Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Servant Leadership on Work Resilience: Evidence from the Hospitality Industry during the COVID-19 Period
Next Article in Special Issue
Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivation: Exploring Fitness Program Experiences of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Government-Driven Green Development Transformation Strategy with Chinese Characteristics: The Case Study of the Xining Metropolitan Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations between Muscle-Tendon Morphology and Functional Movements Capacity, Flexibility, and Balance in Older Women
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of the Barriers and Motives for Practicing Physical Activity and Sport for People with a Disability: Differences According to Gender and Type of Disability

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021320
by Josu Ascondo 1, Andrea Martín-López 2, Aitor Iturricastillo 3, Cristina Granados 3, Iker Garate 1, Estibaliz Romaratezabala 3, Inmaculada Martínez-Aldama 1, Sheila Romero 4 and Javier Yanci 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021320
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity for Special Populations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors and respected colleagues,

it was a pleasure to read your work. The topic of the work is very interesting, but unjustifiably neglected in society. I believe that your work in the future will be the basis for further research on this topic and will help people with disabilities to integrate into society in which they will be more physically active and thus improve their psychophysical health and quality of life.

Good work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Nicely written.  Please see comments in attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The introduction is well planned as well as the objectives.

However, hypotheses are not included. These should be reflected in the paper

It would be interesting to observe the differences in motives and barriers depending on the type of disability. Would it be possible to present these data?

The methodology does not provide information about the reliability indices of the instrument used. It is recommended that it be included.

Include cronbach's alpha obtained for this sample

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have incorporated the requested suggestions into the paper

Back to TopTop