Next Article in Journal
Impact of High-Fidelity E-Learning on Knowledge Acquisition and Satisfaction in Radiation Oncology Trainees
Previous Article in Journal
Hypertension as a Predictor of Advanced Colorectal Cancer Outcome and Cetuximab Treatment Response
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Specific Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte Cryopreservation in Breast Cancer Patients

1
Women’s Health Reference Center, Hospital Perola Byington, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, University of the State of Sao Paulo, Botucatu, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(6), 527-532; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3889
Submission received: 6 September 2018 / Revised: 5 October 2018 / Accepted: 10 November 2018 / Published: 1 December 2018

Abstract

Background: Fertility preservation is an important concern in breast cancer patients. In the present investigation, we set out to create a specific protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients. Methods: From November 2014 to December 2016, 109 patients were studied. The patients were assigned to a specific random-start ovarian stimulation protocol for oocyte cryopreservation. The endpoints were the numbers of oocytes retrieved and of mature oocytes cryopreserved, the total number of days of ovarian stimulation, the total dose of gonadotropin administered, and the estradiol level on the day of the trigger. Results: Mean age in this cohort was 31.27 ± 4.23 years. The average duration of COS was 10.0 ± 1.39 days. The mean number of oocytes collected was 11.62 ± 7.96 and the mean number of vitrified oocytes was 9.60 ± 6.87. The mean estradiol concentration on triggering day was 706.30 ± 450.48 pg/mL, and the mean dose of gonadotropins administered was 2610.00 ± 716.51 IU. When comparing outcomes by phase of the cycle in which COS was commenced, we observed no significant differences in the numbers of oocytes collected and vitrified, the length of ovarian stimulation, and the estradiol level on trigger day. The total dose of follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin administered was statistically greater in the group starting COS in the luteal phase than in the group starting in the late follicular phase. Conclusions: Our results suggest that using a specific protocol with random-start ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients is effective and could be offered to young women undergoing oncologic treatment.
Keywords: fertility preservation; breast cancer; ovarian stimulation; oocyte cryopreservation fertility preservation; breast cancer; ovarian stimulation; oocyte cryopreservation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavagna, F.; Pontes, A.; Cavagna, M.; Dzik, A.; Donadio, N.F.; Portela, R.; Nagai, M.T.; Gebrim, L.H. Specific Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte Cryopreservation in Breast Cancer Patients. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 527-532. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3889

AMA Style

Cavagna F, Pontes A, Cavagna M, Dzik A, Donadio NF, Portela R, Nagai MT, Gebrim LH. Specific Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte Cryopreservation in Breast Cancer Patients. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(6):527-532. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3889

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavagna, F., A. Pontes, M. Cavagna, A. Dzik, N. F. Donadio, R. Portela, M. T. Nagai, and L.H. Gebrim. 2018. "Specific Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte Cryopreservation in Breast Cancer Patients" Current Oncology 25, no. 6: 527-532. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3889

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop