Next Article in Journal
Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: The Illusion of Safeguards and Controls
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model

Dalhousie University Family Medicine Teaching Unit, Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, 700 Priestman Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5N5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18(2), 46-53; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.706
Submission received: 3 March 2011 / Revised: 6 March 2011 / Accepted: 12 March 2011 / Published: 1 April 2011

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer survivorship is a distinct phase of the cancer continuum, and it can have myriad associated stresses and challenges. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a positive self-talk (PST) intervention in enhancing the coping skills and improving the psychological well-being of breast cancer survivors. Methods: Participants (n = 38) were recruited from 5 support groups in a small eastern Canadian province. Support groups were randomly assigned to either a control (n = 18) or an intervention (n = 20) condition. Intervention participants were pre-tested, received a 2-hour PST in-person group workshop and a 10-minute “booster” session by telephone, and completed post-test questionnaires 1 month later. Results: Intervention participants reviewed the workshop favourably. Nearly all participants used the intervention in everyday life, were able to accurately describe how PST works, and found that PST had a considerable impact on their ability to cope with cancer and related sequelae. However, the descriptive findings from the workshop evaluation did not translate into significant differences between the intervention and control groups on the psychometric measures. Conclusions: The PST intervention, delivered in a community group model, was positively received and effective in teaching participants about PST and how PST can be used to enhance coping skills for breast cancer patients. However, the intervention did not promote significantly greater levels of change in anxiety, depression, mood disturbance, or coping ability for intervention participants. The unique challenges of community-level psychological intervention are explored.
Keywords: Cancer survivorship; coping skills; positive self-talk; community-based intervention Cancer survivorship; coping skills; positive self-talk; community-based intervention

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamilton, R.; Miedema, B.; MacIntyre, L.; Easley, J. Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model. Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.706

AMA Style

Hamilton R, Miedema B, MacIntyre L, Easley J. Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model. Current Oncology. 2011; 18(2):46-53. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamilton, Ryan, B. Miedema, L. MacIntyre, and J. Easley. 2011. "Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model" Current Oncology 18, no. 2: 46-53. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.706

APA Style

Hamilton, R., Miedema, B., MacIntyre, L., & Easley, J. (2011). Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model. Current Oncology, 18(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.706

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop