Next Article in Journal
Amateur Athlete with Sinus Arrest and Severe Bradycardia Diagnosed through a Heart Rate Monitor: A Six-Year Observation—The Necessity of Shared Decision-Making in Heart Rhythm Therapy Management
Previous Article in Journal
Rare Diseases: Needs and Impact for Patients and Families: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Valencian Region, Spain
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Benzene and NO2 Exposure during Pregnancy and Preterm Birth in Two Philadelphia Hospitals, 2013–2017

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610365
by Kathleen M. Escoto 1,*, Anne M. Mullin 2, Rachel Ledyard 3, Elizabeth Rovit 4, Nancy Yang 3, Sheila Tripathy 5,6, Heather H. Burris 3,7,8 and Jane E. Clougherty 5
Reviewer 1:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610365
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 14 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I appreciate  the work that went into the analysis. this is an interesting piece but one that is too narrowly focused in my opinion. There are many confounding factors that contribute individually and collectively to pre-term birth. NO2 and benzene, as toxic as they are, are perhaps just a small part of the problem. You make no mention about length of exposure (how long had the pregnant woman lived in the area of exposure?), a more in depth discussion about the impact weight (BMI), personal lifestyle choices (smoking, alcohol drinking, diet, drug abuse, etc), prenatal care, impact of insurance status, SES, and other similar factors have on birth outcome is necessary. It is unrealistic to expect that exposure (and we dont know for how long based on what was presented in the paper) to NO2 and benzene would explain much of pre-term birth.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting investigation of environmental pollution and preterm labor. 

 

However, even though the authors had a large sample size, 18, 616 births, the use of only birth occurrence data without any information about preconception or trimester of pregnancy pollutant exposer is too crude of an indicator to identify any causative association.

 

The discussion and conclusion should be revised to expand on explanations for the author's finding of no association between environmental pollution and preterm birth.

 

Page 2 Line 50:  Young maternal age is not only associated with sPTB but is also associated with mPTD due to an increased risk of  preeclampsia for individuals at the extremes of reproductive age .  (Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jun; 19(6): 1202–1211.  doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1624-7PMCID: PMC4418963 NIHMSID: NIHMS639929 PMID: 25366100

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for trying to tease out other factors that potentially could contribute to pregnancy outcome in Philadelphia. Sadly, you do not have sufficient data on many of these factors (some if not most more important contributors to birth outcome than benzene an NO2). You might have had "better luck" studying birth outcomes in areas where fracking is prevalent, for example. But, again, many factors individually and collectively contribute to adverse birth outcomes.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop