Next Article in Journal
Capecitabine or Infusional 5-fluorouracil for Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Cost–Consequence Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Using a Positive Self-Talk Intervention to Enhance Coping Skills in Breast Cancer Survivors: Lessons from a Community-Based Group Delivery Model
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis

HOPE Research Centre, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18(2), 54-63; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.605
Submission received: 3 March 2011 / Revised: 7 March 2011 / Accepted: 9 March 2011 / Published: 1 April 2011

Abstract

Introduction: Currently marketed epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIS) have been associated with high rates of dermatologic toxicity. Methods: We formally reviewed the literature at MEDLINE and EMBASE. Additional searches were conducted using Internet search engines. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled clinical trials of egfris, specifically cetuximab and panitumumab, in which at least one arm consisted of a non-egfri treatment and rash safety data were reported. The random effects method was used to pool differences in incident rash rates. Results are summarized as differences in incident rash (EGFRIS therapy rate minus the non-EGFRIS therapy rate) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIS) for all severity grades of rash and for grades 3 and 4 rash. Results: Sixteen studies met the initial inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials comparing EGFRIS with non-EGFRIS therapy. Seven publications that provided information on all severity grades of rash were found to have an overall difference in incident rash rate of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.81; p < 0.01). Thirteen studies that reported the incidence of grades 3 and 4 rash showed an overall difference in the incident rash rate of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.14; p < 0.01) between EGFRIS and non-EGFRIS therapy. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were generally robust, but sensitive to small samples. Conclusions: Results quantify the difference in rash rates between EGFRIS and non-EGFRIS therapy.
Keywords: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors; meta-analysis; rash Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors; meta-analysis; rash

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mittmann, N.; Seung, S.J. Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.605

AMA Style

Mittmann N, Seung SJ. Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis. Current Oncology. 2011; 18(2):54-63. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.605

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mittmann, Nicole, and S.J. Seung. 2011. "Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis" Current Oncology 18, no. 2: 54-63. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.605

APA Style

Mittmann, N., & Seung, S. J. (2011). Rash Rates with EGFR Inhibitors: Meta-Analysis. Current Oncology, 18(2), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i2.605

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop