Next Article in Journal
The Security and Driving Factors of the Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Accreditation of Quality in Primary Health Care in Chile: Perception of the Teams from Accredited Family Healthcare Centers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph20032478
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Community-Based, Participatory, Multi-Component Intervention Increased Sales of Healthy Foods in Local Supermarkets—The Health and Local Community Project (SoL)

by
Ulla Toft
1,2,*,
Tine Buch-Andersen
1,
Paul Bloch
3,
Helene Christine Reinbach
4,
Bjarne Bruun Jensen
3,
Bent Egberg Mikkelsen
5,
Jens Aagaard-Hansen
3,6 and
Charlotte Glümer
7
1
Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
2
Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 83, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
4
Department of Food Science, Section for Food Design and Consumer Behaviour, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, Building 2-74, 5th Floor, Room C505, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
5
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
6
SA MRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
7
Center for Diabetes, Copenhagen Municipality, Vesterbrogade 121, 1620 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2478; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032478
Submission received: 4 December 2022 / Revised: 14 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 30 January 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Project SoL was a 19-month (September 2012 to April 2014) community-based multi-component intervention based on the supersetting approach that was designed to promote healthier eating and physical activity among children and their families. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of a multi-component intervention (level 1) and a mass media intervention alone (level 2) compared to a control area (level 3) on food sales. The design was quasi-experimental. Weekly sales data for all Coop supermarkets in the intervention and control areas were analysed via longitudinal linear mixed-effects analyses. Significant increases in the sales of fish (total) (29%; p = 0.003), canned fish (31%; p = 0.025) and oatmeal (31%; p = 0.003) were found for the level 1 intervention area compared to the control area. In the level 2 intervention area, significant increases in the sales of vegetables (total) (17%; p = 0.038), fresh vegetables (20%; p = 0.01), dried fruit (51%; p = 0.022), oatmeal (19%; p = 0.008) and wholegrain pasta (58%; p = 0.0007) were found compared to the control area. The sales of canned fish increased by 30% in the level 1 area compared to the level 2 area (p = 0.025). This study demonstrated significant increases in the sales of healthy foods, both in the areas with multi-component and mass media interventions alone compared to the control area.

1. Introduction

Substantial evidence has shown that healthy diets can promote better health and reduce the risk of obesity, non-communicable diseases (NDCs) and early death among adults [1]. Not least among children, good nutrition is essential for them to reach their growth and developmental potential [2]. Furthermore, dietary habits established during childhood tend to track into adulthood [3,4] and unhealthy diets among children have been found to increase the risk of becoming overweight and obese, as well as increasing the risk of NDCs later in life [1].
According to national dietary surveys, Danish children consume an inadequate amount of vegetables, wholegrains and fish and too much added sugar and total fat [5]. For example, only 6% and 23% of Danish 4–18-year-old children reach recommended intakes of fish and fruit and vegetables, respectively, whereas 50% of children consume more added sugar than the recommended <10 energy% [5,6,7]. However, promoting long-term changes in dietary habits is not an easy task. Hence, children and families’ food choices are influenced by a complex interplay between many factors in a complex system, including the availability of healthy food items in supermarkets, canteens and institutions; knowledge and awareness related to healthy eating, social and cultural norms; pricing and marketing [8]. Single-component approaches targeting individuals to promote healthier behaviour have only shown limited and short-term effects [9,10]. Hence, current evidence points to the need for long-term community-based and whole-system approaches that go beyond traditional information campaigns and target multiple settings where children and families spend their time and address a wide range of factors, including environmental influences within communities [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, according to many studies and reviews, co-creation and involvement of relevant partners and parents increase the likelihood for success [14,15,17,18,19,20].
Project SoL, from the Danish ‘Sundhed og Lokalsamfund’ (Health and Local Community), aimed to mobilise local community resources, strengthen local social networks and promote physical activity, healthier eating and shopping behaviour among Danish children aged 3–8 years and their families living in selected communities on the Danish Island of Bornholm. The intervention was based on the supersetting approach, which implies that the intervention was implemented in a coordinated and integrated manner in multiple local community settings and involved multiple stakeholders to promote intensity, impact, synergy and sustainability [21]. The supersetting approach was developed based on the settings approach, which was introduced in the Ottawa Charter [22] and focuses on intervening in the places/settings where citizens live their daily lives and to intervene in a synchronised way that creates intensity and stronger effects by ‘doing more things in more places’. Hence, Project SoL intervened in schools, childcare centres and supermarkets, as well as the local mass media and social media. The multi-component intervention consisted of a broad range of activities, focusing on healthy food, physical activity and well-being. These included active play for children and families, tasting and cooking with children, healthy recipes, space management in supermarkets to promote healthier shopping, healthy lunch bag workshops, breakfast clubs, outdoor nature-based activities, mass media intervention focusing on healthy eating, etc. (more detail on the supersetting approach and Project SoL can be found in the Methods Section). The design and intervention of Project SoL was described in detail previously [23,24].
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the multi-component intervention of Project SoL on food sales in supermarkets located within three intervention communities compared to a mass media intervention only and to a control area with no intervention. Hence, in this study, we compare three levels of intervention (Figure 1): level 1: multi-component intervention (three local communities on the island of Bornholm (SoL communities)); level 2: mass media intervention only (the rest of the island of Bornholm); level 3: control area (Odsherred Municipality, no intervention).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Intervention

Project SoL was carried out in Denmark in two municipalities during a four-year period from 2012 to 2015, with a 19-month intervention period (September 2012 to April 2014). The project was designed as a quasi-experimental study with a matched pair of interventions (Bornholm) and a control (Odsherred) area. Bornholm is an island with a land mass of 588 square kilometres and a population of approximately 42,000 inhabitants. Odsherred municipality covers an area of 355 square kilometres, with about 32,500 inhabitants. Bornholm and Odsherred were purposively selected as the first level of sampling due to their similar sociodemographic characteristics, including high proportions of citizens with a low socio-economic position and high prevalence rates of health risk factors and NCDs [25,26]. Table 1 provides an overview of important characteristics of the two municipalities.
A multi-component intervention (level 1) was applied in three selected local communities. This was a setting-based intervention and included local childcare centres, primary schools, supermarkets, local mass media and the local communities in general. The intervention components included participatory learning, change and design methods (Future Workshop Scenario [27], Mosaic Method [28]), educational activities, mass communication through mass and social media, brochures, recipes and posters, educational activities for children and their families and professionals in childcare centres, schools and supermarkets. Furthermore, the intervention included environmental or structural changes in schools, childcare centres and supermarkets, in addition to different local community activities and public events. Mental and social well-being were especially promoted by activities, such as outdoor activities in nature, establishing aesthetic environments, tasting good food, exploring the senses, having fun and building strong social networks [23]. Generally, the activities were aimed at promoting health by increasing knowledge, awareness, action competences, participation, integration and social cohesion, as well as modifying the overall policies and structures to ensure that they supported healthier choices and, thereby, contributed to reducing social inequality. Regarding healthy eating, the main focus was on increasing the intake of vegetables, fruits, fish and wholegrains, and on decreasing the intake of soft drinks, cakes and sweets.
To ensure coordination and integration of activities across settings and communities, common overall themes were selected and addressed based on the ideas and interests of the local partners and by the focus of the project. Hence, although all the activities were implemented according to the overall principles in supermarkets, childcare centres and/or schools and mass media, they varied from setting to setting and also from community to community, depending on the priorities of the local stakeholders. Overall themes included ‘taste and senses’, ‘active play’, ‘visibility’, ‘fruit and vegetables’, ‘whole grains’, ‘fish’, ‘nature and movement’, ‘nature as a pantry’ and ‘healthy alternatives’. Interventions were not predetermined but developed jointly with citizens and professional stakeholders as the project unfolded. The intervention has been described in detail elsewhere [23,24].
The local schools and childcare centres in each of the three local communities were all included.
Eight supermarkets of different sizes and from three different food retail groups were located in the three local intervention communities. They were all invited to participate in the project. One small independent grocery store chose not to participate. The other seven supermarkets, including one large, two medium and two small conventional supermarkets and two medium-sized discount supermarkets, participated actively throughout the study period. The supermarket chains involved in the intervention included Netto, Spar and Coop.
The mass media intervention was delivered especially by the local TV station, but also by local radio, newspapers and Facebook. The local TV2 Bornholm station systematically covered the major events and components of Project SoL broadcasted to the whole island of Bornholm. In addition, TV2 Bornholm developed a special programme for the study called ‘Just a little healthier’, which focused on inspiration for healthy eating and cooking. Furthermore, local newspapers and radio programmes also covered the activities of Project SoL.
The rest of Bornholm was only exposed to this mass media intervention (level 2) and, therefore, the design provides the opportunity to investigate the effect of different levels of intensity of the intervention. This is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.2. Data Collection Methods

Weekly sales data for all products sold in the period from January 2013 to June 2014 were delivered by Coop (the largest supermarket chain in Denmark) for all Coop supermarkets on Bornholm, both the in the SoL communities (level 1) and the rest of Bornholm (level 2) and in Odsherred (control area). Due to a shift in the data system in one of the supermarket chains (Netto) during the intervention period and difficulties in obtaining digital data from a small supermarket (Spar), only data from the Coop supermarket chain are included in this study. Unfortunately, due to a standard procedure in Coop, data from 2012 were erroneously deleted and, hence, data from the first four months of the intervention were unavailable.
Based on the main focus of the dietary intervention (increasing intakes of vegetables, fruits, fish and wholegrains, and on decreasing intakes of soft drinks, cakes and sweets) we included sales data for all kinds of fruits and vegetables (including fresh, frozen and dried), fish (fresh, frozen, canned), wholegrain cereals and pasta, sweets, sugary beverages, cakes and unhealthy snacks. The weight of the foods within each of these food categories was determined. Weight and number sold were used to calculate the total weight sold per week of each food category. Monthly sales were calculated based on weekly sales.
Index numbers were calculated for each month as: (weight of sold products n month ×/weight of sold products in January 2013) × 100. For example, an index number of 134 reflects a 34% increase in the amount of fresh vegetables sold in a month compared to the first month of 2013.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software v.9.4. We fitted a longitudinal linear mixed-effects model with the logged index numbers regressed on a time-dependent intervention variable with categories ‘SoL’ (multi-component intervention communities (level 1) n = 4), ‘Bornholm’ (the whole island of Bornholm except the SoL supermarkets, mass media intervention only (level 2), n = 12) and ‘control’ (Odsherred, no intervention (level 3), n = 11).
We used a random effect for supermarket to allow for heterogeneity among supermarkets, and an autoregressive AR1 correlation structure to account for larger similarities of observations closer in time on the same supermarket. We, furthermore, took into account the seasonal variation in sales during public holidays, as this variation might differ between local areas. For small intervention effects, the intervention effect on the logged index scale can be approximately interpreted as the proportional change in index number during the intervention period. The analysis was performed using the proc mixed procedure in SAS. Effects of the intervention were estimated by comparing the development from the first month (January 2013) to the average sale during the last three months (April, May and June 2014) of the intervention in the SoL supermarkets (level 1) and other supermarkets on Bornholm (level 2) compared to the control area (level 3).

3. Results

Results comparing the development in food sales in the intervention Coop supermarkets (level 1), other Coop supermarkets on Bornholm (level 2) and Coop supermarkets in the control area (level 3) are shown in Table 2. The results showed a 29% increase in the sale of fish (total) in the SoL supermarkets (level 1) compared to the control area (level 3) (p = 0.003). The sales of canned fish in the SoL supermarkets (level 1) increased by 31% compared to the control area (level 3) (p = 0.025) and by 30% compared to the rest of Bornholm (level 2) (p = 0.025). Furthermore, the SoL supermarkets (level 1) increased the sale of oatmeal by 31% (p = 0.003) and there was a borderline significant increase in the sale of vegetables (22%; p = 0.06) and dried fruit (60%; p = 0.06) compared to the control area (level 3).
The supermarkets on Bornholm (level 2) significantly increased the sale of vegetables in total by 17% (p = 0.038) and the sale of fresh vegetables by 20% (p = 0.01) compared to the control area (level 3). Furthermore, significant increases in the sales of dried fruit (51%; p = 0.022), oatmeal (19%; p = 0.008) and wholegrain pasta (58%; p = 0.0007) were found on Bornholm (level 2) compared to the control area (level 3).
No significant changes in the sales of sugary beverages, sweets, cakes and unhealthy snacks were found in the intervention supermarkets (levels 1 and 2) compared to the control area (level 3).
Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate the development in monthly sales from January 2013 to June 2014 for fish (total), canned fish, vegetables (total) and oatmeal, respectively (as examples). In general, the figures show a greater increase in the intervention supermarkets (level 1) during the intervention period compared to the control supermarkets (level 3). The sales varied during the intervention period in all supermarkets. In particular, a peak in sales was seen in July 2013 due to the tourist season. Furthermore, the development in sales differed between food groups. However, in general, the differences between the three intervention levels increased during the intervention period.

4. Discussion

The results showed a significant increase in the sales of fish (total and canned) and oatmeal and a borderline significant increase in the sales of vegetables (total) and dried fruit in the SoL supermarkets (level 1) compared to control supermarkets (level 3). Furthermore, a significantly greater increase in the sale of canned fish was found in the SoL supermarkets (level 1) compared to all other Coop supermarkets on Bornholm (level 2). Finally, a significantly greater increase in the sales of vegetables (total and fresh), dried fruit and wholegrain products (oatmeal and wholegrain pasta) and a borderline higher increase in the sales of fish (total) were found in areas with low-intensity intervention (level 2) compared to the control area (level 3). No significant effects were found on sales of fresh fruit, sweets and sugary beverages. In short, the multi-component intervention (level 1) showed the greatest effect on intake of healthy food items, but there was also some effect in the low-intensity (level 2) areas, as compared to the control (level 3). In contrast, there were no significant effects on reductions in unhealthy food items in level 1 or level 2 communities.
The results from this study are in line with several previous studies [29,30,31,32,33,34,35], showing significant beneficial effects on the diet from multi-component, community-based intervention approaches. However, only a small number of earlier studies evaluated the effects of local community-based intervention sales based on data from local supermarkets. Using sales data provides the possibility to measure the effects of the intervention at the community level. Hence, although the target group of Project SoL was children aged 3–8 years old and their families, several of the intervention components were applied to the whole community (including interventions within the supermarkets and in the local mass media) and, thus, had the potential to promote healthy dietary changes among all citizens in the targeted communities. Furthermore, sales data provide a unique opportunity to objectively measure changes in diet-related behaviour. However, the intervention was most intensive among children and their families and, hence, the intervention effects might be considerably diluted when measuring effects at the community level instead of the individual level. Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate that the sales in all supermarkets varied during the intervention period, which is expected due to, for example, tourist seasons, which may explain the peak in sales in July 2013. The statistical analyses took this seasonal variation in sales during public holidays into account. Furthermore, the development in sales of different food groups also varied markedly, which can be explained by seasonal variation but also the change in focus on different foods during the intervention.
In this study, we did not find any effect of the intervention on sales of sweets, unhealthy snacks and sugary beverages. This is possibly because the intervention primarily focused on promoting the intake of healthy foods, including encouraging children to taste new foods products, and less on reducing the intake of unhealthy food products and beverages. The lack of effects on sales of sweets and sugary beverages might be one of the reasons why the intervention had no effect on children’s Body Mass Index (BMI) [36]. Compared to previous studies, both the Romp and Chomp Study [32] and Shape Up Somerville [34] succeeded in reducing children’s intake of sugary beverages and also found a significant decrease in BMI [32,34].
Unlike most other studies, we were able to evaluate the effects of a single intervention component (mass media intervention) as part of a multi-component intervention. This was carried out by measuring food sales on the whole island of Bornholm where the mass media intervention was implemented (level 2) and comparing it to food sales, both in the control area (level 3) and in the three SoL communities (level 1). To our surprise, a significant effect of the mass media intervention only was found on the sales of vegetables, wholegrain products and dried fruit compared to the control area (level 3). The reason may be that the local TV station was a very active partner in the project and supported and covered the project activities very intensively. Project SoL also had its own programme in TV2-Bornholm (called ‘Bare lidt sundere’ [Just a little healthier]), which was broadcasted once every month. Additionally, the supersetting approach supported the development of new innovative initiatives and ways to work with children, families and local communities that were interesting for TV2-Bornholm to cover. Furthermore, it can be hypothesised that part of the multi-component intervention in the three SoL communities inspired (‘contamination’) other areas on Bornholm and influenced citizens on Bornholm more broadly. Not least, it is likely that the other Coop supermarkets were inspired by the successful initiatives in the Coop intervention supermarkets due to their close collaboration. Consequently, the differences between the level 1 and level 2 areas might have been diminished and might also explain the small difference in sales data between the SoL supermarkets and ‘Bornholm’.
A strength of this study is the huge amount of data on food sales included from both the intervention areas and the control area. All supermarkets in both of the targeted municipalities (Bornholm and Odsherred) were involved in the intervention and data were collected during a period of 17 months. However, an important limitation of the study is that we were unable to include data from all these supermarkets. Two discount supermarkets (Netto) were located in the SoL communities and they actively participated in the SoL intervention. However, due to a shift in the data system in Netto during the intervention period, we were unable to include these data in the effect analyses. Furthermore, a small supermarket (Spar) was included in the study, but it was unable to provide digital sales data for the study. Therefore, we only included data from the Coop supermarket chain. Coop is, however, the largest supermarket chain in Denmark and there was a Coop supermarket in all three SoL communities (level 1). Furthermore, including data from the same supermarket chain strengthens the comparability of data between intervention and control supermarkets. The intervention in Netto and Spar followed the same overall themes and the same intervention strategies were used. Therefore, we have no reason to believe that their sales data differed from Coop.
A further limitation of the study is that the sales data from the first four months of the intervention (September–December 2012) were erroneously deleted by the supermarket chain. Therefore, the change in sales might be greater and, hence, the intervention effect larger than it was possible to measure because we would expect the greatest change at the beginning of the intervention period.
Overall, as mentioned earlier, the possibility of using sales data in the evaluation of an intervention provides a unique opportunity to objectively measure changes in diet-related behaviour. However, it is not possible to measure the changes in individuals or families included in the intervention. Furthermore, sales data are only a proxy of dietary intake and, therefore, sales data should be combined with measures of individual dietary intake, which was also undertaken in Project SoL [28].
The quasi-experimental study design with a matched intervention and control area has limitations with respect to the internal validity of the results [36]. However, complex intervention studies are often not suitable for an individual RCT study design. Future research should test the SoL intervention on a larger scale, preferably in a cluster-randomised design [37]. Furthermore, the target group of the intervention could be broadened to include more citizens and possibly the whole community.

5. Conclusions

The results showed significant increases in the sales of healthy food items in the supermarkets located in the high-intensity intervention area (level 1) compared to the low-intensity area (level 2) as well as the control area (level 3). Even the low-intensity area (level 2) showed a significant increase in sales of healthy food items compared to the control area (level 3). In contrast, there were no significant reductions in the sales of unhealthy food items, though this was not an explicit aim of the intervention. The study findings support the rationale for multi-component as well as singular mass media interventions as part of community-based health promotion initiatives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, U.T., P.B., C.G., B.B.J., H.C.R., B.E.M., T.B.-A. and J.A.-H.; methodology, U.T. and T.B.-A.; formal analysis, U.T. and T.B.-A.; investigation, U.T. and T.B-A.; data curation, U.T.; writing—original draft preparation, U.T.; writing—review and editing, U.T., P.B., C.G., B.B.J., H.C.R., B.E.M., T.B.-A. and J.A.-H.; visualisation, U.T.; supervision, C.G.; project administration, C.G., B.B.J. and B.E.M.; funding acquisition, U.T., P.B., C.G., B.B.J. and B.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Nordea-Fonden and the Health Insurance Foundation (Helsefonden, Grant No. 2012B233). Additional support was provided by Aalborg University, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the local project coordinator, study participants, local partners within schools and childcare centres, mass media and supermarkets for fruitful collaboration. We also acknowledge the valuable contribution of other community members, colleagues and students.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Birch, L.L.; Anzman, S.L. Learning to eat in an obesogenic environment: A developmental systems perspective on childhood obesity. Child Dev. Perspect. 2010, 4, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lien, N.; Lytle, L.A.; Klepp, K.I. Stability in consumption of fruit, vegetables, and sugary foods in a cohort from age 14 to age 21. Prev. Med. 2001, 33, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mikkila, V.; Rasanen, L.; Raitakari, O.T.; Pietinen, P.; Viikari, J. Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 93, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pedersen, A.N.; Christensen, T.; Matthiessen, J.; Knudsen, V.K.; Sørensen, M.R.; Biltoft-Jensen, A.P.; Hinsch, H.-J.; Ygil, K.H.; Kørup, K.; Saxholt, E. Danskernes kostvaner 2011–2013. In Hovedresultater (Dietary Habits in Denmark 2011–2013. Main Results), 1st ed.; National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic nutrition recommendations 2012. In Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5th ed.; Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. The Official Dietary Guidelines. 2021. Available online: www.altomkost.dk (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  8. Waterlander, W.E.; Pinzon, A.L.; Verhoef, A.; Hertog, K.d.; Altenburg, T.; Dijkstra, C.; Halberstadt, J.; Hermans, R.; Renders, C.; Seidell, J.; et al. Understanding obesity-related behaviors in youth from a systems dynamics perspective: The use of causal loop diagrams. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ebrahim, S.; Taylor, F.; Ward, K.; Burke, M.; Smith, G.D. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 19, CD001561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Beauchamp, A.; Backholer, K.; Magliano, D.; Peeters, A. The effect of obesity prevention interventions according to socioeconomic position: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Public Health England. Promoting Healthy Weight in Children, Young People and Families: A Resource to Support Local Authorities; PHE Publications: London, UK, 2018; gateway number: 2018530. [Google Scholar]
  12. Allender, S.; Orellana, L.; Crooks, N.; Bolton, K.A.; Fraser, P.; Dwight Brown, A.; Le, H.; Lowe, J.; Haye, K.; Millar, L.; et al. Four-Year Behavioral, Health-Related Quality of Life, and BMI Outcomes from a Cluster Randomized Whole of Systems Trial of Prevention Strategies for Childhood Obesity. Obesity 2021, 29, 1022–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kasman, M.; Hammond, R.A.; Heuberger, B.; Mack-Crane, A.; Purcell, R.; Economos, C.; Swinburn, B.; Allender, S.; Nichols, M. Activating a community: An agent-based model of Romp & Chomp, a whole-of-community childhood obesity intervention. Obesity 2019, 27, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar]
  14. Verjans-Janssen, S.R.B.; van de Kolk, I.; Van Kann, D.H.H.; Kremers, S.P.J.; Gerards, S.M.P.L. Effectiveness of school-based physical activity and nutrition interventions with direct parental involvement on children’s BMI and energy balance-related behaviors—A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e020456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brown, E.C.; Buchan, D.S.; Baker, J.S.; Wyatt, F.B.; Bocalini, D.S.; Kilgore, L. A Systematised Review of Primary School Whole Class Child Obesity Interventions: Effectiveness, Characteristics, and Strategies. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 4902714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cerrato-Carretero, P.; Pedrera-Zamorano, J.; López-Espuela, F.; Puerto-Parejo, L.M.; Sánchez-Fernández, A.; Canal-Macías, M.L.; Moran, J.M.; Lavado-García, J.M. Long-Term Dietary and Physical Activity Interventions in the School Setting and Their Effects on BMI in Children Aged 6-12 Years: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Healthcare 2021, 9, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bagnall, A.; Radley, D.; Jones, R.; Gately, P.; Nobles, J.; Dijk, M.V.; Blackshaw, J.; Montel, S.; Sahota, P. Whole systems approaches to obesity and other complex public health challenges: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Flodgren, G.M.; Helleve, A.; Lobstein, T.; Rutter, H.; Klepp, K.I. Primary prevention of overweight and obesity in adolescents: An overview of systematic reviews. Obes. Rev. 2020, 21, e13102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oosterhoff, M.; Joore, M.; Ferreira, I. The effects of school-based lifestyle interventions on body mass index and blood pressure: A multivariate multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2016, 17, 1131–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nigg, C.R.; Anwar, M.M.; Braun, K.; Mercado, J.; Kainoa Fialkowski, M.; Ropeti Areta, A.A.; Belyeu-Camacho, T.; Bersamin, A.; Guerrero, R.L.; Castro, R.; et al. A Review of Promising Multicomponent Environmental Child Obesity Prevention Intervention Strategies by the Children’s Healthy Living Program. J. Environ. Health 2016, 79, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  21. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Milestones in Health Promotion, Statements from Global Conferences. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, Canada, 17–21 November 1986; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bloch, P.; Toft, U.; Reinbach, H.C.; Clausen, L.T.; Mikkelsen, B.E.; Poulsen, K.; Jensen, B.B. Revitalizing the setting approach-super-settings for sustainable impact in community health promotion. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Toft, U.; Bloch, P.; Reinbach, H.C.; Winkler, L.L.; Buch-Andersen, T.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Mikkelsen, B.E.; Jensen, B.B.; Glumer, C. Project SoL—A Community-Based, Multi-Component Health Promotion Intervention to Improve Eating Habits and Physical Activity among Danish Families with Young Children. Part 1: Intervention Development and Implementation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mikkelsen, B.E.; Bloch, P.; Reinbach, H.C.; Buch-Andersen, T.; Lawaetz Winkler, L.; Toft, U.; Glümer, C.; Jensen, B.B.; Aagaard-Hansen, J. Project SoL—A Community-Based, Multi-Component Health Promotion Intervention to Improve Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practices among Danish Families with Young Children Part 2: Evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Poulsen, I. Hvordan Har Du Det? 2010, Sundhedsprofil for Region Sjælland og Kommuner (How Are You? 2010, Health Profiles of Region Zealand and Municipalities); Region Sjælland: Sorø, Denmark, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glümer, C. Danish National Health Profile Study; Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Capital Region: Glostrup, Denmark, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jungk, R.; Mullert, N.R. Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures; Institute for Social Inventions: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  28. Clausen, L.T.; Schmidt, C.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Reinbach, H.C.; Toft, U.; Bloch, P. Children as visionary change agents in Danish school health promotion. Health Promot. Int. 2018, 34, e18–e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bleich, S.N.; Segal, J.; Wu, Y.; Wilson, R.; Wang, Y. Systematic review of community-based childhood obesity prevention studies. Pediatrics 2013, 132, e201–e210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Brown, T.; Moore, T.H.; Hooper, L.; Gao, Y.; Zayegh, A.; Ijaz, S.; Elwenspoek, M.; Foxen, S.C.; Magee, L.; O’Malley, C.; et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019, 7, CD001871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ewart-Pierce, E.; Ruiz, M.J.M.; Gittelsohn, J. “Whole-of-Community” Obesity Prevention: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Multilevel, Multicomponent Interventions. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2016, 5, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. de Silva-Sanigorski, A.M.; Bell, A.C.; Kremer, P.; Nichols, M.; Crellin, M.; Smith, M.; Sharp, S.; De Groot, F.; Carpenter, L.; Boak, R.; et al. Reducing obesity in early childhood: Results from Romp & Chomp, an Australian community-wide intervention program. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sanigorski, A.M.; Bell, A.C.; Kremer, P.J.; Cuttler, R.; Swinburn, B.A. Reducing unhealthy weight gain in children through community capacity-building: Results of a quasi-experimental intervention program, Be Active Eat Well. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Economos, C.D.; Hyatt, R.R.; Must, A.; Goldberg, J.P.; Kuder, J.; Naumova, E.N.; Collins, J.J.; Nelson, M.E. Shape Up Somerville two-year results: A community-based environmental change intervention sustains weight reduction in children. Prev. Med. 2013, 57, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chomitz, V.R.; McGowan, R.J.; Wendel, J.M.; Williams, S.A.; Cabral, H.J.; King, S.E.; Olcott, D.B.; Cappello, M.; Breen, S.; Hacker, K.A. Healthy Living Cambridge Kids: A community-based participatory effort to promote healthy weight and fitness. Obesity 2010, 18 (Suppl. S1), S45–S53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Buch-Andersen, T.; Eriksson, F.; Bloch, P.; Glümer, C.; Mikkelsen, B.E.; Toft, U. The Danish SoL Project: Effects of a Multi-Component Community-Based Health Promotion Intervention on Prevention of Overweight among 3–8-Year-Old Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Minary, L.; Trompette, J.; Kivits, J.; Cambon, L.; Tarquinio, C.; Alla, F. Which design to evaluate complex interventions? Toward a methodological framework through a systematic review. BMC Med. Res. Method. 2019, 19, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 20 02478 g001 550
Figure 1. Evaluation design: comparing sales data for supermarkets in areas with a multi-component intervention (SoL communities), areas with mass media intervention only (the rest of Bornholm municipality) and the control area (no intervention, Odsherred municipality).
Figure 1. Evaluation design: comparing sales data for supermarkets in areas with a multi-component intervention (SoL communities), areas with mass media intervention only (the rest of Bornholm municipality) and the control area (no intervention, Odsherred municipality).
Ijerph 20 02478 g001
Ijerph 20 02478 g002 550
Figure 2. The development in monthly sales of fish (total) from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Figure 2. The development in monthly sales of fish (total) from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Ijerph 20 02478 g002
Ijerph 20 02478 g003 550
Figure 3. The development in monthly sales of canned fish from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Figure 3. The development in monthly sales of canned fish from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Ijerph 20 02478 g003
Ijerph 20 02478 g004 550
Figure 4. The development in monthly sales of vegetables (total) from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Figure 4. The development in monthly sales of vegetables (total) from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Ijerph 20 02478 g004
