Next Article in Journal
Ambivalence towards the Protection of Refugee Children: A Developmental Relational Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Examining the Potential Scaling Law in Urban PM2.5 Pollution Risks along with the Nationwide Air Environmental Effort in China
Previous Article in Journal
Application of a Water Supply-Demand Balance Model to Set Priorities for Improvements in Water Supply Systems: A Case Study from the Koshi River Basin, Nepal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Association of Urban Form and Particulate Matter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meteorological Influences on Spatiotemporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations in Atmospheric Pollution Transmission Channel Cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China

1
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Rd., Beijing 100101, China
3
School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
4
Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Earth Observation and Modeling, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1607; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031607
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 27 January 2022 / Published: 30 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Modeling of Air Pollutant Variability)

Abstract

:
Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of PM2.5 concentrations and identifying their associated meteorological factors can provide useful insight for implementing air pollution interventions. In this study, we used daily air quality monitoring data for 28 air pollution transmission channel cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region during 2014–2019 to quantify the relative contributions of meteorological factors on spatiotemporal variation in PM2.5 concentration by combining time series and spatial perspectives. The results show that annual mean PM2.5 concentration significantly decreased in 24 of the channel cities from 2014 to 2019, but they all still exceeded the Grade II Chinese Ambient Air Quality Standards (35 μg m−3) in 2019. PM2.5 concentrations exhibited clear spatial agglomeration in the most polluted season, and their spatial pattern changed slightly over time. Meteorological variables accounted for 31.96% of the temporal variation in PM2.5 concentration among the 28 cities during the study period, with minimum temperature and average relative humidity as the most critical factors. Spatially, atmospheric pressure and maximum temperature played a key role in the distribution of PM2.5 concentration in spring and summer, whereas the effect of sunshine hours increased greatly in autumn and winter. These findings highlight the importance of future clean air policy making, but also provide a theoretical support for precise forecasting and prevention of PM2.5 pollution.

1. Introduction

Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) represents one of the most serious air pollutant types due to its profound effects on human living environments [1,2,3]. Previous studies have revealed that PM2.5 significantly affects atmospheric visibility through the scattering and absorption of solar radiation [4,5,6] and modification of cloud microphysical properties by acting as cloud condensation nuclei [7,8]. PM2.5 exerts extreme influences on human health and has been associated with respiratory problems, lung cancer, cardiovascular morbidity and infectious diseases [1,9,10]. Exposure to PM2.5 pollution was related to approximately 1.03 million deaths in the major cities of China in 2013 [11], 103.1 million disability-adjusted life-years and 4.2 million deaths worldwide in 2015 [12] and about 138,150, 80,945, and 18,752 premature deaths for all-cause, cardiovascular diseases and respiratory diseases, respectively, in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region in 2015 [13]. Therefore, quantifying the spatiotemporal variation of regional PM2.5 concentration and understanding its driving factors is essential for addressing global concerns in government, the scientific community and the general public.
The BTH region is the capital economic circle of China. Mainly due to the coal-based energy structure, road-dominated freight transport, fugitive dusts and agricultural activities, it has become one of the most severe air pollution regions in China [14,15,16]. To date, many studies have focused on the temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 in this region. However, most of these studies have been limited to individual cities [17,18,19], dozens of major cities during certain seasons within short time series [20,21,22,23] or 13 cities within a single year [24,25]. Recently, some studies reported an obvious spatial spillover effect of air pollution among different cities [26,27], suggesting much larger amounts from surrounding cities. For example, Chang et al., 2019, indicated that, although local PM2.5 emissions were dominant in all 13 cities within the BTH area, regional transport from Shandong and Henan Provinces contributed as much as 12.9% of PM2.5 emissions [28]. To dramatically reduce the pollution in the BTH area, an air pollution prevention and control program for the BTH and surrounding areas including 28 cities was announced jointly by the Ministry of Ecology and the Environment of China in 2017. The regulations include mandating the shutdown of small and polluting factories, clean heating in winter by replacing coal with gas or electricity, staggered peak production in heating season and no open burning (Table S1). Thus, comprehensive and accurate investigation of the spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 concentration in the 28 cities within the air pollution transmission channel of the BTH region is urgently needed as a scientific basis for preventing and controlling regional air pollution [29,30].
Meteorological conditions and synoptic circulation patterns exert important influences on PM2.5 variation [31,32]. Recently, a large body of research has been conducted based on the chemical transport models. Wang and Zhang, 2020, suggested that about a 59.9% decrease in PM2.5 concentration in 2017 was related to atmospheric conditions over the BTH region [33]. Gonzalez-Abraham et al., 2015, predicted that PM2.5 would increase by 10–30% across the eastern USA to the 2050s [34]. However, the accuracy of these model simulations is greatly influenced by the emissions inventory, model design and meteorological conditions [35]. Statistical models derived from observed PM2.5 and meteorological data offer an alternative approach to identify the effects of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 distribution [36]. However, due to strong relationships among meteorological factors, traditional statistical methods, such as correlation analysis and linear regression, tend to produce biased results when assessing the effects of individual meteorological variables on PM2.5 [37,38]. On the other hand, PM2.5 responses to meteorological variables are complex [31,39]. PM2.5 concentration could rise in areas where the temperature changed from comfortable to cold due to household heating [27] and temperature inversion [38]. It also could be positively related to daily temperature, especially in spring and winter, probably by decreased wind speed through the transformation of air pressure [14] and chemical reactions. The response of PM2.5 concentrations to changes in meteorological conditions seems to be heavily dependent on the time period, case terrain, atmospheric circulation and existing large spatiotemporal heterogeneities [40,41]. Therefore, analyses of the relationship between PM2.5 and meteorological variables should be conducted by combining time series and spatial perspectives to better quantify the role of meteorological factors in spatiotemporal PM2.5 variation. In February 2012, the new Chinese Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS, GB3095-2012) were jointly issued by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. It was not until the air quality standard was published that real-time hourly PM2.5 and PM10 concentration data for the major cities were collected and released online, which is essential for providing detailed information about particulate matter pollution and helpful for understanding how local air quality has changed over time.
In this study, we examined reductions in PM2.5 concentration during 2014–2019 in the 28 cities of the air pollution transmission channel in the BTH region of China at seasonal and annual scales. Then we explored the spatial heterogeneity of the relationship between PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables based on geographical weight regression (GWR) analysis. Finally, we performed partial correlation and multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses to quantify PM2.5 concentration response to meteorological variables and their contributions to the PM2.5 concentration variation from a time-series perspective. The findings of this study will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the influence of meteorological variables on PM2.5 concentration and will provide strong theoretical support for precise forecasting and prevention of PM2.5 pollution in the BTH region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area includes 28 air pollution transmission channel cities of the BTH region, covering an area of 275,000 km2 [30,39]. The 28 cities are the two municipalities of Beijing and Tianjin and 26 prefecture-level cities which comprise the air pollution transmission channel of the BTH region; these cities include Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Langfang, Baoding, Cangzhou, Hengshui, Xingtai and Handan in Hebei Province; Taiyuan, Yangquan, Changzhi and Jincheng in Shanxi Province; Zhengzhou, Kaifeng, Anyang, Hebi, Puyang, Xinxiang and Jiaozou in Henan Province; and Jinan, Zibo, Jining, Dezhou, Liaocheng, Binzhou and Heze in Shandong Province (Figure 1). The area has a typical temperate monsoonal climate, with an annual mean air temperature of 4~15 °C and annual precipitation of 450~700 mm. The terrain is generally lower from west to east. Out of the 28 cities, 24 are located on the northern China plain, with altitudes below 200 m, whereas Taiyuan, Yangquan, Changzhi and Jincheng belong to the Loess Plateau, on the west side of the Taihang Mountains.

2.2. Data Sources

Daily PM10 and PM2.5 concentration data (μgm−3) between 1 March 2014 and 28 February 2019 for the 28 cities in the air pollution transmission channel of the BTH region (Jincheng data started from 1 March 2015) were obtained from an online database (https://www.aqistudy.cn/historydata, accessed on 8 December 2021). This dataset was constructed by averaging hourly concentration data for all national air quality monitoring sites within each city listed on the official website of the China National Environmental Monitoring Center [37]. In accordance with the China Environmental Protection Standards, each national air quality monitoring site recorded the real-time hourly PM2.5 and PM10 concentration obtained by the continuous automated monitoring system based on the micro-oscillating balance method and the β absorption method. The dataset contained very few missing records (44 days among all monitoring stations) and very few zero values for PM10 concentration. We interpolated missing values from the mean values of the two closest days to maintain time series data continuity and comparability. In addition, although PM2.5 has been paid special concern, it was not systematically observed and reported for most cities in China until 2014. Meanwhile, it was unreasonable to effectively consider the relative contributions of different particles to local air quality and the composition characteristics of particulate matter based only on fine particles (and without consideration of coarse particles). Therefore, we removed zero values of PM10 concentration and the corresponding PM2.5 concentration values from the time series in order to calculate the PM2.5/PM10 ratio, which provided crucial information related to particle origin and allowed retrospective prediction of PM2.5 concentration without direct PM2.5 measurements.
Daily meteorological data, including daily maximum temperature (Tmax, °C) and minimum temperature (Tmin, °C), average atmospheric pressure (AP, hPa), sunshine hours (SH, h), average relative humidity (H, %), maximum wind speed (WS, m/s) and wind direction (WD) for the 28 meteorological stations were collected from a Chinese meteorological data sharing service system (http://data.cma.cn/, accessed on 8 December 2021). The 28 meteorological stations were generally located at the center of each city (Figure 1). We interpolated missing values from the mean values of the two closest days and removed corresponding values of meteorological factors to square with records of PM2.5 concentration values from the time series.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Spatial Autocorrelation and Linear Regression

The variation in PM2.5 concentration in each of the air pollution transport channel cities was investigated at seasonal and annual scales. In this study, spring, summer, autumn and winter were defined as March–May, June–August, September–November and December–February, respectively. Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the variation in PM2.5 concentration for each city. We also performed spatial autocorrelation analysis to evaluate the spatial associations of PM2.5 concentration by calculating the global and local Moran’s I using ArcGIS 10.4.1 software [26,42]. The global spatial autocorrelation describes the spatial dependence of PM2.5 in the whole area of the BTH region, which can be characterized by Global Moran’s I. The formula is as follows:
Global Moran s   I = n   i = 1 n j = 1 n W i j ( x i x ¯ ) ( x j x ¯ ) ( i = 1 n j = 1 n W i j ) i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 ( i   j )
where xi, xj, are the PM2.5 concentration observations of cities i, j; n is the number of all cities; x ¯ is the average PM2.5 concentrations of all regions; Wij is the spatial weight matrix. Global Moran’s I values < 0, >0 and =0, indicate negative, positive, and random spatial correlation, respectively. Local Moran’s I values denote the local spatial autocorrelation patterns, where High–High (H–H) means that the city and surrounding cities have high PM2.5 concentrations; High–Low (H–L) represents that the city has a high PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are low; Low–High (L–H) shows that the city has a low PM2.5 concentration, but those surrounding cities are high; Low–Low (L–L) means that both the city and surrounding cities have low PM2.5 concentrations; Not significant (NS) indicates no significant difference in PM2.5 concentration among cities. Global Moran’s I and Local Moran’s I statistical tests used a z-test at 95% confidence level. Finally, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to investigate fluctuation in the temporal variability of PM2.5 concentration. We also explored the spatiotemporal variation in the PM2.5/PM10 ratios using the same methods.

2.3.2. Partial Correlation and Multiple Linear Regression

Partial correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationships among temporal variations in daily PM2.5 concentration and meteorological factors for each city at seasonal and annual scales; this method has been successfully applied in previous environmental studies to remove covariate effects among multiple influential factors. Next, we performed multiple linear regression analysis of daily PM2.5 concentration and meteorological factors at seasonal and annual scales for each city, and the explanation ability of meteorological factors on PM2.5 variability was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2) [32,43]. All calculations were performed using MATLAB 2015b software, and statistical significance was determined at the level of p < 0.05.

2.3.3. Geographically Weighted Regression

The geographically weighted regression was developed to deal with this non-stationarity, which allows relationships between independent and dependent variables to vary spatially by producing a set of local parameters to reveal spatial relationships by assuming heterogeneous influence of the same factor on dependent variables in different spatial units [44,45]. We performed geographically weighted regression to evaluate the spatial heterogeneity of the influence of meteorological factors on PM2.5 concentration based on site data for the 28 cities. First, we normalized mean seasonal and annual PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variable data during 2014–2019 for each city; we then conducted the geographically weighted regression analysis using the ArcGIS 10.4.1 software. The geographically weighted regression was run for an observation point by using a spatial kernel that centered on the point and weighted other observation points by a distance decay function. In this study, the Gaussian model was selected as a weighting function, and the corrected Akaike’s information criteria (AICc) was used to obtain the optimal bandwidth.

3. Results

3.1. Overview of PM2.5 Pollution

3.1.1. Spatiotemporal Variation of PM2.5

During 2014–2019, the highest annual mean PM2.5 concentrations were observed in Xingtai (83.69 μg m−3), Handan (80.98 μg m−3), Shijiazhuang (84.16 μg m−3) and Baoding (85.35 μg m−3), and the lowest PM2.5 concentration was observed in Shanxi Province, with a minimum of 56.77 μg m−3 in Yangquan (Figure 2). In all cities, the annual mean PM2.5 concentration exceeded the CAAQS (GB3095-2012) Grade II standard of 35 μg m−3. Mean PM2.5 concentration showed wide seasonal variation that was similar among all cities. The highest pollution levels were observed in winter and the lowest values in summer. However, the seasonal fluctuation range seriously differed among cities. For instance, Beijing, Tianjin, Tangshan, Langfang, Binzhou, Zibo and Yangquan showed lower CV values, whereas Baoding, Anyang, Puyang and Kaifeng had larger CV values (>40%). CV values were higher in winter and lower in spring. From 2014 to 2019, significant reductions in annual mean PM2.5 concentration occurred across 24 of the 28 channel cities (excluding Hebi, Taiyuan, Yangquan and Jincheng), with a mean rate of −7.14 μg m−3 year−1 (Figure 2). About half of the 28 cities showed a decrease rate of more than −8 μg m−3 year−1. These were mainly scattered in the Hebei and Shandong Provinces. However, in 2019, PM2.5 concentration exceeded the CAAQS (GB3095-2012) Grade II standard in all cities, and PM2.5 concentration variation showed significant seasonal and spatial distribution differences among all 28 cities. Compared with other seasons, PM2.5 concentration in spring and summer exhibited the clearest obviously decreasing trend, with significant reductions in 22 and 26 cities, respectively, which were mainly located in the Hebei and Shandong Provinces. Significant downward trends were also observed in 20 cities in autumn and only 4 cities in winter.
Spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that the average PM2.5 concentrations during 2014–2019 had a Global Moran’s I of −0.05 (p = 0.95) in spring, 0.09 (p = 0.35) in summer, 0.20 (p = 0.08) in autumn, and 0.30 (p = 0.01) in winter, indicating spatial patterns in winter across all channel cities. Local spatial patterns of average PM2.5 concentrations in winter displayed clear spatial agglomeration characteristics, with H–H spatial clusters from Dezhou in 2015, to Handan Anyang, Hebi and Puyang in 2019. The L–L spatial clusters appeared in Beijing and Tianjin and persisted thereafter (Figure 3).

3.1.2. Distribution of PM2.5/PM10 Ratios

Annual mean PM2.5 concentration accounted for a large fraction of PM10 during 2014–2019 in most cities, with a mean PM2.5/PM10 ratio of 0.56 (Figure 4). PM2.5/PM10 ratios showed large differences in spatial distribution, with higher ratios found in Beijing (0.68), Tianjin (0.62) and Binzhou (0.61) and lower ratios observed in Taiyuan (0.49), Yangquan (0.51) and Jincheng (0.50), all of which are located in Shanxi Province. By contrast, despite similar spatial distributions of mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in each season, clear seasonal differences were observed. Among the 28 cities, 27 cities displayed their highest mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in winter (excluding Hengshui), whereas almost all cities showed their lowest mean ratios in spring. From 2014 to 2019, the annual mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in most cities of Hebei and Shandong Provinces exhibited a clearly decreasing trend, with significant decreases in Langfang, Shijiazhuang, Dezhou and Heze, whereas most of the other cities fluctuated over time (Figure 4). Compared with spring and summer, mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios showed particularly large decreases in autumn, with significant reductions in 12 of the 28 cities. By contrast, 23 cites showed a fluctuating upward trend for PM2.5/PM10 ratios in winter, especially in the cities of Henan Province, such as Puyang (p = 0.02), Zhengzhou (p = 0.03) and Kaifeng (p = 0.01).
Spatial autocorrelation analysis of mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios demonstrated that the Global Moran’s I ranged from 0.005 to 0.15, with no significant differences at the seasonal or annual scale, indicating that the PM2.5/PM10 ratio of each city did not influence those of the other cities in aggregate. However, local spatial autocorrelation analysis exhibited L–L spatial clusters of mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in Taiyuan and Yangquan during spring and winter and H–H spatial clusters in Tianjin in summer and in both Tianjin and Beijing in autumn (Figure 5).

3.2. Relationships between Temporal PM2.5 Variation and Meteorological Variables

Partial correlation analysis results for PM2.5 concentration with the meteorological variables are shown in Table 1. PM2.5 concentration was significantly negatively correlated with AP, Tmin, SH (except in Puyang) and WS (except in Yangquan); it was positively correlated with Tmax in 23 of the 28 cities and with H throughout the study period. By comparison, the correlation between WD and PM2.5 concentration was positive over the northeastern part of the study area (Beijing, Tianjin, Langfang, Cangzhou, Binzhou, Dezhou, Jinan and Jining), but negative over the southwestern region (Handan, Liaocheng, Heze, Puyang, Xinxiang, Jiaozuo, Kaifeng, Yangquan, Changzhi and Jincheng). Generally, Tmin and H (especially Tmin) were critical factors affecting variation in PM2.5 concentration throughout the year.
Seasonal correlations between PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables were generally similar to those at the annual scale, with some exceptions (Table S2). In winter, correlations between PM2.5 concentration and SH and H (especially H) were much stronger than those at the annual scale in most cities, whereas those correlations between PM2.5 concentration and Tmin became slightly weaker. In spring, Tmin and H were the two most important factors affecting the variation in PM2.5 concentration in most cities, whereas the relationship between AP and PM2.5 concentration was significant only in seven cities. Among the four seasons, PM2.5 concentration showed the weakest correlation with AP and H in summer and was more strongly correlated with Tmax and SH for more cities in summer than in spring and autumn. In autumn, PM2.5 concentration was significantly negatively correlated with Tmin in 27 cities, with AP in 25 cities and with H in 24 cities; Tmin had the greatest influence on PM2.5 concentration variation. Interestingly, partial correlation analysis also showed that PM2.5 concentration was positively related to WD in winter in eastern cities such as Tianjin, Cangzhou, Xingtai, Binzhou, Dezhou, Zibo, Jinan and Jining, but positively correlated with WD in summer in some northern cities (Beijing, Langfang, Baoding, Hengshui, Binzhou, and Taiyuan).
Based on multiple linear regression analysis, meteorological variables account for 31.96% (mean R2) of the variation in PM2.5 concentration among the 28 cities during the study period; Shijiazhuang had the highest R2 value (44.46%), and Jinan had the lowest value (21.30%). At the seasonal scale, the mean R2 was highest in winter (0.43), with the highest R2 values in Beijing, Tianjin and the cities of Hebei and Shandong Provinces, whereas R2 was lowest in summer, with a mean value of 0.13 (Table 2).

3.3. Effects of Meteorological Factors on the Spatial Heterogeneity of PM2.5

The geographic distribution of regression coefficient values of seven meteorological factors across the BTH region is shown in Figure 6. The association direction between SH, WS, WD and PM2.5 concentration was negative in all cities, especially for SH and WD, suggesting that increases in SH and WD had an inhibitory effect on PM2.5 concentration. Among the seven meteorological factors examined, SH had the strongest influence on PM2.5 concentration in Beijing, Tianjin, Langfang, Hengshui, Xingtai, Handan, Binzhou, Liaocheng, Jining, Anyang and Hebi, which are located to the east of the Taihang Mountains. By comparison, AP and both temperature factors exhibited a strongly positive effect on PM2.5 concentration in the remaining cities. Notably, Tmax had the strongest influence in Tangshan, Baoding, Binzhou, Cangzhou and Dezhou, whereas AP had the strongest influence in the other 13 cities.
Significant spatial heterogeneity was detected in both the direction and strength of the environmental factors among different seasons based on the GWR method (Figure 7). In spring, AP and Tmax had the greatest influence on the spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentration. AP had a significant positive relationship with PM2.5 concentration in Beijing, Tianjin, Langfang, Xingtai, Liaocheng, Jining and Anyang, whereas Tmax had the largest positive effect on PM2.5 concentration in the remaining cities (about 71.43% of all cities). WS and WD were negatively correlated with PM2.5 concentration in all cities except Tangshan, but had a smaller impact on PM2.5 concentration in Beijing, Tianjin, Langfang, Hengshui, Xingtai, Handan, Liaocheng, Jining, Heze, Anyang, Hebi and Puyang (Figure 7a). In summer, the impact patterns of temperature, wind and atmospheric pressure were generally similar to those in spring, but to a much smaller degree. H displayed a clear negative relationship with PM2.5 concentration in most cities of Shanxi, Henan and Shandong Provinces (Figure 7b), indicating that higher humidity was associated with lower PM2.5 concentration.
In autumn, the relationships between SH, WS and WD and PM2.5 concentration were negative, whereas AP and H were positively related with PM2.5 concentration in all cities. These patterns were comparable with those at the annual scale. In Beijing, Tianjin, Tangshan, Langfang, Baoding, Hengshui, Xingtai, Handan, Binzhou, Dezhou, Jining, Anyang and Hebi, SH played the most dominant role in determining PM2.5 concentration, whereas AP was the dominant variable in most other cities, which were mainly located in the southern part of the BTH region (about 50% of all cities). Correlations between meteorological factors and PM2.5 concentration were generally similar in winter and autumn (Figure 7c,d), but with some differences. For instance, SH remained the strongest influence in 13 cities, whereas its impact weakened in nine cities and strengthened in most central and southern cities. AP exerted an increasing impact in southern cities and maintained a dominant role in Jiaozuo, Zhengzhou, Kaifeng, Taiyuan, Yangquan and Jincheng. H showed a negative relationship with PM2.5 concentration in Heze and Xinxiang, and an enhanced positive relationship in 22 cities. Temperature had the largest positive effect on PM2.5 concentration in eastern and central cities, including Shijiazhuang, Cangzhou, Binzhou, Dezhou, Zibo, Jinan and Changzhi (Figure 7d).

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatiotemporal Variations in PM2.5

In this study, we found that annual mean PM2.5 concentration decreased in the 28 channel cities (significantly in 24 cities) in the BTH region during 2014–2019. Similar trends have been reported in previous studies. For example, average annual PM2.5 concentration was reported to have decreased throughout the BTH region during 2013–2016 [46] and 2013–2018 [32,33] and to have declined by about 40% in Beijing from 2013–2018 [18,36]. These decreases in PM2.5 concentration can be attributed mainly to the Action Plan on Prevention and Control of Air Pollution in 2013 and the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Program in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and surrounding areas in 2017. However, it was noteworthy that the rate of decline in PM2.5 concentration slowed dramatically after 2017, even fluctuating upward in some cities (Figure S1). We also found that the annual mean PM2.5 concentration of all channel cities in the BTH region remained much higher than the Grade II standard of CAAQS in 2019, which indicates that further measures are still strongly needed despite the improvements attributed to control strategies implemented within the past decade.
The results of this study demonstrate that PM2.5 concentration exhibits a distinct seasonal cycle, with less severe PM2.5 pollution in summer and greater pollution in winter, probably due to the combined impact of unfavorable weather conditions and coal and biomass combustion for residential heating [32,47]. The PM2.5/PM10 ratio also showed a seasonal variation, decreasing in spring and peaking in winter, which can be attributed to increasing fuel consumption [48] and the secondary formation of PM2.5 in winter [23]. In addition, our results showed significant reductions in PM2.5 concentration in only four cities in winter, the most polluted season, whereas PM2.5/PM10 ratios of most cites showed a fluctuating upward trend. The increase in PM2.5/PM10 ratios also have been reported at several monitoring sites in the UK [49] and India [50]. These results indicate that more control measures should focus on PM2.5 emissions and their formation mechanisms in winter.
Air pollution has been suggested to be strongly affected by pollutants from adjacent cities [51]. The intensity of spatially dependent air pollution tends to differ seasonally due to differences in synoptic patterns and emission characteristics [28]. For example, Sun et al. (2019) reported that spatial agglomeration of air pollution was stronger in winter and weaker in summer [51]. Using a pollutant tracing model, Wang et al. (2015) explored the regional contributions of PM2.5 pollution in Shijiazhuang, Xingtai and Handan, and found that regional contributions were larger in January than in July [52]. In accordance with these findings, our results showed clear large scale spatial autocorrelation of PM2.5 concentration occurred in autumn and winter, indicating that PM2.5 pollution in adjacent cities may strongly interact among the 28 cities of the BTH region during the latter half of the year. However, the local spatial autocorrelation results of our study showed that regions with high agglomeration of PM2.5 concentration were mainly concentrated in the southern Hebei Province and northern Henan Province, but with some spatial variation, suggesting that joint variable control strategies should be emphasized for PM2.5 pollution over time.

4.2. Relationship between PM2.5 Concentration and Meteorological Factors

Meteorological conditions played an important role in influencing PM2.5 concentration. In this study, Tmin and H were the leading factors affecting PM2.5 concentration at the annual scale. Tmin was negatively correlated with PM2.5 concentration, which is consistent with the fact that air quality is better in summer and worse in winter. This negative correlation may be closely related to less dispersion and dilution of air pollutants at lower Tmin. At low minimum temperature, air convection is weak and temperature inversion can easily occur. These conditions are not conducive to the diffusion and dilution of air pollutants [33]. By contrast, H had the strongest positive influence on PM2.5 concentration. Increases in H increase the production of sulfate aerosols via aqueous reactions and also significantly affect the partitioning of HNO3 between the gas and particulate phases, leading to enhanced nitrate formation [34]. In addition, high humidity conditions promote the production of secondary organic aerosols [53]. For example, the contribution of more-oxidized secondary organic aerosols to organic aerosols increases substantially as a function of relative humidity [54]. However, some studies have reported that particulate pollutants tend to gather mass and fall to the ground on days with high relative humidity [55]. This divergence may be attributed partly to the degree of relative humidity. At moderate relative humidity, particulate pollutants tend to cluster, and environmental quality worsens. However, as humidity increases, these particles are scavenged through precipitation [56,57].
The correlations between meteorological factors and PM2.5 concentration showed some interesting characteristics in different seasons. Generally, meteorological factors had a greater influence on PM2.5 concentration in all cities in winter, and the effects of these factors were much stronger in winter than in other seasons, which is consistent with the findings of a previous study [37]. In winter, unfavorable circulation conditions, such as the positive humidity anomalies, a stable boundary layer and air stagnation occur frequently in east Asian monsoonal climates, exacerbating air pollution [33]. Fewer meteorological factors influenced PM2.5 concentration in summer, when the variation in PM2.5 concentration depended mainly on changes in Tmax and SH. Previous studies have reported that increases in temperature increased radical production rates and promoted aerosol formation, but the atmospheric photolysis occurred on organic carbon, reducing PM2.5 concentration [37,40] (Chen et al., 2017; Dawson et al., 2007). These findings are consistent with our results to some extent. However, other studies reported that high temperatures caused atmospheric convection, resulting in greater dispersion and dilution of air pollutants, and photochemical reactions of precursor volatile organic compounds under sunlight could result in secondary organic aerosols and photochemical smog [58,59]. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the influence mechanisms of Tmax and SH on PM2.5 concentration in this region.
The spatial distribution of air pollution has been associated with meteorological factors in previous studies [55]. Liu et al. (2017) found that temperature had a significant positive effect on air pollution distribution, whereas wind speed and precipitation had significant negative effects in 289 Chinese cities in 2014 [42]. Sun et al., 2019, found that temperature and wind speed were significantly negatively correlated with the urban air quality index in 338 Chinese cities [51]. In contrast to some previous studies, our GWR results demonstrated that WS was negatively correlated with PM2.5 concentration in all cities, while Tmax and Tmin exhibited a positive correlation with PM2.5 concentration in 82.14% and 60.71% of all cities, respectively, at the annual scale. The influence of temperature seems complex and differs regionally. We also found that SH strongly affected the PM2.5 concentration in areas east of the Taihang mountains, whereas AP strongly affected the PM2.5 concentration in cities west of this mountain range. These differences can be attributed partly to the topographical characteristics. Unique atmospheric circulation subject to the particular topography has been suggested to develop spatial distribution characteristics of air pollutants [60,61].
This study had some limitations. First, PM10 and PM2.5 concentration data for Jincheng was collected and analyzed from 1 March 2015 due to the limited monitoring record. In addition, there were about 44 missing air pollution records among 28 cities and few zero values for PM10 concentration, which were removed to calculate the PM2.5/PM10 ratios. Although we applied interpolation to maintain the continuity and comparability of these time series data, some uncertainty remains. Moreover, although the Local Moran’s I method used in this study could indeed shed light on the potential interdependence and specific spatial agglomeration patterns of PM2.5 concentration, the limited observations for 28 cities were slightly less than the restriction on the numbers required by this method. Additionally, the temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 concentration were strongly correlated with meteorological factors, and their relationships varied significantly across seasons and geographical locations, probably relating to PM2.5 components. To better address this problem, GWR was applied in this study to capture the spatial nonstationary characteristics, but it could not simultaneously deal with temporal nonstationarity [62,63], which also could result in some uncertainty. Future research is required to elucidate these mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the spatial and temporal variation of PM2.5 concentration in 28 cities within the atmospheric pollution transmission channel in the BTH region with associated meteorological influences during 2014–2019. Average PM2.5 concentration appeared to decrease significantly in most cities at the annual scale, but exhibited clear seasonal and spatial variation. The mean PM2.5 concentration demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in more than 20 cities in spring and summer, but only 4 cities in winter, indicating that strict measures should be continued, especially in the most severely polluted season, despite successful air pollution control plans implemented within the past decade. Temporal variation in daily PM2.5 concentration was strongly correlated with minimum temperature and average relative humidity. The higher the PM2.5 temporal concentration, the stronger the influence of the meteorological factors, with a mean explanatory power of 31.96% for the 28 cities. Spatially, wind speed was negatively correlated with PM2.5 concentration for all cities, while maximum temperature and minimum temperature exhibited a positive correlation with PM2.5 concentration in 82.14% and 60.71% cities, respectively. These results will provide valuable references for understanding the spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 pollution, as well as for future clean air policy making.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19031607/s1, Figure S1: The cities with PM2.5 concentration fluctuating upward after 2017; Table S1: Summary of major air pollution control measures taken in <The work plan for air pollution prevention and control in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and surrounding areas in 2017>; Table S2: Partial correlations of PM2.5 concentration with meteorological variables at the seasonal scale based on daily data during 2014–2019.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W., L.G. and J.G.; methodology, S.W.; software, X.N.; validation, S.W., L.G. and J.G.; resources, J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W. and L.G.; writing—review and editing, X.X.; visualization, J.G. and X.X.; supervision, X.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: 41601580, 419772284, U1810203; the project of science and technology of the Henan province: 212102310028, 212102310404.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Orellano, P.; Reynoso, J.; Quaranta, N.; Bardach, A.; Ciapponi, A. Short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020, 142, 105876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.; Dickinson, R.E.; Su, L.; Zhou, C.; Wang, K. PM2.5 pollution in China and how it has been exacerbated by terrain and meteorological conditions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2018, 99, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Tong, D.; Shao, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; He, H.; Liu, W. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24463–24469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ding, A.; Nie, W.; Huang, X.; Chi, X.; Sun, J.; Kerminen, V.-M.; Xu, Z.; Guo, W.; Petäjä, T.; Yang, X.; et al. Long-term observation of air pollution-weather/climate interactions at the SORPES station: A review and outlook. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, Y.; Yang, X. Influence of fine particulate matter on atmospheric visibility. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 1165–1170. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Yu, W. The Effects of PM2.5 Concentrations and Relative Humidity on Atmospheric Visibility in Beijing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 2235–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grell, G.; Freitas, S.R.; Stuefer, M.; Fast, J. Inclusion of biomass burning in WRF-Chem: Impact of wildfires on weather forecasts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 5289–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Lu, P. Improvement of cloud microphysics in the aerosol-climate model BCC_AGCM2.0.1_CUACE/Aero, evaluation against observations, and updated aerosol indirect effect. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 8400–8417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, Y.; Qi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, J.; Liao, X.; Li, R.; Dong, C.; Zhu, L.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Z. Effects of exposure to ambient fine particulate matter on the heart of diet-induced obesity mouse model. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 732, 139304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yao, Y.; Pan, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z.; Kan, H.; Qiu, Y.; Meng, X.; Wang, W. Association of particulate matter pollution and case fatality rate of COVID-19 in 49 Chinese cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, D.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Qian, X. Mortality effects assessment of ambient PM2.5 pollution in the 74 leading cities of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 1545–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H.R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R.; et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Song, Y.; Huang, B.; He, Q.; Chen, B.; Wei, J.; Mahmood, R. Dynamic assessment of PM2.5 exposure and health risk using remote sensing and geo-spatial big data. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 253, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, R.; Wang, Z.; Cui, L.; Fu, H.; Zhang, L.; Kong, L.; Chen, W.; Chen, J. Air pollution characteristics in China during 2015–2016: Spatiotemporal variations and key meteorological factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lu, D.; Xu, J.; Yang, D.; Zhao, J. Spatio-temporal variation and influence factors of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 1998 to 2014. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017, 8, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Mao, G.; Zuo, J.; Ma, J. Inter-regional and sectoral linkage analysis of air pollution in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (Jing-Jin-Ji) urban agglomeration of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 1436–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tao, J.; Zhang, L.; Cao, J.; Zhang, R. A review of current knowledge concerning PM2.5 chemical composition, aerosol optical properties and their relationships across China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 9485–9518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xu, X.; Zhang, T. Spatial-temporal variability of PM2.5 air quality in Beijing, China during 2013-2018. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 262, 110263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Hao, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Chai, F.; Li, M. Air pollution and control action in Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhu, C.; Hao, J.; Liu, H.; Hua, S.; Tian, H. Temporal-spatial characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 as well as its associated chemical species in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Wang, K.; Chen, Y.; Wallington, T.J.; Han, W.; Shen, W.; Zhang, X.; et al. Source contributions of urban PM2.5 in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region: Changes between 2006 and 2013 and relative impacts of emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 123, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, J.; Li, W.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y. Visualizing the intercity correlation of PM2.5 time series in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region using ground-based air quality monitoring data. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pang, N.; Gao, J.; Che, F.; Ma, T.; Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Yuan, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, Z.; et al. Cause of PM2.5 pollution during the 2016-2017 heating season in Beijing, Tianjin, and Langfang, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 95, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, W.; Zhang, M.; Ding, Y. Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2.5 concentration: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. J. Environ. Manage. 2020, 268, 110703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, D.; Lei, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z. Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China–A case study from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 183, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cheng, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, J. Identifying the spatial effects and driving factors of urban PM2.5 pollution in China. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 82, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Danek, T.; Zaręba, M. The Use of Public Data from Low-Cost Sensors for the Geospatial Analysis of Air Pollution from Solid Fuel Heating during the COVID-19 Pandemic Spring Period in Krakow, Poland. Sensors 2021, 21, 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Xing, J.; Liu, X.; Wei, L.; Song, Y.; Wu, W.; Cai, S.; Zheng, H. Contributions of inter-city and regional transport to PM2.5 concentrations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its implications on regional joint air pollution control. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, L.; He, S.; Zhou, H. Spatio-temporal characteristics and convergence trends of PM2.5 pollution: A case study of cities of air pollution transmission channel in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Qin, Y. Allocation of control targets for PM2.5 concentration: An empirical study from cities of atmospheric pollution transmission channel in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei district. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shen, L.; Mickley, L.J.; Murray, L.T. Influence of 2000–2050 climate change on particulate matter in the United States: Results from a new statistical model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 4355–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhai, S.; Jacob, D.J.; Wang, X.; Shen, L.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Gui, K.; Zhao, T.; Liao, H. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) trends in China, 2013–2018: Separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2019, 19, 11031–11041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, X.; Zhang, R. Effects of atmospheric circulations on the interannual variation in PM2.5 concentrations over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region in 2013–2018. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 7667–7682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gonzalez-Abraham, R.; Chung, S.H.; Avise, J.; Lamb, B.; Salathé, E.P.; Nolte, C.G.; Loughlin, D.; Guenther, A.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Duhl, T.; et al. The effects of global change upon United States air quality. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 12645–12665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chen, Z.; Chen, D.; Kwan, M.P.; Chen, B.; Gao, B.; Zhuang, Y.; Li, R.; Xu, B. The control of anthropogenic emissions contributed to 80% of the decrease in PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing from 2013 to 2017. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 13519–13533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, L.; An, J.; Liu, M.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tao, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, F.; Zheng, D.; Gao, Q.; et al. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Z.; Cai, J.; Gao, B.; Xu, B.; Dai, S.; He, B.; Xie, X. Detecting the causality influence of individual meteorological factors on local PM2.5 concentration in the Jing-Jin-Ji region. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jing, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, T.; Song, H.; Lee, J.; Xu, T.; Xing, Y. Effects of Meteorological Factors and Anthropogenic Precursors on PM2.5 Concentrations in Cities in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peng, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Gao, G.; Ding, G. Spatiotemporal patterns of air pollution in air pollution transmission channel of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from 2000 to 2015. China Environ. Sci. 2019, 39, 449–458. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dawson, J.P.; Adams, P.J.; Pandis, S.N. Sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate in the Eastern US: A modeling case study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7, 4295–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zikova, N.; Masiol, M.; Chalupa, D.C.; Rich, D.Q.; Ferro, A.R.; Hopke, P.K. Estimating Hourly Concentrations of PM2.5 across a Metropolitan Area Using Low-Cost Particle Monitors. Sensors 2017, 17, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, H.; Fang, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Bao, C.; Li, F. The effect of natural and anthropogenic factors on haze pollution in Chinese cities: A spatial econometrics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guo, L.; Gao, J.; Hao, C.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Xiao, X. Winter Wheat Green-up Date Variation and its Diverse Response on the Hydrothermal Conditions over the North China Plain, Using MODIS Time-Series Data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Li, S. Examining the spatially varying effects of factors on PM2.5 concentrations in Chinese cities using geographically weighted regression modeling. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jiao, K.; Gao, J.; Wu, S. Climatic determinants impacting the distribution of greenness in China: Regional differentiation and spatial variability. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2019, 63, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Deng, Q.; Yang, K.; Luo, Y. Spatiotemporal patterns of PM2.5 in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region during 2013–2016. Geol. Ecol. Landsc. 2017, 1, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, X.; Jia, H.; Sha, T.; An, J.; Tian, R. Spatial and seasonal characteristics of particulate matter and gaseous pollution in China: Implications for control policy. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, G.; Jiao, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, M.; Gu, Y.; Liu, J.; Tang, X. Spatial and Temporal Variability of the PM2.5/PM10 Ratio in Wuhan, Central China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Munir, S. Analysing Temporal Trends in the Ratios of PM2.5/PM10 in the UK. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yadav, R.; Korhale, N.; Anand, V.; Rathod, A.; Bano, S.; Shinde, R.; Latha, R.; Sahu, S.K.; Murthy, B.S.; Beig, G. COVID-19 lockdown and air quality of SAFAR-India metro cities. Urban Clim. 2020, 34, 100729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Z.; Zhan, D.; Jin, F. Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Geographical Determinants of Air Quality in Cities at the Prefecture Level and Above in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 29, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, L.; Wei, Z.; Wei, Z.; Wei, W.; Fu, J.S.; Meng, C.; Ma, S. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in top polluted cities in Hebei, China using the CMAQ model. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 122, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, W.; Han, T.; Du, W.; Wang, Q.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Fu, P.; Wang, Z.; et al. Effects of Aqueous-Phase and Photochemical Processing on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Evolution in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kuang, Y.; He, Y.; Xu, W.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, G.; Ma, Z.; Wu, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; et al. Photochemical Aqueous-Phase Reactions Induce Rapid Daytime Formation of Oxygenated Organic Aerosol on the North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3849–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, L.; Zhou, J.; Guo, Y.; Wu, T.; Chen, T.; Zhong, Q.; Yuan, D.; Chen, P.; Ou, C. Spatiotemporal pattern of air quality index and its associated factors in 31 Chinese provincial capital cities. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2017, 10, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bai, L.; Jiang, L.; Yang, D.; Liu, Y. Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity influences of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactions on air pollution using the geographical detector method: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, L.; Qian, J.; Ou, C.-Q.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Guo, C.; Guo, Y. Spatial and temporal analysis of Air Pollution Index and its timescale-dependent relationship with meteorological factors in Guangzhou, China, 2001–2011. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 190, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guo, H.; Ling, Z.H.; Cheng, H.R.; Simpson, I.J.; Lyu, X.P.; Wang, X.M.; Shao, M.; Lu, H.X.; Ayoko, G.; Zhang, Y.L.; et al. Tropospheric volatile organic compounds in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 1021–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wang, Z.; Anthony, J.; Erickson, L.; Higgins, M.; Newmark, G. Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Pollution in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. J. Environ. Prot. 2020, 11, 551–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liao, T.; Wang, S.; Ai, J.; Gui, K.; Duan, B.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, W.; Sun, Y. Heavy pollution episodes, transport pathways and potential sources of PM2.5 during the winter of 2013 in Chengdu China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 1056–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ning, G.; Wang, S.; Ma, M.; Ni, C.; Shang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Characteristics of air pollution in different zones of Sichuan Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Huang, B.; Wu, B.; Barry, M. Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression for Modeling Spatio-Temporal Variation in House Prices. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24, 383–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Huang, B.; Wu, C.; Shi, W. Modeling the spatiotemporal association between COVID-19 transmission and population mobility using geographically and temporally weighted regression. GeoHealth 2021, 5, e2021GH000402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Locations of the 28 cities comprising the air pollution transmission channel in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) area and regional meteorological stations.
Figure 1. Locations of the 28 cities comprising the air pollution transmission channel in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) area and regional meteorological stations.
Ijerph 19 01607 g001
Figure 2. The temporal variation of mean PM2.5 concentration in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019. In each box plot, the bottom and top of the box mean the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; horizontal red lines indicate median values; open black squares represent mean values; whiskers indicate 1.5 times the interquartile range; and red crosses represent outliers. Linear regression slopes and R2 values are provided for each city (* p < 0.05): BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Figure 2. The temporal variation of mean PM2.5 concentration in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019. In each box plot, the bottom and top of the box mean the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; horizontal red lines indicate median values; open black squares represent mean values; whiskers indicate 1.5 times the interquartile range; and red crosses represent outliers. Linear regression slopes and R2 values are provided for each city (* p < 0.05): BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Ijerph 19 01607 g002
Figure 3. Local spatial autocorrelation features of mean PM2.5 concentrations in winter among the 28 air transport channel cities from 2014 to 2019: H–H, city and surrounding cities have high PM2.5 concentrations; H–L, city has a high PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are low; L–H, city has a low PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are high; L–L, both the city and surrounding cities have low PM2.5 concentrations; NS, no significant difference in PM2.5 concentration among cities.
Figure 3. Local spatial autocorrelation features of mean PM2.5 concentrations in winter among the 28 air transport channel cities from 2014 to 2019: H–H, city and surrounding cities have high PM2.5 concentrations; H–L, city has a high PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are low; L–H, city has a low PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are high; L–L, both the city and surrounding cities have low PM2.5 concentrations; NS, no significant difference in PM2.5 concentration among cities.
Ijerph 19 01607 g003aIjerph 19 01607 g003b
Figure 4. The temporal variation of mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019. In each box plot, the bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; horizontal red lines indicate median values; open black squares indicate mean values; whiskers show 1.5 times the interquartile range; and red crosses represent outliers. Linear regression slopes and R2 values are provided for each city (* p < 0.05): BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Figure 4. The temporal variation of mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019. In each box plot, the bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; horizontal red lines indicate median values; open black squares indicate mean values; whiskers show 1.5 times the interquartile range; and red crosses represent outliers. Linear regression slopes and R2 values are provided for each city (* p < 0.05): BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Ijerph 19 01607 g004
Figure 5. Local spatial autocorrelation features of seasonal and annual mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019: H–H, city and surrounding cities have high PM2.5 concentrations; H–L, city has a high PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are low; L–H, city has a low PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are high; L–L, both the city and surrounding cities have low PM2.5 concentrations; NS, no significant difference in PM2.5 concentration among cities.
Figure 5. Local spatial autocorrelation features of seasonal and annual mean PM2.5/PM10 ratios in the 28 air transport channel cities during 2014–2019: H–H, city and surrounding cities have high PM2.5 concentrations; H–L, city has a high PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are low; L–H, city has a low PM2.5 concentration, but those of surrounding cities are high; L–L, both the city and surrounding cities have low PM2.5 concentrations; NS, no significant difference in PM2.5 concentration among cities.
Ijerph 19 01607 g005
Figure 6. The influence characteristics of meteorological factors for each city based on regression coefficients derived from geographically weighted regression at the annual scale. Blue and orange indicate positive and negative spatial correlations, respectively, between mean PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables. Annuli from the center outward represent the magnitude of the regression coefficient, from lowest to highest: SH, sunshine hours; Tmax, daily maximum temperature; Tmin, daily minimum temperature; AP, average atmospheric pressure; H, average relative humidity; WS maximum wind speed; WD, wind direction; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Figure 6. The influence characteristics of meteorological factors for each city based on regression coefficients derived from geographically weighted regression at the annual scale. Blue and orange indicate positive and negative spatial correlations, respectively, between mean PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables. Annuli from the center outward represent the magnitude of the regression coefficient, from lowest to highest: SH, sunshine hours; Tmax, daily maximum temperature; Tmin, daily minimum temperature; AP, average atmospheric pressure; H, average relative humidity; WS maximum wind speed; WD, wind direction; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Ijerph 19 01607 g006
Figure 7. The influence characteristic of meteorological factors for each city based on regression coefficients derived from GWR at the seasonal scale. (a) Spring; (b) Summer; (c) Autumn; (d) Winter. Blue and orange indicate positive and negative spatial correlations, respectively, between mean PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables. Annuli from the center outward represent the magnitude of the regression coefficient, from lowest to highest. See Figure 7 for legend: BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Figure 7. The influence characteristic of meteorological factors for each city based on regression coefficients derived from GWR at the seasonal scale. (a) Spring; (b) Summer; (c) Autumn; (d) Winter. Blue and orange indicate positive and negative spatial correlations, respectively, between mean PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables. Annuli from the center outward represent the magnitude of the regression coefficient, from lowest to highest. See Figure 7 for legend: BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Ijerph 19 01607 g007
Table 1. Partial correlations of PM2.5 concentration with meteorological variables based on daily data during 2014–2019: SH, sunshine hours; Tmax, daily maximum temperature; Tmin, daily minimum temperature; AP, average atmospheric pressure; H, average relative humidity; WS maximum wind speed; WD, wind direction; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Table 1. Partial correlations of PM2.5 concentration with meteorological variables based on daily data during 2014–2019: SH, sunshine hours; Tmax, daily maximum temperature; Tmin, daily minimum temperature; AP, average atmospheric pressure; H, average relative humidity; WS maximum wind speed; WD, wind direction; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
VariableCorrelation Coefficient
BJTJTSLFBDSJZCZHSXTHDBZDZZBJNLCJNGHZAYHBPYXXJZZZKFTYYQCHZJC
SH−0.15−0.20−0.20−0.16−0.28−0.25−0.10−0.18−0.25−0.13−0.31−0.17−0.29−0.13−0.08−0.11−0.13−0.18−0.140.01 −0.12−0.06−0.10−0.08−0.21−0.21−0.07−0.05
Tmax0.02 0.210.180.120.090.160.040.140.200.070.280.130.230.02 0.060.130.110.10−0.03 −0.050.03 0.01 0.00 0.080.180.160.060.14
Tmin−0.24−0.38−0.33−0.31−0.37−0.39−0.22−0.34−0.32−0.31−0.39−0.28−0.38−0.12−0.30−0.29−0.28−0.29−0.21−0.27−0.22−0.23−0.25−0.25−0.37−0.33−0.19−0.36
AP−0.24−0.20−0.18−0.20−0.23−0.26−0.17−0.17−0.12−0.22−0.15−0.14−0.13−0.08−0.15−0.12−0.10−0.19−0.17−0.16−0.17−0.22−0.17−0.12−0.19−0.17−0.13−0.13
H0.280.280.280.280.180.200.220.270.170.260.090.200.200.090.290.190.180.120.210.260.180.210.130.160.260.200.090.20
WS−0.09−0.28−0.12−0.12−0.19−0.26−0.11−0.15−0.25−0.16−0.26−0.14−0.12−0.20−0.18−0.12−0.26−0.17−0.11−0.20−0.16−0.13−0.23−0.22−0.13−0.03 −0.24−0.19
WD0.050.05−0.04 0.08−0.03 −0.04 0.110.04 0.01 −0.070.090.110.02 0.08−0.050.05−0.05−0.01 −0.01 −0.05−0.06−0.06−0.03 −0.050.02 −0.15−0.12−0.10
Note: Bold font denotes p < 0.05.
Table 2. Coefficients of determination (R2) for multiple linear regression of PM2.5 concentration with meteorological variables based on daily data from 2014 to 2019 at the annual and seasonal scales: BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
Table 2. Coefficients of determination (R2) for multiple linear regression of PM2.5 concentration with meteorological variables based on daily data from 2014 to 2019 at the annual and seasonal scales: BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TS, Tangshan; LF, Langfang; BD, Baoding; CZ, Cangzhou; HS, Hengshui; XT, Xingtai; HD, Handan; BZ, Binzhou; DZ, Dezhou; ZB, Zibo; JN, Jinan; LC, Liaocheng; JNG, Jining; HZ, Heze; AY, Anyang; HB, Hebi; PY, Puyang; XX, Xinxiang; JZ, Jiaozou; ZZ, Zhengzhou; KF, Kaifeng; TY, Taiyuan; YQ, Yangquan; CHZ, Changzhi; JC, Jincheng.
PeriodCoefficient of Determination
BJTJTSLFBDSJZCZHSXTHDBZDZZBJNLCJNIHZAYHBPYXXJZZZKFTYYQCHZJC
Spring0.300.310.260.270.280.390.160.270.300.240.240.130.210.140.190.090.210.170.170.230.190.260.190.120.280.250.160.16
Summer0.290.160.040.090.150.310.060.110.190.040.230.070.190.100.190.080.190.080.120.070.060.050.060.070.190.160.070.06
Autumn0.360.430.390.300.340.410.200.310.340.200.220.240.220.130.260.160.180.210.240.180.190.190.190.140.330.210.160.23
Winter0.520.530.560.570.450.540.470.410.400.450.470.440.470.440.420.350.390.370.380.360.330.390.390.360.450.510.300.39
Year0.300.380.310.350.400.440.260.360.350.340.300.280.310.210.350.290.350.310.320.350.290.330.330.310.320.280.240.31
Note: Bold font denotes p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, L.; Nie, X.; Xiao, X. Meteorological Influences on Spatiotemporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations in Atmospheric Pollution Transmission Channel Cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031607

AMA Style

Wang S, Gao J, Guo L, Nie X, Xiao X. Meteorological Influences on Spatiotemporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations in Atmospheric Pollution Transmission Channel Cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Suxian, Jiangbo Gao, Linghui Guo, Xiaojun Nie, and Xiangming Xiao. 2022. "Meteorological Influences on Spatiotemporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations in Atmospheric Pollution Transmission Channel Cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop