Next Article in Journal
Simplified Unified BARGE Method to Assess Migration of Phthalate Esters in Ingested PVC Consumer Products
Previous Article in Journal
Sensitization of Guinea Pig Skin to Imported Fire Ant Alkaloids and Establishment of an Inflammatory Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Leisure-Related Social Work Interventions for Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Minzu University of China, No. 27 Zhongguancun S St, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China
2
Department of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland; Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
3
Department of Social Work, Fudan University, No.220 Han Dan Road, Shanghai 200433, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 1906; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031906
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leisure and Well-Being in Older Adults)

Abstract

The social work profession has been exploring nonpharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment, but there are few evidence-based research outputs. Systematically evaluating the effectiveness of social work interventions for people with cognitive impairment can shed light on the matter to further improve similar interventions. Randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment were selected from key literature databases in both English and Chinese from 2010 to 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis with Revman 5.4 were performed. Seven trials were included, involving 851 patients with cognitive impairment. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of overall cognitive function, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MD = 1.64, 95% CI [0.97, 2.30], p < 0.001) of the intervention group was superior to the control group, but there was no significant difference in the Mini-Mental State Examination score between the two groups (MD = 0.33, 95% CI [−0.16, 0.82], p = 0.18). Compared with the control group, nonpharmacological intervention can effectively improve the neuropsychiatric condition of patients (SMD = −0.42, 95% CI [−0.64, −0.20], p = 0.0002). In summary, the current evidence shows that nonpharmacological social work interventions had a positive effect on the cognitive function and neuropsychiatric status of patients with cognitive impairment. Suggestions for future nonpharmacological intervention practice are discussed.
Keywords: nonpharmacological intervention; social work; cognitive impairment; systematic review; meta-analysis nonpharmacological intervention; social work; cognitive impairment; systematic review; meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.; Lv, Z.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H. Leisure-Related Social Work Interventions for Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031906

AMA Style

Yang H, Lv Z, Xu Y, Chen H. Leisure-Related Social Work Interventions for Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031906

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Hui, Zhezhen Lv, Yuyue Xu, and Honglin Chen. 2023. "Leisure-Related Social Work Interventions for Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031906

APA Style

Yang, H., Lv, Z., Xu, Y., & Chen, H. (2023). Leisure-Related Social Work Interventions for Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031906

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop