Next Article in Journal
Brain Fog and Quality of Life at Work in Non-Hospitalized Patients after COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
“Mi Corazón se Partió en Dos”: Transnational Motherhood at the Intersection of Migration and Violence
Previous Article in Journal
Where Is the Way Forward for New Media Empowering Public Health? Development Strategy Options Based on SWOT-AHP Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leaving the Homestead: Examining the Role of Relative Deprivation, Social Trust, and Urban Integration among Rural Farmers in China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

“We Need Health for All”: Mental Health and Barriers to Care among Latinxs in California and Connecticut

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12817; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912817
by Mario Alberto Viveros Espinoza-Kulick 1,* and Jessica P. Cerdeña 2,3,4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12817; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912817
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 6 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for this thoughtful feedback and the suggestions on where to expand. We have addressed each comment with examples from the revised manuscript in the word document attached here.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript titled  "“We Need Health for All”: Mental Health and Barriers to Care among Latinxs in California and Connecticut"  is related to barriers while Latinxs used mental health services. It is time that many people had to migrate because of many reasons and this manuscript shows how immigrant people were discriminated against and stigmatized against, used mental health services limitedly, and lived with mental conditions. The manuscript contributes to the literature with the mixed method and has been written in detail. However, it made it difficult to follow and read. It could be recommended made shorten especially the method section. 

I wish you success in your work.  

Author Response

Thank you for this review of our paper and your feedback!

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised paper has been improved and the authors have addressed most of the comments.

Back to TopTop