A more recent epidemiologic investigation in Sweden [82] indicates that of all deaths related to a first-ever manifestation of a major coronary event, almost 80% occurred as an out-of-hospital death. Thus, there is an increasing proportion of fatal coronary events that do not reach advanced hospital care. The vast majority of myocardial infarctions (86%) is deemed to originate from haemodynamically nonobstructive CAD burden that cannot be identified with conventional stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging. In this regard, PET/CT imaging with different radiotracers may contribute in the identification of high risk coronary plaque burden prone to rupture [83]. Inflammation is assumed to play a central role in plaque rupture. Histologically, vulnerable coronary plaque burden is commonly described by a lipid rich pool, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and a thin fibrous cap [84]. Vascular inflammation can be determined noninvasively with 18F-FDG-PET/CT as it had been demonstrated first for the carotid artery by Rudd et al. [85], but also for the aorta, iliac, and femoral arteries [86]. As regards the coronary arteries, increased 18F-FDG was reported in patients with coexisting malignancy [87–89]. Following, two studies have demonstrated the feasibility of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of inflammatory plaques in coronary vessels with recent myocardial infarction [90, 91]. Yet, in 50% of patients with acute myocardial infarction no increased 18F-FDG was noted, which might suggest that non-inflammatory plaques may also be prone to rupture [90], potentially by increased activity of metalloproteinases leading to soft coronary plaque burden [92]. Such observations also emphasise the complexity of coronary plaque composition, susceptibility to rupture, and plaque metabolic imaging for risk assessment. The 18F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall as non-invasive surrogate marker for inflammation has been demonstrated to correlate with macrophage burden in the plaque [93], symptoms [85], and conventional Framingham Risk Score [94]. In particular, increases in arterial 18F-FDG-uptake in the noncoronary arteries can be attenuated with statin and dalcetrapib medication, respectively [95, 96]. As regards the assessment of 18F-FDG uptake in the coronary arteries with PET/CT, it remains an ongoing challenge as cardiac and respiratory motion and concurrent 18F-FDG in the myocardium hamper an accurate visualisation of any plaque signal [91, 97]. 64- or 128-slice CT from the cardiac PET/CT systems is commonly used to assess coronary artery calcifications (CAC) or, with intravenous contrast CT coronary morphology, respectively [7, 98]. CAC scoring, as a surrogate marker of coronary atherosclerotic burden, has been established as a powerful cardiovascular risk predictor, which is increasingly applied to enhance primary risk stratification and justification of preventive medical care of the CAD process [99, 100]. CAC may be combined with measurements of high-sensitive CRP, as a marker of systemic micro-inflammation, to improve and refine the prediction of cardiovascular risk [100]. Although measure of CAC and CT-coronary angiography provide important information on coronary morphology and risk prediction, they cannot identify active inflammation of coronary plaque burden, commonly seen as vulnerable plaque prone to rupture with its atherothrombotic sequelae. As mentioned before, measurements of 18F-FDG uptake in coronary arteries with PET/CT is still challenging [91].
Another interesting approach has been proposed more recently [101, 102] with the use of
18F-sodium fluoride (
18F-NaF) as PET radiotracer, which identifies novel regions of bone formation and remodelling. Such a diagnostic approach is assumed to identify active calcification and/or micro-calcifications as potential source of microfractures and acute thrombosis [103–105]. Dweck MR et al. [102] investigated the potential of
18F-NaF and FDG uptake in the coronary arterial wall as marker for active calcification and inflammation, respectively. In 119 volunteers with and without aortic valve disease, coronary CAC score and
18F-NaF and FDG were determined with PET/CT. In individuals with a CAC score of 0 served as control individuals as compared to those with CAC (calcium score>0). As it turned out, the
18F-NaF strongly correlated with CAC, while in 41% of individuals with CAC >1000 had no significant
18F-NaF uptake in the arterial wall. This outlines that
18F-NaF uptake signifies different information reflecting metabolically active calcific plaque and developing microcalcification.
18F-NaF uptake, therefore, may differentiate between individuals with “dormant” coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden, developed many months or years previously, and individuals with metabolically active CAD and ongoing calcification process. This is substantiated by the observation that individual with increased coronary
18F-NaF activity (n = 40) had higher rates of prior cardiovascular events (p = 0.016), angina pectoris (p = 0.023) and higher Framingham risk scores (p = 0.011) (
Figure 13). Somehow surprising, however,
18F-FDG activity was not increased in CAD individuals as compared to controls without CAC. This might suggest that
18F-FDG uptake in the coronary arterial wall is of little use in individuals with stable CAD. Someone could argue that inflammation, as reflected by increased arterial
18F-FDG uptake, is more prevalent in acute coronary syndrome than in stable CAD. The clinical observations of increases in
18F-NaF activity in the coronary arterial wall in CAD patients associated with angina symptoms, prior cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk scores may give raise to prospective investigations to assess its predictive value for future cardiovascular events in individuals with stable CAD. Subsequently, Joshi et al. [106] performed a prospective clinical trial in patients with myocardial infarction (n = 40) or stable angina pectoris (n = 40), respectively, undergoing
18F-NaF and
18F-FDG-PET/CT, and invasive coronary angiography (
Figure 14). In addition,
18F-NaF uptake was compared with histology in carotid endarterectomy specimens from patients with symptomatic carotid disease, and with intravascular ultrasound in patients with stable angina. Overall, in 93% of patients with myocardial infarction,
18F-NaF was commonly highest in the culprit lesion than in the highest nonculprit lesion (median maximum tissue-to-background ratio: 1.66 versus 1.24, p <0.0001) (
Figure 15A). Conversely, the
18F-FDG uptake in the coronary arterial wall was mostly masked, while when being differentiable no significant difference in
18F-FDG uptake between culprit and non-culprit lesion was noted (1.71 versus 1.58, p = 0.34) (
Figure 15B). Furthermore, a distinct uptake of
18F-NaF at the site of all carotid plaque ruptures was reported that was accompanied by histological features of active calcification, macrophage infiltration, apoptosis, and necrosis. In addition, focal
18F-NaF in the coronary arteries was analysed with intravascular ultrasound for morphologic correlates. In 45% patients with stable angina had plaques with focal
18F-NaF uptake that was paralleled with highrisk features such as with microcalcifications, necrotic core, and positive remodelling index, while this was not observed in patients without
18F-NaF uptake in the arterial wall. The results of the current study may be seen more or less as a “proof of principle”, while it may provide an important framework to give raise to further large-scale clinical trials addressing the
18F-NaF uptake in coronary plaque burden, as determined with PET, and its potential predictive value for cardiovascular outcome in patients with subclinical CAD. There is also first evidence that hypoxia but not inflammation alone may trigger the
18F-FDG uptake in human macrophages within the arterial plaque burden [107], which would also accord, at least in part, with previous report that could not find increases in
18F-FDG in culprit plaque burden in 50% of patients with acute myocardial infarction [90]. Hypoxia is known to play a central role in stimulating atherosclerotic burden progression by stimulation foam cell formation, metabolic adaption of infiltrated macrophages, and plaque neovascularisation [108]. Hypoxaemic conditions may activate plaque growth by signalling of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) leading to the formation of lipid droplets, the activation of a metabolic switch to anaerobic glycolysis, and increasing the secretion of proinflammatory and angiogenic mediators [109–111]. Imaging of hypoxia has been performed with PET and the radiotracer
18F-fluoromisonidazole (
18F-FMISO) in patients with ischaemic stroke [112], myocardial ischaemia [113], and various malignancies [114].
18F-FMISO is a cell-permeable 2-nitroimidazole derivative that is reduced in vivo by nitroreductases independent of the levels of intracellular oxygen. When there is a normal oxygenation environment,
18F-FMISO is rapidly reoxidised and diffuses out of the cells. Conversely, in hypoxic viable cells,
18F-FMISO is further reduced to a more reactive form that binds covalently to intracellular macromolecules and remains in the cells. In this direction, recent study evaluated the feasibility of
18F-FMISO PET imaging for in vivo detection of hypoxia in advanced lesions in a rabbit atherosclerosis model [115]. A significant
18F-FMISO accumulation in the aortas of atherosclerotic animals compared with healthy controls, and the uptake increased over time with atherogenic diet, suggesting hypoxia as a good biomarker of disease progression. In addition, the in-vivo detection of hypoxia was translated by ex-vivo PET imaging of the excised aorta that demonstrated regions of strong
18F-FMISO accumulation in atherosclerotic aortas when compared nearly absent uptake in the normal aorta. Thus, hypoxia in atherosclerotic plaque increases with disease progression and is present in macrophage-rich areas associated with neovascularisation, which can be determined noninvasively with
18F-FMISO. This novel imaging approach holds promise to further improve the cardiovascular risk prediction, which should be further tested in clinical investigations in CAD patients.