Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on the Health and Wellbeing of Fathers or Parents: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3. Study Selection
2.4. Data Extraction
2.5. Risk of Bias Assessment
2.6. Data Synthesis
3. Results
3.1. Search Results
3.2. Description and Characteristics of Included Studies
3.3. Risk of Bias Assessment
3.3.1. Risk of Bias for RCTs
3.3.2. Risk of Bias for Non-RCTs
3.4. Effects of Interventions
3.4.1. Data Analysis
3.4.2. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on Health-Related Outcomes
3.4.3. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on Social Well-Being
3.4.4. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on Job Performance
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Population | |
| |
Intervention | Comparator |
|
|
Critical Outcomes | |
|
Almeida 2018 | Haslam 2013 | Martin 2003 | Sanders 2011 | Schiller 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Random sequence generation | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear |
Allocation concealment | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel | Unclear (insufficient information) | High | High (no information) | High (no information) | Unclear (insufficient information) |
Blinding of outcome assessment | Unclear (training/self-reported) | Unclear (training/self-reported) | Unclear (training/self-reported) | Unclear (training/self-reported) | Unclear (Reduced working hour) |
Incomplete outcome data | Low | Low | High | Low | Low |
Selective reporting | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear |
Other bias | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Summary assessment | Low risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias |
Non RCTs | Albertsen 2014 | Nunes 2017 |
---|---|---|
Selection of participants | High | Low |
Confounding variables | Low | Low |
Measurement of exposure | Unclear | High |
Blinding of outcome assessment | Unclear | Unclear |
Incomplete outcome data | Low | Unclear |
Selective outcome reporting | Unclear | Unclear |
Summary assessment | High risk of bias | Unclear risk of bias |
References
- Crespi, I.; Ruspini, E. Transition to fatherhood: New perspectives in the global context of changing men’s identities. Int. Rev. Sociol. 2015, 25, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhaus, J.H.; Beutell, N.J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1985, 10, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgmann, L.-S.; Rattay, P.; Lampert, T. Health-related consequences of work-family conflict from a European perspective: Results of a scoping review. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McGinnity, F.; Whelan, C.T. Comparing work-life conflict in Europe: Evidence from the European social survey. Soc. Indic. Res. 2009, 93, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, T.D.; Herst, D.E.; Bruck, C.S.; Sutton, M. Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2000, 5, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhaus, J.H.; Allen, T.D.; Spector, P.E. Health consequences of work–family conflict: The dark side of the work–family interface. In Employee Health, Coping and Methodologies; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lunau, T.; Bambra, C.; Eikemo, T.A.; van der Wel, K.A.; Dragano, N. A balancing act? Work–life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states. Eur. J. Public Health 2014, 24, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arthur, M.B.; Parker, P. Giving voice to the dual-career couple. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 2004, 32, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gornick, J.C.; Heron, A. The regulation of working time as work-family reconciliation policy: Comparing Europe, Japan, and the United States. J. Comp. Policy Anal. 2006, 8, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hegewisch, A.; Gornick, J.C. The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community Work Fam. 2011, 14, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, J.; Knijn, T.; Martin, C.; Ostner, I. Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s. Soc. Politics 2008, 15, 261–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Population Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Workplace Health Model. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/model/index.html (accessed on 2 March 2021).
- Costa, G. Shift Work and Health: Current Problems and Preventive Actions. Saf. Health Work 2010, 1, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Theorell, T.; Hammarström, A.; Aronsson, G.; Träskman Bendz, L.; Grape, T.; Hogstedt, C.; Marteinsdottir, I.; Skoog, I.; Hall, C. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Oakman, J.; Neupane, S.; Proper, K.I.; Kinsman, N.; Nygård, C.H. Workplace interventions to improve work ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of their effectiveness. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2018, 44, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joyce, S.; Modini, M.; Christensen, H.; Mykletun, A.; Bryant, R.; Mitchell, P.B.; Harvey, S.B. Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: A systematic meta-review. Psychol. Med. 2016, 46, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, C.; Seff, L.R.; Batra, A.; Bhatt, C.; Palmer, R.C. Recruiting and Engaging Older Men in Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs: Perspectives on Barriers and Strategies. J. Aging Res. 2016, 2016, 8981435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Smith, M.L.; Bergeron, C.D.; Ahn, S.; Towne, S.D., Jr.; Mingo, C.A.; Robinson, K.T.; Mathis, J.; Meng, L.; Ory, M.G. Engaging the Underrepresented Sex: Male Participation in Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) Programs. Am. J. Men’s Health 2018, 12, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, J.P.T.; Altman, D.G.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Jüni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savović, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.C. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.Y.; Park, J.E.; Lee, Y.J.; Seo, H.-J.; Sheen, S.-S.; Hahn, S.; Jang, B.-H.; Son, H.-J. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013, 66, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, D.M.; Lee, S.; Walter, K.N.; Lawson, K.M.; Kelly, E.L.; Buxton, O.M. The effects of a workplace intervention on employees’ cortisol awakening response. Community Work Fam. 2018, 21, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barck-Holst, P.; Nilsonne, Å.; Åkerstedt, T.; Hellgren, C. Reduced working hours and stress in the Swedish social services: A longitudinal study. Int. Soc. Work 2017, 60, 897–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, K.D.; Lawson, K.M.; Almeida, D.M.; Kelly, E.L.; King, R.B.; Hammer, L.; Casper, L.M.; Okechukwu, C.A.; Hanson, G.; McHale, S.M. Parents’ daily time with their children: A workplace intervention. Pediatrics 2015, 135, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Haslam, D.M.; Sanders, M.R.; Sofronoff, K. Reducing work and family conflict in teachers: A randomised controlled trial of Workplace Triple P. Sch. Ment. Health 2013, 5, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, E.L.; Moen, P.; Oakes, J.M.; Fan, W.; Okechukwu, C.; Davis, K.D.; Hammer, L.B.; Kossek, E.E.; King, R.B.; Hanson, G.C. Changing work and work-family conflict: Evidence from the work, family, and health network. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2014, 79, 485–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lawson, K.M.; Davis, K.D.; McHale, S.M.; Almeida, D.M.; Kelly, E.L.; King, R.B. Effects of workplace intervention on affective well-being in employees’ children. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 52, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.; Almeida, D.M.; Berkman, L.; Olson, R.; Moen, P.; Buxton, O.M. Age differences in workplace intervention effects on employees’ nighttime and daytime sleep. Sleep Health 2016, 2, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, A.J.; Sanders, M.R. Balancing work and family: A controlled evaluation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a work-site intervention. Child. Adolesc. Ment. Health 2003, 8, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McHale, S.M.; Davis, K.D.; Green, K.; Casper, L.; Kan, M.L.; Kelly, E.L.; King, R.B.; Okechukwu, C. Effects of a workplace intervention on parent–child relationships. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2016, 25, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McHale, S.M.; Lawson, K.M.; Davis, K.D.; Casper, L.; Kelly, E.L.; Buxton, O. Effects of a workplace intervention on sleep in employees’ children. J. Adolesc. Health 2015, 56, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Olson, R.; Crain, T.L.; Bodner, T.E.; King, R.; Hammer, L.B.; Klein, L.C.; Erickson, L.; Moen, P.; Berkman, L.F.; Buxton, O.M. A workplace intervention improves sleep: Results from the randomized controlled Work, Family, and Health Study. Sleep Health 2015, 1, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanders, M.R.; Stallman, H.M.; McHale, M. Workplace Triple P: A controlled evaluation of a parenting intervention for working parents. J. Fam. Psychol. 2011, 25, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schiller, H.; Lekander, M.; Rajaleid, K.; Hellgren, C.; Åkerstedt, T.; Barck-Holst, P.; Kecklund, G. The impact of reduced worktime on sleep and perceived stress—A group randomized intervention study using diary data. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2017, 43, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schiller, H.; Lekander, M.; Rajaleid, K.; Hellgren, C.; Åkerstedt, T.; Barck-Holst, P.; Kecklund, G. Total workload and recovery in relation to worktime reduction: A randomised controlled intervention study with time-use data. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018, 75, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albertsen, K.; Garde, A.H.; Nabe-Nielsen, K.; Hansen, Å.M.; Lund, H.; Hvid, H. Work-life balance among shift workers: Results from an intervention study about self-rostering. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2014, 87, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garde, A.H.; Albertsen, K.; Nabe-Nielsen, K.; Carneiro, I.G.; Skotte, J.; Hansen, S.M.; Lund, H.; Hvid, H.; Hansen, Å.M. Implementation of self-rostering (the PRIO project): Effects on working hours, recovery, and health. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2012, 38, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nunes, A.P.; Richmond, M.K.; Pampel, F.C.; Wood, R.C. The effect of employee assistance services on reductions in employee absenteeism. J. Bus. Psychol. 2018, 33, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richmond, M.K.; Pampel, F.C.; Wood, R.C.; Nunes, A.P. Impact of employee assistance services on depression, anxiety, and risky alcohol use: A quasi-experimental study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 58, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richmond, M.K.; Pampel, F.C.; Wood, R.C.; Nunes, A.P. The impact of employee assistance services on workplace outcomes: Results of a prospective, quasi-experimental study. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altevogt, B.M.; Colten, H.R. (Eds.) Sleep Disorders and Sleep Deprivation: An Unmet Public Health Problem; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Salo, P.; Ala-Mursula, L.; Rod, N.H.; Tucker, P.; Pentti, J.; Kivimäki, M.; Vahtera, J. Work time control and sleep disturbances: Prospective cohort study of Finnish public sector employees. Sleep 2014, 37, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robroek, S.J.W.; van Lenthe, F.J.; van Empelen, P.; Burdorf, A. Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2009, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bracken, K.; Askie, L.; Keech, A.C.; Hague, W.; Wittert, G. Recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials of men aged 50 years and older: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e025580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rongen, A.; Robroek, S.J.W.; van Ginkel, W.; Lindeboom, D.; Altink, B.; Burdorf, A. Barriers and facilitators for participation in health promotion programs among employees: A six-month follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Punt, S.E.; Kurz, D.L.; Befort, C.A. Recruitment of Men into a Pragmatic Rural Primary Care Weight Loss Trial. Am. J. Mens Health 2020, 14, 1557988320971917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shockley, K.M.; Shen, W.; DeNunzio, M.M.; Arvan, M.L.; Knudsen, E.A. Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. J. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 102, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Study ID | Study Period | Country | Design (Unit of Allocation) | Population Description Type of Workplace Age Range, Gender | Intervention Description Provider Follow-Up Period | Resources Economic Impact | Comparator | Outcomes Reported and Scale Used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health | Social Wellbeing | Job Performance | ||||||||
Schiller 2017—Reduced weekly working hours | ||||||||||
Schiller, et al. [35], Schiller, et al. [36], Barck-Holst, et al. [24] | February 2005 November 2006 | Sweden | Cluster-randomized controlled trial (workplace n = 33) Intervention-n = 17 involving 500 participants; control-n = 16 involving 419 participants) | Employees in four different working sectors: social services, technical services, care and welfare, and call center. Almost one third were shift workers, and about half of the participants had children living at home. Age range: 20–65 ~25% male (subgroup analysis done by gender) | 25% reduction of weekly work hours (according to the employers’ time recording data over 14 months) Follow-up: 9 and 18 months | Participants retained their salaries and the workplaces obtained funding for recruiting more staff in order to avoid an increase in workload for the employees | No intervention | Employee Sleep; sleep length, sleepiness (Karolinska Scale) sleep quality (SSQ) worry and stress (at bedtime) perceived stress (Schiller 2017) | Employee Amount of time spent on recovery activity (Schiller 2018); demand, control and social support, manager support, coworker support, work intrusion on private life, private life intrusion on work (Barck-Holst 2015) | |
Albertsen 2014—Self-rostering (Flexibility) | ||||||||||
Albertsen, et al. [37], Garde, et al. [38] | October 2008–October 2009 | Denmark | Quasi-experimental intervention study (9 organizations with workplaces n = 28) Intervention n = 14; control n = 14 840 participants returned the questionnaire at baseline | Shift workers Mainly hospitals and psychiatric homes. Over half of participants had children living at home. Mean age 42 years ~10% male participants | Implementation of IT-based tools for self-rostering. (New work schedule based on the preferences of the employees and the staff needs) Group A: choose starting time and length of shift down to 15 minutes intervals. Group B: choose what days they wanted to work and not to work Group C: only choose between a few specific shifts. Duration: 12 months | Employees received training in the use of the software. All activities related to the interventions were financed by the organizations. | No intervention | Employee Need for recovery Sleep (disturbed sleep and awakening index) (Karolinska Scale), mental distress and somatic symptoms (reduced form of the Symptom Checklist-90) (Garde 2012) | Employee Work-life conflicts, work-life facilitation, marital conflicts, time with children (Albertsen 2014); influence on working hours, preferred length of duty/time of day/day to work, satisfaction with working hours (Garde 2012) | Employee Consider changing job (Garde 2012) |
Almeida 2018—Supervisory/employee training (managing work-family interface) | ||||||||||
Almeida, et al. [23], McHale, et al. [31], Lawson, et al. [28], McHale, et al. [32], Davis, et al. [25], Kelly, et al. [27], Lee, et al. [29], Olson, et al. [33] | September 2009 to September 2011 | USA | Cluster-randomized controlled trial (work units n = 56) Intervention-n = 27 involving 423 participants; control-29 involving 400 participants) | Employees of IT division of a large company (mean tenure was over 10 years) 823 employees completed interviews at baseline. 635 employees completed a weeklong actigraphy data collection (baseline). 147 employees with a child 9–17 years of age participated in an additional home interviews with their child. Median age: 46 ~60% male participants | STAR (Support-Transform-Achieve-Results) workplace intervention aimed at promoting employees’ schedule control and supervisor support for personal and family life Duration: employees 8h and managers attended an additional 4h Provider: outside facilitators Follow-up: up to 12 months | Sessions were held during work hours Four group facilitators delivered the STAR intervention to supervisors and employees (supported by research grants) | Usual practice | Employee Nighttime sleep duration, wake after sleep onset, daytime nap duration (Actigraphic sleep measures) (Lee 2016) Actigraphy-based total sleep duration and sleep quality, self-reported sleep insufficiency and insomnia symptoms (Olson 2015) | Employee Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB), schedule control, work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict, time adequacy with family, psychological job demands (Kelly 2014) | |
Employee/parent Cortisol awakening response (daily saliva collection) (Almeida 2018) | Employee/parent Time with children (Davis 2015) | |||||||||
Child Negative and positive affect (PANAS), daily stressful experiences (DISE) (Lawson 2016); sleep (PSQI; duration, variability, latency quality) (McHale 2015) | Child Parent-child relationships; parental warmth, parents’ education involvement, parents’ solicitation of information about youths’ daily experiences, time with parents (McHale 2016) | |||||||||
Workplace parenting intervention (managing work-family interface) | ||||||||||
Haslam, et al. [26] | Not described | Australia | Randomized controlled trial (individual) Intervention n = 55; control n = 52 | Teachers with at least one child between 2 and 12 years of age Mean age: 40.6 ~23.4% male participants | Workplace Triple P (WPTP, a workplace parenting intervention); aimed at reducing work–family conflict and improving work and family functioning in teachers (1) Three telephone consultations (2) The group section over two full days (9:00 am–4:30 pm including breaks) 1 week apart Duration: 3 weeks Provider: two registered psychologists Follow-up: 4 months | Two schools provided the intervention during paid work-time, the rest of the teachers attended outside school hours. | Waitlist control | Employee/parent Stress (Teacher Occupational Stress Factor Questionnaire, depression and anxiety (Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS) | Employee/parent Work family conflict (Frone’s scale), job satisfaction, parental satisfaction (subscale of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale), dysfunctional parenting, (Parenting scale), parental levels of self-efficacy (Parenting Task Checklist) | Employee/parent Teaching-related self-efficacy |
Child Problem behavior (Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) | ||||||||||
Martin and Sanders [30] | Not described | Australia | Randomized controlled trial (individual) Intervention n = 23; control n = 22 | General and academic staff (employed for at least 20 hours per week) from a major metropolitan university with child aged between 2 and 9 years. Age range: 27 to 46 no data for gender | Workplace Triple P with 17 core positive parenting and child management strategies, and Planned Activities Training Duration: 8 weeks Provider: masters level psychologists (who were accredited Triple P providers) Follow-up: 4 months | WPTP delivered as part of a suite of evidence-based Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) funded by employers to promote ‘family friendly’ workplaces | Waitlist control | Employee/parent Parental adjustment (DASS), work stress | Employee/parent Dysfunctional parenting (Parenting scale), parenting efficacy (Problem Setting and Behavior Checklist), Social Support Scale, job satisfaction | Employee/parent Work commitment (Work Commitment Questionnaire), work-related self-efficacy |
Child Problem behavior (ECBI) (4-months) (The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) | ||||||||||
Sanders, et al. [34] | Not described | Australia | Randomized controlled trial (individual) Intervention n = 62 control n = 59 | Employees employed at least half-time, with child aged between 1 and 16 years Various organizations (including State Government Departments of Education, Housing, Public Works, and Tourism, a large private hospital and a university) 27.6% fathers | Workplace Triple P consisted of two components: work-family balance coping skills and positive parenting skills Duration: 8 weeks period Provider: Triple P practitioners with postgraduate psychology qualifications Follow-up: up to 12 months | Group sessions were conducted at workplace during times identified as convenient by management and employees including lunchtimes, afternoons, or at the close of business | Waitlist control | Employee/parent Parental distress (DASS) (4-months), work stress (Work stress scale) | Employee/parent Dysfunctional parenting (Parenting scale), parenting efficacy (Parenting Task Checklist), job satisfaction | Employee/parent Work commitment (Cohen’s scale) |
Child Problem behavior (ECBI), child behavior (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) | ||||||||||
Nunes 2017—Individualized counseling to employees (experiencing personal and work-related difficulties) | ||||||||||
Nunes, et al. [39], Richmond, et al. [40], Richmond, et al. [41] | October 2013 to July 2014 | USA | Quasi-experimental design EAP users n =145 matched to non-EAP users n = 145 EAP users n = 156 matched to non-EAP users n = 188 | Workers on EAP 19 departments of Colorado state government and the Judicial Branch No information on children Mean age: 44.6 ~30% male participants | Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) offering individualized counseling to employees that support employees to identify effective coping strategies for personal and professional stressors Provider: Approximately 11 licensed staff members and 5–7 graduate student interns Follow-up: up to 12 months | The Colorado State Employee Assistance Program (C-SEAP) Intervention staff are employed by the state. | Non-EAP users | Employee Depression symptoms (PHQ), anxiety severity (GAD-2), alcohol use disorders (AUDIT), absenteeism, presenteeism, and workplace distress (Chestnut Global Partners Workplace Outcome Suite) (Richmond 2016) | Employee Sick time taken for a period of up to 12 months after the baseline survey (timecard data) (Nunes 2017); Absenteeism scale, presenteeism scale, workplace distress (Richmond 2017) |
Study id(s) | Intervention | Intervention Effect * | Primary Outcomes | Secondary Outcomes | Study Quality | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health Outcomes | Social Wellbeing Outcomes | Job Performance Outcomes | ||||
Schiller, et al. [35], Schiller, et al. [36], Barck-Holst, et al. [24] | Reduced working hour (cluster RCT) | Significant positive effect |
|
| Unclear risk of bias | |
No significant difference |
|
| ||||
Albertsen, et al. [37], Garde, et al. [38] | Self-rostering (flexibility) (non-RCT) | Significant positive effect |
|
| High risk of bias | |
Significant negative effect |
| |||||
No significant difference |
|
| ||||
Almeida, et al. [23], McHale, et al. [31], Lawson, et al. [28], McHale, et al. [32], Davis, et al. [25], Kelly, et al. [27], Lee, et al. [29], Olson, et al. [33] | Supervisory/employee training (cluster RCT) | Significant positive effect |
|
| Low risk of bias | |
No significant difference |
|
| ||||
Haslam, et al. [26], Martin and Sanders [30], Sanders, et al. [34] | Workplace parenting intervention (3 studies) (individual RCT) | Significant positive effect |
|
|
| Unclear risk of bias |
No significant difference |
| |||||
Nunes, et al. [39], Richmond, et al. [40], Richmond, et al. [41] | Individualized counseling (non-RCT) | Significant positive effect |
|
| Unclear risk of bias | |
No significant difference |
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Suto, M.; Balogun, O.O.; Dhungel, B.; Kato, T.; Takehara, K. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on the Health and Wellbeing of Fathers or Parents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084779
Suto M, Balogun OO, Dhungel B, Kato T, Takehara K. Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on the Health and Wellbeing of Fathers or Parents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(8):4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084779
Chicago/Turabian StyleSuto, Maiko, Olukunmi Omobolanle Balogun, Bibha Dhungel, Tsuguhiko Kato, and Kenji Takehara. 2022. "Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Working Conditions on the Health and Wellbeing of Fathers or Parents: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 8: 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084779