Next Article in Journal
Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Originating from Urachus—Case Report and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Value of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON
2
McGill University Health Centre, Reproductive Centre, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(1), 137-146; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1360
Submission received: 1 February 2014 / Revised: 1 February 2014 / Accepted: 1 February 2014 / Published: 1 February 2014

Abstract

Cancer can be a devastating diagnosis. In particular, malignancy and its indicated treatments have profoundly negative effects on the fertility of young cancer patients. Oncofertility has emerged as a new interdisciplinary field to address the issue of gonadotoxicity associated with cancer therapies and to facilitate fertility preservation. In Canada, these fertility issues are often inadequately addressed despite the availability of resources. The goal of this four-part series is to facilitate systemic improvements in fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult Canadians with a new diagnosis of cancer. This article reviews fertility preservation options that use cryopreservation techniques. It also outlines some of the alternative options for future parenthood. Cryopreservation of a woman’s gametes and gonadal tissue may involve embryo, oocyte, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation with or without ovarian stimulation. Similarly, male gametes and gonadal tissue may be cryopreserved. Techniques and success rates continue to improve. Third-party assistance through gamete donation, gestational carriers, and adoption are also alternative options for parenthood. Cryopreservation techniques are especially feasible options for fertility preservation in the newly diagnosed cancer patient.
Keywords: Oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adult; adolescent Oncofertility; fertility preservation; cryopreservation; gonadotoxicity; young adult; adolescent

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ronn, R.; Holzer, H.E.G. Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1360

AMA Style

Ronn R, Holzer HEG. Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(1):137-146. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ronn, R., and H.E.G. Holzer. 2014. "Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood" Current Oncology 21, no. 1: 137-146. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1360

APA Style

Ronn, R., & Holzer, H. E. G. (2014). Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood. Current Oncology, 21(1), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1360

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop