Next Article in Journal
The Efficiency of Energy Infrastructure Investment and Its Regional Economic Impact
Next Article in Special Issue
Caries Experience and Risk Indicators in a Portuguese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Herpes Zoster Risk in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Association with Medications Used
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mothers’ Awareness of the Correlation between Their Own and Their Children’s Oral Health
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of an Oral Care Program in Home Care Nursing

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2124; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032124
by Lina F. Weening-Verbree 1,2,3,*, Annemarie A. Schuller 3,4, Sytse U. Zuidema 5 and Johannes S. M. Hobbelen 1,2,5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Reviewer 5:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2124; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032124
Submission received: 19 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Health and Dental Caries)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article provides better access to dental care for community dwelling older people, and confirms a long term collaboration between home care nursing teams and dental care professionals in their working area should be established for the community dwelling older people.

 

No reversion is needed for publishment.

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The experiences of older people, home-care nurses and dental hygienist with the implementation of a Oral Care Program (OCP) were assessed. These experiences were  overall positive, but a very selective cohort was evaluated. E.g., only elderly who wanted to participate were questioned (this were a few, it will be elderly with a special interest in OCP) and the dental hygienist who were asked were very involved with the implementation of OCP. Furthermore, no information is given concerning the background of the interviewees, therefore the data cannot be generalized of be rated of the true effects of the OCP. At best, it can be written that the very preliminary results of the  implementation of a OCP program are reported.  There is probably a huge bias in the experiences which cannot be truly rated as nothing  is known about the age, nursing team and working area etc. It can be just a small area in the Netherlands and e.g. from just or two nursing homes. This detailed information is needed before this paper can be considered for publication.

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

STUDY DESIGN

“A qualitative study using Thematic Analysis of semi-structured interviews was conducted after the quantitative measurements were completed (Fall 2019- Spring 2020)”

please indicate the time slot more precisely.

 

DATA COLLECTION

Specify that the study was carried out in the Netherlands (it is indicated in the title but it is not but then it is almost taken for granted in the text)

 

CONCLUSIONS

one could argue that these programs will have a much greater impact if they are open to young citizens

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 5 Report

Comments are in the pdf

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper has improved, but a very selected sample has been studied. Only elderly from in a very restrict area (Friesland does not represent the north of the Netherlands) were asked and than only the limited group who is participating in OCP. This should be clear from the title and should be mentioned in the introduction and the aim as well as discussed (at least it should be mentioned in the limitations of this study).  

Author Response

thank you for your comments and review. we have adjusted the manuscript and hereby included a response to your request. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 5 Report

Revisions are to my satisfaction

Author Response

thank you for your review and reply. 

Back to TopTop