Ijerph 20 02478 g005 550
Figure 5. The development in monthly sales of oatmeal from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Figure 5. The development in monthly sales of oatmeal from January 2013 to June 2014 in the SoL intervention communities, the Island of Bornholm and the control area (Odsherred). Data are shown as index numbers.
Ijerph 20 02478 g005
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the populations (>16 years) in Bornholm and Odsherred municipalities.
Table 1. Characteristics of the populations (>16 years) in Bornholm and Odsherred municipalities.
CategoryCharacteristicUnitBornholmOdsherred
Population and areaPopulation10004132
Area, square kmKm2588355
Health statusOverweight, BMI > 25%5053
Diabetes%6.55.7
High blood pressure%1623
Health behaviourCitizens with very unhealthy dietary habits%1416
Citizens with < 30 min/day MVPA *%3641
Citizens with self-perceived poor health%1821
Socio-economic status (SES)Unemployed%2628
No vocational education%1918
* MVPA: moderate and vigorous physical activity; source: Poulsen et al. [25]; Glümer et al. [26]).
Table
Table 2. Effect of the intervention: comparing the development in the Coop SoL supermarkets (multi-component intervention, level 1), other Coop supermarkets on Bornholm (mass media intervention only, level 2) and Coop supermarkets in the control area (Odsherred municipality, no intervention, level 3).
Table 2. Effect of the intervention: comparing the development in the Coop SoL supermarkets (multi-component intervention, level 1), other Coop supermarkets on Bornholm (mass media intervention only, level 2) and Coop supermarkets in the control area (Odsherred municipality, no intervention, level 3).
Multi-Component Intervention Vs. No Intervention (Control)
Index		Multi-Component Intervention vs. Mass Media Intervention Only
Index		Mass MEDIA intervention Only vs. No Intervention (Control)
Index
Estimatep-ValueEstimatep-ValueEstimatep-Value
Fish, total1.29500.00281.13280.15651.14320.0659
Fish, canned1.30720.02531.30420.02491.00230.9788
Vegetables, total1.2200.05951.04490.67611.16750.0383
Vegetables, fresh1.11800.25180.93530.47751.19760.0097
Fruit, fresh1.11350.45141.04480.75951.06580.5332
Fruit, dried1.60040.06201.0570.82251.51380.0217
Oatmeal1.31020.00281.10410.27151.18670.0080
Wholegrain pasta1.1430.47270.72270.08341.58150.0007
Sweets0.98760.89341.01160.90090.97620.7192
Sugary beverages1.06200.50391.00120.98911.06080.3599
Results showing the effect of the intervention on the development in sales for selected food categories from development from the first month (January 2013) to the last three months (April, May and June 2014). The statistical analyses were adjusted for seasonal variation in sales during public holidays.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toft, U.; Buch-Andersen, T.; Bloch, P.; Reinbach, H.C.; Jensen, B.B.; Mikkelsen, B.E.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Glümer, C. A Community-Based, Participatory, Multi-Component Intervention Increased Sales of Healthy Foods in Local Supermarkets—The Health and Local Community Project (SoL). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032478

AMA Style

Toft U, Buch-Andersen T, Bloch P, Reinbach HC, Jensen BB, Mikkelsen BE, Aagaard-Hansen J, Glümer C. A Community-Based, Participatory, Multi-Component Intervention Increased Sales of Healthy Foods in Local Supermarkets—The Health and Local Community Project (SoL). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toft, Ulla, Tine Buch-Andersen, Paul Bloch, Helene Christine Reinbach, Bjarne Bruun Jensen, Bent Egberg Mikkelsen, Jens Aagaard-Hansen, and Charlotte Glümer. 2023. "A Community-Based, Participatory, Multi-Component Intervention Increased Sales of Healthy Foods in Local Supermarkets—The Health and Local Community Project (SoL)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032478

APA Style

Toft, U., Buch-Andersen, T., Bloch, P., Reinbach, H. C., Jensen, B. B., Mikkelsen, B. E., Aagaard-Hansen, J., & Glümer, C. (2023). A Community-Based, Participatory, Multi-Component Intervention Increased Sales of Healthy Foods in Local Supermarkets—The Health and Local Community Project (SoL). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop