Next Article in Journal
Infant Age Moderates Associations between Infant Temperament and Maternal Technology Use during Infant Feeding and Care
Next Article in Special Issue
Sleep Quality among the Elderly in 21st Century Shandong Province, China: A Ten-Year Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
SkinSensPred as a Promising in Silico Tool for Integrated Testing Strategy on Skin Sensitization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of LncRNA GAS5 Genetic Variants and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Phenotypes on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 19
10.3390/ijerph191912857
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deep Mobile Linguistic Therapy for Patients with ASD

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12857; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912857
by Ari Ernesto Ortiz Castellanos 1,†, Chuan-Ming Liu 2,*,† and Chongyang Shi 3,*,†
Reviewer 1:
Irene Rodrigues
Reviewer 2:
S. Ramkumar
Reviewer 3:
Stefan Hertling
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12857; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912857
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 7 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3rd Edition of Big Data, Decision Models, and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

This paper needs to be fully rewritten.

English sentences are  frequently incorrect.  It has many typos. 

The related work some times has no citation, see line 67. 

The discourse is disconnected and poorly written, see line 87

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer 

My sincere apologises apologies about my english. I modified almost 100 of paper. My friends supported me with language issue.

My regards.

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The paper organized by the author was good 2. Flow of paper from top to bottom was fine 3. Related work discussed by the author was not sufficient 4. Proposed methodology and architecture with design was fine 5. Author needs to improve the number of words in the study. 6. The system designed by the author was simple and fine.

Author Response

Dear reviewer 

My sincere apologises apologies about my english. I modified almost 100 of paper. My friends supported me with language issue. I modified the paper and I hope fulfil your observations.

My regards.

Reviewer 3 Report

I have some suggestions for improvement

Abstract: linguistic improvement, shortening, presenting essential results in greater detail.

Introduction: shorten and work out the main topic. Include information about COVID 19 and explain howthishad an impact on overall development and whypatients continue to benefit from it.

Methodology: work out more clearly.

Results: Shortened, linguistically reworked, partlyrepetitive. Are all relevant results really presented? Some ofit doesn’t work out.

Conclusion: Detailed presentation, linguistic revisionand concretize the strengths and weaknesses of herwork.

Author Response

Dear reviewer 

My sincere apologises apologies about my english. I modified almost 100 of paper. My friends supported me with language issue. I modified the paper and I hope fulfil your observations.

My regards.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

author carried out all the corrections whatever specified in the review.

Reviewer 3 Report

The revision of your manuscript has been successful. Please look through the manuscript, some double spacing after the end of sentences are included or missing in the text.

Back to TopTop