Next Article in Journal
Psychometric Validation of the Indonesian Version of Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale 13
Next Article in Special Issue
Sexual Behavior and Perceived Loneliness in Elderly People Living with HIV in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 on Inanimate Surfaces: Don’t Trust Ct Value
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation Study of xMAP TIER Assay on a Microsphere-Based Platform for Detecting First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance

1
National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
2
Tuberculosis Dispensary of Changping District, Beijing 102202, China
3
School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 17068; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417068
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tuberculosis and HIV)

Abstract

:
Early diagnosis of drug susceptibility for tuberculosis (TB) patients could guide the timely initiation of effective treatment. We evaluated a novel multiplex xMAP TIER (Tuberculosis-Isoniazid-Ethambutol-Rifampicin) assay based on the Luminex xMAP system to detect first-line anti-tuberculous drug resistance. Deoxyribonucleic acid samples from 353 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates were amplified by multiplex polymerase chain reaction, followed by hybridization and analysis through the xMAP system. Compared with the broth microdilution method, the sensitivity and specificity of the xMAP TIER assay for detecting resistance was 94.9% (95%CI, 90.0–99.8%) and 98.9% (95%CI, 97.7–100.0%) for rifampicin; 89.1% (95%CI, 83.9–94.3%) and 100.0% (95%CI, 100.0–100.0%) for isoniazid; 82.1% (95% CI, 68.0–96.3%) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.0–100.0%) for ethambutol. With DNA sequencing as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of xMAP TIER for detecting resistance were 95.0% (95% CI, 90.2–99.8%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9–100.0%) for rifampicin; 96.9% (95% CI, 93.8–99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0%) for isoniazid; 86.1% (95% CI, 74.8–97.4%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0%) for ethambutol. The results achieved showed that the xMAP TIER assay had good performance for detecting first-line anti-tuberculosis drug resistance, and it has the potential to diagnose drug-resistant tuberculosis more accurately due to the addition of more optimal design primers and probes on open architecture xMAP system.

1. Introduction

Drug-resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB) is an increasing threat to public health worldwide; the initially diagnosed TB patients who had multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB/rifampicin-resistant (RR) TB has remained at about 3–4% and, for previously treated TB patients, it has remained at about 18–21% [1,2]. The WHO End TB Strategy requires drug susceptibility testing (DST) of all people with TB but there are still large gaps in the detection of DR-TB. In 2020, 30% of people diagnosed with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB were not tested for anti-tuberculosis drug resistance [1,2], and resistance detection to the three most effective first-line drugs; rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH) and ethambutol (EMB) is of greatest concern [1].
Conventional DST by the culture method is commonly used for DR TB detection; however, these methods are time-consuming and laborious. Therefore, the conventional DST cannot provide the timely diagnosis required for proper patient treatment; in addition, these methods pose safety threats to the personnel. Most Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates with resistance to RIF, INH, and EMB have mutations at specific codons in a small number of relative genes. RIF resistance involves mutations in the rpoB gene [3], INH resistance is mostly associated with mutations in inhA and katG genes [4], and resistance to EMB involves mutations in embB [5]. Therefore, M. tuberculosis can also be tested for drug resistance using alternative rapid and safer genotypic assays, which detect resistance by identifying mutations known to confer resistance to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs mentioned above [6,7,8,9]. During the past decades, several efficient molecular assays have been recommended by the WHO for the timely and accurate diagnosis of DR TB, including Abbott RealTime MTB RIF/INH, BD MAX MDR-TB, Cobas MTB-RIF/INH, FluoroType MTBDR, and Xpert MTB/RIF which was also approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [10].
The Luminex MagPlex microsphere-based multi-analyte profiling (xMAP) platform (Luminex Corp. Austin, TX, USA) is a multiplexed detection system capable of analyzing and reporting up to 500 different targets in a single reaction vessel [11]. By using labeled microspheres or beads, which allow for the simultaneous capture of multiple analytes from a single reaction, xMAP offered a new platform for high-throughput DR-TB diagnoses through the integration of multiplex PCR amplification and microsphere hybridization technology. In this study, we report a novel multiplex TIER (Tuberculosis-Isoniazid-Ethambutol-Rifampicin) assay using the xMAP platform for the detection of three first-line anti-tuberculosis drug resistance, and its performance evaluation compared with phenotypic broth microdilution DST and whole-genome sequencing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mycobacteria tuberculosis Strain Collection and Culture

Mycobacteria tuberculosis clinical isolates were selected from the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory in China; 353 strains isolated from pulmonary tuberculosis patients were sub-cultured on Löwenstein–Jensen medium and incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 weeks.

2.2. Phenotypic Broth Microdilution Drug Susceptibility Test

Phenotypic DST was performed using the broth microdilution method which provides a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (Sensititre® MYCOTB plate). A panel of 13 anti-TB drugs was tested, including INH, RPF, and EMB. Several colonies were selected from growth on solid media using a sterile loop and inoculated into a test tube containing glass beads as described previously [12]. A 0.5 McFarland standard equivalent was made after vortexing, suspensions were diluted 100-fold with the addition of 100 μL of the 0.5 Mc suspensions to 10 mL of Mueller–Hinton broth with OADC (oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase). Aliquots of 100 μL of the standard 1.5 × 105 CFU/mL inoculum were distributed to each well using the semiautomated SensititreTM Auto-inoculator (Thermo Fisher, Scientific Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). MYCOTB plates were sealed and incubated at 37 °C. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration without obvious visible bacterial growth compared with positive controls, aided by the VizionTM Digital viewing system. Mtb H37Rv (ATCC 27294) was used as a quality control in each batch. Based on CLSI M62, the breakpoints for INH, RPF, and EMB were 0.12 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively. An inconclusive result for ethambutol was an MIC of 4 μg/mL, which does not correlate with either a susceptible or resistant result.

2.3. xMAP TIER Assay

For each isolate, one loop of cultured colonies from Löwenstein–Jensen culture medium was suspended in 500 μL of TE buffer and boiled at 100 °C for 15 min. After cooling, the suspension was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 5 min and 200 μL of the supernatant containing the nucleic acid was transferred into a new microcentrifuge tube for the xMAP TIER assay (Hygienland Shanghai Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). This assay is equipped with two different internal controls (16S, λ bacteriophages) for quality control throughout the whole detection process, including nucleic acid extraction, multiplex PCR amplification, and hybridization. The main steps for the xMAP TIER assay are shown in Figure 1. Several primers were synthesized to amplify gene fragments harboring resistance mutations in rpoB, katG, inhA, and embB genes; seventeen specific mutations at 10 mutation sites can be detected by this assay (Table 1). PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 1 μL of template DNA, 1 μL λDNA, and 23 μL PCR master mix with the following thermal profile: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 20 repeated cycles of melting at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 65 °C for 90 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, respectively; a second round of PCR was performed with 20 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 90 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, respectively; an additional incubation for 10 min at 68 °C, and then cooled to 4 °C. Microsphere probe hybridization was carried out with 33 μL 1.5× tetramethylammonium chloride (TMAC) hybridization buffer mixed with 6 μL hybrid microspheres and 12 μL Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) for each reaction, five microliters of PCR product were then added, the mixture was denatured at 95 °C for 5 min and hybridized at 63 °C for 15 min. Ten microliters of streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin (50 μg/mL) were added for further incubation at 63 °C for 10 min, the results were read immediately using the MAGPIX (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA) System. The cut-off value for a positive result was set at ≥1.5 times the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the negative control by the manufacturer.

2.4. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

Genomic DNA of MTB isolates prepared by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction method was subjected to WGS using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform as described previously [13,14]. The Clockwork pipeline was used to process all raw WGS data [15]. Compared with Mtb H37Rv strain (NC_000962.3), mutations were called when they were present in more than two reads in the forward and reverse directions. Mutations in genes of the proline–glutamic acid (PE)/proline–proline–glutamic acid (PPE) family and in regions with repetitive sequences were excluded. WGS predictions of phenotypic susceptibility were based on the WHO-endorsed catalog of mutations detected in or upstream of drug-resistance-related genes [16]. Isolates with resistance-conferring mutations ranked in Group 1 (associated with resistance) and Group 2 (associated with resistance-interim) were considered to be genotype drug-resistant [16].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Compared with phenotypic DST and WGS, the sensitivity and specificity of the xMAP TIER assay for detecting RIF, INH and EMB resistance were calculated with an exact Clopper–Pearsong confidence interval.

3. Results

A total of 353 MTB isolates from NTRL were collected for validation. Drug susceptibility testing for RIF, INH and EMB was performed using xMAP TIER assay, broth microdilution MIC method and WGS, respectively. On the basis of the broth microdilution DST method, 61 isolates were MDR, 77 isolates were INH mono-resistant, 17 isolates were RIF mono-resistant, and 198 isolates were INH- and RIF-sensitive (Figure 2). Inconclusive results for EMB resistance detection occurred for 14 isolates due to an MIC of 4 μg/mL. Of the 339 MTB isolates which had conclusive EMB susceptibility test results by broth microdilution, 28 (8.3%) were resistant to EMB. Among the 353 MTB isolates, three main lineages were identified: 66.2% (234/353) were assigned to lineage 2 (East Asian genotype), 5.6% (20/353) to lineage 3 (India and East Africa genotype), and 28.2% (99/353) to lineage 4 (Euro-American genotype) (Figure 2). Isolates with detectable mutations in rpoB, katG, inhA, ahpC and embB genes accounted for 22.4% (79/353), 30.0% (106/353), 8.5% (30/353), 1.1% (4/353), and 10.5% (37/353), respectively (Figure 2).
Compared with the broth microdilution MIC method, the sensitivity and specificity of the xMAP TIER assay for RIF resistance detection were 94.9% (95%CI, 90.0–99.8%) and 98.9% (95%CI, 97.7–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for INH resistance detection were 89.1% (95% CI, 83.9–94.3%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting EMB resistance were 82.1% (95% CI, 68.0–96.3%) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.0–100.0%), respectively (Table 2).
Of the 78 isolates with a phenotypic RIF-resistant result, four isolates were identified as RIF susceptible by the xMAP TIER assay. WGS results indicated these four isolates contained genotypic mutations (Q432E, H445L, H445R) not included in the xMAP TIER assay. Three phenotypic RIF susceptible isolates were identified as RIF resistant by the xMAP TIER assay and WGS analysis revealed that two of these were confirmed to be genotypically resistant due to a mutation (L430P) in the rpoB gene (Table 2). In the third strain, an S450L mutation was detected by the xMAP TIER assay but no mutation was found by WGS.
A consistent INH susceptibility result was found for 338 isolates using the xMAP TIER assay and phenotypic DST. A total of 15 phenotypically INH-resistant isolates were tested as INH susceptible by the xMAP TIER assay. WGS revealed that five of these carried no mutations, which may be due to unknown resistance mechanisms. The remaining 10 isolates contained genotypic mutations not included in the xMAP TIER assay (Table 2). For three isolates, a katG_S315N mutation was found which is listed in Group 1 by the WHO catalog, and a katG_2050_ins_2_T_TGC was found in one discordant strain which was listed in Group 2. The other six isolates had mutations not listed in Group1 or Group2 (katG_Asn138Asp; katG_Val1Ala; ahpC_-52C>T, katG_Asp735Ala; ahpC_c-81t; ahpC_-48G>A, katG_ Asp94Gly).
Fourteen isolates gave inconclusive MIC DST results for EMB. Out of the 339 isolates with conclusive EMB susceptibility results, five phenotypically EMB-resistant isolates were called EMB susceptible by the xMAP TIER assay. Of these, four isolates had genotypic mutations (embA_C-12T, embB_Y319C; embB_Y319S; embB_G406A; embB_G406S) outside of the detection scope of xMAP TIER assay. No mutation was found in the fifth strain, perhaps due to unknown resistance mechanisms. One strain was determined to be EMB resistant by the xMAP TIER assay but susceptible to EMB by MIC DST and had a mutation in embB that was detected by WGS (embB_M306V).
With WGS as the reference standard, mutations ranked in Group 1 and Group 2 were considered to be genotypically drug-resistant. The sensitivity and specificity of xMAP TIER detection of resistance were 95.0% (95% CI, 90.2–99.8%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9–100.0%) for rifampicin; 96.9% (95% CI, 93.8–99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0%) for isoniazid; 86.1% (95% CI, 74.8–97.4%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0%) for ethambutol (Table 3). Five isolates were EMB resistant by WGS but classified as EMB susceptible by the xMAP TIER assay. Of these, four isolates contained genotypic mutations (embA_C-12T, embB_Y319C; embB_Y319S; embB_G406A; embB_G406S) outside of the detection scope of the xMAP TIER assay. The fifth strain contained an embB_G406D which was not included in the xMAP TIER assay but was also excluded from further analysis due to an inconclusive MIC DST result for EMB.

4. Discussion

Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent the transmission of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis [17]. Several new molecular diagnostics have revolutionized the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Multiplexing technologies that allow for the detection of multiple nucleic acid sequences in a single reaction, can greatly reduce the time, cost, and labor. The Luminex xMAP system is a multiplexed microsphere-based platform with an open-architecture design and has been used to develop various assays for clinical disease diagnosis [18,19], such as the xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel and NxTAG respiratory pathogen panel has been widely used and approved by FDA. We evaluated a novel xMAP TIER assay to detect three first-line anti-tuberculous drug resistance. The xMAP TIER assay integrates multiplex PCR amplification and Microsphere hybridization, enabling the detection of all single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) types in a single tube. Our results from this preliminary evaluation showed that the TIER assay can timely and effectively diagnose isoniazid, ethambutol, and rifampicin-resistant isolates. Compared with the phenotypic broth microdilution DST, the turnaround time of xMAP TIER was greatly shortened from 10 days to 5 h. With sequencing as the reference standard, the WHO has set targets for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of next-generation molecular DST assays [20]. The xMAP TIER assay reached the sensitivity target (95%) for RIF and INH but missed the sensitivity target for EMB, and it met the specificity target (98%) for all three first-line anti-tuberculous drugs.
Recent studies have shown that patients infected with M. tuberculosis with borderline rpoB mutations were misclassified as sensitive by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and often fail treatment due to low-level resistance to RIF [21,22]. Leu452Pro or Leu430Pro mutations of rpoB in rifampicin-resistant isolates were more likely to be missed by phenotypic DST [23]. Three isolates of RIF susceptible to broth microdilution DST were identified as RIF resistant by the xMAP TIER assay in this study, but WGS analysis revealed that two of these were confirmed to be genotypically resistant due to a Leu430Pro mutation in the rpoB gene; both had MICs of 0.5 μg/mL. A Leu452Pro mutation was detected by the xMAP TIER assay in the third strain, but no mutation was found by WGS, which might be due to heteroresistance. The application of molecular assays for the initial diagnosis of tuberculosis will allow for the detection of more cases that are falsely susceptible to RIF by phenotypic DST. WGS found four isolates with genotypic mutations (Q432E, H445L and H445R) not included in the xMAP TIER assay, indicating that the probes for RIF resistance detection in this assay still need modification and optimization.
The TIER assay interrogates drug resistance by mutations in the katG and inhA genes which are responsible for about 75% of isoniazid-resistant isolates [24]. The sensitivity of the TIER assay for the detection of INH resistance was 89.1%. Fifteen phenotypically INH-resistant isolates were classified as INH susceptible by the xMAP TIER assay. WGS revealed that 11 isolates carried no mutations in katG or inhA, which may be due to resistance-associated mutations outside of the katG and inhA genes or other unknown resistance mechanisms. Four isolates were found to have genotypic mutations (katG_S315N, katG_2050_ins_2_T_TGC) not included in the xMAP TIER assay.
In our analysis, EMB resistance of the TIER assay was detected with a sensitivity of 82.1%. Low performance of EMB resistance detection was also observed in other studies [25,26] and could be due to some mutation-containing codons that were not included in the TIER assay. The development of the WHO catalog of MTBC mutations associated with drug resistance has provided a global standard for resistance interpretation and can improve the design of molecular diagnostics. Further analysis of the isolates for which the TIER assay failed to detect resistance mutations provided insights for further optimization. Importantly, the TIER assay did not miss the detection of any of the mutations that were included in the assay. The open architecture of the xMAP system allows the addition of more specific primers and probes, so the TIER assay has the potential of detecting more resistance-conferring mutations, and strain susceptibility to more anti-Tuberculosis drugs.
This was just a preliminary validation study of a new molecular assay based on the xMAP system for detecting RIF, INH and EMB resistance, and just MTB isolates were tested for evaluation. The preliminary validation performance looks good and with the assay updated based on the results of this study, more MTB isolates and clinical samples, such as sputum, will be recruited for a more extensive evaluation study in the future.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the TIER assay showed good sensitivity in detecting RIF, INH, and EMB resistance. The inclusion of additional primers and probes to improve the sensitivity of drug resistance detection would enhance the use of the TIER assay in future clinical studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192417068/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.O., Z.Z. and Y.Z.; methodology and validation, X.O., B.Z., R.X., S.W. and H.X.; software and formal analysis, Z.S., D.L. and W.H.; data curation and writing—original draft, S.P., X.O. and Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program (2022YFC2305200) and China CDC-Tuberculosis Control and Prevention Project (228711).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of China CDC (202223).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to all isolates used in this study were from previous drug-resistance surveillance (DRS) work, and no additional data and specimens were collected. Each patient signed an informed consent form during the routine DRS.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sherry Dunbar and Jing Xu for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest to this article.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2021 (accessed on 27 October 2022).
  2. Zhao, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Chin, D.P.; Wang, S.; Jiang, G.; Xia, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Q.; Ou, X.; et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kapur, V.; Li, L.L.; Iordanescu, S.; Hamrick, M.R.; Wanger, A.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Musser, J.M. Characterization by automated DNA sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpoB) encoding the RNA polymerase beta subunit in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from New York City and Texas. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 1095–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Musser, J.M.; Kapur, V.; Williams, D.L.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; van Soolingen, D.; van Embden, J.D. Characterization of the catalase-peroxidase gene (katG) and inhA locus in isoniazid-resistant and -susceptible strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by automated DNA sequencing: Restricted array of mutations associated with drug resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 1996, 173, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ramaswamy, S.V.; Amin, A.G.; Göksel, S.; Stager, C.E.; Dou, S.J.; El Sahly, H.; Moghazeh, S.L.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Musser, J.M. Molecular genetic analysis of nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ethambutol resistance in human isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boehme, C.C.; Nabeta, P.; Hillemann, D.; Nicol, M.P.; Shenai, S.; Krapp, F.; Allen, J.; Tahirli, R.; Blakemore, R.; Rustomjee, R.; et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, S.F.; Ou, X.C.; Li, Q.; Zheng, H.W.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhao, Y.L. The Abbott RealTime MTB assay and the Cepheid GeneXpert assay show comparable performance for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 45, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Ou, X.; Li, Q.; Su, D.; Xia, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, Y. A pilot study: VereMTB detection kit for rapid detection of multidrug-resistant mycobcterium tuberculosis in clinical sputum samples. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Penn-Nicholson, A.; Georghiou, S.B.; Ciobanu, N.; Kazi, M.; Bhalla, M.; David, A.; Conradie, F.; Ruhwald, M.; Crudu, V.; Rodrigues, C.; et al. Detection of isoniazid, fluoroquinolone, ethionamide, amikacin, kanamycin, and capreomycin resistance by the Xpert MTB/XDR assay: A cross-sectional multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. WHO. Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis Module 3: Diagnosis—Rapid Diagnostics for Tuberculosis Detection; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/342331/9789240029415-eng.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  11. Yin, F.; Chan, J.F.; Zhu, Q.; Fu, R.; Chen, J.H.; Choi, G.K.; Tee, K.M.; Li, L.; Qian, S.; Yam, W.C.; et al. Development and in-use evaluation of a novel Luminex MicroPlex microsphere-based (TRIOL) assay for simultaneous identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and detection of first-line and second-line anti-tuberculous drug resistance in China. J. Clin. Pathol. 2017, 70, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, C.F.; Song, Y.M.; He, P.; Liu, D.X.; He, W.C.; Li, Y.M.; Zhao, Y.L. Evaluation of Multidrug Resistant Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Detecting the Drug Resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2021, 34, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, D.; Huang, F.; Zhang, G.; He, W.; Ou, X.; He, P.; Zhao, B.; Zhu, B.; Liu, F.; Li, Z.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing for surveillance of tuberculosis drug resistance and determination of resistance level in China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 731.e9–731.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, W.; Tan, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; He, P.; Song, Z.; Liu, D.; Zheng, H.; Ma, A.; Zhao, B.; et al. Drug-Resistant Characteristics, Genetic Diversity, and Transmission Dynamics of Rifampicin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Hunan, China, Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0154321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Catalogue of Mutations in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex and Their Association with Drug Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  16. Walker, T.M.; Miotto, P.; Köser, C.U.; Fowler, P.W.; Knaggs, J.; Iqbal, Z.; Hunt, M.; Chindelevitch, L.; Farhat, M.; Cirillo, D.M.; et al. The 2021 WHO catalogue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex mutations associated with drug resistance: A genotypic analysis. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e265–e273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kik, S.V.; Qin, Z.Z.; Pai, M. Optimal Diagnosis: How Early and Improved Diagnosis Can Help Prevent TB Transmission, Clinical Insights: Tuberculosis Prevention; Future Medicine Ltd.: London, UK, 2014; pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunbar, S.A. Applications of Luminex xMAP technology for rapid, high-throughput multiplexed nucleic acid detection. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 363, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, W.M.; Grindle, K.; Pappas, T.; Marshall, D.J.; Moser, M.J.; Beaty, E.L.; Shult, P.A.; Prudent, J.R.; Gern, J.E. High-throughput, sensitive, and accurate multiplex PCR-microsphere flow cytometry system for large-scale comprehensive detection of respiratory viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2626–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. High-Priority Target Product Profiles for New Tuberculosis Diagnostics: Report of a Consensus Meeting; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HTM-TB-2014.18 (accessed on 5 August 2014).
  21. Van Ingen, J.; Aarnoutse, R.; de Vries, G.; Boeree, M.J.; van Soolingen, D. Low-level rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains raise a new therapeutic challenge. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2011, 15, 990–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Deun, A.; Aung, K.J.; Hossain, A.; de Rijk, P.; Gumusboga, M.; Rigouts, L.; de Jong, B.C. Disputed rpoB mutations can frequently cause important rifampicin resistance among new tuberculosis patients. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2015, 19, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, H.; Song, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; He, W.; Liu, D.; Ou, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Y. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampicin Resistance Conferred by Borderline rpoB Mutations: Xpert MTB/RIF is Superior to Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seifert, M.; Catanzaro, D.; Catanzaro, A.; Rodwell, T.C. Genetic mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maningi, N.E.; Malinga, L.A.; Antiabong, J.F.; Lekalakala, R.M.; Mbelle, N.M. Comparison of line probe assay to BACTEC MGIT 960 system for susceptibility testing of first and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in a referral laboratory in South Africa. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chandak, R.J.; Malhotra, B.; Bhargava, S.; Goel, S.K.; Verma, D.; Tiwari, J. Evaluation of MTBDRsl for detecting resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to second-line drugs. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2019, 23, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. xMAP TIER test workflow.
Figure 1. xMAP TIER test workflow.
Ijerph 19 17068 g001
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood tree of 353 MTB isolates and annotated with drug-resistance information. Note: Lineages, phenotypic drug-resistant type, and genotypic drug-resistant profile of isolates are shown.
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood tree of 353 MTB isolates and annotated with drug-resistance information. Note: Lineages, phenotypic drug-resistant type, and genotypic drug-resistant profile of isolates are shown.
Ijerph 19 17068 g002
Table 1. Specific mutations designed for detection in the xMAP TIER assay.
Table 1. Specific mutations designed for detection in the xMAP TIER assay.
DrugGeneWild TypeMutation
INH
katG315AGC315ACC
inhA-777C-777T
-770T-770C
RIF
rpoB430CTG430CCG
rpoB432CAA432AAA or 432CAA
rpoB435GAC435GTC or 435GGC
rpoB445CAC445TAC or 445GAC
rpoB450TCG450TTG
rpoB452CTG152CCG
EMBembB306ATG306GTG, 306CTG, 306ATA, 306ATT or 306ATC
Table 2. Diagnostic performance of the xMAP TIER assay compared with the phenotypic DST method for detection of RIF, INH, and EMB susceptibility.
Table 2. Diagnostic performance of the xMAP TIER assay compared with the phenotypic DST method for detection of RIF, INH, and EMB susceptibility.
DrugsPhenotypically DST ResistantPhenotypically DST SusceptibleSensitivity (95%CI)Specificity (95%CI)
xMAP ResistantxMAP SusceptibleTotalxMAP ResistantxMAP SusceptibleTotal
Rifampicin744 a783 b27227594.9 (87.4–98.6)98.9 (96.9–99.8)
Isoniazid12315 c138021521589.1 (82.7–93.8)100.0 (98.3–100.0)
Ethambutol235 d281 e31031182.1 (63.1–93.9)99.7 (98.2–100.0)
a Four isolates contained genotypic mutation in rpoB by WGS. b Two isolates showed genotypic mutation in rpoB by sequencing, the third discordant strain has no mutation according to WGS. c Ten isolates contained genotypic mutation by WGS. d Four isolates have mutations in embB according to WGS. e Mutation in embB has been detected by WGS.
Table 3. Diagnostic performance of the xMAP TIER assay compared with WGS for detection of RIF, INH, and EMB susceptibility.
Table 3. Diagnostic performance of the xMAP TIER assay compared with WGS for detection of RIF, INH, and EMB susceptibility.
DrugsGenotypically Resistant by WGSGenotypically Susceptible by WGSSensitivity (95%CI)Specificity (95%CI)
xMAP ResistantxMAP SusceptibleTotalxMAP ResistantxMAP SusceptibleTotal
Rifampicin76480127227395.0 (87.7–98.6)99.6 (98.0–100.0)
Isoniazid1234127022622696.9 (93.8–99.9)100.0 (100.0–100.0)
Ethambutol31536031731786.1 (70.5–95.3)100.0 (98.8–100.0)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, B.; Song, Z.; Wang, S.; He, W.; Pei, S.; Liu, D.; Xing, R.; Xia, H.; et al. Evaluation Study of xMAP TIER Assay on a Microsphere-Based Platform for Detecting First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 17068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417068

AMA Style

Ou X, Zhang Z, Zhao B, Song Z, Wang S, He W, Pei S, Liu D, Xing R, Xia H, et al. Evaluation Study of xMAP TIER Assay on a Microsphere-Based Platform for Detecting First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(24):17068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ou, Xichao, Zhiguo Zhang, Bing Zhao, Zexuan Song, Shengfen Wang, Wencong He, Shaojun Pei, Dongxin Liu, Ruida Xing, Hui Xia, and et al. 2022. "Evaluation Study of xMAP TIER Assay on a Microsphere-Based Platform for Detecting First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 24: 17068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop