Next Article in Journal
Rapid Agrichemical Inventory via Video Documentation and Large Language Model Identification
Previous Article in Journal
From Trust to Choice: A Cross-Sectional Survey of How Patient Trust in Pharmacists Shapes Willingness and Vaccination Decision Control Preferences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review

1
Department of Global, Environmental, and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
2
STEM Library, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
3
Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital, Dhulikhel 45210, Nepal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(10), 1526; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101526
Submission received: 15 August 2025 / Revised: 8 September 2025 / Accepted: 28 September 2025 / Published: 5 October 2025

Abstract

Nepal is currently facing critical water quality challenges due to urbanization, water management and governance issues, as well as natural disasters. This has resulted in the presence of harmful contaminants (e.g., pathogens, nitrates, arsenic) across multiple water sources, subsequently leading to waterborne disease risks (e.g., cholera and typhoid). In response to these environmental and public health concerns, we conducted a scoping review to assess microbial and chemical contaminants in drinking and irrigation water in Nepal, as well as their potential impacts on public health. Following the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA-SCR guidelines, we systematically searched for peer-reviewed literature on Nepal’s water quality in seven databases. Of 3666 unique records screened using predefined inclusion criteria, 140 met our criteria. The studies encompassed a variety of methodological designs, with the majority focusing on water sources in the Bagmati province. Bacteria and arsenic emerged as the most prevalent contaminants. Additionally, diseases such as arsenicosis and typhoid remain widespread and may be linked to contaminated water sources. The review identified key gaps in Nepal’s water quality management, including limited geographic research coverage, inconsistent testing protocols, weak regulatory enforcement, and a lack of integration of water quality with public health planning. Our findings underscore the urgent need for effective surveillance systems and a robust regulatory framework to promptly respond to water contamination events in Nepal.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Clean and safe water is essential for maintaining the overall health of a community and its environment. Faced with climate variability and rapid urbanization, low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries remain vulnerable to water scarcity, including Nepal, where only a small percentage of the household population (19%) has access to safely managed drinking water [1], a number that has not improved much over the years [2]. The variable climate exacerbates these water challenges with unpredictable rainfall patterns and glacial melt, affecting the quantity of water available for drinking and irrigation purposes. For example, the Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepani Limited (KUKL) reported a daily demand of 485 million liters of water in the Kathmandu Valley [3]. In contrast, the available amount was only 175.02 million liters per day, with an average supply of 129.63 million liters per day due to a 20% loss [3].
Coupled with limited water quantity, access to high-quality, safe drinking and irrigation water sources in Nepal varies significantly. According to Nepal’s Department of Water Supply and Sewage, it is estimated that although the majority of Nepal’s population of 31.1 million [4] has access to drinking water, this water is not considered ‘safe,’ and significant differences in water quality exist between urban and rural areas [1]. For example, while 21.9% of the household population in the urban region receives safely managed drinking water, the percentage drops to only 13.3% in rural regions [1].
In addition to having limited access to safe drinking and irrigation waters, Nepal faces challenges in water quality that differ between urban and rural areas. For example, those living in densely populated areas like the Kathmandu Valley are exposed to greater anthropogenic water contamination, in contrast to those living in rural areas [5]. The rapid growth of the population in urban regions has led to an increase in solid waste production. Limited infrastructure to treat sewage, excessive use of agrochemicals and pesticides in agriculture, and unprotected springs, wells, and surface waters are the major contributors to water pollution in Nepal [6,7]. An estimated 75 tons of waste is dumped into rivers from Kathmandu’s highly populated capital city, leading to a highly contaminated drinking water supply [8,9]. Meanwhile, rural communities, especially in the Terai region, rely on tube wells for drinking water but face chemical contamination from arsenic and nitrates [10]. Other chemical contaminants, like pesticides, frequently contaminate drinking water supplies via agricultural runoff [6]. Besides chemical and heavy metal contamination, Nepal also suffers from widespread microbial contamination in drinking and irrigation water sources [11]. Waterborne diseases such as cholera and typhoid are common, especially in rural areas, with an estimated 817 children dying from diarrhea annually in Nepal [12]. Additionally, these contaminated water sources are frequently used for food crop irrigation, and when irrigated crops are ingested, these exposures could potentially lead to food-borne infections/outbreaks [11].
To address these issues, Nepal has set ambitious national targets for water and sanitation by 2030 [13], including 99% coverage for basic water supply and 95% for improved sanitation, aligning with its constitutional recognition of clean water as a fundamental right [14]. To support these goals, the government has developed a comprehensive legislative framework, including National Drinking Water Quality Standards [15], multiple acts regulating water supply and sanitation (The Nepal Water Supply Corporation Act 1989, Local Self Governance Act 1999, and Water Supply and Sanitation Act 2022), and policies promoting environmental sustainability concerning irrigation and wastewater management. These legal instruments emphasize safe drinking water, pollution prevention, and integrated water resource management [16].
Similarly, the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 aims to achieve “universal access to safe and affordable drinking water for all by 2030” [17]. Since the adoption of the SDG aims in 2016, Nepal has made significant strides in the Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) sector, achieving 95.5% sanitation coverage and 88.6% water supply coverage [18]. However, significant knowledge gaps in water quality data and the identification of contamination sources continue to impede further advancement. Identifying these sources is crucial for targeted mitigation efforts, while comprehensive monitoring networks are essential for detecting contamination hotspots. In addition, studies on the health impacts of consuming or using contaminated water are vital for informing the public health care system, designing effective interventions, and raising public awareness.
Despite the increasing water contamination and lack of access to clean and safe drinking and irrigation water, to our knowledge, there are no systematic or scoping reviews to date that summarize the extent of water contamination, characterize the microbial and chemical contaminants studied in various localities, and evaluate their impacts on community health. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies on drinking and irrigation waters in Nepal to address these gaps. This methodology allowed us to comprehensively summarize the microbial and chemical contaminants prevalent in the region and assess their potential impact on public health outcomes.
Specifically, our scoping review aimed to identify studies assessing the quality of drinking and irrigation water sources that might potentially impact human health in Nepal. The specific objectives of our study were to: (1) identify and characterize the microbiological quality of drinking and irrigation water in Nepal; (2) understand and evaluate the chemical quality of drinking and irrigation water; and (3) identify the key health outcomes from exposure to microbial and chemical contaminants present in drinking and irrigation water.

2. Methods

2.1. Protocol and Registration

Following the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [19] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScP) Guidelines [20], we developed a protocol in advance, defining the objectives, inclusion criteria, and methods to be used in this scoping review as outlined on the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/by2qd/, accessed on 8 February 2025).

2.2. Review Question

We utilized the PEO framework [21] to develop our research question. In this framework, the Population (P) refers to the population living in Nepal, the Exposure (E) pertains to contaminated drinking and irrigation water, and the Outcomes (O) focus on food- and waterborne diseases. The scoping review was guided by the following overarching research question: What is the current state of research on food and waterborne diseases affecting the population in Nepal, particularly in the context of contaminated drinking and irrigation water?

2.3. Search Strategy

To identify subject headings and free-text terms, we conducted a preliminary search in Google Scholar and EBSCO databases, utilizing the Choose Databases feature to search multiple databases simultaneously. This method led us to 15 relevant studies, which we used to identify potential key terms [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
Key terms were identified for each of the concepts in the PEO framework, listing the population living in Nepal and its regions (P), various sources for drinking and irrigation water (E), and specific health outcomes related to food- and waterborne diseases (O). Refer to Table 1 in the protocol for all search terms we identified to develop the search strategy (https://osf.io/by2qd/, accessed on 8 February 2025). The terms within each concept were combined using the Boolean operator OR, and all concepts were combined with the Boolean operator AND. The terms for the Exposure (E) concept were combined with the proximity operator (N, NEAR, W, depending on database syntax) to reflect all combinations of phrases where these terms were used (e.g., “water contamination” vs. “contamination of water”). Double quotation marks were used to search as an exact phrase (e.g., “ground water”), and truncation was employed to find any variations of the stem word (e.g., pollut* will find pollution, pollutants, polluting, polluted, etc.).
Our public health librarian (NT) developed a single-line general search strategy to ensure reproducibility, transparency, and time efficiency [37]. The search strategy was adapted to the syntax and commands for each database. Additionally, the search string did not include terms related to health outcomes, as this could have reduced search recall and risked excluding potentially relevant studies [38]. For example, studies with health outcomes other than those listed in Table 1 of the protocol, such as “worm infestation,” “arsenicosis,” “Typhoid fever,” “Giardia lamblia,” and “Enteric fever,” would have been overlooked (https://osf.io/by2qd/, accessed on 8 February 2025).

2.4. Information Sources (Databases)

We searched seven databases for literature published from database inception to 5 July 2023: Academic Search Ultimate, Agricola, GreenFILE, GeoRef, MEDLINE (all on the EBSCO platform), Scopus (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate). The final search strategies for each database are presented in Supplementary Material S1. No search has been conducted for gray literature.

2.5. Eligibility Criteria

As outlined in the study protocol, Table 3 (https://osf.io/by2qd/), predefined criteria were used to identify peer-reviewed studies in academic journals that met the eligibility criteria. These criteria included studies of people living in Nepal, studies that addressed human health and water quality, studies that used any methodological design, and studies that were published in English with no restriction on the publication year (https://osf.io/by2qd/, accessed on 8 February 2025).

2.6. Selection of Sources of Evidence

Records from database searches were downloaded in Zotero, a citation management software, and duplicates were removed. The unique records were then transferred to Rayyan, a software collaborative platform designed for screening in systematic and systematic-like reviews. Two reviewers (SC, AC) independently screened the unique records in two phases: title/abstract and full-text screening. Any discrepancies in the decision-making process were resolved through discussion, and whenever a decision could not be made, a third reviewer (LM) was consulted. The full text was pulled for the unique studies that met the eligibility criteria during the initial title/abstract screening. These full-text studies were then reviewed and reevaluated to confirm their suitability for inclusion in the analysis based on the predefined eligibility criteria.

2.7. Data Charting Process

Data from the studies that met the eligibility criteria were extracted into a predefined Excel spreadsheet by one reviewer (AC), with a second reviewer (SC) verifying the accuracy of the entered data. Based on the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the quality of each study was not assessed as “scoping reviews do not aim to produce a critically appraised and synthesized result/answer to a particular question, [they] rather aim to provide an overview or map of the evidence” [39].

2.8. Data Items

The following data were extracted: record identifiers (e.g., objectives, methodology, sample size, Nepal region), water usage (drinking, irrigation, spring, river, well, etc.), water source (surface, wastewater, spring, river, well, glacier, rainfall, lake, pond, groundwater, harvested rainwater, etc.), type of contamination (microbial—bacteria, virus, protozoa, algae; and chemical—pesticides, metals, fertilizers), assessment of water quality, location (urban, rural, semi-urban), health outcomes, key findings, and recommendations.

2.9. Synthesis of Results

We conducted a thematic analysis of the included data, coding the information related to this scoping review’s objectives by documenting the descriptive themes and generating analytical themes. A flow diagram was developed to illustrate the process of identifying studies that met the eligibility criteria. Visualizations were generated using Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power BI (Sankey, filled map, heatmap). Articles focusing on both microbial and chemical contaminants in water sources across multiple locations in Nepal were summarized in tabular form. Future recommendations within the included studies were categorized into six common themes and presented in a separate table.

3. Results

3.1. Selection of Sources of Evidence

The study search and selection process is illustrated in Figure 1, providing an overview of each step taken to identify and select relevant studies for inclusion.
A total of 3666 records were identified. After 1998 duplicates were removed, 1668 unique records were screened for titles and abstracts. Of these, 1230 records were excluded, and 438 were sought for full-text retrieval and reviewed in two stages. After consulting the full text for details during the first stage, we reviewed the studies initially marked as “Maybe” and “Included” in Rayyan, and 257 were excluded. During the second stage, we reassessed the remaining 181 records for eligibility, resulting in the exclusion of 41 studies [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] (Supplementary Material S2). Following the reassessment process, we identified 140 studies [22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,33,34,35,36,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208] that met the eligibility criteria and were subsequently included in this review (Supplementary Material S3).

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The organizational structure of this review article is based on three key categories: location (urban, rural, both, and non-specified), water sources (groundwater, surface water, and multiple other sources), and water usage (drinking, irrigation, both, and non-specified). This approach not only allowed for a more streamlined and systematic evaluation of the literature but also enabled us to address additional questions—for instance, how many studies investigated both irrigation and drinking water, or how many drew samples from multiple provinces. It is also worth noting that among microbial contaminants, some studies focused on identifying total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and/or Escherichia coli (E. coli). E. coli is a subset of fecal coliforms, which in turn are a subset of total coliforms. To maintain consistency with the original literature, the terminology used in each original study has been preserved without modification.
Between 1982 and 2023, a total of 140 articles were published that met our screening criteria, with the highest number appearing in 2021 (13 articles), followed by 2018 and 2020 (both with 11 articles) (Figure 2). Publication rates increased significantly over the last decade (2013–2023) compared to earlier years. Out of the 140 records analyzed, 111 studies utilized quantitative research methodologies, 24 employed mixed methods (analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data), and five relied on qualitative approaches [209]. In 2021, 12 studies employed quantitative methods, and one study employed mixed methods. In 2018, nine studies employed quantitative methods, and two studies employed mixed methods. In contrast, in 2020, seven studies utilized quantitative methods, and four studies employed mixed methods. The earliest study included in the scoping review was a quantitative study published in 1982 [199]. The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Supplementary Material S4.
Of the 140 studies included, 95 focused exclusively on either microbial (40 studies, 28.5%), chemical (30 studies, 21.4%), or both types of contaminants (25 studies, 17.9%), regardless of the methodology used. Additionally, multiple chemical contaminants were assessed in 35 studies (25%), while multiple microbial contaminants were reported in 10 studies (7%).

3.2.1. Overview of Studies

Location
Regarding the study locations, out of the 140 studies included, 21 (15%) were conducted exclusively in rural areas, 60 (42.86%) exclusively in urban areas, and 17 (12.14%) were conducted in both rural and urban locations (Figure 3). Furthermore, 42 (30.0%) studies reported only on the province from which the water samples were collected, without specifying whether the samples were from urban or rural areas.
Water Sources
Forty studies (28.57%) focused solely on testing groundwater, while 43 studies (30.71%) exclusively examined surface waters (Figure 3). Additionally, 57 studies (40.71%) tested both ground and surface water, as well as multiple other water sources, including bottled water, wastewater, jar water, tap water, dhunge dharas, and spout water. For this review, water sources such as seesaw wells, sunken wells, deep/shallow tube wells, hand-pump wells, dug wells, stone spouts, and bore wells are categorized as groundwater sources. While springs, streams, rivers, lakes, glaciers, and ponds are classified as surface water sources.
Across studies that evaluated groundwater sources, arsenic was identified as the major contaminant (n = 20; 50%), followed by bacterial contamination (n = 6; 15%). Compared to studies evaluating groundwater and other sources, those focusing solely on surface water reported trace elements (n = 5; 11.63%) and metals (n = 3; 6.98%). Most studies testing surface waters (n = 25; 58.14%) identified chemical contaminants, including ions, trace elements, nitrogen, nitrates, chloride, manganese, and sulfur (Figure 3). Overall, Figure 3 highlights that both geography and water source type strongly influence patterns of water contamination.
Water Usage
In the context of water usage, the 140 included studies primarily focused on drinking water sources, with 68 studies (48.57%) exclusively examining them. Eight studies (5.71%) focused solely on irrigation water sources, while 19 (13.57%) investigated both drinking and irrigation water sources. Moreover, 45 studies (32.14%) did not specify the intended use of the tested water (Figure 4).
Among the microbial contaminants found in drinking water, bacteria were the most prevalent in most studies (n = 23; 33.82%). Notably, only one study reported the presence of protozoa [175], while two studies identified viruses [142,195]. Regarding chemical contaminants, most studies commonly reported arsenic (n = 9; 13.24%). Additionally, trace elements and fertilizers were detected in two studies (2.94%) [157,169] and one study (1.47%) [113] respectively (Figure 4). Eighteen articles studied more than one contaminant in their drinking water samples [22,27,30,82,83,87,95,110,146,147,160,165,166,188,190,192,197,203] (Table 1).
In the studies that focused on irrigation waters, arsenic (n = 2, 20%) [98,99], bacteria (n = 1) [34] and viruses (n = 1) [185] were reported as the major contaminants. Of the 45 studies that did not specify the use of water that was being tested, three (6.67%) identified metal contamination [174,191,198] (Figure 4).

3.2.2. Overview of Contaminants in Studies by Province

For subsequent analysis, we classified the 140 studies by provinces (Bagmati, Gandaki, Karnali, Koshi, Lumbini, Madhesh, Sudurpaschim), multiple provinces, and non-specified provinces. Among these 140 studies, 110 (78.57%) focused on a single province, with the breakdown as follows: Bagmati (n = 76, 69.09%), Gandaki (n = 15, 13.64%), Karnali (n = 1, 0.91%), Koshi (n = 12, 8.57%), Lumbini (n = 3, 2.73%), Madhesh (n = 1, 0.91%), Sudurpaschim (n = 2, 1.82%) (Figure 5).
Table 1. Articles focusing on both microbial and chemical contaminants in water sources across multiple locations in Nepal.
Table 1. Articles focusing on both microbial and chemical contaminants in water sources across multiple locations in Nepal.
AuthorsLocationWater UsageMultiple Contaminants
Aryal, 2022 [83]Non specified Drinking E. coli, coliforms, metals, trace elements
Aryal et al., 2012 [82]Urban and rural Arsenic and total coliforms
Bhandari et al., 2021 [87]UrbanChloride, copper, nitrate, sulfate, E. coli, Citrobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Enterobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Pseudomonas
Bittner et al., 2002 [95]Urban and rural Arsenic and total coliforms
Burlakoti et al., 2020 [22]UrbanFluoride, ammonia, E. coli, and total coliforms
Guragai et al., 2017 [110]UrbanIron, manganese, ammonia, chlorine, and E. coli
Merz et al., 2004 [146]Non specified Fecal coliform, phosphate, nitrate
Moravek et al., 2019 [147]Non specified Total coliforms, E. coli, Giardia, Salmonella, Shigella, nitrate, ammonia, and total phosphorus
Pant 2011 [27]UrbanChloride, iron, arsenic, fluoride, and total coliforms
Pradhan et al., 2005 [165]RuralE. coli, total coliforms, pH, iron, chlorine, total hardness, chloride, nitrogen, ammonia, phosphate, phosphorus, and fluoride.
Poudel & Basi-Chipalu 2022 [160]UrbanChloride, nitrate, iron, total coliforms, Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio
Pradhan et al., 2022 [166]Non specified Ammonia, nitrate, chloride, fluoride, calcium, E. coli, and total coliforms
Sarkar et al., 2022 [30]UrbanTotal and fecal coliforms, aluminum, arsenic, barium, beryllium, boron, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, fluoride, iron, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, thallium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc
Subedi et al., 2017 [190]Urban and rural Fecal coliforms, ammonia, nitrate, chloride, and nitrite
Subedi et al., 2012 [188]UrbanNitrate, calcium, iron, and fecal coliforms
Tamrakar et al., 2017 [192]UrbanCalcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, total ammonia, sodium, potassium, fluoride, arsenic, aluminum, total chlorides, total chlorine, and fecal coliforms
Thapa et al., 2019 [197]UrbanCalcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and total coliforms
Warner et al., 2008 [203]UrbanTotal coliforms, E. coli, nitrate, ammonia, heavy metals, arsenic, mercury, iron, sulphate, phosphate, and manganese
Ghimire 1985 [106]UrbanNon specified Calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, silica, chloride, phosphate, nitrogen, ammonia, coliforms, and E. coli
Pantha et al., 2022 [28]Non specified Fecal coliforms, ammonia, nitrate, and calcium
Khadka 1993 [126]UrbanE. coli, total coliforms, ammonia, orthophosphate, chloride, iron, and manganese
Khadka et al., 2015 [128]UrbanE. coli, phosphate, chloride, and sulphate
Poudel et al., 2021 [164]Urban and rural E. coli, total coliforms, ammonia, phosphate, chloride, iron, and nitrate
Ghimire et al., 2023 [108]UrbanBoth drinking and irrigationSodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, bicarbonate, nitrate, ammonium, iron, phosphate, sulphate, and total coliforms
Ghimire et al., 2023 [109]UrbanSodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium, phosphate, sulphate, chloride, bicarbonate, nitrate, iron, and total coliforms
Twenty-three (16.43%) out of the 140 included studies covered more than one province: Koshi, Madhesh, Lumbini, and Sudurpaschim (n = 1, 4.35%) [208]; Bagmati, Madhesh, Gandaki, and Lumbini (n = 1, 4.35%) [135]; Bagmati, Lumbini, and Gandaki (n = 1, 4.35%) [102]; Gandaki and Bagmati (n = 3, 13.04%) [106,118,169]; Karnali and Sudurpaschim (n = 2, 8.70%) [23,86]; Koshi, Bagmati, and Gandaki (n = 2, 8.70%) [93,174]; Koshi, Bagmati, and Karnali (n = 1, 4.35%) [167]; Lumbini and Gandaki (n = 9, 43.48%) [81,98,99,134,137,148,149,206,207]; Gandaki and Koshi (n = 1, 4.35%) [198], Madhesh, Lumbini, and Gandaki (n = 1, 4.35%) [180] and Bagmati, Madhesh, Koshi, Lumbini, and Sudurpaschim (n = 1, 4.35%) [36].
Seven publications (5.00%) did not specify the province from which the study samples were collected [29,146,176,179,200,201,202].
Bagmati Province
Out of the 76 studies focusing on water samples from the Bagmati region, the majority (n = 56, 73.68%) examined water samples from urban areas. Among these, 48 (85.71%) utilized quantitative methods, while eight (14.29%) employed mixed methods to analyze their data. In contrast, three studies (3.98%) focused on rural locations, all using mixed methods. Additionally, seven studies (9.21%) investigated both urban and rural locations, with one (14.29%) using mixed methods and six (85.71%) employing quantitative methods. Lastly, ten studies (13.16%) did not specify the study location, and all utilized quantitative methods.
Of the 76 studies that evaluated water from the Bagmati province, 41 identified health outcomes, with the predominant ones being defined as waterborne illnesses, including gastroenteritis, diarrhea, and dysentery, resulting from microbial contamination. The other major health outcomes or health risks were related to chemical or inorganic contaminants in the water sources. They were listed as arsenicosis, high hazard and cancer index, thyroid diseases, neural tube defects, and hypertension.
Studies focusing on exclusively urban locations
Among the studies focusing on urban locations, 15 examined water from multiple groundwater sources, including shallow wells, deep tube wells, and handpump wells [26,27,97,107,109,113,126,129,140,141,159,172,178,181,193]. Additionally, ten studies examined surface water sites, with nine out of ten focusing on the Bagmati River [88,89,91,92,122,128,155,162,194], and one on the Kodku River [107]. Furthermore, 31 studies did not specify the water source being tested.
Contaminants found in both drinking and irrigation water samples in studies focusing exclusively on urban locations
Regardless of the water source, 29 studies analyzed samples of drinking water, of which 15 studies reported on microbes, including bacteria, viruses, and protozoa [25,33,85,103,104,139,140,141,142,143,175,181,183,189,195], four reported on chemical contaminants [97,113,129,172] and ten studies reported on both microbial and chemical contaminants [22,27,30,44,110,160,188,192,197,203]. Additionally, four articles reported on microbes, including waterborne protozoa, bacteria, and viruses in irrigation water samples [34,182,184,185]. Eight tested both drinking and irrigation waters and identified more than one chemical contaminant [89,91,92,107,155] or only bacteria, including Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, and Arcobacter [178] and both microbes and chemical contaminants [108,109].
Five studies exclusively identified various chemical contaminants in the shallow tube and dug wells, including nitrogenous fertilizers [113], nitrogen, iron, and chloride [159,172], and multiple chemical contaminants like ammonia, nitrate, mercury, iron, magnesium, chloride, and sulfate [97,129]. Six studies exclusively identified bacteria and protozoa among the microbial contaminants [26,140,141,181,183,193]. In studies that identified bacterial contaminants, two studies highlighted Bacteroidales [140,141], two identified E. coli [181,183], one identified Acinetobacter [193], and one identified Arthrobacter and Legionella [26]. One study detected two protozoa, Giardia and Cryptosporidium [181]. Among the articles that tested for both microbial and chemical contaminants, 10 articles identified several bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family, along with metals and trace elements (Table 1).
Three studies focused on bottled water samples [22,103,104], two of which detected microbial contaminants [103,104], while one study [22] also identified chemical contaminants such as fluoride and ammonia. A single study [142] focused on tanker water and identified bacterial (E. coli) and viruses (enteroviruses, noroviruses of genogroup II (NoVs-GII), human adenoviruses (HAdVs), and group A rotaviruses). Three studies assessed jar water [139,189,195], revealing contamination with bacteria (E. coli and total coliforms), viruses (group A rotaviruses, enteroviruses, adenoviruses, and noroviruses of genogroup I), and protozoa (Cryptosporidium and Giardia). Moreover, one study tested tap water and detected Aeromonas spp. in the samples [163], while another study [130] examined wastewater samples and identified heavy metals (e.g., iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic).
Out of the eight studies examining urban water sources for both drinking and irrigation, five focused on surface water sources from the Bagmati River [89,90,92,155] and the Kodku River [107]. Two studies evaluated groundwater from dug wells [108,109], while one study tested multiple water sources, including shallow dug wells, deep tube wells, and rivers [178]. While contaminants like arsenic and trace elements were identified in all surface water sources, both inorganic (iron, calcium) and microbial (total coliform) contaminants were identified in dug well samples [108,109]. One study examined microbial contaminants and identified Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, and Arcobacter [178] from multiple water sources, such as dug wells, deep tube wells, and rivers.
Contaminants found in water samples that did not specify water usage in studies focusing exclusively on urban locations
Fifteen studies assessing urban water sources did not specify the intended use of the water, but identified multiple chemical and microbial contaminants [26,88,114,115,116,121,126,128,130,159,162,163,187,193,194]. Four studies focused exclusively on groundwater sources identified different types of contaminants—two studies identified only bacteria (E. coli, total coliforms, Acinetobacter, Neisseria, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium) [26,193], one study identified only inorganic contaminants like nitrate and iron [159], and one study identified both microbial and chemical contaminants [126].
Five additional studies exclusively evaluated water samples from surface water sources such as rivers [88,121,128,162,194]. Tandukar et al. [194] identified enteric viruses (enteroviruses and saliviruses), protozoa (Cryptosporidium and Giardia), and bacteria (total coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus spp.), while Khadka et al. [128] also identified heavy metal contaminants in the Bagmati River. Other contaminants, including heavy metals and trace elements, were also identified in three studies [88,121,162].
Six studies evaluated multiple water sources, including shallow dug wells, tube wells, sewage pipes, piped water (surface water that is being transported through pipes into homes and public tap/standpipes [210]), jar water, tanker water, and rivers [114,115,116,130,163,187]. Three studies investigated bacterial contaminants, with two focusing on E. coli [116,187], and one on Aeromonas [163]. Among the E. coli studies, one specifically examined the presence of Shiga toxin-producing strains [187].
Studies focusing exclusively on rural locations
Among the studies focusing on rural areas, three specifically examined drinking water samples from different sources: piped water, tube wells, and open wells [35]; streams [100]; and stone spouts, ponds, streams, and wells [165]. Each of the three studies employed mixed methods in their research. All of the studies identified fecal coliforms [35,100,165]. Additionally, Pradhan et al. [165] also identified iron, chlorine, chloride, nitrogen, ammonia, phosphate-phosphorus, and fluoride in the tested water sources, while Dahal et al. [100] also identified ammonia, nitrate, orthophosphate, lead, copper, zinc, sodium, and potassium.
Studies focusing on both urban and rural locations
Two additional studies focused on drinking water samples from urban and rural areas [95,190]. Both studies drew on multiple sources, including groundwater and surface water samples. While Subedi et al. [190] identified only microbial contaminants, both inorganic (arsenic) and microbial contaminants (E. coli and other bacteria) were identified by Bittner et al. [95]. Five studies evaluated water samples from both urban and rural locations without specifying the intended use of the water collected [120,122,123,164,168]. Among the five studies mentioned above, only one study [123] focused on both ground and surface waters, while all the other studies concentrated solely on surface water samples. Three studies identified inorganic contaminants [120,122,168], including metals like lead [168]. One study identified microbial contaminants (E. coli) [164].
Five studies evaluated drinking water quality without specifying whether the samples were collected from urban or rural locations. Among these studies, two evaluated groundwater [166,196], and three tested multiple water sources like stone spouts, rivers, snowmelt, and rainwater [124,147,186]. The referenced studies detected multiple bacteria, including E. coli, total coliforms, Salmonella, Shigella, S. typhi, and S. paratyphi, as well as protozoa such as Giardia. Additionally, one study reported the presence of chemical contaminants, including nitrate and ammonia [166]. Two studies, which did not specify whether the samples were collected from urban or rural locations, evaluated both drinking and irrigation water sources from surface waters such as rivers [158,199]. While the study by Upadhyaya & Roy [199] detected metal contaminants, the study by Pantha et al. [158] identified bacterial contaminants (Clostridium, Prevotella, Arcobacter, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus). Furthermore, three studies [90,94,170] evaluated surface waters from rivers without specifying the location of the collected samples or the intended use of the water source. These studies reported both chemical contaminants [90,170] and microbial contaminants (bacteriophages) [94].
Gandaki Province
Of the 15 studies from the Gandaki Province, one (6.67%) focused on urban areas, two (13.34%) focused on rural areas, and five (33.34%) investigated both urban and rural locations. In contrast, seven (46.67%) did not specify the sampled regions.
The sole urban study within this province, a quantitative study [144], examined heavy metal contamination, particularly lead, in Phewa Lake without specifying the water’s usage.
In the rural location, one of the two studies, a mixed-methods study by Maharajan et al. [136], analyzed arsenic levels in groundwater used for drinking purposes. The other study, by Khadka and Ramanathan [127], investigated multiple chemicals in lakes within the Pokhara Valley without specifying water usage.
Of the five studies examining both urban and rural locations, three quantitative studies focused exclusively on drinking water from various sources, such as springs, borewells, rivers, and reservoir tanks, and surface sources within the Besishahar municipality [83], Mygadi district [82] and Lakes Begnas and Rupa [157]. One study exclusively focused on trace elements [157], while the other two investigated microbial and chemical contaminants [82,83]. The remaining two studies, conducted in urban and rural areas, examined both irrigation and drinking water, with a strong focus on chemical contaminants. Pant et al. [153] examined trace elements in the Badigad river basin, while Yadav et al. [204] focused on arsenic levels in the Terai region.
In unspecified locations within the province, three out of seven studies examined both irrigation and drinking water sources. These three studies focused exclusively on chemical or inorganic contaminants, including arsenic [205], trace elements [157], and multiple chemical contaminants [156]. Yadav et al. [205] focused on groundwater sources in the Nawalparasi district, while Pant et al. examined surface water sources from the Seti River Basin [154] and the Gandaki River Basin [157]. The other four studies from Gandaki Province exclusively investigated surface water sources without specifying the water usage [28,96,105,154]. Of these four studies, three focused on chemical contaminants [96,105,154], and one study examined both microbial and chemical contaminants in the Tanahun district’s springs in the western mid-hill region of Nepal [28].
Six studies from the Gandaki Province also reported on multiple health outcomes or health risks: high cancer index measurements [153,154,157], arsenicosis, skin lesions [136,204], and gastrointestinal problems due to drinking water with increased levels of sulfates [205].
Karnali Province
A mixed-method study conducted in the rural Karnali Province examined drinking water sourced from communal taps or piped water sources [145]. The study found E. coli in the tested water sources, and diarrhea was reported as the associated health outcome.
Koshi Province
Among the 12 studies from Koshi Province, four (33.34%) focused on rural locations, whereas eight (66.67%) did not specify the region. Of the four studies focusing on rural locations, only one [138] investigated metal contamination (e.g., manganese, iron, and arsenic) in groundwater sources (borewells and tube wells) used for drinking. Within the unspecified locations, four studies explored drinking water quality [125,131,150,151]. They identified microbial contaminants (e.g., Streptococcus and fecal coliforms) in bottled water and municipal taps [151], streams, and household storage containers [125], and various sources [131,150].
Out of the seven studies that did not specify water use, three focused on microbial contaminants, specifically bacteria, in rural locations. The remaining four examined various chemical contaminants in surface waters from unspecified locations. The researchers [132,133] primarily investigated culturable bacteria (e.g., Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Bacillus, Sanguibacter, etc.) in surface, glacier melt waters, and lakes in the Mount Everest region. Shreshtha and Shakya [177] identified Vibrio species in multiple water sources (rivers, ponds, taps, and sewage) within Sunsari, Terai region. The identified chemical or inorganic contaminants included trace elements [161] and mercury [191] from the Koshi River Basin; unspecific metals from Gokyo Valley, Everest National Park, Nepal [173]; and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Sagarmatha National Park, Solu-Khumbu District, in northeastern Nepal [111].
Only two studies reported health outcomes: one focused on diarrhea caused by vibrios [177], and the other examined the high risks of lead and cadmium pollution [174].
Lumbini Province
Of the three quantitative studies reviewed, one [84] was conducted in rural locations, while the other two [112,171] did not specify their location. Atreya et al. [84] investigated microbial contaminants, specifically total coliforms, in drinking water sourced from tube wells. Sapkota et al. [171] and Gyawali et al. [112] focused on chemical or inorganic contaminants, including multiple chemicals (calcium, magnesium, sodium, iron, and nitrogen compounds) and arsenic. Sapkota et al. [171] researched multiple chemical contaminants in surface waters used for drinking and irrigation, while Gyawali et al. [112] analyzed groundwater without specifying the intended use of the water samples. The primary health outcomes reported in the two studies were waterborne illnesses and health issues associated with elevated arsenic levels.
Madhesh Province
In Gaur Municipality, located in the Rautahat district within the Madhesh Province, a quantitative study [119] examined arsenic contamination in groundwater. The study did not report any health outcomes or specify the purposes of water usage.
Sudurpaschim Province
In Sudurpaschim Province, two studies assessed surface water, focusing on physico-chemical parameters. One study conducted in a rural area [101] and another in an unspecified location [117] explored these parameters in depth. Dumaru et al. [101] conducted a comprehensive evaluation of spring water quality in the Thuligaad watershed. This watershed spans the Kailali and Doti districts, serving multiple purposes, including drinking water and irrigation. Their study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide a holistic understanding of the water quality in this region. On the other hand, Joshi and Devkota [117] focused on the Ghodaghodi lakes in Western Terai, Nepal. Unlike the study by Dumaru et al. [101], this research did not specify the intended use of the water samples.
Neither of these studies addressed health outcomes associated with the water quality under examination.
Multiple Provinces
Among the 23 studies encompassing multiple (2–5) provinces in Nepal, 12 focused on drinking water samples: Lumbini and Gandaki [81,134,137]; Kamali and Sudurpaschim [23,86]; Gandaki and Bagmati [169]; Bagmati, Gandaki, and Lumbini [102]; Koshi, Bagmati, and Kamali [167]; Koshi, Bagmati, and Gandaki [93]; Bagmati, Madhesh, and Lumbini [135]; Madhesh, Lumbini, and Gandaki [180]; and Bagmati, Koshi, Lumbini, Madhesh, and Sudurpaschim [36]. Of these studies, four employed mixed-methods [23,86,102,137], five used quantitative methods [81,93,134,167,169], and three used qualitative methods [36,135,179].
Six studies [36,81,134,135,137,179] examined groundwater quality from tube wells and detected contaminants such as arsenic. In contrast, one study [169] investigated surface water sources like lakes, and another [93] focused on tap water. Four studies [23,86,102,167] examined multiple water sources, including wells, piped water, and natural springs. These studies identified both chemical contaminants, such as trace elements [169] and microbial contaminants like E.coli [167].
Three studies, spanning multiple provinces and employing quantitative methods, examined water intended for irrigation [98,99,118]. One of these studies assessed surface water sources such as lakes [118]; the other two investigated groundwater quality from tube wells [98,99] and seesaw wells [98]. The identified contaminants included metals [118] and arsenic [98,99].
Two studies examined both drinking and irrigation waters sourced from groundwater, particularly tube wells, with arsenic being identified as the primary chemical contaminant [149,208]. Six studies spanning two provinces assessed water sources without specifying their intended use [106,148,174,198,206,207]. Among these studies, three focused on groundwater from tube wells, detecting arsenic contamination [148,206,207]. The remaining three studies [106,174,198] identified metal contamination in river water sources, along with microbial contamination (E. coli and total coliforms) [106].
Only 13 of the 22 studies examined health outcomes, with arsenicosis reported in seven [81,134,137,148,149,205,208]. Three studies focused on waterborne diseases such as non-specific diarrheal diseases and enteric typhoid fever [23,93,167].
Unspecified Provinces
Among the seven studies that did not specify the province, two [176,201] were conducted in rural areas, one [29] in both urban and rural locations, and four [146,180,200,202] in an unspecified location. These studies employed quantitative [29,200,201,202] and mixed-methods [146,176,180] research methods.
Three studies [29,176,201] focused on microbial contaminants, specifically E. coli, in various drinking water sources. Two studies [180,200] identified arsenic contamination in drinking water from groundwater sources, and one study [146] examined both microbial and chemical quality of drinking water from various sources such as natural springs (mool), improved springs or spring boxes (kuwa), stone spouts (dhunge dhara), taps (dharo; water supply through a pipe with a proper tap or open PVC pipe end), dug wells (inar), and streamlets (kholsa).
Additionally, one study that did not specify the use of water samples in the study evaluated multiple metals (arsenic, iron, manganese, and sulfur) in groundwater [202]. The reported health outcomes included chronic exposure to arsenic [180,200] and diarrheal diseases [146,201].

3.2.3. Synthesis of Results

To provide a comprehensive understanding of the geographical distribution and impact of water contamination in the included studies, we present an analysis illustrated in Figure 6. This figure features a heatmap that visually represents the number of studies identifying microbial and chemical (or inorganic) contaminants in water samples collected from seven provinces in Nepal. The heatmap also correlates these findings with various health outcomes reported in the included studies. This visual representation facilitates the identification of contamination hotspots and understanding of the corresponding health implications across different provinces.
Among the 140 studies included in this scoping review, 32 focused on microbial contamination in drinking water, identifying bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. Additionally, 19 studies highlighted chemical or inorganic contamination, reporting on substances such as arsenic, fertilizers, and trace elements. In evaluations of drinking water samples, 46 studies documented various health outcomes, including conditions such as arsenicosis and waterborne illnesses (defined as diarrhea, typhoid, and enteric fever). Only two studies identified microbial contamination in assessments of irrigation water sources, while six studies detected multiple types of chemical contamination.
Across studies evaluating both drinking and irrigation water samples, two studies identified bacterial contaminants, while 15 detected chemical or inorganic contaminants ranging from arsenic to trace elements. Furthermore, nine studies discussed potential health outcomes or risks, including higher cancer risks and waterborne illnesses, such as gastroenteritis.

3.2.4. Recommendations Proposed by the Included Studies

Out of the 140 studies reviewed, 91 provided a range of recommendations aimed at addressing the water quality challenges in Nepal. These recommendations encompass a variety of measures essential for mitigating contamination and improving overall water safety. The proposed strategies include treatment techniques, infrastructure improvements, monitoring schemes, educational campaigns, policy reforms, and continued research (Table 2).
Overall, multiple articles highlighted the persistent contamination of water sources, particularly by arsenic, bacteria, and chemicals, which pose significant health risks to the population. To address this issue, Ahmad et al. [81] recommended early preventive measures, case management, and the supply of arsenic-safe water, while M. Aryal [83] emphasized the importance of implementing appropriate treatment methods and testing procedures. Furthermore, Aryal et al. [82] mentioned the importance of protecting natural water sources and implementing effective treatment and distribution management strategies to ensure a safe drinking water supply. Similarly, Bittner et al. [95] suggested a multifaceted point-of-use treatment regime involving filtration and disinfection to combat microbial contamination. Infrastructure improvement emerges as a key recommendation across multiple studies. Dumaru et al. [101] advocated for improved water transport infrastructure, particularly in urban areas, while Khatiwada et al. [129] emphasized the need for wastewater treatment plants in industries to mitigate environmental hazards. Several authors emphasized the importance of community awareness and education programs. Baker et al. [85] highlighted the importance of infrastructure improvements in conjunction with health campaigns to control diseases such as typhoid. Similarly, Malla et al. [141] recommended increased surveillance of water industries and microbial analysis to ensure water quality. Moreover, sustainable management practices were underscored by various studies. Meierhofer et al. [145] emphasized the need for catchment-based water management plans that involve all stakeholders, while Subedi and Aryal [189] suggested treating underground water sources and raising public awareness about water quality. Despite these recommendations, challenges remain, as highlighted by several authors. Ghimire et al. [109] stressed the need for chemical and biological treatment of groundwater, and Nicholson et al. [150] emphasized continued monitoring of water sources, especially in tourist areas.
As evidenced by this overview of recommendations in the included studies, the literature on water quality management in Nepal highlights the complexity of the issue, and emphasizes the need for integrated, holistic approaches. Recommendations include infrastructure improvement, community education, sustainable management practices, and continued monitoring and surveillance. However, effectively implementing these measures requires collaboration among stakeholders, government intervention, and sustained funding to ensure the availability of clean and safe drinking water for all.

4. Discussion

Our scoping review highlights research conducted across all seven provinces in Nepal: Bagmati, Gandaki, Karnali, Koshi, Lumbini, Madhesh, and Sudurpaschim. This widespread geographical coverage underscores the extensive nature of water quality issues throughout the country, providing a robust basis for our discussion of the varying contamination levels and health impacts observed across these regions.
The highest number of studies (n = 76) evaluated water quality in Bagmati Province, followed by Gandaki (n = 15) and Koshi (n = 12). In contrast, the provinces with the lower number of studies were Karnali (n = 1), Madhesh (n = 1), Sudurpaschim (n = 2), and Lumbini (n = 3) (Figure 5). Regardless of the province, most of the studies included in this scoping review focused exclusively on evaluating drinking water quality (n = 68), while a smaller number evaluated irrigation water quality (n = 8).

4.1. Water Quality Evaluation in Nepal Provinces

Bagmati province, which includes Nepal’s capital, Kathmandu, spans 13 districts and is home to 6.1 million people [212]. According to the Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) statistical WASH report, 4.4% of the rural household population and 1.8% of the urban population in the Kathmandu Valley have unimproved drinking water [1]. Our review indicates that studies from the Kathmandu Valley show widespread contamination by E. coli and total coliforms in the urban community. More than one chemical contaminant and fertilizer predominated in the urban Kathmandu valley. Most of the studies from this province focused on drinking water quality (n = 39), while four studies exclusively tested irrigation water quality.
Gandaki Province reported the second-highest number of studies (n = 15) and is home to approximately 2.5 million people [212]. The province is home to the popular tourist destination of Pokhara, which attracts one million tourists per year [213]. It features five major lakes: Phewa, the second largest lake in Nepal and largest in the Pokhara region; Begnas; Rupa, the third largest lake in the Pokhara region [214]; Tilicho; and Damodarkunda, along with numerous rivers and streams. Among the five major lakes, we identified studies focusing on heavy metals, trace elements, and multiple chemical contaminations in Phewa, Begnas, and Rupa within the Pokhara region. A major part of Rupa Lake is surrounded by forest and agricultural fields; hence, the high levels of trace elements can be attributed to these sources.
Nearly 4.9 million people reside in Koshi Province, which is renowned for one of Nepal’s major rivers, the Koshi River [212]. Trace elements, metals, and bacteria were the predominant contaminants identified in the water samples tested from this province.
Karnali, Lumbini, Madhesh, and Sudurpaschim provinces, with the lowest number of studies, are home to approximately 15.6 million people [212]. While studies examining drinking water quality in Karnali and Lumbini reported bacterial contamination, those from Madhesh and Sudurpaschim focused on chemical contaminants such as arsenic.

4.2. Predominant Health Concerns Identified in the Included Studies

Our review identified arsenicosis and other waterborne diseases as the predominant public health concerns in most of Nepal’s provinces. Arsenicosis, a debilitating condition caused by prolonged exposure to arsenic-contaminated water, poses a significant public health concern. Despite being a landlocked nation, Nepal shares similar challenges with its neighboring countries regarding arsenic contamination in groundwater and its adverse health effects on populations. Arsenic contamination in drinking water sources affects approximately 3 million people in Nepal [200]. In districts like Bara, Parsa, and Nawalparasi in the Terai region, approximately 5.1% of the population has shown clinical symptoms of arsenicosis, with over 5,200 individuals exposed to arsenic levels above 50 μg/L [215]. Other affected areas, such as Rautahat and Nawalparasi, have reported arsenicosis prevalence rates of 2.5% and 2.1%, respectively, while in Siraha and Saptari, the rates range between 1% and 3%, indicating widespread health risks associated with prolonged exposure to arsenic-contaminated groundwater [135]. Additionally, much of the country’s groundwater contains naturally occurring arsenic, sometimes at concentrations exceeding 10 ppb [216]. The prevalence of arsenicosis varies across different regions of Nepal, with higher incidences reported in areas with greater arsenic contamination [36,134,135], hence underscoring the urgent need for coordinated efforts to address water quality issues and mitigate the health impacts of arsenic contamination.
Arsenicosis manifests in various forms, including skin lesions, respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, and even cancers, imposing a significant burden on affected individuals and healthcare systems [217]. The primary cause of arsenic contamination in groundwater is geological, as arsenic leaches naturally from bedrock into aquifers over time. However, anthropogenic activities such as mining, industrial pollution, and agricultural practices can exacerbate arsenic contamination, further compromising water quality and public health. In Nepal, rapid urbanization, industrial growth, and agricultural intensification contribute to the contamination of water sources, exacerbating the arsenicosis crisis [216]. Additionally, inadequate infrastructure and limited access to safe drinking water increase the vulnerability of marginalized communities, thereby widening disparities in arsenicosis prevalence.
Other waterborne diseases, defined by outcomes such as non-specific diarrheal illnesses, typhoid fever, and hepatitis A, continue to impose a significant burden on public health in Nepal. According to UNICEF, 3.5 million Nepalese lack access to basic water services, leading to potential waterborne diseases, particularly among children under the age of five [1]. Inadequate water and sanitation facilities are major contributors to the high incidence of waterborne diseases in Nepal [218]. The prevalence of waterborne diseases in Nepal can be attributed to various factors, including inadequate water quality monitoring, poor sanitation infrastructure, and geographical vulnerabilities. Reliance on contaminated groundwater sources exacerbates the risk of waterborne illnesses in rural areas, where access to safe drinking water is limited. Additionally, rapid urbanization and industrialization have led to pollution of surface water bodies, further compromising water quality and public health [218].

4.3. Research Gaps Identified and Proposed Recommendations

Despite agriculture being Nepal’s primary economic activity, engaging around 65% of the population and contributing 31.7% to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [219], our study revealed a significant gap in research on evaluating irrigation water quality. This knowledge gap in assessing water quality may have significant implications for public health outcomes, particularly regarding water and food-borne disease prevalence [11,82]. Poor water quality in irrigation systems can lead to crop contamination, increasing the risk of foodborne illnesses among consumers. Therefore, addressing this research gap and ensuring the quality of irrigation water is crucial for safeguarding public health and enhancing agricultural productivity in Nepal.
Addressing these public health concerns requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach that encompasses water quality monitoring, infrastructure development, community education, and policy interventions. Collaborative efforts involving government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and international partners are crucial for implementing sustainable solutions and ensuring access to safe drinking water for all Nepalese communities. By learning from experiences in neighboring countries and prioritizing preventive measures, Nepal can mitigate the health impacts of arsenicosis and waterborne diseases, contributing to improved overall well-being and sustainable development.
As Nepal strives to achieve its Sustainable Development Goals [220], it is imperative to assess the progress made thus far and identify areas that require heightened attention. A significant research gap persists in understanding water insecurity across Nepal, especially outside the well-studied Bagmati Province. Therefore, efforts should be directed towards provinces with lower research coverage, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of water quality contaminants in those areas.
The prevalence of arsenicosis underscores the urgent need for concerted action to address water quality issues in Nepal and its neighboring countries. Beyond being a public health concern, arsenicosis serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate connections between water quality, environmental health, and human well-being. By expanding research efforts and implementing targeted interventions, Nepal can safeguard its population against the detrimental effects of water contamination while advancing progress toward the SDGs.
It is recommended that stakeholders, including government bodies, research institutions, and non-governmental organizations, collaborate to expand the scope of water quality studies to areas beyond Bagmati Province [211,221]. Investments in monitoring and mitigation strategies should prioritize regions with limited research coverage to ensure equitable access to safe water resources for all Nepalese citizens. Through collective action and a comprehensive approach, Nepal can effectively progress toward its water quality goals and SDG 6, ultimately ensuring healthier lives and a more sustainable environment for its citizens.

4.4. Strengths and Limitations

Our scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of articles that have researched drinking and irrigation water quality in Nepal, highlighting key contaminants such as bacteria and arsenic, and their potential links to waterborne diseases, including typhoid and arsenicosis. A major strength of this review lies in its systematic and rigorous approach, guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and its extensive search across seven databases, which enabled the inclusion of diverse methodological studies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods) and provided valuable insights into regional disparities (e.g., majority of the included articles focused on water samples from the Bagmati region) and gaps in water quality research. The review also provides an overview of health outcomes from both drinking and irrigation water sources, identifying critical challenges such as weak regulatory enforcement, inconsistent testing protocols, and the lack of coordination between water quality monitoring and public health planning. However, the review also has limitations. Our review article did not conduct a statistical analysis of the data from the included articles, making it difficult to identify water quality trends, if any, or potential associations with health outcomes. Furthermore, the exclusion of non-English language publications may have led to the omission of relevant studies, introducing potential language bias.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our scoping review highlights significant disparities in water quality research across Nepal’s provinces, with Bagmati receiving the most attention. At the same time, regions like Karnali, Madhesh, and Sudurpaschim remain under-studied. The predominant contaminants identified were arsenic, trace elements, and microbial pathogens, contributing to widespread public health concerns, including arsenicosis and other waterborne diseases. Despite agriculture’s importance, the quality of irrigation water is largely overlooked, posing risks to food safety and public health. Arsenicosis and waterborne diseases remain major concerns, driven by both natural and human factors.
Our review suggests the urgent need for expanded monitoring and interventions, and the importance of coordinated efforts to ensure equitable access to safe water nationwide. Beyond Nepal, this article contributes to the global community by offering specific methodological insights into linking water quality phenomena with food- and waterborne disease risks in both urban and rural settings, particularly in developing countries facing similar challenges. Advancing such research and interventions is critical to reducing health disparities and supporting progress toward SDG 6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph22101526/s1, Supplementary S1: Search strategies for all databases searched; Supplementary S2: List of excluded studies with reasons; Supplementary S3: List of included studies; Supplementary S4: Characteristics of included studies.

Author Contributions

S.C.: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing—Original Draft, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration; A.C.: Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft; N.T.: Methodology, Resources, Writing—Original Draft, Project Administration; Y.A.: Writing—Original Draft; A.R.S.: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Funding Acquisition; L.M.: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing—Original Draft, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.C., A.C., Y.A., A.R.S., and L.M. were supported by an Institutional Grant from the University of Maryland Grand Challenges Program that established the Global FEWture Alliance. S.C. and A.R.S. were supported by NRT-INFEWS: UMD Global STEWARDS (STEM Training at the Nexus of Energy, WAter Reuse and FooD Systems), which was awarded to the UMD School of Public Health by the National Science Foundation’s National Research Traineeship Program (Grant #1828910).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data related to this work are presented in the manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work presented in this paper.

References

  1. UNICEF. Nepal MICS Statistical Snapshot: Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH). Available online: https://www.unicef.org/nepal/media/16261/file/Nepal-MICS-statistical-Snapshot-Water-Sanitation-and-Hygiene.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2023).
  2. USAID. Nepal: High Priority Country Plan. Available online: https://www.globalwaters.org/files/sites/default/files/nepal_hpc_plan_508.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2023).
  3. KUKL Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepani Limited: Annual Report (Sixteenth Anniversary, Kathmandu, 2080 Falgun). Available online: https://kathmanduwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/KUKL_Annual_Report_2080.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2023).
  4. U.S. Census Bureau Nepal: Population Clock—World. Available online: https://www.census.gov/popclock/world/np (accessed on 17 April 2024).
  5. Karn, S.K.; Harada, H. Surface Water Pollution in Three Urban Territories of Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. Environ. Manag. 2001, 28, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Acharya, S.; Upadhayay, H.R.; Houbraken, M.; Bajracharya, R.M.; Spanoghe, P. Occurrence of Unapproved Pesticides and Their Ecotoxicological Significance for an Agriculturally Influenced Reservoir and Its Tributaries in Nepal. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2023, 234, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aryal, M.; Adhikary, S. Solid Waste Management Practices and Challenges in Besisahar Municipality, Nepal. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0292758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Giri, I.; Ritika, K.C.; Khadka, U.R. Chapter 23: Water Quality Status in Bagmati River of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. In Ecological Significance of River Ecosystems; Madhav, S., Kanhaiya, S., Srivastav, A., Singh, V., Singh, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 481–502. ISBN 978-0-323-85045-2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khatoon, A. Waste Management: A Case Study in Nepal. In Solid Waste Policies and Strategies: Issues, Challenges and Case Studies; Ghosh, S.K., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 185–196. ISBN 978-981-15-1542-2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ogata, R.; Suenaga, K. Critical Fluctuations in the Arsenic Concentration of Tube Well Water in Nepal: Influences of Monsoon and Groundwater Irrigation. SSRN 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khanal, A.R.; Timilsina, R.H.; Sharma, B.; Pokharel, B.; Aryal, R. Contaminated Water and an Indication of Risk: Examining Microbial Contamination in the Water Used by Consumers and Commercial Growers in Fresh Produce Systems in Nepal. J. Food Prot. 2024, 87, 100228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. WHO. GHO|By Category|Number of Deaths by Country—Diarrhoeal Diseases. Available online: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.ghe1002015-CH3?lang=en (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  13. National Planning Commission. Nepal’s Sustainable Development Goals: Baseline Report; Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2017.
  14. Ministry of Law, Justice & Parliamentary Affairs. The Constitution of Nepal (First Amendment), 2016 (2072); Government of Nepal: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016. Available online: https://ag.gov.np/files/Constitution-of-Nepal_2072_Eng_www.moljpa.gov_.npDate-72_11_16.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  15. Ministry of Planning and Works. National Drinking Water Quality Standards: Implementation Directives for National Drinking Water Quality Standards; Government of Nepal, Ministry of Planning and Works: Kathmandu, Nepal; World Health Organization Nepal: Patan, Nepal; Department of Water Supply & Sewerage: Maharajaganja, India, 2005. Available online: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/nep199481.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  16. Ministry of Water Supply Wastewater Effluent Standard, 2080. Available online: https://mows.gov.np/content/6451/6451-effluent-water-standard/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  17. United Nations. Goal 6: Ensure Access to Water and Sanitation for All; United Nations Sustainable Development: New York, NY, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  18. ENPHO. Nepal Progress Towards Achieving 2030 Sanitation Goal; ENPHO: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2025; Available online: https://enpho.org/featured-post/nepal-progress-towards-achieving-2030-sanitation-goal/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  19. Peters, M.; McInerney, P.; Munn, Z.; Tricco, A.; Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; JBI: Adelaide, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, K.S. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Review and Apply Findings of Healthcare Research; Royal Society of Medicine Press: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 978-1-85315-525-3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Burlakoti, N.; Upadhyaya, J.; Ghimire, N.; Bajgai, T.R.; Chhetri, A.B.; Rawal, D.S.; Koirala, N.; Pant, B.R. Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Characterization of Processed Drinking Water in Central Nepal: Current State Study. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2020, 10, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Daniel, D.; Diener, A.; van de Vossenberg, J.; Bhatta, M.; Marks, S.J. Assessing Drinking Water Quality at the Point of Collection and within Household Storage Containers in the Hilly Rural Areas of Mid and Far-Western Nepal. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gruver, J.; Nicholson, K.; Neumann, K.; Sharma, S.; Dowling, C. Water Quality in the Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal: A Modification of Viable Field-Based Testing Methods. Environ. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 6, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haramoto, E. Detection of Waterborne Protozoa, Viruses, and Bacteria in Groundwater and Other Water Samples in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 120, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Inoue, D.; Hinoura, T.; Suzuki, N.; Pang, J.; Malla, R.; Shrestha, S.; Chapagain, S.K.; Matsuzawa, H.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, Y.; et al. High-Throughput DNA Microarray Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria in Shallow Well Groundwater in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 70, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pant, B.R. Ground Water Quality in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 178, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pantha, S.; Timilsina, S.; Pantha, S.; Manjan, S.K.; Maharjan, M. Water Quality Index of Springs in Mid-Hill of Nepal. Environ. Chall. 2022, 9, 100658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rai, S.K.; Ono, K.; Yanagida, J.I.; Ishiyama-Imura, S.; Kurokawa, M.; Rai, C.K. A Large-Scale Study of Bacterial Contamination of Drinking Water and Its Public Health Impact in Nepal. Nepal. Med. Coll. J. 2012, 14, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Sarkar, B.; Mitchell, E.; Frisbie, S.; Grigg, L.; Adhikari, S.; Maskey Byanju, R. Drinking Water Quality and Public Health in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Coliform Bacteria, Chemical Contaminants, and Health Status of Consumers. J. Environ. Public Health 2022, 2022, e3895859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Shakya, S.; Pradhan, B.; Smith, L.; Shrestha, J.; Tuladhar, S. Isolation and Characterization of Aerobic Culturable Arsenic-Resistant Bacteria from Surfacewater and Groundwater of Rautahat District, Nepal. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 95, S250–S255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shrestha, R.G.; Tandukar, S.; Bhandari, D.; Sherchan, S.P.; Tanaka, Y.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Prevalence of Arcobacter and Other Pathogenic Bacteria in River Water in Nepal. Water 2019, 11, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shrestha, R.G.; Tanaka, Y.; Malla, B.; Bhandari, D.; Tandukar, S.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Next-Generation Sequencing Identification of Pathogenic Bacterial Genes and Their Relationship with Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Different Water Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601–602, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shrestha, S. Seasonal Variation of Microbial Quality of Irrigation Water in Different Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Naresuan Univ. Eng. J. 2016, 11, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silvanus, V.; Gupta, R.K.; Shreshta, S.R. Assessment of Water Supply and Microbial Quality of Water among Schools in the Rural Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 2016, 18, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  36. Thakur, J.K.; Thakur, R.K.; Ramanathan, A.L.; Kumar, M.; Singh, S.K. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Nepal: An Overview. Water 2011, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bramer, W.M.; Jonge, G.B.; de Rethlefsen, M.L.; Mast, F.; Kleijnen, J. A Systematic Approach to Searching: An Efficient and Complete Method to Develop Literature Searches. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2018, 106, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frandsen, T.F.; Bruun Nielsen, M.F.; Lindhardt, C.L.; Eriksen, M.B. Using the Full PICO Model as a Search Tool for Systematic Reviews Resulted in Lower Recall for Some PICO Elements. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020, 127, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Munn, Z.; Peters, M.D.J.; Stern, C.; Tufanaru, C.; McArthur, A.; Aromataris, E. Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Acharya, K.; Khanal, S.; Pantha, K.; Amatya, N.; Davenport, R.J.; Werner, D. A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Molecular Methods, Including MinION Nanopore Sequencing, for Surveying Water Quality. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Adhikari, S.; Sharma Regmi, R.; Sapkota, S.; Khadka, S.; Patel, N.; Gurung, S.; Thapa, D.; Bhattarai, P.; Sapkota, P.; Devkota, R.; et al. Multidrug Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Detection of Bla CTX-M and Bla VIM Genes in E. Coli and Salmonella Isolates from Chutney Served at the Street-Food Stalls of Bharatpur, Nepal. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alam, A.; Islam, M.; Rahman, M.; Ahmed, E.; Islam, S.; Sultana, K.; Siddique, M. Transport of Toxic Metals through the Major River Systems of Bangladesh. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2004, 26, 328–332. [Google Scholar]
  43. Balestrini, R.; Polesello, S.; Sacchi, E. Chemistry and Isotopic Composition of Precipitation and Surface Waters in Khumbu Valley (Nepal Himalaya): N Dynamics of High Elevation Basins. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bhandari, D.; Tandukar, S.; Sherchand, S.; Thapa, P.; Shah, P.K. Cryptosporidium Infection among the School Children of Kathmandu Valley. J. Inst. Med. Nepal 2015, 37, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bhatt, M.P.; Masuzawa, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Gardner, K.H. Spatial Variations in Chemical Compositions along Langtang-Narayani River System in Central Nepal. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bhatt, M.P.; Hartmann, J.; Acevedo, M.F. Seasonal Variations of Biogeochemical Matter Export along the Langtang-Narayani River System in Central Himalaya. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 238, 208–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhatta, R.; Gurung, S.; Joshi, R.; Tuladhar, S.; Regmi, D.; Kafle, B.K.; Dahal, B.M.; Raut, N.; Kafle, K.R.; Kayastha, R.; et al. Spatio-Temporal Hydrochemistry of Two Selected Ramsar Sites (Rara and Ghodaghodi) of West Nepal. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bhattachan, B.; Panta, Y.B.; Tiwari, S.; Magar, D.T.; Sherchand, J.B.; Rai, G.; Rai, S.K. Intestinal Parasitic Infection among School Children in Chitwan District of Nepal. J. Inst. Med. Nepal 2015, 37, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bhusal, A.; Devkota, A. Environmental Variables and Macrophytes of Lakes of the Chitwan National Park, Central Nepal. Limnol. Rev. 2020, 20, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bickle, M.J.; Tipper, E.; Galy, A.; Chapman, H.; Harris, N. On Discrimination between Carbonate and Silicate Inputs to Himalayan Rivers. Am. J. Sci. 2015, 315, 120–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chakraborti, D.; Mukherjee, S.C.; Pati, S.; Sengupta, M.K.; Rahman, M.M.; Chowdhury, U.K.; Lodh, D.; Chanda, C.R.; Chakraborti, A.K.; Basu, G.K. Arsenic Groundwater Contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: A Future Danger? Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Davis, J.A. Water Quality Standards for the Bagmati River. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1977, 49, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. English, N.B.; Quade, J.; DeCelles, P.G.; Garzione, C.N. Geologic Control of Sr and Major Element Chemistry in Himalayan Rivers, Nepal. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 2549–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Evans, M.J.; Derry, L.A.; Anderson, S.P.; France-Lanord, C. Hydrothermal Source of Radiogenic Sr to Himalayan Rivers. Geology 2002, 29, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Evans, M.J.; Derry, L.A.; France-Lanord, C. Geothermal Fluxes of Alkalinity in the Narayani River System of Central Nepal. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2004, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Grabczak, J.; Kotarba, M. Isotopic Composition of the Thermal Waters in the Central Part of the Nepal Himalayas. Geothermics 1985, 14, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Griffioen, J.; Passier, H.F.; Klein, J. Comparison of Selection Methods to Deduce Natural Background Levels for Groundwater Units. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 4863–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gupta, R.; Rayamajhee, B.; Sherchan, S.P.; Rai, G.; Mukhiya, R.K.; Khanal, B.; Rai, S.K. Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitosis and Associated Risk Factors among School Children of Saptari District, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. Trop. Med. Health 2020, 48, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gupta, T.; Kumari, R. Assessment of Groundwater Nitrate Vulnerability Using DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC in Upper Catchment of Sabarmati Basin. Environ. Earth Sci. 2023, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ise, T.; Pokharel, B.M.; Rawal, S.; Shrestha, R.S.; Dhakhwa, J.R. Outbreaks of Cholera in Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. J. Trop. Pediatr. 1996, 42, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jüttner, I.; Sharma, S.; Dahal, B.M.; Ormerod, S.J.; Chimonides, P.J.; Cox, E.J. Diatoms as Indicators of Stream Quality in the Kathmandu Valley and Middle Hills of Nepal and India. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 48, 2065–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Katz, J.; West, K.P., Jr.; Khatry, S.K.; LeClerq, S.C.; Pradhan, E.K.; Thapa, M.D.; Ram Shrestha, S.; Taylor, H.R. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Trachoma in Sarlahi District, Nepal. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1996, 80, 1037–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khanitchaidecha, W.; Shakya, M.; Nakano, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Kazama, F. Development of an Attached Growth Reactor for NH 4 –N Removal at a Drinking Water Supply System in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2012, 47, 734–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumar, H.R. Causes and Effects of Critical Change in Nitrate Level of Ground Water in Koshi Region of North Bihar. Pollut. Res. 2013, 32, 931–932. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, L.I.; Chye, T.T.; Karmacharya, B.M.; Govind, S.K. Blastocystis Sp.: Waterborne Zoonotic Organism, a Possibility? Parasit. Vectors 2012, 5, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, M.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, X.; Karki, K.; Zeng, C.; Pandey, A.; Rawat, B.; Zhang, F. Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments in the Trans-Himalayan Koshi River Catchment: Distribution, Source Identification and Pollution Assessment. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mainali, J.; Chang, H. Environmental and Spatial Factors Affecting Surface Water Quality in a Himalayan Watershed, Central Nepal. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2021, 9, 100096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Malla-Pradhan, R.; Pradhan, B.L.; Phoungthong, K.; Joshi, T.P. Occurrence and Distribution of Microplastics from Nepal’s Second Largest Lake. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Malla-Pradhan, R.; Phoungthong, K.; Suwunwong, T.; Joshi, T.P.; Pradhan, B.L. Microplastic Pollution in Lakeshore Sediments: The First Report on Abundance and Composition of Phewa Lake, Nepal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 70065–70075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Malla-Pradhan, R.; Suwunwong, T.; Phoungthong, K.; Joshi, T.P.; Pradhan, B.L. Microplastic Pollution in Urban Lake Phewa, Nepal: The First Report on Abundance and Composition in Surface Water of Lake in Different Seasons. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 39928–39936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Miftahussurur, M.; Sharma, R.P.; Shrestha, P.K.; Suzuki, R.; Uchida, T.; Yamaoka, Y. Molecular Epidemiology of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Nepal: Specific Ancestor Root. PLoS One 2015, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pant, R.R.; Zhang, F.; Rehman, F.U.; Wang, G.; Ye, M.; Zeng, C.; Tang, H. Spatiotemporal Variations of Hydrogeochemistry and Its Controlling Factors in the Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalaya Nepal. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622–623, 770–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pokhrel, S.; Ghimire, N.P.; Rai, S.K. Seasonal Variation of Algal Diversity with Reference to Water Quality in Jagadishpur Reservoir, Nepal. Limnol. Rev. 2021, 21, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rahman, M.M.; Naidu, R.; Bhattacharya, P. Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater in the Southeast Asia Region. Environ. Geochem. Health 2009, 31, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shaji, E.; Santosh, M.; Sarath, K.V.; Prakash, P.; Deepchand, V.; Divya, B.V. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater; a Global Synopsis with Focus on the Indian Peninsula. Geosci. Front. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sherchan, J.B.; Sherpa, K.; Tandukar, S.; Cross, J.H.; Gajadhar, A.; Shrechand, J.B. Infection of Cyclospora Cayetanensis in Diarrhoeal Children of Nepal. J. Nepal Paediatr. Soc. 2010, 30, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sherpa, A.M.; Byamukama, D.; Shrestha, R.R.; Haberl, R.; Mach, R.L.; Farnleitner, A.H. Use of Faecal Pollution Indicators to Estimate Pathogen Die off Conditions in Source Separated Faeces in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Water Health 2009, 7, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shrestha, A.; Sharma, S.; Gerold, J.; Erismann, S.; Sagar, S.; Koju, R.; Schindler, C.; Odermatt, P.; Utzinger, J.; Cissé, G. Water Quality, Sanitation, and Hygiene Conditions in Schools and Households in Dolakha and Ramechhap Districts, Nepal: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2017, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shrestha, R.R.; Haberl, R.; Laber, J. Constructed Wetland Technology Transfer to Nepal. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Verma, A.; Yadav, B.K.; Singh, N.B. Hydrochemical Monitoring of Groundwater Quality for Drinking and Irrigation Use in Rapti Basin. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ahmad, S.A.; Maharjan, M.; Watanabe, C.; Ohtsuka, R. Arsenicosis in Two Villages in Terai, Lowland Nepal. Environ. Sci. 2004, 11, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  82. Aryal, J.; Gautam, B.; Sapkota, N. Drinking Water Quality Assessment. J. Nepal. Health Res. Counc. 2012, 10, 192–196. [Google Scholar]
  83. Aryal, M. An Analysis of Drinking Water Quality Parameters to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in Rural and Urban Areas of Besisahar, Lamjung, Nepal. World Water Policy 2022, 10, 297–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Atreya, K.; Panthee, S.; Sharma, P. Bacterial Contamination of Drinking Water and the Economic Burden of Illnesses for the Nepalese Households. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2006, 16, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Baker, S.; Holt, K.E.; Clements, A.C.A.; Karkey, A.; Arjyal, A.; Boni, M.F.; Dongol, S.; Hammond, N.; Koirala, S.; Duy, P.T.; et al. Combined High-Resolution Genotyping and Geospatial Analysis Reveals Modes of Endemic Urban Typhoid Fever Transmission. Open Biol. 2011, 1, 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bänziger, C.; Schertenleib, A.; Kunwar, B.M.; Bhatta, M.R.; Marks, S.J. Assessing Microbial Water Quality, Users’ Perceptions and System Functionality Following a Combined Water Safety Intervention in Rural Nepal. Front. Water 2022, 3, 750802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bhandari, P.; Banjara, M.R.; Singh, A.; Kandel, S.; Rawal, D.S.; Pant, B.R. Water Quality Status of Groundwater and Municipal Water Supply (Tap Water) from Bagmati River Basin in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2021, 11, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhatt, M. Water Quality and Flux of Bagmati River within Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. In Surface and Sub-Surface Water in Asia: Issues and Perspectives; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 243–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bhatt, M.P.; Gardner, K.H. Variation in DOC and Trace Metal Concentration along the Heavily Urbanized Basin in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Environ. Geol. 2008, 58, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bhatt, M.P.; Masuzawa, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Takeuchi, N. Chemical Characteristics of Pond Waters within the Debris Area of Lirung Glacier in Nepal Himalaya. J. Limnol. 2007, 66, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bhatt, M.P.; McDowell, W.H. Evolution of Chemistry along the Bagmati Drainage Network in Kathmandu Valley. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2007, 185, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bhatt, M.P.; McDowell, W.H.; Gardner, K.H.; Hartmann, J. Chemistry of the Heavily Urbanized Bagmati River System in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Export of Organic Matter, Nutrients, Major Ions, Silica, and Metals. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 71, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bhatta, D.R.; Bangtrakulnonth, A.; Tishyadhigama, P.; Saroj, S.D.; Bandekar, J.R.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Kapadnis, B.P. Serotyping, PCR, Phage-Typing and Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing of Salmonella Serovars Isolated from Urban Drinking Water Supply Systems of Nepal. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bhetwal, A.; Maharjan, A.; Shakya, S.; Satyal, D.; Ghimire, S.; Khanal, P.R.; Parajuli, N.P. Isolation of Potential Phages against Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Isolates: Promising Agents in the Rivers of Kathmandu, Nepal. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bittner, A.; Khayyat, A.M.A.; Luu, K.; Maag, B.; Murcott, S.E.; Pinto, P.M.; Sagara, J.; Wolfe, A. Drinking Water Quality & Point-of-Use Treatment Studies in Nepal. Civ. Eng. Pract. 2002, 17, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  96. Chalise, B.; Paudyal, P.; Kunwar, B.B.; Bishwakarma, K.; Thapa, B.; Pant, R.R.; Neupane, B.B. Water Quality and Hydrochemical Assessments of Thermal Springs, Gandaki Province, Nepal. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chapagain, S.K.; Pandey, V.P.; Shrestha, S.; Nakamura, T.; Kazama, F. Assessment of Deep Groundwater Quality in Kathmandu Valley Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2010, 210, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dahal, B.M.; Fuerhacker, M.; Mentler, A.; Karki, K.B.; Shrestha, R.R.; Blum, W.E.H. Arsenic Contamination of Soils and Agricultural Plants through Irrigation Water in Nepal. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 155, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Dahal, B.M.; Fuerhacker, M.; Mentler, A.; Shrestha, R.R.; Blum, W.E.H. Screening of Arsenic in Irrigation Water Used for Vegetable Production in Nepal. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2008, 54, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dahal, B.M.; Sitaula, B.K.; Sharma, S.; Bajracharya, R.M. Effects of Agricultural Intensification on the Quality of Rivers in Rural Watersheds of Nepal. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2007, 5, 341–347. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dumaru, B.; Kayastha, S.P.; Pandey, V.P. Spring Water Assessment for Quality and Suitability for Various Uses: The Case of Thuligaad Watershed, Western Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Futawatari, T.; Kashiwazaki, H.; Hamai, T.; Shrestha, M.P. Perceived Environmental Problems by Nepalese of Three Ecologically Different Areas. J. Global Environ. Eng. 2000, 6, 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  103. Gautam, B. Microbiological Quality Assessment (Including Antibiogram and Threat Assessment) of Bottled Water. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 1980–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gautam, B.; Gyanwali, G.; Ussery, D. Assessment of Bacterial Load in Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottled Water Marketed in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ghezzi, L.; Iaccarino, S.; Carosi, R.; Montomoli, C.; Simonetti, M.; Paudyal, K.R.; Cidu, R.; Petrini, R. Water Quality and Solute Sources in the Marsyangdi River System of Higher Himalayan Range (West-Central Nepal). Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 677, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ghimire, G.P.S. Water Pollution: A Major Crisis in Nepal. Environmentalist 1985, 5, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ghimire, M.; Regmi, T. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Kodku River of Lalitpur District, Nepal. H2Open J. 2023, 6, 188–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ghimire, M.; Kayastha, S.P.; Regmi, T.; Bhuiyan, C. Hydro-Chemical Characterisation and Quality Assessment of Shallow Groundwater in Parts of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Phys. Chem. Earth 2023, 129, 103349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ghimire, M.; Regmi, T.; Kayastha, S.P.; Bhuiyan, C. Groundwater Quality and Community Health Risk in Lalitpur Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Geospatial Analysis. Geocarto Int. 2023, 38, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Guragai, B.; Takizawa, S.; Hashimoto, T.; Oguma, K. Effects of Inequality of Supply Hours on Consumers’ Coping Strategies and Perceptions of Intermittent Water Supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 599, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Guzzella, L.; Poma, G.; De Paolis, A.; Roscioli, C.; Viviano, G. Organic Persistent Toxic Substances in Soils, Waters and Sediments along an Altitudinal Gradient at Mt. Sagarmatha, Himalayas, Nepal. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2552–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Gyawali, T.; Pant, S.; Nakamura, K.; Komai, T.; Paudel, S.R. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater of Nawalparasi-West, Nepal: An Investigation with Suggested Countermeasures for South Asian Region. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Hammoud, A.; Leung, J.; Tripathi, S.; Butler, A.; Sule, M.; Templeton, M. The Impact of Latrine Contents and Emptying Practices on Nitrogen Contamination of Well Water in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2018, 5, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Haramoto, E.; Kitajima, M. Quantification and Genotyping of Aichi Virus 1 in Water Samples in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Food Environ. Virol. 2017, 9, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Haramoto, E.; Yamada, K.; Nishida, K. Prevalence of Protozoa, Viruses, Coliphages and Indicator Bacteria in Groundwater and River Water in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 105, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ito, Y.; Shrestha Malla, S.; Bhattarai, A.P.; Haramoto, E.; Shindo, J.; Nishida, K. Waterborne Diarrhoeal Infection Risk from Multiple Water Sources and the Impact of an Earthquake. J. Water Health 2020, 18, 464–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Joshi, B.; Devkota, A. Assessment of the Water Quality of Ghodaghodi Lake Using Selected Physicochemical Parameters. Int. J. Ecology Environm Sci. 2022, 48, 495–504. [Google Scholar]
  118. Kafle, B.K.; Sharma, C.M.; Gurung, S.; Raut, N.; Kafle, K.R.; Bhatta, R.; Tripathee, L.; Paudyal, R.; Guo, J.; Kang, S.; et al. Hydrogeochemistry of Two Major Mid-Hill Lentic Water Bodies for Irrigation of the Central Himalaya, Nepal. Environm Nat. Resour. J. 2023, 21, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kanel, S.R.; Malla, G.B.; Choi, H. Modeling and Study of the Mechanism of Mobilization of Arsenic Contamination in the Groundwater of Nepal in South Asia. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2013, 15, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kannel, P.R.; Kanel, S.R.; Lee, S.; Li, R. Chemometrics in Assessment of Seasonal Variation of Water Quality in Fresh Water Systems. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 174, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kannel, P.R.; Lee, S.; Kanel, S.R.; Khan, S.P. Chemometric Application in Classification and Assessment of Monitoring Locations of an Urban River System. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 582, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kannel, P.R.; Lee, S.; Kanel, S.R.; Khan, S.P.; Lee, Y.-S. Spatial-Temporal Variation and Comparative Assessment of Water Qualities of Urban River System: A Case Study of the River Bagmati (Nepal). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 129, 433–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kannel, P.R.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.-S. Assessment of Spatial–Temporal Patterns of Surface and Ground Water Qualities and Factors Influencing Management Strategy of Groundwater System in an Urban River Corridor of Nepal. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Karkey, A.; Jombart, T.; Walker, A.W.; Thompson, C.N.; Torres, A.; Dongol, S.; Tran Vu Thieu, N.; Pham Thanh, D.; Tran Thi Ngoc, D.; Voong Vinh, P.; et al. The Ecological Dynamics of Fecal Contamination and Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in Municipal Kathmandu Drinking Water. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kelly, L.J. Expedition to Nepal: Research Project Aims to Prevent Waterborne Disease. J. Environ. Health 1990, 53, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  126. Khadka, M.S. The Groundwater Quality Situation in Alluvial Aquifers on the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 1993, 14, 207–211. [Google Scholar]
  127. Khadka, U.; Ramanathan, A. Major Ion Composition and Seasonal Variation in the Lesser Himalayan Lake: Case of Begnas Lake of the Pokhara Valley, Nepal. Arabian J. Geosci. 2013, 6, 4191–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Khadka, Y.J.; Iqbal, M.Z.; De Nault, K.J. Urban Pollution of Bagmati River Corridor within the Densely Populated Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. Asian J. Wat Environ. Pollut. 2015, 12, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Khatiwada, N.R.; Takizawa, S.; Tran, T.V.N.; Inoue, M. Groundwater Contamination Assessment for Sustainable Water Supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Koju, N.K.; Sherpa, C.D.; Koju, N.P. Assessment of Physico-Chemical Parameters along with the Concentration of Heavy Metals in the Effluents Released from Different Industries in Kathmandu Valley. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2022, 233, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Küpper, T.; Apel, C.; Bertsch, D.; van der Giet, M.; van der Giet, S.; Graß, M.; Cerfontaine, C.; Haunolder, M.; Hundt, N.; Kühn, C.; et al. Analysis of Local Drinking Water for Fecal Contamination in Solu-Khumbu/Mt. Everest Region, Nepal. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2022, 246, 114043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, Y.; Yao, T.; Jiao, N.; Kang, S.; Huang, S.; Li, Q.; Wang, K.; Liu, X. 211at 6,350 m on the East Rongbuk Glacier, Mount Everest. Extrem. Life Under Extrem. Cond. 2009, 13, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Liu, Y.; Yao, T.; Jiao, N.; Kang, S.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, S. Microbial Community Structure in Moraine Lakes and Glacial Meltwaters, Mount Everest. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 265, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Maden, N.; Singh, A.; Smith, L.; Maharjan, M.; Shrestha, S. Factors Associated with Arsenicosis and Arsenic Exposure Status in Nepal: Implications from Community Based Study. J. Community Health 2011, 36, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Maharjan, M.; Shrestha, R.R.; Ahmad, S.A.; Watanabe, C.; Ohtsuka, R. Prevalence of Arsenicosis in Terai, Nepal. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2006, 24, 246–252. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23499363 (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  136. Maharjan, M.; Watanabe, C.; Ahmad, S.A.; Umezaki, M.; Ohtsuka, R. Mutual Interaction between Nutritional Status and Chronic Arsenic Toxicity Due to Groundwater Contamination in an Area of Terai, Lowland Nepal. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007, 61, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Maharjan, M.; Watanabe, C.; Ahmad, S.A.; Ohtsuka, R. Short Report: Arsenic Contamination in Drinking Water and Skin Manifestations in Lowland Nepal: The First Community-Based Survey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 73, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mahato, S.; Mahato, A.; Karna, P.K.; Balmiki, N. Investigating Aquifer Contamination and Groundwater Quality in Eastern Terai Region of Nepal. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Malla, B.; Shrestha, R.G.; Bhandari, D.; Tandukar, S.; Shrestha, S.; Yoshinaga, H.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Nishida, K.; Tanaka, Y.; et al. Detection of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Fecal Indicator Bacteria, and Total Bacteria in Commercial Jar Water in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Inst. Med. Nepal. 2015, 37, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Malla, B.; Shrestha, R.G.; Tandukar, S.; Bhandari, D.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Identification of Human and Animal Fecal Contamination in Drinking Water Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Using Host-Associated Bacteroidales Quantitative PCR Assays. Water 2018, 10, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Malla, B.; Ghaju Shrestha, R.; Tandukar, S.; Bhandari, D.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Validation of Host-specific Bacteroidales Quantitative PCR Assays and Their Application to Microbial Source Tracking of Drinking Water Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Malla, B.; Shrestha, R.G.; Tandukar, S.; Bhandari, D.; Thakali, O.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Detection of Pathogenic Viruses, Pathogen Indicators, and Fecal-Source Markers within Tanker Water and Their Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Pathogens 2019, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Malla, B.; Shrestha, R.G.; Tandukar, S.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Performance Evaluation of Human-Specific Viral Markers and Application of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and Crassphage to Environmental Water Samples as Fecal Pollution Markers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Food Environ. Virol. 2019, 11, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Malla-Pradhan, R.; Pradhan, B.L.; Prasai Joshi, T.; Phoungthong, K. Water Quality Assessment through Numerical Indices in Phewa Lake, Nepal. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 104, 6446–6460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Meierhofer, R.; Bänziger, C.; Deppeler, S.; Kunwar, B.M.; Bhatta, M. From Water Source to Tap of Ceramic Filters-Factors That Influence Water Quality between Collection and Consumption in Rural Households in Nepal. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Merz, J.; Nakarmi, G.; Shrestha, S.; Dahal, B.M.; Dongol, B.S.; Schaffner, M.; Shakya, S.; Sharma, S.; Weingartner, R. Public Water Sources in Rural Watersheds of Nepal’s Middle Mountains: Issues and Constraints. Environ. Manag. 2004, 34, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Moravek, J.A.; Shrestha, M.B.; Yonzon, S. Baseline Biodiversity and Physiochemical Survey in Parvati Kunda and Surrounding Area in Rasuwa, Nepal. J. Threat. Taxa 2019, 11, 13734–13747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mueller, B.; Hug, S.J. Climatic Variations and De-Coupling between Arsenic and Iron in Arsenic Contaminated Ground Water in the Lowlands of Nepal. Chemosphere 2018, 210, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Nakano, A.; Kurosawa, K.; Shamim, U.M.d.; Tani, M. Geochemical Assessment of Arsenic Contamination in Well Water and Sediments from Several Communities in the Nawalparasi District of Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 3269–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nicholson, K.N.; Neumann, K.; Dowling, C.; Gruver, J.; Sherman, H.; Sharma, S. An Assessment of Drinking Water Sources in Sagarmatha National Park (Mt Everest Region), Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 2018, 38, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Pant, D.N.; Poudyal, N.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Pant, N.D.; Bhattacharya, S.K. Bacteriological Quality of Bottled Drinking Water versus Municipal Tap Water in Dharan Municipality, Nepal. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2016, 35, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pant, R.R.; Bishwakarma, K.; Basnet, B.B.; Pal, K.B.; Karki, L.; Dhital, Y.P.; Bhatta, Y.R.; Pant, B.R.; Thapa, L.B. Distribution and Risk Appraisal of Dissolved Trace Elements in Begnas Lake and Rupa Lake, Gandaki Province, Nepal. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pant, R.R.; Bishwakarma, K.; Kandel, K.; Poudel, S.; Nepal, J.; Neupane, B.B.; Singh, V.B. Seasonal Variations and Health Risk Assessment of Trace Elements in the Badigad River, Lesser Himalayas, Nepal. Acta Geochim. 2023, 42, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pant, R.R.; Bishwakarma, K.; Nepal, J.; Paudel, S.; Chand, M.B.; Qaisar, F.U.R.; Pal, K.B.; Thapa, L.B.; Wang, G. Seasonal Variations and Health Risk Assessment of Trace Elements in Seti River Basin, Gandaki Province, Nepal. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 107, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Pant, R.R.; Bishwakarma, K.; Rehman Qaiser, F.U.; Pathak, L.; Jayaswal, G.; Sapkota, B.; Pal, K.B.; Thapa, L.B.; Koirala, M.; Rijal, K.; et al. Imprints of COVID-19 Lockdown on the Surface Water Quality of Bagmati River Basin, Nepal. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 289, 112522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Pant, R.R.; Qaiser, F.U.R.; Wang, G.; Adhikari, S.; Bishwakarma, K.; Baral, U.; Rimal, B.; Bhatta, Y.R.; Rijal, K. Hydrochemical Appraisal and Solute Acquisitions in Seti River Basin, Central Himalaya, Nepal. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pant, R.R.; Zhang, F.; Rehman, F.U.; Koirala, M.; Rijal, K.; Maskey, R. Spatiotemporal Characterization of Dissolved Trace Elements in the Gandaki River, Central Himalaya Nepal. J. Hazard Mater. 2020, 389, 121913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pantha, K.; Acharya, K.; Mohapatra, S.; Khanal, S.; Amatya, N.; Ospina-Betancourth, C.; Butte, G.; Shrestha, S.D.; Rajbhandari, P.; Werner, D. Faecal Pollution Source Tracking in the Holy Bagmati River by Portable 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. NPJ Clean Water 2021, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pathak, D.R.; Hiratsuka, A. An Investigation of Nitrate and Iron Concentrations and Their Relationship in Shallow Groundwater Systems of Kathmandu. Desalin Water Treat. 2010, 19, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Paudel, K.; Basi-Chipalu, S. Microbiological Assessment for Potable Water. Sci. World 2022, 15, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Paudyal, R.; Kang, S.; Sharma, C.M.; Tripathee, L.; Huang, J.; Rupakheti, D.; Sillanpää, M. Major Ions and Trace Elements of Two Selected Rivers near Everest Region, Southern Himalayas, Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Paudyal, R.; Kang, S.; Sharma, C.M.; Tripathee, L.; Sillanpää, M. Variations of the Physicochemical Parameters and Metal Levels and Their Risk Assessment in Urbanized Bagmati River, Kathmandu, Nepal. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Pokhrel, B.M.; Thapa, N. Prevalence of Aeromonas in Different Clinical and Water Samples with Special Reference to Gastroenteritis. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 2004, 6, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  164. Poudel, S.; Paudyal, A.; Sharma, B.P.; Sharma, K.; Baral, Y.; Adhikari, S.; Hada, M.S.S. Microbial and Physico-Chemical Quality Assessment of Rivers of Kathmandu Valley. Nepal. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Pradhan, B.; Gruendlinger, R.; Fuerhapper, I.; Pradhan, P.; Pradhanang, S. Knowledge of Water Quality and Water Borne Disease in Rural Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2005, 8, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Pradhan, S.P.; Joshi, P.; Poudel, P.; Ghimire, A.; Chhetri, S.; Maharjan, J.; Khadgi, N.; Poudel, M.; Luitel, A.; Pandey, B.P.; et al. Long-Term Assessment of Water Quality of Kathmandu University Drinking Water Supply Centre, Nepal. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2022, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Rai, S.K.; Ono, K.; Yanagida, J.I.; Kurokawa, M.; Rai, C.K. Status of Drinking Water Contamination in Mountain Region, Nepal. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 2009, 11, 281–283. [Google Scholar]
  168. Regmi, R.K.; Mishra, B.K.; Masago, Y.; Luo, P.; Toyozumi-Kojima, A.; Jalilov, S.-M. Applying a Water Quality Index Model to Assess the Water Quality of the Major Rivers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rupakheti, D.; Tripathee, L.; Kang, S.; Sharma, C.M.; Paudyal, R.; Sillanpää, M. Assessment of Water Quality and Health Risks for Toxic Trace Elements in Urban Phewa and Remote Gosainkunda Lakes, Nepal. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2017, 23, 959–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sah, J.P.; Sah, S.K.; Acharya, P.; Pant, D.; Lance, V.A. Assessment of Water Pollution in the Narayani River, Nepal. Int. J. Ecology Environ. Sci. 2000, 26, 235–252. [Google Scholar]
  171. Sapkota, M.; Pant, R.R.; Pathak, L.; Khanal, B.; Shrestha, S.; Poudel, B.; Poudel, S.; Thapa, L.B.; Pal, K.B.; Bishwakarma, K.; et al. Assessment of Water Quality Using Multivariate Statistical Approaches in Jagadishpur Reservoir, Lumbini Province, Nepal. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shakya, B.M.; Nakamura, T.; Kamei, T.; Shrestha, S.D.; Nishida, K. Seasonal Groundwater Quality Status and Nitrogen Contamination in the Shallow Aquifer System of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water 2019, 11, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sharma, C.M.; Kang, S.; Tripathee, L.; Paudyal, R.; Sillanpää, M. Major Ions and Irrigation Water Quality Assessment of the Nepalese Himalayan Rivers. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 2668–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sharma, C.; Sharma, S.; Bajracharya, R.; Gurung, S.; Jüttner, I.; Kang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Q. First Results on Bathymetry and Limnology of High-Altitude Lakes in the Gokyo Valley, Sagarmatha (Everest) National Park, Nepal. Limnology 2012, 13, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sherchand, J.B.; Cross, J.H.; Jimba, M.; Sherchand, S.; Shrestha, M.P. Study of Cyclospora Cayetanensis in Health Care Facilities, Sewage Water and Green Leafy Vegetables in Nepal. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1999, 30, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  176. Shrestha, A.; Six, J.; Dahal, D.; Marks, S.; Meierhofer, R. Association of Nutrition, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Practices with Children’s Nutritional Status, Intestinal Parasitic Infections and Diarrhoea in Rural Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shrestha, B.K.; Shakya, J. Simple Method Devised for Rapid Isolation and Identification of Vibrio Cholerae from Water Resources of Sunsari District, Nepal. Nepal. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Shrestha, R.G.; Tanaka, Y.; Malla, B.; Tandukar, S.; Bhandari, D.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Development of a Quantitative PCR Assay for Arcobacter spp. and Its Application to Environmental Water Samples. Microbes Environ. 2018, 33, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Shrestha, R.R.; Shrestha, M.P.; Upadhyay, N.P.; Pradhan, R.; Khadka, R.; Maskey, A.; Maharjan, M.; Tuladhar, S.; Dahal, B.M.; Shrestha, K. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination, Its Health Impact and Mitigation Program in Nepal. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2003, 38, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Shrestha, R.R.; Shrestha, M.P.; Upadhyay, N.P.; Pradhan, R.; Khadka, R.; Maskey, A.; Tuladhar, S.; Dahal, B.M.; Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, K.B. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in Nepal: A New Challenge for Water Supply Sector. In Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects V; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  181. Shrestha, S.; Haramoto, E.; Malla, R.; Nishida, K. Risk of Diarrhoea from Shallow Groundwater Contaminated with Enteropathogens in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J. Water Health 2015, 13, 259–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Shrestha, S.; Haramoto, E.; Sherchand, J.B.; Junko, S. Detection of Coliform Bacteria in Irrigation Water and on Vegetable Surfaces in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. J. Inst. Med. Nepal 2016, 38, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Shrestha, S.; Nakamura, T.; Magome, J.; Aihara, Y.; Kondo, N.; Haramoto, E.; Malla, B.; Shindo, J.; Nishida, K. Groundwater Use and Diarrhoea in Urban Nepal: Novel Application of a Geostatistical Interpolation Technique Linking Environmental and Epidemiologic Survey Data. Int. Health 2018, 10, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Shrestha, S.; Nakamura, T.; Malla, R.; Nishida, K. Seasonal Variation in the Microbial Quality of Shallow Groundwater in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2014, 14, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, S.; Shindo, J.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E. Virological Quality of Irrigation Water Sources and Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and Tobacco Mosaic Virus as Index of Pathogenic Virus Contamination Level. Food Environ. Virol. 2018, 10, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Spica, N.; Green, M.; Lown, L.; Duwal, R.; Fuyal, M.; Giri, S.; Giri, B.; Paetkau, D.; Lamichhane-Khadka, R. Development of a Microbiological Paper-Based Analytical Device to Detect Fecal Contamination of Water in Resource-Limited Settings. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Sthapit, N.; Malla, B.; Ghaju Shrestha, R.; Tandukar, S.; Sherchand, J.B.; Haramoto, E.; Kazama, F. Investigation of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia Coli in Groundwater, River Water, and Fecal Sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Subedi, D.P.; Tyata, R.B.; Khadgi, A.; Wong, C.S. Physicochemical and Microbiological Analysis of Drinking Water Treated by Using Ozone. Sains Malays. 2012, 41, 739–745. [Google Scholar]
  189. Subedi, M.; Aryal, M. Public Perception about Drinking Jar Water and Its Bacteriological Analysis. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 2010, 12, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  190. Subedi, M.; Magar, M.G.; Rajbhandari, G.S. Assessment of Quality of Underground Drinking Water: Very near (≤20 Meters) and Far (>50 Meters) from the River. Nepal J. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Sun, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Kandel, K.; Rawat, B.; Pandey, A.; Guo, J.; Kang, S.; Pant, R.R.; Cong, Z.; et al. Mercury Variation and Export in Trans-Himalayan Rivers: Insights from Field Observations in the Koshi River. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 139836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tamrakar, P.; Sapkota, K.; Shakya, S.K. Water Quality Assessment of City Water Supply in Kathmandu Valley. Indian J. Environ. Prot. 2017, 37, 290–297. [Google Scholar]
  193. Tanaka, Y.; Nishida, K.; Nakamura, T.; Chapagain, S.K.; Inoue, D.; Sei, K.; Mori, K.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kazama, F. Characterization of Microbial Communities Distributed in the Groundwater Pumped from Deep Tube Wells in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. J. Water Health 2012, 10, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Tandukar, S.; Sherchand, J.B.; Bhandari, D.; Sherchan, S.P.; Malla, B.; Ghaju Shrestha, R.; Haramoto, E. Presence of Human Enteric Viruses, Protozoa, and Indicators of Pathogens in the Bagmati River, Nepal. Pathogens 2018, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Tandukar, S.; Sherchand, J.B.; Karki, S.; Malla, B.; Ghaju Shrestha, R.; Bhandari, D.; Thakali, O.; Haramoto, E. Co-Infection by Waterborne Enteric Viruses in Children with Gastroenteritis in Nepal. Healthcare 2019, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Thakur, J.K.; Diwakar, J.; Singh, S.K. Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Groundwater of Bhaktapur Municipality, Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 4973–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Thapa, K.; Shrestha, S.M.; Rawal, D.S.; Pant, B.R. Quality of Drinking Water in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2019, 5, 1995–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Tripathee, L.; Kang, S.; Sharma, C.M.; Rupakheti, D.; Paudyal, R.; Huang, J.; Sillanpää, M. Preliminary Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Metals in Surface Water of the Himalayan Rivers, Nepal. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 97, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Upadhyaya, N.P.; Roy, N.N. Studies in River Pollution in Kathmandu Valley. Indian J. Environ. Health 1982, 24, 124–135. [Google Scholar]
  200. Uppal, J.; Zheng, Q.; Le, X. Arsenic in Drinking Water: Recent Examples and Updates from Southeast Asia. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2019, 7, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Uprety, S.; Dangol, B.; Nakarmi, P.; Dhakal, I.; Sherchan, S.P.; Shisler, J.L.; Jutla, A.; Amarasiri, M.; Sano, D.; Nguyen, T.H. Assessment of Microbial Risks by Characterization of Escherichia Coli Presence to Analyze the Public Health Risks from Poor Water Quality in Nepal. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 226, 113484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. van Geen, A.; Radloff, K.A.; Aziz, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Huq, M.R.; Ahmed, K.M.; Weinman, B.; Goodbred, S.; Jung, H.B.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Comparison of Arsenic Concentrations in Simultaneously-Collected Ground Water and Aquifer Particles from Bangladesh, India, Vietnam, and Nepal. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 3244–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Warner, N.R.; Levy, J.; Harpp, K.; Farruggia, F. Drinking Water Quality in Nepal’s Kathmandu Valley: A Survey and Assessment of Selected Controlling Site Characteristics. Hydrogeol. J. 2008, 16, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Yadav, I.C.; Dhuldhaj, U.P.; Mohan, D.; Singh, S. Current Status of Groundwater Arsenic and Its Impacts on Health and Mitigation Measures in the Terai Basin of Nepal: An Overview. Environ. Rev. 2011, 19, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Yadav, I.C.; Devi, N.L.; Mohan, D.; Shihua, Q.; Singh, S. Assessment of Groundwater Quality with Special Reference to Arsenic in Nawalparasi District, Nepal Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Yadav, I.C.; Devi, N.L.; Singh, S. Spatial and Temporal Variation in Arsenic in the Groundwater of Upstream of Ganges River Basin, Nepal. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 1265–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Yadav, I.C.; Devi, N.L.; Singh, S. Reductive Dissolution of Iron Oxyhydroxides Directs Ground Water Arsenic Mobilization in the Upstream of Ganges River Basin, Nepal. J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 148, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Yadav, I.C.; Singh, S.; Linthoingambi Devi, N.; Mohan, D.; Pahari, M.; Singh Tater, P.; Man Shakya, B. Spatial Distribution of Arsenic in Groundwater of Southern Nepal. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 218, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Taherdoost, H. What Are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Res. 2022, 5, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. UNICEF. Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/nepal/reports/multiple-indicator-cluster-survey-final-report-2019 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
  211. Sharma, L.; Gupta, N.; Basnayake, S. Water Sector Policies and Guidelines of Nepal: Review Report; Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC): Bangkok, Thailand, 2021; Available online: https://www.adpc.net/igo/category/ID1811/doc/2022-otj7NA-ADPC-Water_Sector_Policies_and_Guidelines_of_Nepal.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  212. National Statistics Office. National Population and Housing Census 2021: Population Size and Distribution. Available online: https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/results/population (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  213. Dahal, B. Pokhara Poised to Lure More Tourists. Available online: https://risingnepaldaily.com/news/40360 (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  214. Acharya, S. Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Catchments Impact the Ecosystem in Phewa, Begnas, and Rupa Lakes, Nepal. J. Nepal. Geol. Soc. 2020, 60, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Pokhrel, D.; Bhandari, B.S.; Viraraghavan, T. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in the Terai Region of Nepal: An Overview of Health Concerns and Treatment Options. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Rasaili, P.; Rai, S.; Sachin, K.; Saha, B.; Bhattarai, A. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater Sources and a Comparative Study of Its Remediation by Various Conventional and Recent Approaches in Nepal. Vietnam. J. Chem. 2024, 62, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Martínez-Castillo, M.; García-Montalvo, E.A.; Arellano-Mendoza, M.G.; del Sánchez-Peña, L.C.; Soria Jasso, L.E.; Izquierdo-Vega, J.A.; Valenzuela, O.L.; Hernández-Zavala, A. Arsenic Exposure and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effects. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021, 40, S826–S850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Balkhi, S.A.A.; Karki, B.K.; Philip, L.; Maliyekkal, S.M. Chapter 2: Water Quality Status and Challenges in India and Nepal. In Technological Solutions for Water Sustainability: Challenges and Prospects Towards a Water-Secure India; Philip, L., Pradeep, T., Bhallamudi, S.M., Eds.; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  219. Sawe, B.E. What Are the Biggest Industries in Nepal? Available online: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-biggest-industries-in-nepal.html (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  220. UNICEF. Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://nepal.un.org/en/sdgs (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  221. Nepal, S.; Neupane, N.; Koirala, S.; Lautze, J.; Shrestha, R.N.; Bhatt, D.; Shrestha, N.; Adhikari, M.; Kaini, S.; Karki, S.; et al. Integrated Assessment of Irrigation and Agriculture Management Challenges in Nepal: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the study search and selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the study search and selection process.
Ijerph 22 01526 g001
Figure 2. Trends in the number of publications focusing on microbial and chemical contaminants in irrigation and drinking water in Nepal across the study period 1982–2023.
Figure 2. Trends in the number of publications focusing on microbial and chemical contaminants in irrigation and drinking water in Nepal across the study period 1982–2023.
Ijerph 22 01526 g002
Figure 3. Sankey plot illustrating locations across Nepal (far-left bars and text), different water sources studied within those locations (middle bars and text), and identified microbial and chemical contaminants (far-right bars and text). Numbers in parentheses after the text indicate the number of studies reporting each category. Color bands indicate (1) the locations where water sources were studied and (2) the contaminants associated with these water sources.
Figure 3. Sankey plot illustrating locations across Nepal (far-left bars and text), different water sources studied within those locations (middle bars and text), and identified microbial and chemical contaminants (far-right bars and text). Numbers in parentheses after the text indicate the number of studies reporting each category. Color bands indicate (1) the locations where water sources were studied and (2) the contaminants associated with these water sources.
Ijerph 22 01526 g003
Figure 4. Sankey plot illustrating locations across Nepal (far-left bars and text), different water usage studied within those locations (middle bars and text), and identified microbial and chemical contaminants (far-right bars and text). Numbers in parentheses after the text indicate the number of studies reporting each category. Color bands indicate (1) the locations where water usage was studied and (2) the contaminants associated with these water sources.
Figure 4. Sankey plot illustrating locations across Nepal (far-left bars and text), different water usage studied within those locations (middle bars and text), and identified microbial and chemical contaminants (far-right bars and text). Numbers in parentheses after the text indicate the number of studies reporting each category. Color bands indicate (1) the locations where water usage was studied and (2) the contaminants associated with these water sources.
Ijerph 22 01526 g004
Figure 5. A map representing the number of studies identified from the seven provinces of Nepal. The colors represent the seven different provinces, and the circle size represents the number of studies evaluating water samples from a location in each province.
Figure 5. A map representing the number of studies identified from the seven provinces of Nepal. The colors represent the seven different provinces, and the circle size represents the number of studies evaluating water samples from a location in each province.
Ijerph 22 01526 g005
Figure 6. Heatmap representing the number of studies identifying microbial and chemical contaminants in water samples collected from the seven provinces and their potential related health outcomes. Darker colors represent a higher number of studies, while lighter shades represent a lower number of studies.
Figure 6. Heatmap representing the number of studies identifying microbial and chemical contaminants in water samples collected from the seven provinces and their potential related health outcomes. Darker colors represent a higher number of studies, while lighter shades represent a lower number of studies.
Ijerph 22 01526 g006
Table 2. Recommendations proposed by authors of included studies and categorized under broader themes.
Table 2. Recommendations proposed by authors of included studies and categorized under broader themes.
ThemeRecommendationsStudies
Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Disinfection of drinking water sources, especially during the monsoon season
  • Regular maintenance of water purification filters
  • Implementation of solar water disinfection methods
  • Utilizing chlorine or lime for water treatment before consumption
  • Safe disposal of solid waste and wastewater
Bhandari et al., 2021 [87]; Kannel et al., 2007 [122]; Shrestha et al., 2003 [180]; Shrestha et al., 2016 [182]; Shrestha & Shakya, 2021 [177]
Infrastructure Improvement
  • Infrastructure improvements, especially in Kathmandu, are crucial for controlling diseases like typhoid
  • Improving piped water supply infrastructure
  • Enhancing water transport infrastructure for urban areas
Baker et al., 2011 [85]; Dumaru et al., 2021 [101]; Inoue et al., 2015 [26]
Water Quality Monitoring
  • Increased surveillance of water quality, particularly in the jar water industry
  • Regular monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
  • Implementation of groundwater monitoring programs
Bhatta et al., 2007 [93]; Maharjan et al., 2006 [135]; Malla et al., 2018 [140]; Nicholson et al., 2023 [150]; Pant et al., 2021 [152]; Pant et al., 2020 [157]
Health Education and Awareness
  • Conducting health education programs on water hygiene, sanitation, and safe water handling
  • Organizing awareness programs on arsenic contamination and its health effects
  • Motivational programs regarding safe water options
  • Training health professionals on diagnosing and managing arsenic-related health implications
Aryal et al., 2012 [82]; Maharjan et al., 2005 [137]; Shrestha et al., 2016 [182]; Warner et al., 2008 [203]
Policy and Management
  • Formulation of plans and policies for sustainable groundwater management
  • Establishment of a systematic mechanism for the surveillance and monitoring of waterborne pathogens
  • Collaboration with stakeholders for effective water resource management
Aryal et al., 2012 [82]; Bhatta et al., 2007 [93]; Khatiwada et al., 2002 [129]; Shrestha et al., 2018 [178]; Warner et al., 2008 [203]
Further Research and Studies
  • Conducting further research on specific topics such as temporal variations of health risks, sediment analysis, and wastewater treatment
  • Urgent need for more comprehensive studies to ensure water quality and safety
  • Focus on genetic analysis of pathogens and environmental impact evaluations
Bhetwal et al., 2017 [94]; Kafle et al., 2023 [118]; Sharma et al., 2021 [211]; Thakur et al., 2015 [196]; Thapa et al., 2019 [197]; Warner et al., 2008 [203]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chattopadhyay, S.; Choiniere, A.; Tchangalova, N.; Acharya, Y.; Sapkota, A.R.; Malayil, L. Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101526

AMA Style

Chattopadhyay S, Choiniere A, Tchangalova N, Acharya Y, Sapkota AR, Malayil L. Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(10):1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chattopadhyay, Suhana, Alex Choiniere, Nedelina Tchangalova, Yunika Acharya, Amy R. Sapkota, and Leena Malayil. 2025. "Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 10: 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101526

APA Style

Chattopadhyay, S., Choiniere, A., Tchangalova, N., Acharya, Y., Sapkota, A. R., & Malayil, L. (2025). Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(10), 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22101526

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop