Next Article in Journal
Burden of Oral Cancer on the 10 Most Populous Countries from 1990 to 2019: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating the Barriers to Applying the Internet-of-Things-Based Technologies to Construction Site Safety Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Miscanthus as Sustainable Feedstock through Statistical Optimization of Culture Conditions

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea
2
Department of Biotechnology, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea
3
Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea
4
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea
5
Research Institute of Clean Manufacturing System, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020866
Submission received: 24 November 2021 / Revised: 30 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 13 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Climate Change)

Abstract

:
Biorefineries are attracting attention as an alternative to the petroleum industry to reduce carbon emissions and achieve sustainable development. In particular, because forests play an important role in potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, alternatives to cellulose produced by plants are required. Bacterial cellulose (BC) can prevent deforestation and has a high potential for use as a biomaterial in various industries such as food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. This study aimed to improve BC production from lignocellulose, a sustainable feedstock, and to optimize the culture conditions for Gluconacetobacter xylinus using Miscanthus hydrolysates as a medium. The productivity of BC was improved using statistical optimization of the major culture parameters which were as follows: temperature, 29 °C; initial pH, 5.1; and sodium alginate concentration, 0.09% (w/v). The predicted and actual values of BC production in the optimal conditions were 14.07 g/L and 14.88 g/L, respectively, confirming that our prediction model was statistically significant. Additionally, BC production using Miscanthus hydrolysates was 1.12-fold higher than in the control group (commercial glucose). Our result indicate that lignocellulose can be used in the BC production processes in the near future.

1. Introduction

The reckless use of fossil fuels has accelerated greenhouse gas emissions, leading to global climate change [1,2]. Uncontrolled climate change has resulted in catastrophes, such as environmental pollution, reduced food production, and ecological destruction, and these are factors that threaten societal sustainability and public health [1,2,3]. The United Nations (UN) has established the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and adopted treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement to combat climate change through development goals that require carbon emission reduction [1,2,3,4]. As a solution, the concept of replacing fossil fuels with biomass which is a sustainable resource has attracted attention [1,5,6]. Various studies are being conducted globally to design carbon-neutral platforms that produce value-added materials such as biopolymers, biofuels, and biochemicals using the biorefinery concept [1,2,7,8].
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a natural polymer synthesized by bacteria such as Gluconacetobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Sarcina [8,9]. BC can potentially serve as an alternative to plant cellulose (PC) because of its unique properties, such as high water retention capacity, mechanical strength, porosity, elasticity, and biocompatibility [8,10,11]. Unlike PC that contains hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, and ash, BC has a high purity and does not require a separate process to remove impurities [8,10,12]. In addition, the utilization of BC can help prevent environmental pollution by reducing the cutting of trees, which are the major source of PC [8,10,13]. The global BC market was estimated at 250 million US dollar in 2019 and is forecasted to grow to 680 million US dollar by the end of 2025 [14]. Various companies such as CelluForce (Quebec, QC, Canada), FiberLean® Technologies (Orono, ME, USA), and Borregaard ChemCell (Sarpsborg, Norway) produce BC which is used in paper, food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries [15]. However, the high production costs involved in the commercial mass production of BC impose limitations on its usage. The Hestrin–Schramm (HS) medium, which is used mainly for BC production requires large amounts of commercial glucose and glycerol resulting in high production costs [8,10,15,16]. Therefore, for the economical and sustainable production of BC, it is necessary to replace commercial carbon sources, such as glucose and glycerol, with inexpensive and renewable raw materials.
Various studies have investigated the utilization of biomass as a carbon source [8,10,17]. The use of conventional biomass from sources such as corn, wheat, and sugar cane for use as a carbon source entails food-related ethical issues [8,18]. In contrast, the use of Miscanthus does not impact food security and has several advantages such as high biomass yields per unit of arable land, the ability to grow easily without requiring pesticides or fertilizers, and a long lifespan [8,19]. The global Miscanthus yield is estimated to be approximately 6.6 Mt/year, making it a potential biomass source that is readily available in large quantities [8,20]. In addition, the utilization of Miscanthus is expected to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions and soil erosion but increase the soil carbon content and biodiversity [8,21]. For these reasons, Miscanthus is considered to be a reasonable source of biomass for biorefineries.
In our previous study [8], lignocellulosic hydrolysates were used for BC production, and the effect of inhibitors on BC production was investigated. The purpose of this study was to maximize BC production by optimizing the culture conditions using Miscanthus hydrolysates as a carbon source. To improve BC production, the culture conditions for Gluconacetobacter xylinus ATCC 53524 with regard to the correlation between temperature, initial pH, and sodium alginate (NaAlg) concentration were optimized using a statistical method.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Yeast extract, peptone, and agar were purchased from Difco (Detroit, MI, USA). Ammonium sulfate, potassium phosphate monobasic, and magnesium sulfate heptahydrate were purchased from Daejung Chemicals and Metals (Siheung, Korea). Corn steep liquor (CSL) and glucose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. BC Production

Gluconacetobacter xylinus ATCC 53524 was pre-cultured in YPD medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone, and 20 g/L dextrose) as a seed culture at 30 °C with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. The seed suspension (4 mL) was inoculated into 50 mL of the main medium for BC production and cultured at 30 °C and 150 rpm for 4 days. The main medium comprised 40 g/L glucose in Miscanthus hydrolysates, 20 g/L CSL, 4 g/L ammonium sulfate, 2 g/L potassium phosphate monobasic, and 0.4 g/L magnesium sulfate heptahydrate. In the control group, the same components were used, except for the carbon source, which was replaced with commercial glucose.
The produced BC was separated from the main medium and washed with 1 N sodium hydroxide at 30 °C for 24 h to remove impurities such as residual medium, cell fragments, and proteins and nucleic acids derived from cells. The BC was next washed with distilled water at 30 °C for 24 h to remove the sodium hydroxide used for washing impurities and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. BC production (g/L) was calculated as follows:
BC   production   [ g / L ] = dried   BC   weight   [ g ] volume   of   culture   medium   [ L ]

2.3. Experimental Design

The response surface methodology (RSM) is an experimental design that reduces the number of experiments required and provides reliable data based on statistical and mathematical analyses [22]. Central composite design (CCD) is a frequently used technique in RSM, and it provides a predictive model with high accuracy by clearly explaining the correlation between variables [23]. To investigate the optimal conditions for BC production, CCD of RSM was performed using the software Design–Expert 7 (Stat-Ease Inc, MN, USA). Table 1 shows the three variables including temperature, initial pH, and NaAlg concentration, divided into five different levels (−2, −1, 0, 1, and 2). The range of each variable was as follows: temperature (X1), 20–40 °C; initial pH (X2), 3–7; and NaAlg concentration (X3), 0.00–0.16% (w/v).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed based on the experimental results to verify the reliability of the predicted model and explain the correlation between the variables. Each variable and its interaction are described by the following quadratic equation:
Y = β 0 + i = 1 n β i X i + i = 1 n β i i X i 2 + i = 1 n 1 j = 1 n β i j X i X j
where Y is the predicted response, Xi and Xj are the independent variables, β0 is the offset term, βi is the first-order model coefficient, βii is the quadratic coefficient for the variable i, and βij is the linear model coefficient for the interaction between the variables i and j [24].

3. Results and Discussion

CCD was performed to investigate the optimal culture conditions for G. xylinus ATCC 53524 for enhanced BC production. Table 2 shows 20 experiments designed by dividing three independent variables (X1: temperature, X2: initial pH, and X3: NaAlg concentration) into five different levels (−2, −1, 0, 1, and 2) and the experimental results obtained. The range of response (BC production, g/L) was 0.00–14.63 g/L. The experiments were performed six times (Std nos. 15–20) at the center point to confirm reproducibility.
Studies have reported that the addition of NaAlg to the culture medium affects the BC yield, crystallinity index, contact angles, and hydrophilicity [25]. Zhou et al. [26] achieved increased BC production (6.0 g/L) using Acetobacter xylinum NUST4.1 by adding 0.04% (w/v) NaAlg (BC production of the control group without NaAlg was 3.7 g/L). However, according to Cheng et al. [27], the addition of NaAlg at concentrations above 0.2% (w/v) negatively affected BC production. Therefore, the center point of X3 was set to 0.08% (w/v) to accurately evaluate the effect of the NaAlg concentration on BC production.
The model equation for predicting the response was determined using multiple regression analysis of the experimental results as follows:
Y = 13.92 0.94 X 1 + 0.61 X 2 + 0.33 X 3 0.26 X 1 X 2 0.34 X 1 X 3 0.42 X 2 X 3 3.52 X 1 2 2.96 X 2 2 0.51 X 3 2
where Y is BC production (g/L), and X1, X2, and X3 are the independent variables representing temperature, initial pH, and NaAlg concentration, respectively.
Table 3 shows the ANOVA results for the quadratic model of BC production. The F-value, which indicates the accuracy of the model [28], for the predictive model was 25.28. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant [29], and the results of our predictive model were demonstrated to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The model terms affecting BC production were found to be X1, X12, and X22; temperature (X1) was the most significant variable among the three independent variables examined. The statistical acceptability of the predictive model was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), and a value close to 1 indicates that the experimental response agrees with the predicted response within the designed experimental range [30]. The R2 values higher than 0.8 and a difference between R2 and adjusted R2 not exceeding 0.2 indicate the reliability of the model [31]. The R2 and adjusted R2 of our model were 0.9579 and 0.9200, respectively, indicating the statistical acceptability of our model.
Figure 1 shows the three-dimensional plots based on Equation (3). Figure 1a shows the effects of temperature and initial pH on BC production when the NaAlg concentration is the center point (X3 = 0). BC production was maximal when both the temperature and initial pH had values approximately equal to the corresponding values at the center points (temperature of 30 °C and initial pH of 5) and showed a marked decrease when the values of both variables deviated from those at the center point. Figure 1b shows the effects of temperature and NaAlg concentration on BC production when the initial pH is the center point (X2 = 0). BC production was maximal when the temperature was approximately equal to that at the center point (temperature of 30 °C and NaAlg concentration of 0.08% [w/v]) and decreased sharply as the temperature varied from that at the center point. The effects of initial pH and NaAlg concentration on BC production are shown in Figure 1c. The results indicate that when the temperature is the center point (X1 = 0), BC production was maximal when both the variables had values equal to those at the center point (initial pH of 5 and NaAlg concentration of 0.08% [w/v]). Figure 1b,c show that the NaAlg concentration had no significant effect on BC production compared to the other variables.
Numerical optimization was performed using multiple regression model analysis to derive the optimal culture conditions that can maximize BC production. Table 4 shows the culture conditions derived from the numerical optimization for the predicted and actual BC production values. The optimal culture conditions for enhanced BC production derived by the predictive model were as follows: temperature, 29.24 °C; initial pH, 5.09; and NaAlg concentration, 0.09% (w/v). The predicted BC production under optimal conditions was 14.07 g/L. To verify the reproducibility of the predictive model, G. xylinus ATCC 53524 was cultured under the derived optimal conditions. The relevance of the model was verified by obtaining BC production approximately equal to 14.88 g/L, indicating that the value for the experimentally obtained yield was approximately 94.2%, consistent with that obtained using the prediction model.
In our previous study [8], we determined the phenolic compound contents in Miscanthus hydrolysates to be as follows: 0.13 g/L acetic acid, 0.16 g/L formic acid, 0.02 g/L furfural, and 0.05 g/L 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural. These phenolic compounds have been reported to inhibit microbial growth [32]. However, Miscanthus hydrolysates did not inhibit BC production via G. xylinus ATCC 53524 fermentation, indicating their potential as a renewable raw material [8]. Therefore, we investigated the optimal culture conditions for improving BC production using Miscanthus hydrolysates. BC production obtained from the control group using commercial glucose was 13.26 g/L, whereas that from the group using Miscanthus hydrolysates under optimal culture conditions was 14.88 g/L. Thus, the Miscanthus hydrolysate group achieved a production equivalent to 112% relative to the production by the control group. A method for calculating the theoretical maximum BC production was shown by Soeiro et al. [33]. With the glucose concentration of the medium used in this study, the theoretical maximum BC production was determined to be about 36 g/L, and BC conversion using Miscanthus hydrolysates was about 41% of the theoretical maximum for BC production. BC conversion using Miscanthus hydrolysates was greater than that observed in other studies that used hydrolysates of potato peel (32.1%) [34], orange peel (22.0%) [35], and sweet sorghum root (34.9%) [36], indicating that Miscanthus is a promising feedstock for BC production.
In a previous study [8], BC production using Miscanthus hydrolysates was 97.86% relative to that of the control group. As our previous study [8] focused on the potential utilization of Miscanthus hydrolysates as an inexpensive substrate for BC production, we fermented G. xylinus ATCC 53524 under culture conditions (temperature, 30 °C; initial pH, 6.0; 7 days) that are generally known to promote sufficient growth without considering variables that increase BC production.
We aimed to optimize the culture conditions by considering various variables reported to affect BC production, such as temperature, initial pH, and NaAlg concentration, for economical and sustainable BC production by shortening the culture time. We succeeded in shortening the culture time for BC production from 7 days to 4 days due to the effect of these variables which were not considered previously, and the BC production was determined to be 14.88 g/L. These results are presumably due to the effect of the initial pH and NaAlg. Mikkelsen et al. [37] reported that the optimal pH for BC production by G. xylinus ATCC 53524 was 5.0. In addition, according to Zhou et al. [26], the addition of NaAlg not only improved BC yield but also enhanced cell growth of A. xylinum. Improvement of BC productivity through optimization of culture conditions will contribute to overcoming the low economic feasibility of biorefinery. Improvement of BC productivity through optimization of culture conditions will contribute to overcoming the low economic feasibility of biorefinery. In particular, our research in which Miscanthus hydrolysate was applied as a useful feedstock provides a direction for sustainable and eco-friendly BC production.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the optimal culture conditions for G. xylinus ATCC 53524 were investigated using statistical methods to improve BC production using Miscanthus hydrolysates. The derived optimal culture conditions were as follows: temperature, 29 °C; initial pH, 5.1; and NaAlg concentration, 0.09% (w/v). Under the derived optimal conditions, the predicted and actual BC yields were 14.07 g/L and 14.88 g/L, respectively. These results demonstrate that our predictive model was statistically significant. In addition, BC production using Miscanthus hydrolysates was 1.12-fold greater relative to the control group wherein commercial glucose was used. Taken together, the results of our study for optimizing the culture conditions using Miscanthus hydrolysates to enhance BC production is expected to provide useful insights into methods for mitigating global warming and improving public health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.J.Y., H.Y.Y. and C.P.; methodology, T.L., H.S.K., W.H.S., J.-M.O. and S.-M.K.; software, J.S. and K.H.L.; validation, T.L., H.S.K., W.H.S., J.-M.O. and S.-M.K.; formal analysis, J.S. and K.H.L.; investigation, B.J.Y., H.Y.Y. and C.P.; resources, B.J.Y., H.Y.Y. and C.P.; data curation, J.S. and K.H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and K.H.L.; writing—review and editing, B.J.Y., H.Y.Y. and C.P.; visualization, T.L., H.S.K., W.H.S., J.-M.O. and S.-M.K.; supervision, B.J.Y., H.Y.Y. and C.P.; project administration, C.P.; funding acquisition, C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Mid-Career Researcher Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1A2C1007493), and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by the MSIT (NRF-2018M3A9H3020459). This work was also supported by a Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korean government (MOTIE) (P0012451, The Competency Development Program for Industry Specialist).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shin, M.; Seo, J.; Baek, Y.; Lee, T.; Jang, M.; Park, C. Novel and Efficient Synthesis of Phenethyl Formate via Enzymatic Esterification of Formic Acid. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lee, K.H.; Chun, Y.; Jang, Y.W.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, H.R.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.W.; Park, C.; Yoo, H.Y. Fabrication of Functional Bioelastomer for Food Packaging from Aronia (Aronia melanocarpa) Juice Processing By-Products. Foods 2020, 9, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, G. Performance Evaluation of Low Global Warming Potential Working Fluids as R134a Alternatives for Two-Stage Centrifugal Chiller Applications. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 38, 1438–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herrmann, A.; Sauerborn, R.; Nilsson, M. The Role of Health in Households’ Balancing Act for Lifestyles Compatible with the Paris Agreement—Qualitative Results from Mannheim, Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kostas, E.T.; Adams, J.M.M.; Ruiz, H.A.; Durán-Jiménez, G.; Lye, G.J. Macroalgal Biorefinery Concepts for the Circular Bioeconomy: A Review on Biotechnological Developments and Future Perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2021, 151, 111553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. An, H.-E.; Lee, K.H.; Jang, Y.W.; Kim, C.-B.; Yoo, H.Y. Improved Glucose Recovery from Sicyos angulatus by NaOH Pretreatment and Application to Bioethanol Production. Processes 2021, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoo, H.Y.; Kim, S.W. The Next-Generation Biomass for Biorefining. BioResources 2021, 16, 2188–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, H.; Son, J.; Lee, J.; Yoo, H.Y.; Lee, T.; Jang, M.; Oh, J.-M.; Park, C. Improved Production of Bacterial Cellulose through Investigation of Effects of Inhibitory Compounds from Lignocellulosic Hydrolysates. GCB Bioenergy 2021, 13, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naomi, R.; Bt Hj Idrus, R.; Fauzi, M.B. Plant- vs. Bacterial-Derived Cellulose for Wound Healing: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ho Jin, Y.; Lee, T.; Kim, J.R.; Choi, Y.-E.; Park, C. Improved Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Waste Glycerol through Investigation of Inhibitory Effects of Crude Glycerol-Derived Compounds by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 75, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skiba, E.A.; Budaeva, V.V.; Ovchinnikova, E.V.; Gladysheva, E.K.; Kashcheyeva, E.I.; Pavlov, I.N.; Sakovich, G.V. A Technology for Pilot Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Oat Hulls. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lin, S.; Loira Calvar, I.; Catchmark, J.M.; Liu, J.; Demirci, A.; Cheng, K. Biosynthesis, Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose. Cellulose 2013, 20, 2191–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raval, A.A.; Raval, U.G.; Sayyed, R.Z. Utilization of Industrial Waste for the Sustainable Production of Bacterial Cellulose. Environ. Sustain. 2020, 3, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.; Huang, X.; Ma, M.; Hu, C.; Seidi, F.; Yin, S.; Xiao, H. Recent Advances on the Bacterial Cellulose-Derived Carbon Aerogels. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 818–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fernandes, I.A.A.; Pedro, A.C.; Ribeiro, V.R.; Bortolini, D.G.; Ozaki, M.S.C.; Maciel, G.M.; Haminiuk, C.W.I. Bacterial Cellulose: From Production Optimization to New Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2598–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sperotto, G.; Stasiak, L.G.; Godoi, J.P.M.G.; Gabiatti, N.C.; De Souza, S.S. A Review of Culture Media for Bacterial Cellulose Production: Complex, Chemically Defined and Minimal Media Modulations. Cellulose 2021, 28, 2649–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chukwuma, O.B.; Rafatullah, M.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Ismail, N. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, K.H.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W.; Yoo, H.Y. Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoo, H.Y.; Yang, X.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, S.K.; Lotrakul, P.; Prasongsuk, S.; Punnapayak, H.; Kim, S.W. Evaluation of the Overall Process on Bioethanol Production from Miscanthus Hydrolysates Obtained by Dilute Acid Pretreatment. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2016, 21, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shepherd, A.; Littleton, E.; Clifton-Brown, J.; Martin, M.; Hastings, A. Projections of Global and UK Bioenergy Potential from Miscanthus × Giganteus—Feedstock Yield, Carbon Cycling and Electricity Generation in the 21st Century. GCB Bioenergy 2020, 12, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pidlisnyuk, V.; Erickson, L.; Stefanovska, T.; Popelka, J.; Hettiarachchi, G.; Davis, L.; Trögl, J. Potential Phytomanagement of Military Polluted Sites and Biomass Production Using Biofuel Crop Miscanthus × Giganteus. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jang, Y.W.; Lee, K.H.; Yoo, H.Y. Improved Sugar Recovery from Orange Peel by Statistical Optimization of Thermo-Alkaline Pretreatment. Processes 2021, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, K.H.; Jang, Y.W.; Kim, H.; Ki, J.S.; Yoo, H.Y. Optimization of Lutein Recovery from Tetraselmis suecica by Response Surface Methodology. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.H.; Yoo, H.Y.; Lee, S.K.; Chun, Y.; Kim, H.R.; Bankeeree, W.; Lotrakul, P.; Punnapayak, H.; Prasongsuk, S.; Kim, S.W. Significant Impact of Casein Hydrolysate to Overcome the Low Consumption of Glycerol by Klebsiella aerogenes ATCC 29007 and Its Application to Bioethanol Production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 221, 113181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Islam, M.U.; Ullah, M.W.; Khan, S.; Shah, N.; Park, J.K. Strategies for Cost-Effective and Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, L.L.; Sun, D.P.; Hu, L.Y.; Li, Y.W.; Yang, J.Z. Effect of Addition of Sodium Alginate on Bacterial Cellulose Production by Acetobacter Xylinum. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheng, K.C.; Catchmark, J.M.; Demirci, A. Effect of Different Additives on Bacterial Cellulose Production by Acetobacter Xylinum and Analysis of Material Property. Cellulose 2009, 16, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, H.-D.; Choi, J.-I. Medium Optimization and Proteome Analysis of Protease Production by Janthinobacterium sp. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 25, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, H.; Yoo, H.Y.; Park, N.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Baek, Y.; Lee, T.; Oh, J.M.; Cho, J.; Park, C. Enhanced l-Lysine into 1,5-Diaminopentane Conversion via Statistical Optimization of Whole-Cell Decarboxylation System. Polymers 2019, 11, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Saadat, F.; Zerafat, M.M.; Foorginezhad, S. Adsorption of Copper Ions from Aqueous Media Using Montmorillonite-Al2O3 Nano-Adsorbent Incorporated with Fe3O4 for Facile Separation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 2273–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, K.H.; Jang, Y.W.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, C.; Yoo, H.Y. Statistical Optimization of Alkali Pretreatment to Improve Sugars Recovery from Spent Coffee Grounds and Utilization in Lactic Acid Fermentation. Processes 2021, 9, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Monlau, F.; Sambusiti, C.; Barakat, A.; Quéméneur, M.; Trably, E.; Steyer, J.P.; Carrère, H. Do Furanic and Phenolic Compounds of Lignocellulosic and Algae Biomass Hydrolyzate Inhibit Anaerobic Mixed Cultures? A Comprehensive Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 934–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Soeiro, V.S.; Tundisi, L.L.; Novaes, L.C.L.; Mazzola, P.G.; Aranha, N.; Grotto, D.; Júnior, J.M.O.; Komatsu, D.; Gama, F.M.P.; Chaud, M.V.; et al. Production of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals via enzymatic hydrolysis and evaluation of their coating on alginate particles formed by ionotropic gelation. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdelraof, M.; Hasanin, M.S.; El-Saied, H. Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 211, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kuo, C.-H.H.; Huang, C.-Y.Y.; Shieh, C.-J.J.; Wang, H.-M.M.D.; Tseng, C.-Y.Y. Hydrolysis of Orange Peel with Cellulase and Pectinase to Produce Bacterial Cellulose using Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Q.; Nnanna, P.C.; Shen, F.; Huang, M.; Tian, D.; Hu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, G.; Deng, S. Full utilization of sweet sorghum for bacterial cellulose production: A concept of material crop. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mikkelsen, D.; Flanagan, B.M.; Dykes, G.A.; Gidley, M.J. Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response surface plots representing the effects of each variable on bacterial cellulose production. (a) Effects of temperature and initial pH; (b) effects of temperature and NaAlg concentration; (c) effects of initial pH and NaAlg concentration.
Figure 1. Response surface plots representing the effects of each variable on bacterial cellulose production. (a) Effects of temperature and initial pH; (b) effects of temperature and NaAlg concentration; (c) effects of initial pH and NaAlg concentration.
Ijerph 19 00866 g001aIjerph 19 00866 g001b
Table 1. Variables and the coded variable levels of the central composite design under experimental conditions.
Table 1. Variables and the coded variable levels of the central composite design under experimental conditions.
VariablesUnitSymbolCoded Variable Levels
−2−1012
Temperature°CX12025303540
Initial pH X234567
NaAlg concentration%, w/vX30.000.040.080.120.16
Table 2. The designed experimental plan and the result values for five-level, three-variable response surface analysis.
Table 2. The designed experimental plan and the result values for five-level, three-variable response surface analysis.
Std.Coded Variable LevelsBC Production (g/L)
X1X2X3ActualPredicted
1−1−1−16.985.91
21−1−14.645.23
3−11−18.758.48
411−14.976.78
5−1−119.628.09
61−115.496.05
7−1119.308.99
81114.575.92
9−2000.001.73
102000.00−2.02
110−200.000.86
120204.463.31
1300−211.5911.20
1400212.4312.53
1500014.3613.92
1600013.4413.92
1700014.6313.92
1800013.1613.92
1900013.5913.92
2000014.6313.92
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response surface model.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response surface model.
SourceSum of SquaresDFMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model474.26952.7025.28<0.0001
X 1 14.03114.036.730.0267
X 2 5.9715.972.860.1214
X 3 1.7711.770.850.3791
X 1 X 2 0.5310.530.250.6257
X 1 X 3 0.9410.940.450.5182
X 2 X 3 1.3911.390.670.4331
X 1 2 310.761310.76149.08<0.0001
X 2 2 220.011220.01105.55<0.0001
X 3 2 6.6216.623.180.1051
Residual20.85102.08
Lack of Fit18.7353.758.850.0159
Pure Error2.1250.42
Cor Total495.1019
Coefficient of determination (R2): 0.9579. Adjusted R2: 0.9200.
Table 4. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production using the regression model.
Table 4. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production using the regression model.
ParametersGoalImportancePredictedActual
Temperature (°C)In range29.2429
Initial pHIn range5.095.1
NaAlg concentration (%, w/v)In range0.090.09
Bacterial cellulose production (g/L)Maximize314.0714.88
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Son, J.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, T.; Kim, H.S.; Shin, W.H.; Oh, J.-M.; Koo, S.-M.; Yu, B.J.; Yoo, H.Y.; Park, C. Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Miscanthus as Sustainable Feedstock through Statistical Optimization of Culture Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020866

AMA Style

Son J, Lee KH, Lee T, Kim HS, Shin WH, Oh J-M, Koo S-M, Yu BJ, Yoo HY, Park C. Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Miscanthus as Sustainable Feedstock through Statistical Optimization of Culture Conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(2):866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Son, Jemin, Kang Hyun Lee, Taek Lee, Hyun Soo Kim, Weon Ho Shin, Jong-Min Oh, Sang-Mo Koo, Byung Jo Yu, Hah Young Yoo, and Chulhwan Park. 2022. "Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Miscanthus as Sustainable Feedstock through Statistical Optimization of Culture Conditions" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 2: 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop