Next Article in Journal
Casting Stones and Casting Aspersions: Let’s Not Lose Sight of the Main Issues in the Euthanasia Debate
Previous Article in Journal
Risk Factors and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Facts, Questions, and Genome-Based Perspectives
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pereira’s Attack on Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: Smoke and Mirrors

1
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
2
The Research Foundation–Flanders and End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University and Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium
3
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University and Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19(3), 133-138; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.1063
Submission received: 3 March 2012 / Revised: 9 April 2012 / Accepted: 6 May 2012 / Published: 1 June 2012

Abstract

Objective: To review the empirical claims made in: Pereira J. Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls. Curr Oncol 2011;18:e38–45. Design: We collected all of the empirical claims made by Jose Pereira in “Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls.” We then collected all reference sources provided for those claims. We compared the claims with the sources (where sources were provided) and evaluated the level of support, if any, the sources provide for the claims. We also reviewed other available literature to assess the veracity of the empirical claims made in the paper. We then wrote the present paper using examples from the review. Results: Pereira makes a number of factual statements without providing any sources. Pereira also makes a number of factual statements with sources, where the sources do not, in fact, provide support for the statements he made. Pereira also makes a number of false statements about the law and practice in jurisdictions that have legalized euthanasia or assisted suicide. Conclusions: Pereira’s conclusions are not supported by the evidence he provided. His paper should not be given any credence in the public policy debate about the legal status of assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada and around the world.
Keywords: euthanasia; assisted suicide; slippery slopes; evidence; Netherlands; Belgium; Canada euthanasia; assisted suicide; slippery slopes; evidence; Netherlands; Belgium; Canada

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Downie, J.; Chambaere, K.; Bernheim, J.L. Pereira’s Attack on Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: Smoke and Mirrors. Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19, 133-138. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.1063

AMA Style

Downie J, Chambaere K, Bernheim JL. Pereira’s Attack on Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: Smoke and Mirrors. Current Oncology. 2012; 19(3):133-138. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.1063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Downie, J., K. Chambaere, and J.L. Bernheim. 2012. "Pereira’s Attack on Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: Smoke and Mirrors" Current Oncology 19, no. 3: 133-138. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.1063

APA Style

Downie, J., Chambaere, K., & Bernheim, J. L. (2012). Pereira’s Attack on Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: Smoke and Mirrors. Current Oncology, 19(3), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.1063

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop