Next Article in Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Receptivity towards Clinical Innovations That Can Benefit Workplace Mental Health Programs: Anxiety and Hypnotherapy Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Socio-Demographic Composition and Potential Occupational Exposure to SARS-CoV2 under Routine Working Conditions among Key Workers in France
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does Technological Innovation Curb O3 Pollution? Evidence from Three Major Regions in China

School of International Business, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 7743; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137743
Submission received: 30 April 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022

Abstract

At the end of 2020, when China’s three-year Blue Sky Protection Campaign was successfully concluded, the main pollutants, led by O3, increased instead of decreasing, creating a new air pollution problem. In this paper, the impact of the technological innovation level on O3 pollution and its inter-regional differences across three major regions from 2014 to 2019 are studied using the dynamic spatial Durbin model. Generally, in terms of ozone pollution showing significant spatial correlation, technological innovations in China are still not effective in curbing ozone pollution. Furthermore, technological innovation is a key factor affecting ozone pollution, and it is heterogeneous, demonstrating that the impact of technological innovation on O3 pollution is different among regions. Technological innovation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei significantly reduces local O3 pollution with spillover, while technological innovation in the Yangtze River Delta instead significantly exacerbates local O3 pollution, and the impact of technological innovation on O3 pollution in the Fenwei Plain is not significant. Third, other factors in O3 pollution also differ between regions, with the number of cars and the amount of foreign capital actually utilized being the main factors. Therefore, we should pay attention to the spillover of O3 pollution and technological innovation and strengthen regional cooperation according to our own characteristics to effectively suppress O3 pollution. Finally, the findings of this paper are representative, which provides a possible reference for other similar national or regional studies.
Keywords: dynamic spatial Dubin model; technological innovation; O3 pollution; inter-regional differences dynamic spatial Dubin model; technological innovation; O3 pollution; inter-regional differences

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.-j.; Liu, Y.-n.; Ying, X.-r. Does Technological Innovation Curb O3 Pollution? Evidence from Three Major Regions in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137743

AMA Style

Wang W-j, Liu Y-n, Ying X-r. Does Technological Innovation Curb O3 Pollution? Evidence from Three Major Regions in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137743

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wen-jun, Yan-ni Liu, and Xin-ru Ying. 2022. "Does Technological Innovation Curb O3 Pollution? Evidence from Three Major Regions in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 7743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137743

APA Style

Wang, W.-j., Liu, Y.-n., & Ying, X.-r. (2022). Does Technological Innovation Curb O3 Pollution? Evidence from Three Major Regions in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137743

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop