Next Article in Journal
Association between E-Cigarette Advertising Exposure and Use of E-Cigarettes among a Cohort of U.S. Youth and Young Adults
Next Article in Special Issue
Financing the Agri-Environmental Policy: Consequences on the Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Retinal and Choroidal Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as Treatment for Sleep Apnea: Results at 12 Months
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Rapid Analysis of Residues of 186 Pesticides in Hawk Tea Using Modified QuEChERS Coupled with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12639; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912639
by Xiao Shu 1,2, Nengming Chu 1,2, Xuemei Zhang 1,2, Xiaoxia Yang 1,2,*, Xia Meng 1,2, Junying Yang 1,2 and Na Wang 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12639; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912639
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 3 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change and Agriculture)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Rapid analysis of 186 pesticide residues in hawk tea using modified QuEChERS coupled with gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry" is an interesting study, supported by an impressive amount of data. The experiment was well-designed and performed thoroughly. The authors modified the QuEChERS method by the EMR-lipid and MWCNTs, and successfully applied in determination of 186 pesticides in hawk tea with GC–MS/MS. It is quite an improvement to the previously known methods.

The paper is written in a concise way, and the results are presented as clearly as it is possible with so many results. Although there is no part of the manuscript that would not be understandable, language definitely should be improved before publication.

After corrections, I recommend publication of this manuscript.

Some minor issues are:

Figure 2 seems to be missing (?)

Table 2 was it 3 g or 4 g of NaCl ? - there is inconsistency between the text and the table

latin names should be written in italics (beginning of introduction)

 

A loose thought: determination of pesticides in tea powder surely is important but also challenging as it causes a great deal of problems during sample preparation. But, from the perspective of safety for tea consumers, wouldn't it be enough to determine pesticides in tea extracts, prepared in a similar way that this kind of tea is usually served?

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments:

C1 - Line 363

The "splendid" term should be replaced with "excellent" or " acceptable".

C2 - paragraph 3.7 real samples

The authors should report the anlytical results in mg/kg unit - the same of the MRL in order to support the reading process of work.

C3 - paragraph 3.6  limit od detection and limits of quantitation

The Limits LOD, LOQ should be reported in the same unit of the analytical results preferably in mg/kg.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop