at baseline) and excessive alcohol consumption (>14 units of alcohol per week for women or >21 units of alcohol per week for men) were self-reported using a study-specific questionnaire. BMI was calculated based on height and weight (weight (kg)/height (m)), which were measured using a standardized procedure during a home visit. Among these characteristics, two continuous variables were included in the network model as covariates as they were associated with higher inflammatory markers, namely, age [25] and BMI [26].

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of NET-QUBIC Study

Inclusion criteria were: 18 years of age or older; diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx, or neck lymph node metastasis of an unknown primary tumor; intention of curative treatment; and the ability to write, read, and speak Dutch. Exclusion criteria included severe psychiatric comorbidity (e.g., schizophrenia, Korsakoff’s syndrome, severe dementia), as participation in the study was thought to be too burdensome. In addition, patients with less prevalent types of HNC (i.e., lymphoma, thyroid cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, malignancy of skin, or malignancy of salivary glands) were excluded from the study.

2.3. Measures

NET-QUBIC encompasses measurements at baseline (before start of treatment) and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of follow-up. In this study, we used only the baseline measurements.
Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) [27]. Its validity and reliability have been confirmed in cancer patients [28]. PSQI covers seven domains of sleep quality and disturbances [27], with each domain score ranging from 0 to 3. The PSQI total score ranges from 0 to 21; a higher score indicates poorer sleep quality.
Psychological distress, i.e., depression and anxiety symptoms, was assessed using the 14-item hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) [29]. The anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscales both consist of 7 items, each ranging from 0 to 3. The sum score of each subscale ranges from 0 to 21; a higher score indicates a higher extent of depression or anxiety symptoms. The HADS was demonstrated to have good psychometric properties in measuring anxiety and depression among cancer patients [30].
Pain was measured using the oral pain subscale of the European organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire, HNC specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) [31]. This subscale consists of 4 items about whether the patient has had pain in the mouth, jaw, or throat, or soreness in the mouth (further referred to as oral pain). The subscale score ranges from 0 to100; a higher score indicates a worse extent of oral pain [32].
Fatigue was measured using the general fatigue scale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) [33]. This scale consists of four items, wherein each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding a summary score that ranges from 4 (least fatigued) to 20 (most fatigued). This scale has good psychometric properties in measuring fatigue among cancer patients [33].
Saliva collection and cortisol measurement were performed as follows. Patients were instructed to collect saliva at four time points: at awakening, 30 min after awakening, 60 min after awakening, and at 22:00. Patients were given 4 salivette tubes (one for each saliva sample) and were instructed to note the exact time of saliva collection. All samples were collected at home by the patients after a thorough explanation by a trained fieldworker (along with a written guideline) and sent by mail to the coordinating research center (Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc). Upon receipt, the samples were immediately centrifuged, transferred to storage vials, and stored at −20 °C. Saliva cortisol concentrations were measured at the Endocrine Laboratory of the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, with the use of an isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS method. In short, the internal standard (13C3-labeled cortisol, Isosciences) was added to the samples. Samples were extracted by supported liquid extraction (Biotage) and analysed on a LC-MS/MS (Xevo TQ-S Micro LC-MS-MS System, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The lower limit of quantitation was 1.0 nmol/L. The intra-assay variation was 5% and 3% at the cortisol concentrations of 2 and 15 nmol/L, respectively. The inter-assay variation was <9% over the whole concentration range. The diurnal cortisol slope was calculated by substracting the cortisol level at 22:00 from the cortisol level at awakening, divided by the duration (in hours) between these two time-points [34]. A higher value of slope means a steeper decline of cortisol, a lower value of slope means a slower decline, and a negative slope indicates an increasing cortisol level during the day.
Inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α) were measured from venous blood samples collected by a research nurse or trained fieldworker. For CRP, blood was collected in a heparine-gel tube. CRP was immediately determined in the laboratories of the participating hospitals according to standard laboratory protocol. For cytokines IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α, blood was collected in a tube for serum collection with a clot activator. The serum samples were preprocessed according to the standard laboratory protocol and stored at the NET-QUBIC biobank (AmsterdamUMC, location VUmc) at −80 °C until the day of the assay. Cytokines were measured by the laboratory of Clinical Chemistry at AmsterdamUMC, location VUmc, in 500 µL aliquots. Each sample was analyzed using an ELISA-based technology that uses electrochemiluminescence for detection with Meso Scale Discovery Quickplex SQ 120 Imager (cat. # K15049-Series, Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD, USA). The intraassay variations were 4.7% (IL-6), 4.0% (IL-10), and 3.7% (TNF-α) and the interassay variations were 7.9% (IL-6), 5.5% (IL-10), and 8.0% (TNF-α).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, smoking and alcohol use, psychoneurological symptoms, and biomarkers were compared between patients with complete vs. incomplete data: a chi-square test was used for categorical variables, an unpaired t-test for normally distributed continuous variables, and a Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variable. Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05. We adjusted for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) [35].
An undirected network model was used to examine the connections between poor sleep quality, symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, oral pain, fatigue, biomarkers (cortisol slope, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α), and covariates (age and BMI). Only participants with complete data for these 12 variables were included in the analyses (i.e., using a listwise approach). The network was estimated using R package Rags2Ridges version 2.2.3 [36]. First, skewed distributions were normalized by nonparanormal transformations using the huge.npn function from the huge package. Network extraction was then based on targeted ridge estimation of the partial correlation matrix [37]. The resulting partial correlation matrix was sparsified by thresholding, choosing an absolute value ≥ 0.1 as the cut-off value. The resulting networks were conditional independence graphs. In such graphs, the nodes represent the variables (i.e., symptoms, biomarkers, and covariates), and the connections between node-pairs represent a substantive partial correlation, i.e., an association that cannot be conditioned away by the remaining nodes (given the chosen threshold). The network of conditional associations was visualized using the Fruchterman-Reingold approach, which locates highly associated nodes closer to each other [38]. To gain insight into the structural importance of the nodes in the network, we calculated three centrality indices, namely the “degree” (the number of connections for a node), “closeness” (average proximity of a node to all other nodes), and “betweenness” (based on the number of times a node is located on the shortest path between any pair of the other nodes) [39]. Finally, we examined the clustering of nodes (i.e., variables which are closer to each other) using the edge-betweenness approach, also known as shortest-path betweenness [40].

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

Given the large scope of the study measurements, at baseline, the newly diagnosed NET-QUBIC participants were given the possibility to participate only in certain components of the assessment (i.e., questionnaires, home-based tests, self-collected saliva, and/or blood collection). In this study, using 12 variables of interest, missing values ranged from one variable (in 141 patients) to 11 variables (in 20 patients). The most missing values were found for cortisol slope (46%), sleep quality (24%), fatigue (24%), BMI (23%), anxiety (19%), and depression (19%). Among all 739 patients included in the NET-QUBIC study, 264 patients (36%) had complete data on all twelve variables of interest and were included in the network analysis.
Table 1 provides an overview of characteristics of patients with complete (n = 264) vs. those with incomplete data (n = 475). Patients with complete data were older (mean age 65 years (SD = 8.2) vs. 62 years (SD = 10.4), adjusted p = 0.007), more often lived together with family or relatives (81.4% vs. 70.1%, adjusted p = 0.007), and were less fatigued (median = 9.0 (5.0–13.0) vs. 11.5 (6.0–14.0), adjusted p = 0.007). No statistically significant difference was found for clinical characteristics, biomarkers, daily smoking status, and excessive alcohol consumption.

3.2. Network Analysis

Figure 1 depicts the network of partial correlations between psychoneurological symptoms, biomarkers, and covariates (age and BMI). Solid edges represent positive partial correlations and dashed edges represent negative partial correlations. All edges were positive (indicating that higher levels of symptoms, inflammation markers, or covariates were associated with higher levels of other symptoms, inflammation markers, or covariates), except for the edge between poor sleep quality and the cortisol slope. A higher PSQI total score (poorer sleep quality) was connected with a lower value of cortisol slope (flatter slope).
Centrality indices of all nodes are displayed in Table 2. Based on the three centrality indices (degree, closeness, and betweenness), four nodes had the most important position in the network: fatigue (highest degree and closeness), poor sleep quality (highest degree), CRP (highest closeness), and IL-6 (highest betweenness). Poor sleep quality and fatigue were connected with the most number of nodes (i.e., highest degree): each had 5 connections with other nodes. Fatigue and CRP had the highest closeness index, which means that changes in fatigue or CRP will quickly result in changes of any other node in the network, or vice versa. IL-6 had the highest betweenness, which means that IL-6 is most often an intermediate node on the shortest paths between any pair of nodes. Hence, from the viewpoint of information flow, IL-6 is an important node.
Two clusters were identified in the community analysis (Figure 2). The first cluster consisted of all patient-reported psychoneurological symptoms (poor sleep quality, depression, anxiety, fatigue, and oral pain) together with an inflammation marker (CRP) and stress marker (the cortisol slope). The second cluster consisted of the other three inflammation markers (IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α) and the two covariates (age and BMI). Based on its highest betweenness index, IL-6 was the most important node connecting the two clusters.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to use a network analysis to examine associations between psychoneurological symptoms and biomarkers of stress and inflammation in newly diagnosed HNC patients. All psychoneurological symptoms in our network model were connected with each other as well as with biomarkers in the expected directions: worse symptoms were associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers and a flattened cortisol slope. Two clusters were identified in our network model: all psychoneurological symptoms—cortisol slope—CRP cluster, and the inflammation cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TNF-a)—age—BMI cluster. Poor sleep quality, fatigue, CRP, and IL-6 were the most central nodes in the network based on the centrality indices.
The central position of poor sleep quality and fatigue among other psychoneurological symptoms suggesting their importance in the network of psychoneurological symptoms and markers of stress and inflammation. Poor sleep quality may worsen fatigue, anxiety, depression, and lower pain tolerance by impairing emotional regulation [41]. As such, newly diagnosed HNC patients often suffer from anxiety, depression, fatigue, and oral pain, which may disrupt their sleep quality [42]. Fatigue has also been demonstrated both as a cause [43] as well as a consequence [44] of psychological distress and pain in cancer patients. Future study using time-series data is needed to gain more insight on the dynamics of these central symptoms in the network model over time.
Based on our network model, IL-6 appeared to be the most important node connecting other non-adjacent nodes, as well as the most important node in terms of the information flow between the two clusters. A previous study hypothesized that IL-6 was produced not only by tumor cells to induce HNC proliferation but also by host cells (e.g., endothelial cells, stromal cells, immune cells) as a response to tumor growth [45]. Furthermore, an accumulative increase of IL-6 induces the release of CRP in a larger quantity, a marker of ongoing systemic inflammation [46]. In accordance with a previous study in newly diagnosed HNC patients [19], we also found that higher CRP levels is also associated with worse pain and fatigue.
In this study, the association between stress biomarkers and psychoneurological symptoms seemed to take place particularly through the connection of a flatter cortisol slope with poor sleep quality. In contrast with earlier findings in general adult population [13], our network model did not indicate a connection between the cortisol slope and inflammatory cytokines. This finding may be explained by a decreased sensitivity of immune cells towards cortisol (i.e., cortisol resistance) upon systemic inflammation [47], which is hypothesized to play a key role in cancer pathogenesis [48]. A study in HNC patients before and 1 month after treatment found that increasing inflammation and fatigue was associated with increasing cortisol resistance over time, but this study did not include poor sleep quality in their analysis [49]. Nonetheless, our findings may suggest that poor sleep quality plays an important role in the association between HPA-axis disruption, higher inflammation, and psychoneurological symptoms through several pathways. First, poor sleep quality and a flattened cortisol slope may aggravate each other. Second, the cortisol-resistant immune cells may sustain their inflammatory state by ignoring anti-inflammatory cues from cortisol. Both prolonged poor sleep quality and sustained inflammation may lead to more fatigue and the eventual worsening of the other psychoneurological symptoms. This hypothesis has yet to be tested.
A strength of this study was that we examined associations between psychoneurological symptoms, cortisol diurnal slope, and inflammation markers by network analysis using a large study cohort of newly diagnosed HNC patients. Our findings also need to be interpreted with caution. First, as we analyzed only patients with complete data, our findings may not be fully representative of the HNC patients that did not have complete data (those who were younger, lived alone, and were more fatigued). Second, we measured inflammatory marker levels in blood at one time point of the day, and these levels may vary throughout the day. However, collecting blood samples multiple times in a day may be too burdensome for the patients. To deal with this issue, future investigations may consider using serial saliva samples to measure inflammatory markers [50]. Third, we only measured IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α as they were the most frequently studied markers, and we did not measure the concentration of other cytokines. A further study including other inflammatory cytokines is needed for deeper insight on the inflammatory process in the network. Fourth, we did not control for different subgroups of HNC patients, for example, based on HNC location or stage. Future study is needed to examine whether the network of psychoneurological symptoms, the cortisol diurnal slope, and inflammation differ among these sub-populations.

5. Conclusions

We aimed to investigate the associations of poor sleep quality, depression, anxiety, fatigue, oral pain, and biomarkers of stress and inflammation in newly diagnosed HNC patients. Using network analysis, we found evidence that poor sleep quality, fatigue, CRP, and IL-6 were the most important variables in these complex interconnections. Our findings may assist future studies in disentangling the role of inflammation and psychoneurological symptoms in the progression of HNC-related outcomes over time.

Author Contributions

A.M.M.S. contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review & editing. F.J. contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—review & editing. C.F.W.P. contributed to the formal analysis, methodology, software, visualization, and writing—review & editing. R.J.B.d.J., R.H.B., J.A.L., C.R.L., R.P.T. and C.H.J.T. contributed in the data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—review & editing. A.v.S. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and writing—review & editing. I.M.V.-d.L. contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was carried out using the research infrastructure within the NETherlands Quality of life and Biomedical Cohort study in the head and neck cancer (NET-QUBIC) project funded by the Dutch Cancer Society/Alpe d’Huzes (grant number VU-2013-5930). The funding body had no role in the study design, the data collection, analysis, and interpretation, nor the manuscript preparation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam (2013.301(A2018.307)-NL45051.029.13).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this article is regulated by the NET-QUBIC project. Any inquiries to access the data can be directed to the NET-QUBIC project. Please refer to NET-QUBIC website (www.kubusproject.nl) detailed information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BMI: body mass index; CRP: c-reactive protein; ECOG: Eastern cooperative oncology group; EORTC QLQ-H&N35: European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire—HNC-specific module; HADS: hospital anxiety and depression scale; HADS-A: hospital anxiety and depression scale, anxiety subscale; HADS-D: hospital anxiety and depression scale, depression subscale; HNC: head and neck cancer; HPA: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; IL: interleukin; IQR: interquartile range; MFI: multidimensional fatigue inventory; NET-QUBIC: the Netherlands quality of life and biomedical cohort; PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index; SD: standard deviation; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha.

References

  1. Gupta, B.; Johnson, N.W.; Kumar, N. Global epidemiology of head and neck cancers: A continuing challenge. Oncology 2016, 91, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alho, O.-P.; Teppo, H.; Mäntyselkä, P.; Kantola, S. Head and neck cancer in primary care: Presenting symptoms and the effect of delayed diagnosis of cancer cases. CMAJ 2006, 174, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moore, K.; Ford, P.; Farah, C. “I have quality of life… but…”: Exploring support needs important to quality of life in head and neck cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2014, 18, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Macfarlane, T.V.; Wirth, T.; Ranasinghe, S.; Ah-See, K.W.; Renny, N.; Hurman, D. Head and neck cancer pain: Systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2012, 3, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Santoso, A.M.; Jansen, F.; Lissenberg-Witte, B.I.; de Jong, R.J.B.; Langendijk, J.A.; Leemans, C.R.; Smit, J.H.; Takes, R.P.; Terhaard, C.H.; van Straten, A. Poor sleep quality among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients: Prevalence and associated factors. Support. Care Cancer 2021, 29, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haisfield-Wolfe, M.E.; McGuire, D.B.; Soeken, K.; Geiger-Brown, J.; De Forge, B.R. Prevalence and correlates of depression among patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review of implications for research. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2009, 36, E107–E125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nautiyal, V.; Lal, P.; Verma, M.; Yadav, R.; Singh, N.; Kumar, S. Evaluation of fatigue in head and neck cancer patients undergoing (intensity modulated radiation therapy) radiotherapy: A prospective study. Asian J. Oncol. 2015, 1, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. So, W.K.; Law, B.M.; Ng, M.S.; He, X.; Chan, D.N.; Chan, C.W.; McCarthy, A.L. Symptom clusters experienced by breast cancer patients at various treatment stages: A systematic review. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 2531–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tometich, D.B.; Small, B.J.; Carroll, J.E.; Zhai, W.; Luta, G.; Zhou, X.; Kobayashi, L.C.; Ahles, T.; Saykin, A.J.; Clapp, J.D. Pretreatment psychoneurological symptoms and their association with longitudinal cognitive function and quality of life in older breast cancer survivors. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2019, 57, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dickerson, S.S.; Kemeny, M.E. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol. Bull. 2004, 130, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Buckley, T.M.; Schatzberg, A.F. On the interactions of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sleep: Normal HPA axis activity and circadian rhythm, exemplary sleep disorders. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 3106–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adam, E.K.; Quinn, M.E.; Tavernier, R.; McQuillan, M.T.; Dahlke, K.A.; Gilbert, K.E. Diurnal cortisol slopes and mental and physical health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017, 83, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Knight, E.L.; Jiang, Y.; Rodriguez-Stanley, J.; Almeida, D.M.; Engeland, C.G.; Zilioli, S. Perceived stress is linked to heightened biomarkers of inflammation via diurnal cortisol in a national sample of adults. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 93, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Solomon, I.; Voiculescu, V.M.; Caruntu, C.; Lupu, M.; Popa, A.; Ilie, M.A.; Albulescu, R.; Caruntu, A.; Tanase, C.; Constantin, C. Neuroendocrine factors and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An affair to remember. Dis. Markers 2018, 2018, 9787831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chang, W.-P.; Lin, C.-C. Relationships of salivary cortisol and melatonin rhythms to sleep quality, emotion, and fatigue levels in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2017, 29, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Clevenger, L.; Schrepf, A.; Christensen, D.; DeGeest, K.; Bender, D.; Ahmed, A.; Goodheart, M.J.; Penedo, F.; Lubaroff, D.M.; Sood, A.K. Sleep disturbance, cytokines, and fatigue in women with ovarian cancer. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012, 26, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Himbert, C.; Ose, J.; Lin, T.; Warby, C.A.; Gigic, B.; Steindorf, K.; Schrotz-King, P.; Abbenhardt-Martin, C.; Zielske, L.; Boehm, J. Inflammation-and angiogenesis-related biomarkers are correlated with cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer patients: Results from the ColoCare Study. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2019, 28, e13055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Miranda, D.O.; Anatriello, E.; Azevedo, L.R.; Cordeiro, J.F.; Peria, F.M.; Flória-Santos, M.; Pereira-da-Silva, G. Elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines potentially correlate with depression and anxiety in colorectal cancer patients in different stages of the antitumor therapy. Cytokine 2018, 104, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xiao, C.; Beitler, J.J.; Higgins, K.A.; Conneely, K.; Dwivedi, B.; Felger, J.; Wommack, E.C.; Shin, D.M.; Saba, N.F.; Ong, L.Y. Fatigue is associated with inflammation in patients with head and neck cancer before and after intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 52, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oliveira, K.; von Zeidler, S.; Lamas, A.; de Podestá, J.; Sena, A.; Souza, E.; Lenzi, J.; Lemos, E.; Gouvea, S.; Bissoli, N. Relationship of inflammatory markers and pain in patients with head and neck cancer prior to anticancer therapy. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2014, 47, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shimba, A.; Ikuta, K. Immune-enhancing effects of glucocorticoids in response to day–night cycles and stress. Int. Immunol. 2020, 32, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mac Giollabhui, N. Inflammation and depression: Research designs to better understand the mechanistic relationships between depression, inflammation, cognitive dysfunction, and their shared risk factors. Brain Behav. Immun.-Health 2021, 15, 100278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Contreras, A.; Nieto, I.; Valiente, C.; Espinosa, R.; Vazquez, C. The study of psychopathology from the network analysis perspective: A systematic review. Psychother. Psychosom. 2019, 88, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Verdonck-de Leeuw, I.; Jansen, F.; Brakenhoff, R.; Langendijk, J.; Takes, R.; Terhaard, C.; de Jong, R.B.; Smit, J.; Leemans, C. Advancing interdisciplinary research in head and neck cancer through a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study: The NETherlands QUality of life and BIomedical Cohort (NET-QUBIC) data warehouse and biobank. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 765. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rea, I.M.; Gibson, D.S.; McGilligan, V.; McNerlan, S.E.; Alexander, H.D.; Ross, O.A. Age and age-related diseases: Role of inflammation triggers and cytokines. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalaoja, M.; Corbin, L.J.; Tan, V.Y.; Ahola-Olli, A.V.; Havulinna, A.S.; Santalahti, K.; Pitkänen, N.; Lehtimäki, T.; Lyytikäinen, L.P.; Raitoharju, E. The role of inflammatory cytokines as intermediates in the pathway from increased adiposity to disease. Obesity 2021, 29, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds III, C.F.; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beck, S.L.; Schwartz, A.L.; Towsley, G.; Dudley, W.; Barsevick, A. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in cancer patients. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2004, 27, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zigmond, A.S.; Snaith, R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983, 67, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vodermaier, A.; Linden, W.; Siu, C. Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: A systematic review of assessment instruments. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009, 101, 1464–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aaronson, N.K.; Ahmedzai, S.; Bergman, B.; Bullinger, M.; Cull, A.; Duez, N.J.; Filiberti, A.; Flechtner, H.; Fleishman, S.B.; de Haes, J.C. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fayers, P.; Aaronson, N.K.; Bjordal, K.; Sullivan, M. EORTC QLQ–C30 Scoring Manual; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Brussels, Belgium, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  33. Smets, E.; Garssen, B.; Bonke, B.d.; De Haes, J. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J. Psychosom. Res. 1995, 39, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adam, E.K.; Kumari, M. Assessing salivary cortisol in large-scale, epidemiological research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34, 1423–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peeters, C.F.; Bilgrau, A.E.; van Wieringen, W.N. rags2ridges: A One-Stop-Shop for Graphical Modeling of High-Dimensional Precision Matrices. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.05619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van Wieringen, W.N.; Peeters, C.F. Ridge estimation of inverse covariance matrices from high-dimensional data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2016, 103, 284–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fruchterman, T.M.; Reingold, E.M. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exp. 1991, 21, 1129–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Epskamp, S.; Borsboom, D.; Fried, E.I. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behav. Res. Methods 2018, 50, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Newman, M.E.; Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 69, 026113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pace-Schott, E.F.; Germain, A.; Milad, M.R. Effects of sleep on memory for conditioned fear and fear extinction. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 141, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McQuestion, M.; Fitch, M. Patients’ experience of receiving radiation treatment for head and neck cancer: Before, during and after treatment. Can. Oncol. Nurs. J. 2016, 26, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Recine, T.S. Contributions of Fatigue, Pain, and Functional Limitation to Future Depression in Cancer Survivors. Ph.D. Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stepanski, E.J.; Walker, M.S.; Schwartzberg, L.S.; Blakely, L.J.; Ong, J.C.; Houts, A.C. The relation of trouble sleeping, depressed mood, pain, and fatigue in patients with cancer. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2009, 5, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Choudhary, M.M.; France, T.J.; Teknos, T.N.; Kumar, P. Interleukin-6 role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression. World J. Otorhinolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2016, 2, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kishimoto, T. Interleukin-6: Discovery of a pleiotropic cytokine. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Silverman, M.N.; Sternberg, E.M. Glucocorticoid regulation of inflammation and its behavioral and metabolic correlates: From HPA axis to glucocorticoid receptor dysfunction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1261, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Multhoff, G.; Molls, M.; Radons, J. Chronic inflammation in cancer development. Front. Immunol. 2012, 2, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiao, C.; Eldridge, R.C.; Beitler, J.J.; Higgins, K.A.; Chico, C.E.; Felger, J.C.; Wommack, E.C.; Knobf, T.; Saba, N.F.; Shin, D.M. Association Among Glucocorticoid Receptor Sensitivity, Fatigue, and Inflammation in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Psychosom. Med. 2020, 82, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szabo, Y.Z.; Slavish, D.C. Measuring salivary markers of inflammation in health research: A review of methodological considerations and best practices. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020, 124, 105069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Curroncol 29 00559 g001 550
Figure 1. Network displaying the partial correlations between all symptoms (in purple), biomarkers (in salmon orange), and covariates (in green); N = 264. Solid edges represent positive partial correlations, dashed edges represent negative partial correlations. The anxiety label indicates the HADS anxiety subscale score; depression, HADS depression subscale score; fatigue, MFI general fatigue score; oral pain, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 oral pain subscale score; sleep, PSQI total score; and cortisol, the diurnal cortisol slope. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 1. Network displaying the partial correlations between all symptoms (in purple), biomarkers (in salmon orange), and covariates (in green); N = 264. Solid edges represent positive partial correlations, dashed edges represent negative partial correlations. The anxiety label indicates the HADS anxiety subscale score; depression, HADS depression subscale score; fatigue, MFI general fatigue score; oral pain, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 oral pain subscale score; sleep, PSQI total score; and cortisol, the diurnal cortisol slope. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Curroncol 29 00559 g001
Curroncol 29 00559 g002 550
Figure 2. Visualization of the community structure between all symptoms, biomarkers, and covariates, using the edge-betweenness approach (N = 264). Solid edges represent positive partial correlations, dashed edges represent negative partial correlations. The two clusters are represented by different colored area (red and blue). The anxiety label indicates a HADS anxiety subscale score; depression, HADS depression subscale score; fatigue, MFI general fatigue score; oral pain, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 oral pain subscale score; sleep, PSQI total score; cortisol, the diurnal cortisol slope. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 2. Visualization of the community structure between all symptoms, biomarkers, and covariates, using the edge-betweenness approach (N = 264). Solid edges represent positive partial correlations, dashed edges represent negative partial correlations. The two clusters are represented by different colored area (red and blue). The anxiety label indicates a HADS anxiety subscale score; depression, HADS depression subscale score; fatigue, MFI general fatigue score; oral pain, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 oral pain subscale score; sleep, PSQI total score; cortisol, the diurnal cortisol slope. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Curroncol 29 00559 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with complete data (the study population) vs. patients with incomplete data.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with complete data (the study population) vs. patients with incomplete data.
CharacteristicsPatients with
Complete Data		Patients with
Incomplete Data		Adjusted
p-Value a
(n = 264)(n = 475)
Age (mean, SD)65 (8.2)62 (10.4)0.007
Men, No. (%)209 (79.2%)340 (71.6%)0.112
Education level, No. (%) b
Low107 (40.5%)172 (44.8%)0.560
Middle77 (29.2%)94 (24.5%)
High80 (30.3%)118 (30.7%)
Living together, No. (%) b215 (81.4%)270 (70.1%)0.007
HNC location, No. (%)
Oral cavity64 (24.2%)135 (28.4%)0.427
Oropharynx98 (37.1%)164 (34.5%)
Hypopharynx17 (6.4%)35 (7.4%)
Larynx81 (30.7%)124 (26.1%)
Unknown primary4 (1.5%)17 (3.6%)
HNC stage, No. (%)
I67 (25.4%)96 (20.2%)0.559
II48 (18.2%)84 (17.7%)
III40 (15.2%)87 (18.3%)
IV109 (41.3%)208 (43.8%)
ECOG performance status, No. (%)
0191 (72.3%)316 (66.5%)0.238
1 or more73 (27.7%)159 (33.5%)
Comorbidity, No. (%) b
None86 (33.7%)118 (26.6%)0.427
Mild93 (36.5%)171 (38.5%)
Moderate51 (20%)104 (23.4%)
Severe25 (9.8%)51 (11.5%)
Excessive alcohol consumption, No. (%) b58 (22.0%)71 (22.8%)0.805
Smoking daily, No. (%) b57 (21.7%)70 (22.7%)0.805
BMI (kg/m2) b, mean (SD)26.1 (4.5)25.3 (4.6)0.112
Sleep (PSQI score) b, median (IQR)5.0 (3.0–7.0)5.0 (3.0–9.0)0.600
Depression (HADS-D score) b, median (IQR)3.0 (1.0–6.0)3.0 (1.0–6.0)0.791
Anxiety (HADS-A score) b, median (IQR)5.0 (3.0–7.8)5 (3.0–8.0)0.600
Oral pain (EORTC-H&N35) b, median (IQR)16.7 (8.3–33.3)25 (8.3–50.0)0.112
Fatigue (MFI general fatigue) b, median (IQR)9.0 (5.0–13.0)11.5 (6.0–14.0)0.007
Cortisol slope (nmol/L/hour) b, median (IQR)0.47 (0.25–0.78)0.48 (0.28–0.77)0.791
CRP (mg/L) b, median (IQR)2.8 (2.5–5.5)3.1 (2.4–8.0)0.238
IL-6 (pg/mL) b, median (IQR)1.03 (0.66–1.72)1.11 (0.66–1.84)0.427
IL-10 (pg/mL) b, median (IQR)0.24 (0.18–0.36)0.27 (0.19–0.40)0.222
TNF-α (pg/mL) b, median (IQR)2.72 (2.32–3.37)2.79 (2.31–3.44)0.600
a p-values were obtained from comparison statistics: chi-square test for categorical variables, t-test for normally distributed continuous variables, or Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. Corrections for multiple comparison were performed with false discovery rates approach. Statistically significant variables (in bold) were defined by p value < 0.05. b There were 91 missing values on education level, 90 on living arrangements, 40 on comorbidity score, 164 on excessive alcohol consumption, 167 on smoking, 169 on BMI, 179 on PSQI score, 142 on oral pain score, 142 on HADS-D score, 144 on HADS-A score, 177 on MFI general fatigue score, 340 on cortisol slope, and 93 on each inflammation marker (CRP, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; HADS-A, the hospital anxiety and depression scale—anxiety subscale; HADS-D, the hospital anxiety and depression scale—depression subscale; HNC, head and neck cancer; IL, interleukin; IQR, interquartile range; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; MFI, multidimensional fatigue inventory; SD, standard deviation; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Table
Table 2. Centrality indices of the network model.
Table 2. Centrality indices of the network model.
-DegreeBetweennessCloseness
Poor sleep quality 511.330.040
Depression symptoms49.330.045
Anxiety symptoms300.037
Oral pain33.670.042
Fatigue590.048
Cortisol slope100.028
CRP315.670.048
IL-6425.330.045
IL-10200.033
TNF-α3100.034
Age28.670.043
BMI100.026
Anxiety symptoms were measured by the HADS anxiety subscale score; depression symptoms, HADS depression subscale score; fatigue, MFI general fatigue score; oral pain, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 oral pain subscale score; poor sleep quality, PSQI total score. Centrality indices are degree (number of connections), closeness (proximity of a variable to other variables), and betweenness (based on the number of times a variable is located on the shortest path between any pair of other variables). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, c-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santoso, A.M.M.; Jansen, F.; Peeters, C.F.W.; Baatenburg de Jong, R.J.; Brakenhoff, R.H.; Langendijk, J.A.; Leemans, C.R.; Takes, R.P.; Terhaard, C.H.J.; van Straten, A.; et al. Psychoneurological Symptoms and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 7109-7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100559

AMA Style

Santoso AMM, Jansen F, Peeters CFW, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Brakenhoff RH, Langendijk JA, Leemans CR, Takes RP, Terhaard CHJ, van Straten A, et al. Psychoneurological Symptoms and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis. Current Oncology. 2022; 29(10):7109-7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santoso, Angelina M. M., Femke Jansen, Carel F. W. Peeters, Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong, Ruud H. Brakenhoff, Johannes A. Langendijk, C. René Leemans, Robert P. Takes, Chris H. J. Terhaard, Annemieke van Straten, and et al. 2022. "Psychoneurological Symptoms and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis" Current Oncology 29, no. 10: 7109-7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100559

APA Style

Santoso, A. M. M., Jansen, F., Peeters, C. F. W., Baatenburg de Jong, R. J., Brakenhoff, R. H., Langendijk, J. A., Leemans, C. R., Takes, R. P., Terhaard, C. H. J., van Straten, A., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M. (2022). Psychoneurological Symptoms and Biomarkers of Stress and Inflammation in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis. Current Oncology, 29(10), 7109-7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100559

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop