Next Article in Journal
Bone Mineral Content Estimation in People Living with HIV: Prediction and Validation of Sex-Specific Anthropometric Models
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Hyperlipidemia: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Perception of Overweight and Obesity among South African Adults: Implications for Intervention Strategies

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12335; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912335
by Mashudu Manafe 1,*, Paul Kiprono Chelule 2 and Sphiwe Madiba 3
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12335; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912335
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 24 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors:

The article is interesting but some aspects need to be improved:

1) I suggest that when you referring "obese people or obese person" in te text, please change it to "person who living with obesity or person (people) with obesity". Person-centered language should be used.

2) Line 35: I suggest to change "metabolic abnormalities", maybe you should say metabolic comorbidities.

3) Paragraph between lines 63-69: the idea is a bit confusing, which author are you referring to?

4) I suggest to the author check the language with a native English person.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled “The perception of overweight and obesity, health, and cultural beliefs among South African adults: implications for intervention strategies” explores perceptions and beliefs about being overweight or obese among South African adult individuals. Despite having its merit, the manuscript contains several limitations that authors should address point-by-point before publication endorsement.

 

Introduction

- The authors should provide the rationale behind using in-depth interviews as the primary tool to examine the perception of overweight and obesity among the study subjects.

-The authors should shorten the introduction section because it is repetitive and too long.

Material and Methods

-Please provide the criteria used to define overweight and obesity in the study subjects (lines 92-93).

-Did the authors calculate the sample size? In my viewpoint, an n = 24 appears insufficient when analyzing interview information.

-Information regarding the statistical approach to analyze and compare data from in-depth interviews is missing.

Results

- The sample size is too small, which does not allow for analyzing the potential effects of age, gender, marital status, and education level, among others, on the perception of overweight and obesity. So, please adjust data from Table 2 by confounding variables such as those mentioned above.

- I encourage the authors to examine data from interviews by multivariate analysis to describe what factors (i.e., age, gender, marital status, education level, etc.) influence the perception of being overweight or obese.

-Interview fragments should be removed from the result section and provided as supplementary files. Reading the main findings turned hard due to interview fragments in their current form.

Discussion

- Discussion is too long. Please shorten it. Also, compare your findings with data from other research teams, even if contradictory.

- Please discuss the advantages of using in-depth interviews instead of other methodologies to collect data regarding the perception of being overweight or obese among the study subjects.

 

-Include limitations to the study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I kindly request the authors to submit the review report point-by-point. In its current form, I cannot find the correspondence of changes to the main manuscript text with each point of the review report. So, please resubmit the review report, describing page and line numbers where I can see every change made to the manuscript.

Thank you.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop